Am 17.10.22 um 11:23 schrieb David Brooks:
> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>> Am 17.10.22 um 09:02 schrieb Snit:
>>> Your opinion has been noted. Personally I think it is a good reminder of much
>>> of what we see in too many Usenet groups. People too often try to tear others
>>> down, largely because they do not feel good about themselves. It is one thing
>>> to note specific inappropriate behavior, but so many people are clearly
>>> hurting.
>>>
>>>> Reduce it to 72 characters per line.
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>
>
> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!

Nevertheless still valid.

--
Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

Am 17.10.22 um 11:23 schrieb David Brooks:
> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>> Am 17.10.22 um 09:02 schrieb Snit:
>>> Your opinion has been noted. Personally I think it is a good reminder of much
>>> of what we see in too many Usenet groups. People too often try to tear others
>>> down, largely because they do not feel good about themselves. It is one thing
>>> to note specific inappropriate behavior, but so many people are clearly
>>> hurting.
>>>
>>>> Reduce it to 72 characters per line.
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>
>
> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!

BTW: Usenet is something funny from the last century.

--
Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

After serious thinking Joerg Lorenz wrote :
> Am 17.10.22 um 06:35 schrieb Snit:
>> Evidence?
>
> Fanboy?
>
> https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/05/apple-icloud-photos-scanning/

I'm not worried, are you?

David Brooks expressed precisely :
> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>> Am 17.10.22 um 09:02 schrieb Snit:
>>> Your opinion has been noted. Personally I think it is a good reminder of
>>> much
>>> of what we see in too many Usenet groups. People too often try to tear
>>> others
>>> down, largely because they do not feel good about themselves. It is one
>>> thing
>>> to note specific inappropriate behavior, but so many people are clearly
>>> hurting.
>>>
>>>> Reduce it to 72 characters per line.
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>
>
> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!

Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.

On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>> Am 17.10.22 um 09:02 schrieb Snit:
>>>> Your opinion has been noted. Personally I think it is a good
>>>> reminder of much
>>>> of what we see in too many Usenet groups. People too often try to
>>>> tear others
>>>> down, largely because they do not feel good about themselves. It is
>>>> one thing
>>>> to note specific inappropriate behavior, but so many people are clearly
>>>> hurting.
>>>>
>>>>> Reduce it to 72 characters per line.
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>
>>
>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>
> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.

Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
rules are unenforceable.

David Brooks wrote :
> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>> Am 17.10.22 um 09:02 schrieb Snit:
>>>>> Your opinion has been noted. Personally I think it is a good reminder of
>>>>> much
>>>>> of what we see in too many Usenet groups. People too often try to tear
>>>>> others
>>>>> down, largely because they do not feel good about themselves. It is one
>>>>> thing
>>>>> to note specific inappropriate behavior, but so many people are clearly
>>>>> hurting.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Reduce it to 72 characters per line.
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>
>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>
> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
> rules are unenforceable.

It relies upon good guys to do the right thing despite there being no
enforcement.

In article <tiionc$ctbv$1@solani.org>, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch>
wrote:

> >>>> Only the *superstupid* believe an American commercial company such
> >>>> "claims". Are people even not learning it the hard way anmore? The
> >>>> spying on pictures for example is only possible if the encyption is
> >>>> broken up.
> >>>
> >>> apple doesn't spy on pictures.
> >>
> >> Certainly they do.
> >
> > they don't, nor can they, by design.
>
> They do by design:

nope. in fact, they go well out of their way so that they *can't*.

> https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/05/apple-icloud-photos-scanning/

perhaps read it first.

Apple is trying to calm fears by baking in privacy through multiple
layers of encryption, fashioned in a way that requires multiple steps
before it ever makes it into the hands of Apple¹s final manual review.
....
The results are uploaded to Apple but cannot be read on their own.
Apple uses another cryptographic principle called threshold secret
sharing that allows it only to decrypt the contents if a user crosses
a threshold of known child abuse imagery in their iCloud Photos

the entire design is so that apple *can't* scan photos.

the images are matched locally, much like anti-malware apps and email
spam filtering works.

*if* and only if a threshold is met, there's probable cause that the
user has csam material and then and only then, does apple look at the
relevant photos (not the entire photo library) which have been visually
degraded to obscure the content but can still be matched to known csam.

that's very different than what google, facebook, microsoft, etc.,
does, who can see every photo uploaded in the clear. not only do they
scan them for csam, but also to data mine its contents of the photos,
including location (to know where you travel), type of photo (sports,
family, scenery, animals, etc.) and face recognition on the people in
them to build a social graph.

that's a lot more invasive, which apple does not (nor cannot) do.

On 17/10/2022 13:27, nospam wrote:
> In article <tiionc$ctbv$1@solani.org>, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Only the *superstupid* believe an American commercial company such
>>>>>> "claims". Are people even not learning it the hard way anmore? The
>>>>>> spying on pictures for example is only possible if the encyption is
>>>>>> broken up.
>>>>>
>>>>> apple doesn't spy on pictures.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly they do.
>>>
>>> they don't, nor can they, by design.
>>
>> They do by design:
>
> nope. in fact, they go well out of their way so that they *can't*.
>
>> https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/05/apple-icloud-photos-scanning/
>
> perhaps read it first.
>
> Apple is trying to calm fears by baking in privacy through multiple
> layers of encryption, fashioned in a way that requires multiple steps
> before it ever makes it into the hands of Apple¹s final manual review.
> ...
> The results are uploaded to Apple but cannot be read on their own.
> Apple uses another cryptographic principle called threshold secret
> sharing that allows it only to decrypt the contents if a user crosses
> a threshold of known child abuse imagery in their iCloud Photos
>
> the entire design is so that apple *can't* scan photos.
>
> the images are matched locally, much like anti-malware apps and email
> spam filtering works.
>
> *if* and only if a threshold is met, there's probable cause that the
> user has csam material and then and only then, does apple look at the
> relevant photos (not the entire photo library) which have been visually
> degraded to obscure the content but can still be matched to known csam.
>
> that's very different than what google, facebook, microsoft, etc.,
> does, who can see every photo uploaded in the clear. not only do they
> scan them for csam, but also to data mine its contents of the photos,
> including location (to know where you travel), type of photo (sports,
> family, scenery, animals, etc.) and face recognition on the people in
> them to build a social graph.
>
> that's a lot more invasive, which apple does not (nor cannot) do.

Thank you. I will do my very best to remember that.

On a slightly different tack, does Apple scan material on its iCloud for
malicious material? Viruses, Trojans and other malware?

If so, is one's iCloud Drive EXEMPT from such scans?

Perhaps you don't know. This is, I realise, digging quite deep.

Any help will be appreciated. TIA

In article <n0d3L.1504358$YC96.523585@fx12.ams1>, David Brooks
<BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:

> On a slightly different tack, does Apple scan material on its iCloud for
> malicious material? Viruses, Trojans and other malware?
>
> If so, is one's iCloud Drive EXEMPT from such scans?

you unhealthy obsession with malware continues.

> Perhaps you don't know. This is, I realise, digging quite deep.

i do and it isn't.

> Any help will be appreciated. TIA

you're beyond help.

On 17/10/2022 15:06, nospam wrote:
> In article <n0d3L.1504358$YC96.523585@fx12.ams1>, David Brooks
> <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:
>
>> On a slightly different tack, does Apple scan material on its iCloud for
>> malicious material? Viruses, Trojans and other malware?
>>
>> If so, is one's iCloud Drive EXEMPT from such scans?
>
> you unhealthy obsession with malware continues.

It's been an *interest* since I was scammed for £245.00 back in 2005.
Our High-Tec Crime Unit (as was) recommended that I should learn as much
as possible about such things.

I was looking at a DVD from 2007 yesterday and found this item:-
https://jumpshare.com/v/YwJyiDM5EWHnYBOkB6vJ

Have you ever used BugHunter?

>> Perhaps you don't know. This is, I realise, digging quite deep.
>
> i do and it isn't.

You know that Apple CAN scan the iCloud for malware?
Is that right?

And that iCloud Drive *IS* INCLUDED in such scans? Is that correct.

>> Any help will be appreciated. TIA
>
> you're beyond help.

No. I'm just old! :-D

On Oct 17, 2022 at 1:29:49 AM MST, "Joerg Lorenz" wrote
<tij3pt$d2rj$1@solani.org>:

> Am 17.10.22 um 09:02 schrieb Snit:
>> On Oct 16, 2022 at 11:36:06 PM MST, "Joerg Lorenz" wrote
>> <tiit4m$cvcl$2@solani.org>:
>>
>>> Am 17.10.22 um 08:31 schrieb Snit:
>>>> --
>>>> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
>>>> use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
>>>> superior by attacking the messenger.
>>>>
>>>> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>>>
>>> Your signature sucks.
>>
>> Your opinion has been noted. Personally I think it is a good reminder of much
>> of what we see in too many Usenet groups. People too often try to tear others
>> down, largely because they do not feel good about themselves. It is one thing
>> to note specific inappropriate behavior, but so many people are clearly
>> hurting.
>>
>>> Reduce it to 72 characters per line.
>>
>> No.
>
> I will do that for you.

Unlikely.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>
>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>
> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
> rules are unenforceable.

They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.

--
Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

On Oct 17, 2022 at 7:43:31 AM MST, "Joerg Lorenz" wrote
<tijpmj$cuma$1@solani.org>:

> Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
>> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>>
>>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>>
>> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
>> rules are unenforceable.
>
> They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.

There are also a lot of people on Usenet who use the semi-anonymous nature and
the fact there is no way to block them (in most cases) as a way to just get
their jollies attacking people. It is a shame there is that side to humanity.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2022-10-17, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2022 at 7:43:31 AM MST, "Joerg Lorenz" wrote
><tijpmj$cuma$1@solani.org>:
>
>> Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
>>> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>>>
>>>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>>>
>>> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
>>> rules are unenforceable.
>>
>> They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.
>
> There are also a lot of people on Usenet who use the semi-anonymous nature and
> the fact there is no way to block them (in most cases) as a way to just get
> their jollies attacking people. It is a shame there is that side to humanity.

Irony, thy name is Michael Glasser.

On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:08:53 +0100, HunterBD <HunterBD@btinternet.invalid> wrote:

> On 10/09/2022 17:03, HunterBD wrote:
>> On 17/08/2022 11:50, David Brooks wrote:
>>> On 05/04/2022 18:27, Savageduck wrote:
>>>> It has been a while since I last posted a drone video, so here is a
>>>> great
>>>> spring day flying the DJI Air 2S around Morro Bay.
>>>>
>>>> <https://photos.smugmug.com/Air-2S-Work-2022/Air2S-Work-2022/i-k47h46J/0/7ad54298/1920/MB-4-4-2022-1920.mp4>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just watched this again. It's a very special place.
>>>
>>> Some of us are truly blessed! ❤️
>>
>> Reposting the link to check again.
>
>
> The video at the link above now plays perfectly using Safari! :-D
>
> Does it play for you?

It plays here, but takes ages to start, slow website?

Nice place, I wish I lived there but it's a bit warm.

On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:43:31 +0100, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:

> Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
>> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>>
>>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>>
>> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
>> rules are unenforceable.
>
> They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.

They are attempted to be enforced by OCD morons, I just ignore them. Oh no, this line is more than 72 characters! You'll go blind reading it! My eyes can jump to the start of the next line just fine....

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:10:36 +0100, ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

> pothead" wrote in message news:ti9vtr$1sfkq$1@dont-email.me...
>> Sounds to me that you had whatever directory the files were downloaded to
>> configured to back up to iCloud.
>> I'm not a Mac user but I had a similar problem with MS Onedrive.
>> It has defaults that get set up when you install/activate it and I
>> noticed similar behavior.
>
> Yes, One Drive on first use(never having signed in, oobe use) will configure
> Backup for:
> - Desktop, Documents, Pictures located your specific Windows user logon
> C:\\Users\<windows logon>
> ...but, to do so, user intervention is necessary and with acceptance to
> occur
> - i.e. a screen prompt showing the Backup windows with each of those
> folder options needs to be 'Ok'd'
>
> The other direction available is not 'up' to the MSA's OneDrive(cloud)
> - It's from OneDrive online down to the local stored OneDrive folder
> Again...user intervention is necessary to configure what syncs down
>
> OneDrive does not have settings for applications/apps that integrate
> with OneDrive. Those applications have their own OneDrive
> 'save-to-cloud' settings.

I wonder if they scan such drives for illegal material?

On 20/10/2022 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:43:31 +0100, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
>
>> Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
>>> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>>>
>>>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>>>
>>> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
>>> rules are unenforceable.
>>
>> They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.
>
> They are attempted to be enforced by OCD morons, I just ignore them.  Oh
> no, this line is more than 72 characters!  You'll go blind reading it!
> My eyes can jump to the start of the next line just fine....

Thanks for popping in! :-D

On 20/10/2022 08:23, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:08:53 +0100, HunterBD
> <HunterBD@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/2022 17:03, HunterBD wrote:
>>> On 17/08/2022 11:50, David Brooks wrote:
>>>> On 05/04/2022 18:27, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>> It has been a while since I last posted a drone video, so here is a
>>>>> great
>>>>> spring day flying the DJI Air 2S around Morro Bay.
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://photos.smugmug.com/Air-2S-Work-2022/Air2S-Work-2022/i-k47h46J/0/7ad54298/1920/MB-4-4-2022-1920.mp4>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've just watched this again. It's a very special place.
>>>>
>>>> Some of us are truly blessed! ❤️
>>>
>>> Reposting the link to check again.
>>
>>
>> The video at the link above now plays perfectly using Safari! :-D
>>
>> Does it play for you?
>
> It plays here, but takes ages to start, slow website?

I would like to know WHY it is so slow to start. How can one determine that?

> Nice place, I wish I lived there but it's a bit warm.

There's certainly a lot of money tied up is all those boats! ;-)

On 20/10/2022 08:30, David Brooks wrote:
> On 20/10/2022 08:23, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:08:53 +0100, HunterBD
>> <HunterBD@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/09/2022 17:03, HunterBD wrote:
>>>> On 17/08/2022 11:50, David Brooks wrote:
>>>>> On 05/04/2022 18:27, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>> It has been a while since I last posted a drone video, so here is a
>>>>>> great
>>>>>> spring day flying the DJI Air 2S around Morro Bay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://photos.smugmug.com/Air-2S-Work-2022/Air2S-Work-2022/i-k47h46J/0/7ad54298/1920/MB-4-4-2022-1920.mp4>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just watched this again. It's a very special place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of us are truly blessed! ❤️
>>>>
>>>> Reposting the link to check again.
>>>
>>>
>>> The video at the link above now plays perfectly using Safari! :-D
>>>
>>> Does it play for you?
>>
>> It plays here, but takes ages to start, slow website?
>
> I would like to know WHY it is so slow to start. How can one determine
> that?
>
>> Nice place, I wish I lived there but it's a bit warm.
>
> There's certainly a lot of money tied up is all those boats! ;-)

Oops! Perhaps I should have said "moored up IN all those boats"!

Apologies for the typo!

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:26:51 +0100, David Brooks <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:

> On 20/10/2022 08:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:43:31 +0100, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
>>>> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>>>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>>>>
>>>>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>>>>
>>>> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
>>>> rules are unenforceable.
>>>
>>> They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.
>>
>> They are attempted to be enforced by OCD morons, I just ignore them. Oh
>> no, this line is more than 72 characters! You'll go blind reading it!
>> My eyes can jump to the start of the next line just fine....
>
> Thanks for popping in! :-D

This is a now a 40" monitor, so the 72 character jerks piss me off even more, all that over there is white space!! ---->

My eyesight is normal, so I can in fact jump from the end of line 7 to the beginning of line 8 across a 40" screen without a thought. Anybody who can't, I don't care about.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:30:47 +0100, David Brooks <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:

> On 20/10/2022 08:23, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:08:53 +0100, HunterBD
>> <HunterBD@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/09/2022 17:03, HunterBD wrote:
>>>> On 17/08/2022 11:50, David Brooks wrote:
>>>>> On 05/04/2022 18:27, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>> It has been a while since I last posted a drone video, so here is a
>>>>>> great
>>>>>> spring day flying the DJI Air 2S around Morro Bay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://photos.smugmug.com/Air-2S-Work-2022/Air2S-Work-2022/i-k47h46J/0/7ad54298/1920/MB-4-4-2022-1920.mp4>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just watched this again. It's a very special place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of us are truly blessed! ❤️
>>>>
>>>> Reposting the link to check again.
>>>
>>>
>>> The video at the link above now plays perfectly using Safari! :-D
>>>
>>> Does it play for you?
>>
>> It plays here, but takes ages to start, slow website?
>
> I would like to know WHY it is so slow to start. How can one determine that?

It's a shit server, it's overloaded, or they have a slow internet connection. Not sure you can tell what systems they have without asking.

>> Nice place, I wish I lived there but it's a bit warm.
>
> There's certainly a lot of money tied up is all those boats! ;-)

Unless you forget to tie up the boat, then your money is at sea.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:33:43 +0100, David Brooks <BDB@not.on.your.life> wrote:

> On 20/10/2022 08:30, David Brooks wrote:
>> On 20/10/2022 08:23, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:08:53 +0100, HunterBD
>>> <HunterBD@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/09/2022 17:03, HunterBD wrote:
>>>>> On 17/08/2022 11:50, David Brooks wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/04/2022 18:27, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>>> It has been a while since I last posted a drone video, so here is a
>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>> spring day flying the DJI Air 2S around Morro Bay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://photos.smugmug.com/Air-2S-Work-2022/Air2S-Work-2022/i-k47h46J/0/7ad54298/1920/MB-4-4-2022-1920.mp4>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've just watched this again. It's a very special place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of us are truly blessed! ❤️
>>>>>
>>>>> Reposting the link to check again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The video at the link above now plays perfectly using Safari! :-D
>>>>
>>>> Does it play for you?
>>>
>>> It plays here, but takes ages to start, slow website?
>>
>> I would like to know WHY it is so slow to start. How can one determine
>> that?
>>
>>> Nice place, I wish I lived there but it's a bit warm.
>>
>> There's certainly a lot of money tied up is all those boats! ;-)
>
> Oops! Perhaps I should have said "moored up IN all those boats"!
>
> Apologies for the typo!

I guess that would have meant you can't release the money, but I'm sure it's easy to sell a boat.

And you can't call it a typo when you changed 4 letters.

Commander Kinsey has brought this to us :
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:43:31 +0100, Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
>
>> Am 17.10.22 um 13:36 schrieb David Brooks:
>>> On 17/10/2022 12:07, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> David Brooks expressed precisely :
>>>>> On 17/10/2022 10:03, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *That is a reference from THE LAST CENTURY*!
>>>>
>>>> Has it been superseded? It appears not to have been.
>>>
>>> Not as far as I am aware. The 'thing' about Usenet, though, is that the
>>> rules are unenforceable.
>>
>> They are enforced by social pressure. That is why the Usenet still works.
>
> They are attempted to be enforced by OCD morons, I just ignore them. Oh no,
> this line is more than 72 characters! You'll go blind reading it! My eyes
> can jump to the start of the next line just fine....

Antisocial behavior, color me surprised.

David Brooks formulated on Thursday :
> On 20/10/2022 08:30, David Brooks wrote:
>> On 20/10/2022 08:23, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:08:53 +0100, HunterBD <HunterBD@btinternet.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/09/2022 17:03, HunterBD wrote:
>>>>> On 17/08/2022 11:50, David Brooks wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/04/2022 18:27, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>>> It has been a while since I last posted a drone video, so here is a
>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>> spring day flying the DJI Air 2S around Morro Bay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://photos.smugmug.com/Air-2S-Work-2022/Air2S-Work-2022/i-k47h46J/0/7ad54298/1920/MB-4-4-2022-1920.mp4>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've just watched this again. It's a very special place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of us are truly blessed! ❤️
>>>>>
>>>>> Reposting the link to check again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The video at the link above now plays perfectly using Safari! :-D
>>>>
>>>> Does it play for you?
>>>
>>> It plays here, but takes ages to start, slow website?
>>
>> I would like to know WHY it is so slow to start. How can one determine
>> that?
>>
>>> Nice place, I wish I lived there but it's a bit warm.
>>
>> There's certainly a lot of money tied up is all those boats! ;-)
>
> Oops! Perhaps I should have said "moored up IN all those boats"!
>
> Apologies for the typo!

Not a typo, it depends upon whether you wrote it as a boater or as a
financial advisor.