Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>>> that's cheating. By def, a point is zero sized. Your granularity
>>>> argument is just aesthetic, as drawing arbitrary points on a
>>>> blackboard or paper. Just think, if applicable.
>>>
>>> Huh? A point is a location. There are an infinite number of points on
>>> a line. Get it? Wow!
>>
>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero sized.
>> What an idiot. Another one.
>
> Points are locations. You seem to have some sort of mental block that
> two points can define a line, and there are infinite points on that
> line. WOW!

Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate system.
We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives, as
position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero sized.
>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>
>> A point is an idealized, primitive notion. It does not have any
>> physical size to speak of.
>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite mass.
>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>
> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>
> void iterate_line(
> ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,

what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
You are a waste of time.

On 7/27/2021 2:47 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>
>>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero sized.
>>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>>
>>> A point is an idealized, primitive notion. It does not have any
>>> physical size to speak of.
>>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite mass.
>>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>>
>> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>>
>> void iterate_line(
>> ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,
>
> what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
> drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
> You are a waste of time.
>

Wow! You are beyond repair. Sorry.

Just WOW!

On 7/27/2021 2:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>>>> that's cheating. By def, a point is zero sized. Your granularity
>>>>> argument is just aesthetic, as drawing arbitrary points on a
>>>>> blackboard or paper. Just think, if applicable.
>>>>
>>>> Huh? A point is a location. There are an infinite number of points on
>>>> a line. Get it? Wow!
>>>
>>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero sized.
>>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>
>> Points are locations. You seem to have some sort of mental block that
>> two points can define a line, and there are infinite points on that
>> line. WOW!
>
> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate system.
> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives, as
> position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>

WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are some
sort of sock puppet for John?

Anyway, I was talking about drawing lines on a segment by segment basis.
My n-ary vector field algorithms do this in order to show their lines.

You do not even know how to use points and draw lines.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>>> physical size to speak of.
>>>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite mass.
>>>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>>>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>>>
>>> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>>>
>>> void iterate_line(
>>> ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,
>>
>> what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
>> drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
>> You are a waste of time.
>
> Wow! You are beyond repair. Sorry. Just WOW!

this imbecile is not knowing his algorithm is drawing points on a
display, first by putting numbers into his graphic-card memory arrays,
then make it visible shifting the buffer to the active zone. Admit you
are a cretin, fucking stupid. You don't know what you do.

On 7/27/2021 2:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/27/2021 2:47 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero sized.
>>>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>>>
>>>> A point is an idealized, primitive notion. It does not have any
>>>> physical size to speak of.
>>>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite mass.
>>>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>>>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>>>
>>> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>>>
>>> void iterate_line(
>>>       ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,
>>
>> what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
>> drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
>> You are a waste of time.
>>
>
> Wow! You are beyond repair. Sorry.
>
> Just WOW!

Oh wow.... You do not seem to understand that a point is n-ary. And I
can draw lines in different dimensions. A line in 3d could be between
two 3-ary points.

Since my vector field is n-ary, 3d is no problem for me:

https://youtu.be/skGUAXAx6eg

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>> Points are locations. You seem to have some sort of mental block that
>>> two points can define a line, and there are infinite points on that
>>> line. WOW!
>>
>> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate system.
>> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives, as
>> position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>>
>>
> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are some
> sort of sock puppet for John?
>
> Anyway, I was talking about drawing lines on a segment by segment basis.
> My n-ary vector field algorithms do this in order to show their lines.
>
> You do not even know how to use points and draw lines.

that's a fucking *application*, braindead cretin with a big mouth!! Not
different from a pencil drawing arbitrary sized points on a paper. But in
math and physics points are ZERO sized. Go back to kindergarten, idiot.

On 7/27/2021 2:55 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>>>> physical size to speak of.
>>>>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite mass.
>>>>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>>>>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>>>>
>>>> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>>>>
>>>> void iterate_line(
>>>> ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,
>>>
>>> what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
>>> drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
>>> You are a waste of time.
>>
>> Wow! You are beyond repair. Sorry. Just WOW!
>
> this imbecile is not knowing his algorithm is drawing points on a
> display, first by putting numbers into his graphic-card memory arrays,
> then make it visible shifting the buffer to the active zone. Admit you
> are a cretin, fucking stupid. You don't know what you do.
>

You are completely confused. Humm... Have you ever heard of projection?
For instance projecting a 3d object onto a 2d surface? You are having a
lot of trouble understanding basic things...

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> On 7/27/2021 2:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/27/2021 2:47 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero
>>>>> sized.
>>>>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>>>>
>>>>> A point is an idealized, primitive notion. It does not have any
>>>>> physical size to speak of.
>>>>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite
>>>>> mass.
>>>>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>>>>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>>>>
>>>> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>>>>
>>>> void iterate_line(
>>>>       ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,
>>>
>>> what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
>>> drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
>>> You are a waste of time.
>>>
>>>
>> Wow! You are beyond repair. Sorry.
>>
>> Just WOW!
>
> Oh wow.... You do not seem to understand that a point is n-ary. And I
> can draw lines in different dimensions. A line in 3d could be between
> two 3-ary points.

not in math and physics, fucking stoopid. How a particular application
embeds points is totally irrelevant.

On 7/27/2021 2:58 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>
>>>> Points are locations. You seem to have some sort of mental block that
>>>> two points can define a line, and there are infinite points on that
>>>> line. WOW!
>>>
>>> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate system.
>>> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives, as
>>> position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>>>
>>>
>> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are some
>> sort of sock puppet for John?
>>
>> Anyway, I was talking about drawing lines on a segment by segment basis.
>> My n-ary vector field algorithms do this in order to show their lines.
>>
>> You do not even know how to use points and draw lines.
>
> that's a fucking *application*, braindead cretin with a big mouth!! Not
> different from a pencil drawing arbitrary sized points on a paper. But in
> math and physics points are ZERO sized. Go back to kindergarten, idiot.
>

God! Why do you miss the point so much! LOL! A point is a location, got
it? There are an infinite number of points on a line. Got it!

WOW! You are amazing!

On 7/27/2021 3:01 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> On 7/27/2021 2:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 7/27/2021 2:47 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero
>>>>>> sized.
>>>>>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A point is an idealized, primitive notion. It does not have any
>>>>>> physical size to speak of.
>>>>>> A geometric (0-dimensional) point that may be assigned a finite
>>>>>> mass.
>>>>>> Since a point has zero volume, the density of a point mass having a
>>>>>> finite mass is infinite, so point masses do not exist in reality.
>>>>>
>>>>> How to draw a line with equidistant points:
>>>>>
>>>>> void iterate_line(
>>>>>       ct::plot::cairo::plot_2d& plot,
>>>>
>>>> what a cretin, that's implementation and display, not different as
>>>> drawing points with a pencil on a paper. You uneducated piece of shit.
>>>> You are a waste of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Wow! You are beyond repair. Sorry.
>>>
>>> Just WOW!
>>
>> Oh wow.... You do not seem to understand that a point is n-ary. And I
>> can draw lines in different dimensions. A line in 3d could be between
>> two 3-ary points.
>
> not in math and physics, fucking stoopid. How a particular application
> embeds points is totally irrelevant.
>

Oh shit! You have never created a line in 3d before, right? lol. A line
can be constructed between two points. There are infinite points on that
line. WOW!!!!!!

Here is some of my code in WebGL, it draw lines on a segment-by-segment
basic using one of my vector fields:

http://fractallife247.com/test/webgl/

Ahhh, shit. Who am I kidding. You cannot possibly understand it!

WOW!!! ;^/

On 7/27/2021 2:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>>>> that's cheating. By def, a point is zero sized. Your granularity
>>>>> argument is just aesthetic, as drawing arbitrary points on a
>>>>> blackboard or paper. Just think, if applicable.
>>>>
>>>> Huh? A point is a location. There are an infinite number of points on
>>>> a line. Get it? Wow!
>>>
>>> you talk about granularity, fucking stupid, but points are zero sized.
>>> What an idiot. Another one.
>>
>> Points are locations. You seem to have some sort of mental block that
>> two points can define a line, and there are infinite points on that
>> line. WOW!
>
> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate system.

Have you ever played around with any half-plane to disc mappings? They
are fun. Here is are some of my results:

https://youtu.be/Y6wOS7c7_Xg

https://youtu.be/bpBvK-VhSjA

Notice how it preserves the circles and ellipses? Its a fun conformal
map to mess around with.

> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives, as
> position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>> Oh wow.... You do not seem to understand that a point is n-ary. And I
>>> can draw lines in different dimensions. A line in 3d could be between
>>> two 3-ary points.
>>
>> not in math and physics, fucking stoopid. How a particular application
>> embeds points is totally irrelevant.
>
> Oh shit! You have never created a line in 3d before, right? lol. A line
> can be constructed between two points. There are infinite points on that
> line. WOW!!!!!!
> Here is some of my code in WebGL, it draw lines on a segment-by-segment
> basic using one of my vector fields:

you are an uneducated pos, not knowing what you do.

You wore diapers the time I was doing physics for living, ie math modeling
and scientific computation.

On 7/27/2021 3:40 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>>> Oh wow.... You do not seem to understand that a point is n-ary. And I
>>>> can draw lines in different dimensions. A line in 3d could be between
>>>> two 3-ary points.
>>>
>>> not in math and physics, fucking stoopid. How a particular application
>>> embeds points is totally irrelevant.
>>
>> Oh shit! You have never created a line in 3d before, right? lol. A line
>> can be constructed between two points. There are infinite points on that
>> line. WOW!!!!!!
>> Here is some of my code in WebGL, it draw lines on a segment-by-segment
>> basic using one of my vector fields:
>
> you are an uneducated pos, not knowing what you do.
>
> You wore diapers the time I was doing physics for living, ie math modeling
> and scientific computation.
>

Where can I run your work? I produce examples:

https://www.shadertoy.com/user/Chris_M_Thomasson

On 7/27/2021 5:51 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/27/2021 2:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:

>> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate system.
>> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives, as
>> position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>>
>
> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are some
> sort of sock puppet for John?
>
No, that is just the nymshifter troll, whose only purpose in life is to
spread confusion. It isn't John's sock puppet but a giant laundry basket
of dirty socks from a Marines boot camp after a particularly hot day of
strenuous basic training.

On 7/27/2021 6:50 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> Where can I run your work? I produce examples:
>
> https://www.shadertoy.com/user/Chris_M_Thomasson

I just said the only purpose in the miserable life of the nymshifter
troll is to spread confusion. You sure went for its rotten bait, hook
line and sinker!

Now watch as it nymshifts into another "new" poster.

On 7/27/2021 4:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/27/2021 6:50 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> Where can I run your work? I produce examples:
>>
>> https://www.shadertoy.com/user/Chris_M_Thomasson
>
> I just said the only purpose in the miserable life of the nymshifter
> troll is to spread confusion.  You sure went for its rotten bait, hook
> line and sinker!

Yes, indeed I did! The hook was not barbed, thank god!

Yikes!

> Now watch as it nymshifts into another "new" poster.

For some reason I compared it to John's behavior. Quick to call others
all sorts of names.

extreme crank Michael Moroney wrote:

> On 7/27/2021 5:51 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/27/2021 2:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>
>>> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate
>>> system.
>>> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives,
>>> as position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>>>
>>>
>> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are some
>> sort of sock puppet for John?
>>
> No, that is just the nymshifter troll, whose only purpose in life is to
> spread confusion. It isn't John's sock puppet but a giant laundry basket
> of dirty socks from a Marines boot camp after a particularly hot day of
> strenuous basic training.

seemingly that laundry basket must be you stinking ugly mother with a
couple of black dicks in she mouth. Make no mistake. Your stupid
uneducated like hell boyfriend "Chris" was saying points has size in math
and physics. You are attacking the man, not the issue, you stinking bag
of sub-human excrement.

On 7/27/2021 4:56 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> extreme crank Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> On 7/27/2021 5:51 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 7/27/2021 2:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>
>>>> Not necessary, imbecile, only when used in a certain coordinate
>>>> system.
>>>> We are talking about points and lines, not about motion derivatives,
>>>> as position, speed and acceleration. You are an idiot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are some
>>> sort of sock puppet for John?
>>>
>> No, that is just the nymshifter troll, whose only purpose in life is to
>> spread confusion. It isn't John's sock puppet but a giant laundry basket
>> of dirty socks from a Marines boot camp after a particularly hot day of
>> strenuous basic training.
>
> seemingly that laundry basket must be you stinking ugly mother with a
> couple of black dicks in she mouth. Make no mistake. Your stupid
> uneducated like hell boyfriend "Chris" was saying points has size in math
> and physics. You are attacking the man, not the issue, you stinking bag
> of sub-human excrement.
>

A point is a location. Why can't you seem to grasp that?

fart in a bottle Michael Moron-ey wrote:

> On 7/27/2021 6:50 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> Where can I run your work? I produce examples:
>>
>> https://www.shadertoy.com/user/Chris_M_Thomasson
>
> I just said the only purpose in the miserable life of the nymshifter
> troll is to spread confusion. You sure went for its rotten bait, hook
> line and sinker!

the confusion is all yours, due your lack of basic education, you stupid
sack of sub-human excrement.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>>> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are
>>>> some sort of sock puppet for John?
>>>>
>>> No, that is just the nymshifter troll, whose only purpose in life is
>>> to spread confusion. It isn't John's sock puppet but a giant laundry
>>> basket of dirty socks from a Marines boot camp after a particularly
>>> hot day of strenuous basic training.
>>
>> seemingly that laundry basket must be you stinking ugly mother with a
>> couple of black dicks in she mouth. Make no mistake. Your stupid
>> uneducated like hell boyfriend "Chris" was saying points has size in
>> math and physics. You are attacking the man, not the issue, you
>> stinking bag of sub-human excrement.
>
> A point is a location. Why can't you seem to grasp that?

get out of the math/science forum, you stupid bag of rocks. Go fuck morony
and yourself some other places.

On 7/27/2021 5:03 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>>>> WTF are you talking about? Well, now I can basically tell you are
>>>>> some sort of sock puppet for John?
>>>>>
>>>> No, that is just the nymshifter troll, whose only purpose in life is
>>>> to spread confusion. It isn't John's sock puppet but a giant laundry
>>>> basket of dirty socks from a Marines boot camp after a particularly
>>>> hot day of strenuous basic training.
>>>
>>> seemingly that laundry basket must be you stinking ugly mother with a
>>> couple of black dicks in she mouth. Make no mistake. Your stupid
>>> uneducated like hell boyfriend "Chris" was saying points has size in
>>> math and physics. You are attacking the man, not the issue, you
>>> stinking bag of sub-human excrement.
>>
>> A point is a location. Why can't you seem to grasp that?
>
> get out of the math/science forum, you stupid bag of rocks. Go fuck morony
> and yourself some other places.
>

The finishing line connecting your rod to my brain just broke. The hook
was not barbed, and I am free again! Hallelujah!

I am free from that horrible thing! Good bye.

:^)

On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> >>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> >>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> >>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> >>>>> travelled along a road.
> >>>> [...]
> >>>>
> >>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> >
> > Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> >
> How can you disagree with me?

Because you are a natural born idiot.

> There are an infinite number of points on a line.

No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.

Get it idiot?

A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.

onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > >> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> > >>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > >>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> > >>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> > >>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> > >>>>> travelled along a road.
> > >>>> [...]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> > >
> > > Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> > >
> > How can you disagree with me?
>
> Because you are a natural born idiot.
> > There are an infinite number of points on a line.
> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
>
> Get it idiot?
>
> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.

A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction. You are talking about line segments. Line segments are given between two points on the line. You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!

KON

On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> > > >>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > >>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> > > >>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> > > >>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> > > >>>>> travelled along a road.
> > > >>>> [...]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> > > >
> > > > Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> > > >
> > > How can you disagree with me?
> >
> > Because you are a natural born idiot.
> > > There are an infinite number of points on a line.
> > No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
> >
> > Get it idiot?
> >
> > A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.

> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.

No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.

> You are talking about line segments.

A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.

> Line segments are given between two points on the line.

No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.

> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!

You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.