And what is 3 =< 4?

We are waiting...

LoL

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Freitag, 6. August 2021 um 15:07:30 UTC+2:
> Isnt John Gabriel the one that cant even determine the truth value of 3=<4 ?
>
> LoL
>
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Freitag, 6. August 2021 um 15:06:09 UTC+2:
> > On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 01:21:18 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 16:14:39 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:01:52 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <drivel>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > > > > > > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > > > > > > being very useful?
> > > > > > What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything.
> > > > How can a moron (YOU!) know the thoughts of a genius? You suffer from so much mental baggage, but your projectionitis is chronic!
> > > You are not a genius, you are a crank
> > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.

Eram semper recta wrote:

>> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written
>> over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not
>> yet shared with the public.
>
> Refreshed due to Jan Burse (aka Mostowski Collapse) trolling.

The Penny Drops for this Vaxxxed reporter
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RRKvuizJepRy/

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>
> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>
> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>
> This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
>
> If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
>
> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.

Refreshed due to troll activity.

Eram semper recta wrote:

>> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written
>> over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not
>> yet shared with the public.
>
> Refreshed due to troll activity.

You are fucked up in your head, there is nothing to refresh. You are
stupid like a door.

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>
> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>
> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>
> This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
>
> If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
>
> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.

Refreshed due to troll activity.

fredag 6 augusti 2021 kl. 15:06:09 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 01:21:18 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 16:14:39 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:01:52 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <drivel>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > > > > > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > > > > > being very useful?
> > > > > What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
> > > > >
> > > > > 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything.
> > > How can a moron (YOU!) know the thoughts of a genius? You suffer from so much mental baggage, but your projectionitis is chronic!
> > You are not a genius, you are a crank
> The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)

On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:

> > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)

Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.

måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
nope, that is 100% you

Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.

I agree with mainstream, you do not.

Ergo, you're the crank.

On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> nope, that is 100% you
>
> Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
>
> I agree with mainstream, you do not.
>
> Ergo, you're the crank.

Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Bingo! That's YOU!

tisdag 10 augusti 2021 kl. 12:54:56 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> > nope, that is 100% you
> >
> > Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
> >
> > I agree with mainstream, you do not.
> >
> > Ergo, you're the crank.
> Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.
>
> Bingo! That's YOU!

"Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."

Ah sorry, you got the definition wrong :) I do not fit the bill, you however do!

On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 01:14:23 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 10 augusti 2021 kl. 12:54:56 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > > > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> > > nope, that is 100% you
> > >
> > > Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
> > >
> > > I agree with mainstream, you do not.
> > >
> > > Ergo, you're the crank.
> > Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> >
> > Bingo! That's YOU!
> "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
>
> Ah sorry, you got the definition wrong :) I do not fit the bill, you however do!

Crank is a term used for a person who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.

No need for the blessing of the apes in the Church of Academia or the journals they control. LMAO.

onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:14:12 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 01:14:23 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 10 augusti 2021 kl. 12:54:56 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > > > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > > > > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> > > > nope, that is 100% you
> > > >
> > > > Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
> > > >
> > > > I agree with mainstream, you do not.
> > > >
> > > > Ergo, you're the crank.
> > > Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > >
> > > Bingo! That's YOU!
> > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> >
> > Ah sorry, you got the definition wrong :) I do not fit the bill, you however do!
> Crank is a term used for a person who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
>
> No need for the blessing of the apes in the Church of Academia or the journals they control. LMAO.

"Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."

Incorrect, that is not at all what it says :)

On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 04:56:33 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:14:12 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 01:14:23 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > tisdag 10 augusti 2021 kl. 12:54:56 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > > > > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > > > > > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> > > > > nope, that is 100% you
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with mainstream, you do not.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ergo, you're the crank.
> > > > Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > >
> > > > Bingo! That's YOU!
> > > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> > >
> > > Ah sorry, you got the definition wrong :) I do not fit the bill, you however do!
> > Crank is a term used for a person who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> >
> > No need for the blessing of the apes in the Church of Academia or the journals they control. LMAO.
>
> "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> Incorrect, that is not at all what it says :)

One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence. - is ALWAYS TRUE.

Your Mainstream supported drivel "definition" may or may not be TRUE. As I've tried to teach you, it is necessary but insufficient because there have been many examples of those who have been correct and the mainstream wrong..

måndag 26 juli 2021 kl. 14:58:17 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>
> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>
> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>
> This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
>
> If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
>
> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.
I'm pretty sure John Gabriel just makes these e-mails up, or write them to himself.

torsdag 12 augusti 2021 kl. 13:25:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 04:56:33 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:14:12 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 01:14:23 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > tisdag 10 augusti 2021 kl. 12:54:56 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > > > > > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > > > > > > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> > > > > > nope, that is 100% you
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree with mainstream, you do not.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ergo, you're the crank.
> > > > > Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bingo! That's YOU!
> > > > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> > > >
> > > > Ah sorry, you got the definition wrong :) I do not fit the bill, you however do!
> > > Crank is a term used for a person who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > >
> > > No need for the blessing of the apes in the Church of Academia or the journals they control. LMAO.
> >
> > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> > Incorrect, that is not at all what it says :)
> One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence. - is ALWAYS TRUE.
>
> Your Mainstream supported drivel "definition" may or may not be TRUE. As I've tried to teach you, it is necessary but insufficient because there have been many examples of those who have been correct and the mainstream wrong.

Yet another classical crank example.

"compare themselves with luminaries in their chosen field (often Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein or Georg Cantor),[citation needed] implying that the mere unpopularity of some belief is not good reason for it to be dismissed,"

On Friday, 13 August 2021 at 00:53:54 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 12 augusti 2021 kl. 13:25:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 04:56:33 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:14:12 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 01:14:23 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > tisdag 10 augusti 2021 kl. 12:54:56 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:54:07 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > måndag 9 augusti 2021 kl. 14:36:47 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:31:42 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.
> > > > > > > > > oh yes, that means you've lost all of them because you spew the same garbage whenever someone doesn't agree that you a genius, which you aren't. You are a crank :)
> > > > > > > > Oh dear. I believe you are thinking about yourself again.
> > > > > > > nope, that is 100% you
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Again, by definition, a crank must think that things mainstream view as false as being true.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I agree with mainstream, you do not.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ergo, you're the crank.
> > > > > > Crank: One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bingo! That's YOU!
> > > > > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah sorry, you got the definition wrong :) I do not fit the bill, you however do!
> > > > Crank is a term used for a person who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > >
> > > > No need for the blessing of the apes in the Church of Academia or the journals they control. LMAO.
> > >
> > > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> > > Incorrect, that is not at all what it says :)
> > One who cannot be convinced his beliefs are false in the face of overwhelming evidence. - is ALWAYS TRUE.
> >
> > Your Mainstream supported drivel "definition" may or may not be TRUE. As I've tried to teach you, it is necessary but insufficient because there have been many examples of those who have been correct and the mainstream wrong.
> Yet another classical crank example.
>
> "compare themselves with luminaries in their chosen field (often Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein or Georg Cantor),[citation needed] implying that the mere unpopularity of some belief is not good reason for it to be dismissed,"

I am greater than all of them. This is not arrogance but fact. There is only one who might have held a candle to me: Archimedes.

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>
> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>
> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>
> This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
>
> If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
>
> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.

Students:

Don't believe what the morons and cranks on this forum say about me. Study my works and decide for yourselves. You'll be glad you did!

lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> >
> > Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
> >
> > "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
> >
> > This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
> >
> > If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
> >
> > The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.
> Students:
>
> Don't believe what the morons and cranks on this forum say about me. Study my works and decide for yourselves. You'll be glad you did!

I've studied it and come to conclusion you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> > >
> > > Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
> > >
> > > "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
> > >
> > > This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
> > >
> > > If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
> > >
> > > The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.
> > Students:
> >
> > Don't believe what the morons and cranks on this forum say about me. Study my works and decide for yourselves. You'll be glad you did!
> I've studied it and come to conclusion you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

Oh, cute! I was not addressing you. You are a lost cause. Chuckle. I am addressing those who still have a brain and are able to think independently. You're just another idiot.

lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 18:27:44 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> > > >
> > > > Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
> > > >
> > > > "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
> > > >
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
> > > >
> > > > This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
> > > >
> > > > If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
> > > >
> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
> > > >
> > > > The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.
> > > Students:
> > >
> > > Don't believe what the morons and cranks on this forum say about me. Study my works and decide for yourselves. You'll be glad you did!
> > I've studied it and come to conclusion you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
> Oh, cute! I was not addressing you. You are a lost cause. Chuckle. I am addressing those who still have a brain and are able to think independently. You're just another idiot.

So the other 10-20 people who follow your channel on Youtube, of half which just follows you because cranks are fun to watch?

On 8/14/2021 9:27 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>> lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>> On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>>>>
>>>> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>>>>
>>>> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>>>>
[...]

You mean the patch over your left eye right!?

wow. WTF? LOL!!!!!!! ROFL!

On 8/14/2021 2:08 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/14/2021 9:27 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>> On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even
>>>>> though they are too afraid to admit it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only
>>>>> possible in the New Calculus:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used
>>>>> your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my
>>>>> results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give
>>>>> them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me
>>>>> publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>>>>>
> [...]
>
> You mean the patch over your left eye right!?
>
> wow. WTF? LOL!!!!!!! ROFL!

Btw, what the heck happened to your left eye? Damn.

On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 17:08:12 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/14/2021 9:27 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>> On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
> >>>>
> [...]
>
> You mean the patch over your left eye right!?

No moron. If you knew anything about physics, then you would know that the patch is over my right eye. The camera flips the image. LMAO.

Didn't I tell you so many times that you're an idiot?

>
> wow. WTF? LOL!!!!!!! ROFL!

Small minds are easily and inappropriately amused.

On 8/15/2021 8:37 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 17:08:12 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/14/2021 9:27 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>> On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>>>>>>
>> [...]
>>
>> You mean the patch over your left eye right!?
>
> No moron. If you knew anything about physics, then you would know that the patch is over my right eye. The camera flips the image. LMAO.
>
> Didn't I tell you so many times that you're an idiot?
>
>>
>> wow. WTF? LOL!!!!!!! ROFL!
>
> Small minds are easily and inappropriately amused.
>

WTF! Are you retarded or something? Your left eye is messed up! God. Are
you that stupid?

On 8/15/2021 1:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/15/2021 8:37 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 17:08:12 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 8/14/2021 9:27 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, 14 August 2021 at 11:55:17 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> lördag 14 augusti 2021 kl. 13:40:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>> On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even
>>>>>>> though they are too afraid to admit it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation
>>>>>>> only possible in the New Calculus:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I
>>>>>>> used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my
>>>>>>> results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give
>>>>>>> them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let
>>>>>>> me publish your results and on other side you are not getting
>>>>>>> attention."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>>>>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> You mean the patch over your left eye right!?
>>
>> No moron. If you knew anything about physics, then you would know that
>> the patch is over my right eye. The camera flips the image. LMAO.

I know that: I also know that your left eye is messed up. Wow!

>>
>> Didn't I tell you so many times that you're an idiot?
>>
>>>
>>> wow. WTF? LOL!!!!!!! ROFL!
>>
>> Small minds are easily and inappropriately amused.
>>
>
> WTF! Are you retarded or something? Your left eye is messed up! God. Are
> you that stupid?