On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
>>>>>
>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
>>>>>
>>>> How can you disagree with me?
>>>
>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
>>>
>>> Get it idiot?
>>>
>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
>
>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
>
> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
>
>> You are talking about line segments.
>
> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
>
>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
>
> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
>
>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
>
> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
>
>

A line has infinitely many points on it. A point is a location, it has
no size.

You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.

On 7/28/2021 5:40 AM, konyberg wrote:
> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
>>>>
>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
>>>>
>>> How can you disagree with me?
>>
>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
>>
>> Get it idiot?
>>
>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
>
> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction. You are talking about line segments. Line segments are given between two points on the line. You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!

As long as we have two n-ary points that do not equal one another, we
have a line in n-ary space. If the two points are equal, then we have a
location, or point of you will in n-ary space. A line can have an
infinite number of points on it. Be it a ray, line, segment of a line,
ect... Does not matter. Sound Kosher?

On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
> >> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> >>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> >>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> >>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> >>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
> >>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> >>>>>
> >>>> How can you disagree with me?
> >>>
> >>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
> >>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
> >>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
> >>>
> >>> Get it idiot?
> >>>
> >>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
> >
> >> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
> >
> > No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
> >
> >> You are talking about line segments.
> >
> > A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
> >
> >> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
> >
> > No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
> >
> >> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
> >
> > You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
> >
> >
> A line has infinitely many points on it.

What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?

> A point is a location, it has no size.

This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".

No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.

If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.

>
> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.

It's sad that you are such a moron!

On 7/28/2021 5:19 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
>>>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
>>>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
>>>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
>>>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can you disagree with me?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
>>>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
>>>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Get it idiot?
>>>>>
>>>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
>>>
>>>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
>>>
>>> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
>>>
>>>> You are talking about line segments.
>>>
>>> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
>>>
>>>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
>>>
>>> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
>>>
>>>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
>>>
>>> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
>>>
>>>
>> A line has infinitely many points on it.
>
> What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?
>
>> A point is a location, it has no size.
>
> This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".
>
> No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.
>
> If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.
>
>>
>> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.
>
> It's sad that you are such a moron!
>

A line is made up of an infinite number of points, or locations if you
will. You seem to have trouble understanding that point!

On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 20:26:09 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/28/2021 5:19 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
> >>>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> >>>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> >>>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> >>>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
> >>>>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> How can you disagree with me?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
> >>>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
> >>>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Get it idiot?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
> >>>
> >>>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
> >>>
> >>> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
> >>>
> >>>> You are talking about line segments.
> >>>
> >>> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
> >>>
> >>>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
> >>>
> >>> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
> >>>
> >>>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
> >>>
> >>> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> A line has infinitely many points on it.
> >
> > What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?
> >
> >> A point is a location, it has no size.
> >
> > This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".
> >
> > No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.
> >
> > If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.
> >
> >>
> >> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.
> >
> > It's sad that you are such a moron!
> >
> A line is made up of an infinite number of points, or locations if you
> will.

NO. A line is not made up of anything. A line is a distance, you moron!

How can a distance consist of locations? A distance is a magnitude whose measure may or may not be described by a number.

On 7/29/2021 3:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 20:26:09 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/28/2021 5:19 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
>>>>>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
>>>>>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
>>>>>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How can you disagree with me?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
>>>>>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
>>>>>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get it idiot?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
>>>>>
>>>>>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are talking about line segments.
>>>>>
>>>>> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
>>>>>
>>>>> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> A line has infinitely many points on it.
>>>
>>> What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?
>>>
>>>> A point is a location, it has no size.
>>>
>>> This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".
>>>
>>> No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.
>>>
>>> If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.
>>>
>>> It's sad that you are such a moron!
>>>
>> A line is made up of an infinite number of points, or locations if you
>> will.
>
> NO. A line is not made up of anything. A line is a distance, you moron!
>
> How can a distance consist of locations? A distance is a magnitude whose measure may or may not be described by a number.
>
>

Have you ever heard of mile markers?

https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-do-highways-have-mile-markers

:^)

On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 13:44:02 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/29/2021 3:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 20:26:09 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 7/28/2021 5:19 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
> >>>>>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How can you disagree with me?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
> >>>>>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
> >>>>>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Get it idiot?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> You are talking about line segments.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> A line has infinitely many points on it.
> >>>
> >>> What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?
> >>>
> >>>> A point is a location, it has no size.
> >>>
> >>> This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".
> >>>
> >>> No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.
> >>>
> >>> If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.
> >>>
> >>> It's sad that you are such a moron!
> >>>
> >> A line is made up of an infinite number of points, or locations if you
> >> will.
> >
> > NO. A line is not made up of anything. A line is a distance, you moron!
> >
> > How can a distance consist of locations? A distance is a magnitude whose measure may or may not be described by a number.
> >
> >
> Have you ever heard of mile markers?
>
> https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-do-highways-have-mile-markers
>

Fucking crank! DO YOU EVEN TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WRITE????? Or do you just enjoy being stupid?

Woa! I didn't think that dealing with Greek theory of ratio
can be that demanding that I can lead to burnout.

John Gabriel you look like Zombie, take some vacation
from your own nonsense.

LoL

Eram semper recta schrieb am Montag, 26. Juli 2021 um 14:58:17 UTC+2:
> ... gibberish ...

I recommend a Pina Colada, a parasol and a beach,
and this booklet, could be quite refreshing:

Basic Set Theory, Azriel Levy
https://www.amazon.de/dp/0486420795

The paperback is only around 20$

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2021 um 20:20:14 UTC+2:
> Woa! I didn't think that dealing with Greek theory of ratio
> can be that demanding that I can lead to burnout.
>
> John Gabriel you look like Zombie, take some vacation
> from your own nonsense.
>
> LoL
>
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Montag, 26. Juli 2021 um 14:58:17 UTC+2:
> > ... gibberish ...

On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 13:44:02 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/29/2021 3:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 20:26:09 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/2021 5:19 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
>>>>>>>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How can you disagree with me?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
>>>>>>>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
>>>>>>>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Get it idiot?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are talking about line segments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> A line has infinitely many points on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?
>>>>>
>>>>>> A point is a location, it has no size.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".
>>>>>
>>>>> No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.
>>>>>
>>>>> If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's sad that you are such a moron!
>>>>>
>>>> A line is made up of an infinite number of points, or locations if you
>>>> will.
>>>
>>> NO. A line is not made up of anything. A line is a distance, you moron!
>>>
>>> How can a distance consist of locations? A distance is a magnitude whose measure may or may not be described by a number.
>>>
>>>
>> Have you ever heard of mile markers?
>>
>> https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-do-highways-have-mile-markers
>>
>
> Fucking crank! DO YOU EVEN TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WRITE????? Or do you just enjoy being stupid?
>

The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
or points if you will. Curvy line, not problem, any line.

On 7/27/2021 5:40 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>>> Oh wow.... You do not seem to understand that a point is n-ary. And I
>>>> can draw lines in different dimensions. A line in 3d could be between
>>>> two 3-ary points.
>>>
>>> not in math and physics, fucking stoopid. How a particular application
>>> embeds points is totally irrelevant.
>>
>> Oh shit! You have never created a line in 3d before, right? lol. A line
>> can be constructed between two points. There are infinite points on that
>> line. WOW!!!!!!
>> Here is some of my code in WebGL, it draw lines on a segment-by-segment
>> basic using one of my vector fields:
>
> you are an uneducated pos, not knowing what you do.
>
> You wore diapers the time I was doing physics for living, ie math modeling
> and scientific computation.
>

so that makes you at least 90 years old, Grandpa!

still using your slipstick ?

On 29.Jul.2021, Sergio wrote:

>>> Oh shit! You have never created a line in 3d before, right? lol. A
>>> line can be constructed between two points. There are infinite points
>>> on that line. WOW!!!!!!
>>> Here is some of my code in WebGL, it draw lines on a
>>> segment-by-segment basic using one of my vector fields:
>>
>> you are an uneducated pos, not knowing what you do.
>> You wore diapers the time I was doing physics for living, ie math
>> modeling and scientific computation.
>
> so that makes you at least 90 years old, Grandpa!
> still using your slipstick ?

Another one not knowing that PDEs, hence numerical analysis and modeling,
took off with the introduction of computers and programming, here from
1940s and so on. There was no proper math modeling in physics before
that. How would you know, that's Master and PhD stuff.

On 7/29/2021 11:24 AM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> I recommend a Pina Colada,

A big one with at least three shots of 151 rum in it. ;^)

> a parasol and a beach,
> and this booklet, could be quite refreshing:
>
> Basic Set Theory, Azriel Levy
> https://www.amazon.de/dp/0486420795
>
> The paperback is only around 20$
>
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2021 um 20:20:14 UTC+2:
>> Woa! I didn't think that dealing with Greek theory of ratio
>> can be that demanding that I can lead to burnout.
>>
>> John Gabriel you look like Zombie, take some vacation
>> from your own nonsense.
>>
>> LoL
>>
>> Eram semper recta schrieb am Montag, 26. Juli 2021 um 14:58:17 UTC+2:
>>> ... gibberish ...

On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 13:44:02 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 7/29/2021 3:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 20:26:09 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>> On 7/28/2021 5:19 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 15:55:26 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 7/28/2021 7:25 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 08:40:14 UTC-4, konyberg wrote:
> >>>>>>>> onsdag 28. juli 2021 kl. 12:28:25 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:55:06 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:52 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 16:51:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:45 PM, Walker Rodriguez-Larrinaga wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2021 1:22 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "There are no points on a line."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> travelled along a road.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A line is comprised of an infinite amount of points.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Spoken like a true idiot that you are.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How can you disagree with me?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Because you are a natural born idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>> There are an infinite number of points on a line.
> >>>>>>>>> No, moron. A line DOES NOT consist of points any more than a ROAD consists of road signs.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Get it idiot?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> A line's chief attribute is its length which is defined as the length of a given path between two points. There are innumerable paths between any two points and only one of these paths is the shortest path, ie, straight line.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A line has no specified length. It goes on forever in each direction.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No. A "straight line" can be extended indefinitely, but this does not mean "infinite". There is no such thing as an infinite line length - it's nonsense.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You are talking about line segments.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A line is always a FIXED length. There is no other kind of line.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Line segments are given between two points on the line.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No. A line segment is given between TWO points. These points are NOT on the line or even part of the line. Points have no size.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You can give a segment a length you choose. Why? Because there are more than two points to choose. There are an infinity of them!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You can choose any two points you like, but there will ALWAYS ONLY be EXACTLY ONE STRAIGHT LINE between those points.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> A line has infinitely many points on it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What part of "A line DOES NOT consist of points" do you not understand, you imbecile?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> A point is a location, it has no size.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is correct. Now ask yourself if it makes sense to say "A line is made up of locations".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No, idiot! Any line's chief attribute is its length which is calculated as a path between two points.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If a line is straight, then the distance formula gives us the shortest length between two points. Any line is a *DISTANCE*. Any line is defined by its length. You can't list the locations which act like road signs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You seem to be baffled by simple things. Strange! Just wow. Sad.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's sad that you are such a moron!
> >>>>>
> >>>> A line is made up of an infinite number of points, or locations if you
> >>>> will.
> >>>
> >>> NO. A line is not made up of anything. A line is a distance, you moron!
> >>>
> >>> How can a distance consist of locations? A distance is a magnitude whose measure may or may not be described by a number.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Have you ever heard of mile markers?
> >>
> >> https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-do-highways-have-mile-markers
> >>
> >
> > Fucking crank! DO YOU EVEN TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WRITE????? Or do you just enjoy being stupid?
> >
> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,

It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.

A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.

On 7/29/2021 4:38 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
[...]
>> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
>
> It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.
>
> A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.
>

It kind of sounds as if you never generated a line before... Humm...

There are an infinite number of points on a line. Why are you having
trouble understanding that?

On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 00:22:11 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/29/2021 4:38 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> [...]
> >> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
> >
> > It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.
> >
> > A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.
> >
> It kind of sounds as if you never generated a line before... Humm...

"Generate a line"???? My word, but you are a retard! Lines cannot be generated, you idiot!!!!

Lines represent ***********DISTANCES************.

What part of that do you not understand?

.. IS NOT A POINT!!!!!
________ IS NOT A LINE!!!!!!
o IS NOT A CIRCLE!!!!!!!

On 7/30/2021 4:38 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 00:22:11 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/29/2021 4:38 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
>>>
>>> It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.
>>>
>>> A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.
>>>
>> It kind of sounds as if you never generated a line before... Humm...
>
> "Generate a line"???? My word, but you are a retard! Lines cannot be generated, you idiot!!!!

A line can be generated on a segment-by-segment basis.

>
> Lines represent ***********DISTANCES************.
>
> What part of that do you not understand?
>
> . IS NOT A POINT!!!!!
> ________ IS NOT A LINE!!!!!!
> o IS NOT A CIRCLE!!!!!!!
>

On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 16:05:18 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/30/2021 4:38 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 00:22:11 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 7/29/2021 4:38 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>>> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
> >>>
> >>> It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.
> >>>
> >>> A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.
> >>>
> >> It kind of sounds as if you never generated a line before... Humm...
> >
> > "Generate a line"???? My word, but you are a retard! Lines cannot be generated, you idiot!!!!
> A line can be generated on a segment-by-segment basis.

Tsk, tsk. You're an idiot. What a waste of time....

<PLONK!>

> >
> > Lines represent ***********DISTANCES************.
> >
> > What part of that do you not understand?
> >
> > . IS NOT A POINT!!!!!
> > ________ IS NOT A LINE!!!!!!
> > o IS NOT A CIRCLE!!!!!!!
> >

On 7/30/2021 5:29 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 16:05:18 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/30/2021 4:38 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 00:22:11 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/29/2021 4:38 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.
>>>>>
>>>>> A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.
>>>>>
>>>> It kind of sounds as if you never generated a line before... Humm...
>>>
>>> "Generate a line"???? My word, but you are a retard! Lines cannot be generated, you idiot!!!!
>> A line can be generated on a segment-by-segment basis.
>
> Tsk, tsk. You're an idiot. What a waste of time....
>
> <PLONK!>
Okay. Cool!

https://youtu.be/GfvM5szPb4c

:^)

On 7/30/2021 5:29 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 16:05:18 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/30/2021 4:38 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Friday, 30 July 2021 at 00:22:11 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/29/2021 4:38 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 14:37:14 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/29/2021 10:57 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> The fact is that a line is comprised of an infinite number of locations,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not a fact of any kind, you incorrigible moron. It is your delusional belief. A line has no breadth, nor width, nor extent. Neither does a point. "Infinite number" is meaningless nonsense.
>>>>>
>>>>> A line does not consist of ANYTHING. <----- This is a FACT.
>>>>>
>>>> It kind of sounds as if you never generated a line before... Humm...
>>>
>>> "Generate a line"???? My word, but you are a retard! Lines cannot be generated, you idiot!!!!
>> A line can be generated on a segment-by-segment basis.
>
> Tsk, tsk. You're an idiot. What a waste of time....
>
> <PLONK!>
>
>>>
>>> Lines represent ***********DISTANCES************.
>>>
>>> What part of that do you not understand?
>>>
>>> . IS NOT A POINT!!!!!
>>> ________ IS NOT A LINE!!!!!!
>>> o IS NOT A CIRCLE!!!!!!!
>>>

I suppose you think this guy is a moron as well:

https://youtu.be/il_Qg9AqQkE

;^)

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>
> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>
> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>
> This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
>
> If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
>
> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.

Refreshing comment due to troll activity.

On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 01:20:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> What a convenient excuse!

It's fact. Excuse has nothing to do with it.

On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 08:01:43 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> måndag 2 augusti 2021 kl. 12:36:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 01:20:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> > > What a convenient excuse!
> > It's fact. Excuse has nothing to do with it.
> it is an excuse because you cannot find anyone that uses it

Rubbish. Your assertions are merely the same old lies you've been telling all along.

On 8/2/2021 6:35 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 08:01:43 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>> måndag 2 augusti 2021 kl. 12:36:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>> On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 01:20:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>>>> What a convenient excuse!
>>> It's fact. Excuse has nothing to do with it.
>> it is an excuse because you cannot find anyone that uses it
>
> Rubbish. Your assertions are merely the same old lies you've been telling all along.
>

I am wondering if you could use it in a Newton fractal to help find the
roots.

måndag 2 augusti 2021 kl. 15:35:31 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 08:01:43 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > måndag 2 augusti 2021 kl. 12:36:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 01:20:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> > > > What a convenient excuse!
> > > It's fact. Excuse has nothing to do with it.
> > it is an excuse because you cannot find anyone that uses it
> Rubbish. Your assertions are merely the same old lies you've been telling all along.

And you make empty assertions you cannot demonstrate and then make up excuses as to why not.

Find me a single mathematical article in a reputable mathematical journal that cites your stuff as a source, just one :)