On 7/29/2021 1:28 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/29/2021 11:24 AM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>> I recommend a Pina Colada,
>
> A big one with at least three shots of 151 rum in it. ;^)
[...]

https://youtu.be/kRJA2YrA6qI

LOL!

On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 at 01:03:20 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> måndag 2 augusti 2021 kl. 15:35:31 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 08:01:43 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > måndag 2 augusti 2021 kl. 12:36:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Monday, 2 August 2021 at 01:20:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
> > > > > What a convenient excuse!
> > > > It's fact. Excuse has nothing to do with it.
> > > it is an excuse because you cannot find anyone that uses it
> > Rubbish. Your assertions are merely the same old lies you've been telling all along.
> And you make empty assertions you cannot demonstrate and then make up excuses as to why not.

I've told you many times that LYING is a very bad habit. You need to quit it!

Everything I assert is TRUE. When you talk about failing to demonstrate, you're actually talking about yourself!

>
> Find me a single mathematical article in a reputable mathematical journal that cites your stuff as a source, just one :)

Many cite my work. There are entire web sites dedicated to my work, you stupid imbecile! I am quoted everywhere.

If I were not important, I would not be quoted so much. LMAO.

However, because I am in the process of dismantling mainstream bullshit mathematics, there are going to be far more negative quotes than positive. The number of positive impressions is increasing by the day. You can't defend your bullshit beliefs for too much longer.

Basic Set Theory is possibly too advanced for
bird brain John Garbageiel. This might not work
out as a relaxing vacantion book.

Here is my recommendation for John Gabriel
instead, it might give an old fashion introducion
to some basic concepts instead:

"Introductio in analysin infinitorum (Latin:[1] Introduction to the
Analysis of the Infinite) is a two-volume work by Leonhard Euler
which lays the foundations of mathematical analysis. Written in
Latin and published in 1748, the Introductio contains 18
chapters in the first part and 22 chapters in the second. It
has Eneström numbers E101 and E102."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introductio_in_analysin_infinitorum

Instead of a Pina Colada, I recommend a Virgin Pina Colada,
it is without alcohol, so there is no danger that the last single
brain cell of John Garbageiel gets swept away.

How To Make The Best Non-Alcoholic Pina Colada
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNm2XZjCH9g

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2021 um 20:24:19 UTC+2:
> I recommend a Pina Colada, a parasol and a beach,
> and this booklet, could be quite refreshing:
>
> Basic Set Theory, Azriel Levy
> https://www.amazon.de/dp/0486420795
>
> The paperback is only around 20$
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2021 um 20:20:14 UTC+2:
> > Woa! I didn't think that dealing with Greek theory of ratio
> > can be that demanding that I can lead to burnout.
> >
> > John Gabriel you look like Zombie, take some vacation
> > from your own nonsense.
> >
> > LoL
> >
> > Eram semper recta schrieb am Montag, 26. Juli 2021 um 14:58:17 UTC+2:
> > > ... gibberish ...

Ha Ha, Pina Colada **Mocktail**:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-nBa4Jczak

LoL

Like new calculoose, it is also a mockup of real calculus.

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 3. August 2021 um 17:18:44 UTC+2:
> Basic Set Theory is possibly too advanced for
> bird brain John Garbageiel. This might not work
> out as a relaxing vacantion book.
>
> Here is my recommendation for John Gabriel
> instead, it might give an old fashion introducion
> to some basic concepts instead:
>
> "Introductio in analysin infinitorum (Latin:[1] Introduction to the
> Analysis of the Infinite) is a two-volume work by Leonhard Euler
> which lays the foundations of mathematical analysis. Written in
> Latin and published in 1748, the Introductio contains 18
> chapters in the first part and 22 chapters in the second. It
> has Eneström numbers E101 and E102."
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introductio_in_analysin_infinitorum
>
> Instead of a Pina Colada, I recommend a Virgin Pina Colada,
> it is without alcohol, so there is no danger that the last single
> brain cell of John Garbageiel gets swept away.
>
> How To Make The Best Non-Alcoholic Pina Colada
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNm2XZjCH9g
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2021 um 20:24:19 UTC+2:
> > I recommend a Pina Colada, a parasol and a beach,
> > and this booklet, could be quite refreshing:
> >
> > Basic Set Theory, Azriel Levy
> > https://www.amazon.de/dp/0486420795
> >
> > The paperback is only around 20$
> > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2021 um 20:20:14 UTC+2:
> > > Woa! I didn't think that dealing with Greek theory of ratio
> > > can be that demanding that I can lead to burnout.
> > >
> > > John Gabriel you look like Zombie, take some vacation
> > > from your own nonsense.
> > >
> > > LoL
> > >
> > > Eram semper recta schrieb am Montag, 26. Juli 2021 um 14:58:17 UTC+2:
> > > > ... gibberish ...

On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 11:18:44 AM UTC-4, Swiss Crank Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse wrote:

You're just mad that I exposed your national math hero for the idiot that he was. :)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12oUJAfIMFMcXFb8DvgsYxuPfdaB99XYH

If you can't handle the truth, then you shouldn't be here!

On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 11:30:51 AM UTC-4, New Age Prophet (aka "I am Super Rectum," John Gabriel, Troll Boy) wrote:

>
> You're just mad that I exposed your national math hero for the idiot that he was. :)
>

Troll Boy here is mad because we continue to exposed his lies. (See my original posting in this thread.) What a moron!

Must be frustrating as hell for you, but your lies here will ALWAYS be met with the truth no matter how often you repeat them, Troll Boy.

Dan

On 8/3/2021 8:30 AM, New Age Prophet wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 11:18:44 AM UTC-4, Swiss Crank Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
> You're just mad that I exposed your national math hero for the idiot that he was. :)
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/12oUJAfIMFMcXFb8DvgsYxuPfdaB99XYH
>
> If you can't handle the truth, then you shouldn't be here!
>

Are you the new John?

On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 at 11:30:51 UTC-4, New Age Prophet wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 11:18:44 AM UTC-4, Swiss Crank Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
> You're just mad that I exposed your national math hero for the idiot that he was. :)
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/12oUJAfIMFMcXFb8DvgsYxuPfdaB99XYH
>
> If you can't handle the truth, then you shouldn't be here!

When the debate is lost, libel becomes the tool of the loser.

>I've told you many times that LYING is a very bad habit. You need to quit it!

I haven't lied, that is exactly what you do.

>Everything I assert is TRUE. When you talk about failing to demonstrate, you're actually talking about yourself!

You want it to be true, but that doesn't mean it is.

>Many cite my work. There are entire web sites dedicated to my work, you stupid imbecile! I am quoted everywhere

There are websites dedicated to flatearth theory, so fucking what?

>If I were not important, I would not be quoted so much. LMAO

You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals. So you are just like them.

On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:

<drivel>

> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.

LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.

A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.

****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****

YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.

On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> <drivel>
>
>> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
>
> LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.

Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
being very useful?

>
> A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
>
> ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
>
> YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
>

Peer reviewed toilet paper.

Chris M. Thomasson schrieb am Mittwoch, 4. August 2021 um 21:50:30 UTC+2:
> On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > <drivel>
> >
> >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> >
> > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> being very useful?
> >
> > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> >
> > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> >
> > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> >

On 8/4/2021 1:49 PM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> Peer reviewed toilet paper.

Oh, shit!

Fwiw, here is one of my algorithms that other people use:

https://vorbrodt.blog/2019/02/14/read-write-mutex/

>
> Chris M. Thomasson schrieb am Mittwoch, 4. August 2021 um 21:50:30 UTC+2:
>> On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> <drivel>
>>>
>>>> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
>>>
>>> LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
>> Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
>> being very useful?
>>>
>>> A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
>>>
>>> ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
>>>
>>> YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
>>>

On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > <drivel>
> >
> >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> >
> > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> being very useful?

What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?

99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.

> >
> > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> >
> > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> >
> > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> >

On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 17:16:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/4/2021 1:49 PM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > Peer reviewed toilet paper.
>
> Oh, shit!
>
> Fwiw, here is one of my algorithms that other people use:
>
> https://vorbrodt.blog/2019/02/14/read-write-mutex/

It's elementary. I am not at all impressed if that's what you were trying to do....

> >
> > Chris M. Thomasson schrieb am Mittwoch, 4. August 2021 um 21:50:30 UTC+2:
> >> On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> <drivel>
> >>>
> >>>> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> >>>
> >>> LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> >> Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> >> being very useful?
> >>>
> >>> A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> >>>
> >>> ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> >>>
> >>> YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> >>>

On 8/4/2021 3:33 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 17:16:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/4/2021 1:49 PM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>>> Peer reviewed toilet paper.
>>
>> Oh, shit!
>>
>> Fwiw, here is one of my algorithms that other people use:
>>
>> https://vorbrodt.blog/2019/02/14/read-write-mutex/
>
> It's elementary.

Please elaborate on that?

> I am not at all impressed if that's what you were trying to do....

My algorithm was not meant to impress you.

On 8/4/2021 3:32 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> <drivel>
>>>
>>>> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
>>>
>>> LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
>> Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
>> being very useful?
>
> What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?

Did I infer that in your mind? Stop projecting. I am asking:

Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
being very useful?

That's all.

>
> 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.

Pure sarcasm: Are you sure its not 99.999%? LOL!

>
>>>
>>> A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
>>>
>>> ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
>>>
>>> YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
>>>

On 8/4/2021 9:43 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/4/2021 3:33 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 17:16:39 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2021 1:49 PM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>>>> Peer reviewed toilet paper.
>>>
>>> Oh, shit!
>>>
>>> Fwiw, here is one of my algorithms that other people use:
>>>
>>> https://vorbrodt.blog/2019/02/14/read-write-mutex/
>>
>> It's elementary.
>
> Please elaborate on that?
>
>
>> I am not at all impressed if that's what you were trying to do....
>
> My algorithm was not meant to impress you.

I should of underscored the word _you_. ;^)

>LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.

Cite one article from a reputable journal that has cited you.

Again, on a random website, who gives a shit? Flatearthers are there too so you are no better than them.

>A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU.

Nope, they are cranks LIKE YOU! They reject mainstream just like you, are convinced just like you and behaves just like you.

>By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.

That is not it, as I have cited, but even fi we go by it....that is still you!

>YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.

That is an oxymoron.

If you agree with mainstream you are by definition not a crank.

torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > <drivel>
> > >
> > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > >
> > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > being very useful?
> What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
>
> 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > >
> > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > >
> > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > >
> > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > >

You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything. Doesn't fit you = bad.

On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:01:52 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <drivel>
> > > >
> > > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > > >
> > > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > > being very useful?
> > What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
> >
> > 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > > >
> > > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > >
> > > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > > >
> > > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > > >
> You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything.

How can a moron (YOU!) know the thoughts of a genius? You suffer from so much mental baggage, but your projectionitis is chronic!

torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 16:14:39 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:01:52 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > <drivel>
> > > > >
> > > > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > > > >
> > > > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > > > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > > > being very useful?
> > > What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
> > >
> > > 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > > > >
> > > > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > >
> > > > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > > > >
> > > > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > > > >
> > You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything.
> How can a moron (YOU!) know the thoughts of a genius? You suffer from so much mental baggage, but your projectionitis is chronic!

You are not a genius, you are a crank

On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 01:21:18 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 16:14:39 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:01:52 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <drivel>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > > > > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > > > > being very useful?
> > > > What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
> > > >
> > > > 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > > > > >
> > > > > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > > > > >
> > > You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything.
> > How can a moron (YOU!) know the thoughts of a genius? You suffer from so much mental baggage, but your projectionitis is chronic!
> You are not a genius, you are a crank

The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.

Isnt John Gabriel the one that cant even determine the truth value of 3=<4 ?

LoL

Eram semper recta schrieb am Freitag, 6. August 2021 um 15:06:09 UTC+2:
> On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 01:21:18 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 16:14:39 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:01:52 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > torsdag 5 augusti 2021 kl. 00:33:01 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:50:30 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/4/2021 4:56 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 01:18:44 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <drivel>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> You are less quoted than flatearthers and like them, you got nothing in reputable journals.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LIE. I am quoted and with the passing of time, more and more.
> > > > > > Is there some peer reviewed paper out there that cites your work as
> > > > > > being very useful?
> > > > > What makes you think that anything that is peer reviewed makes it useful?
> > > > >
> > > > > 99.99% of math Phd dissertations are useless.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A flatearther is a CRANK like YOU. By definition, the main attribute of a crank is that he cannot be convinced, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ****Not agreeing with the mainstream is not sufficient to be called a crank.****
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > YOU are a prime example of a mainstream CRANK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > You only think that because they don't agree with you which is the measuring stick you use for everything.
> > > How can a moron (YOU!) know the thoughts of a genius? You suffer from so much mental baggage, but your projectionitis is chronic!
> > You are not a genius, you are a crank
> The final resort of one who loses an argument is the tool of libel.

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 08:58:17 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> The New Calculus is being used by many mainstream academics even though they are too afraid to admit it.
>
> Here is what one had to say about using the auxiliary equation only possible in the New Calculus:
>
> "Haven't they accepted your calculus , how much fun is that I used your auxiliary equation of derivatives to publish some of my results in complex analytic continuation in Canada. May god give them sense , what a laugh out loud for them on one side they let me publish your results and on other side you are not getting attention."
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxfUn_iAM7U
>
> This is just one application but there are many I haven't shared. Another very useful application of the auxiliary equation is in image recognition. Nothing beats it.
>
> If you haven't learned the New Calculus yet, now is your chance. Download my free eBook here for an introduction:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
>
> The free eBook is a collection of several papers that I have written over many decades. However, it is only a small part of what I have not yet shared with the public.

Refreshed due to Jan Burse (aka Mostowski Collapse) trolling.