Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?

On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:45:04 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:

> Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?

Have you ever looked for them? They are easy to find...

https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5fb7b693ca6aaa8fd28d620bf0c31f52.webp

https://filmdaily.co/news/international-space-station-viewing/

https://www.pinterest.com/cottonscience/iss-photographed-from-earth/

https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/astrophotography-international-space-station-pic-in-front-of-moon-535437.html

Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:45:04 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
>
>> Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?
>
> Have you ever looked for them? They are easy to find...
>
> https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
>
> https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5fb7b693ca6aaa8fd28d620bf0c31f52.webp
>
> https://filmdaily.co/news/international-space-station-viewing/
>
> https://www.pinterest.com/cottonscience/iss-photographed-from-earth/
>
> https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/astrophotography-international-space-station-pic-in-front-of-moon-535437.html
>

I think the one thing that defines “carl eto” is his firm conviction that
Something is Going On.
That the Truth is being hidden.
That there are Secret Objectives, and nothing is Real.

Consider carefully how much time needs to be spent on the bat-shit-crazy
folks. Cranks are one thing. Out-and-out psychos are another.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

With the LICK you should be able to read the astronaut's name tag. How come the photos have such low resolution. Surely, you can find better photos, unless the ISS is fake. Did you see the movie Gravity?

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 12:34:55 PM UTC-5, carl eto wrote:
> With the LICK you should be able to read the astronaut's name tag. How come the photos have such low resolution. Surely, you can find better photos, unless the ISS is fake. Did you see the movie Gravity?

Spam reported.
I incite others to do the same.

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 9:51:23 AM UTC-8, rotchm wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 12:34:55 PM UTC-5, carl eto wrote:
> > With the LICK you should be able to read the astronaut's name tag. How come the photos have such low resolution. Surely, you can find better photos, unless the ISS is fake. Did you see the movie Gravity?
> Spam reported.
> I incite others to do the same.

I'm shaking in my shoes.....HA GHA HA HA HA HA HA HA....heheh he he he he who heoo

carl eto wrote:

> On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 9:51:23 AM UTC-8, rotchm wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 12:34:55 PM UTC-5, carl eto wrote:
>> > With the LICK you should be able to read the astronaut's name tag.
>> > How come the photos have such low resolution. Surely, you can find
>> > better photos, unless the ISS is fake. Did you see the movie Gravity?
>>
>> Spam reported. I incite others to do the same.
>
> I'm shaking in my shoes.....HA GHA HA HA HA HA HA HA....heheh he he he
> he who heoo

the guy is an imbecilic troll spamming nonsense. Stupid like hell in
anything else.

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 10:20:57 AM UTC-8, Oval Curd wrote:
> carl eto wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 9:51:23 AM UTC-8, rotchm wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 12:34:55 PM UTC-5, carl eto wrote:
> >> > With the LICK you should be able to read the astronaut's name tag.
> >> > How come the photos have such low resolution. Surely, you can find
> >> > better photos, unless the ISS is fake. Did you see the movie Gravity?
> >>
> >> Spam reported. I incite others to do the same.
> >
> > I'm shaking in my shoes.....HA GHA HA HA HA HA HA HA....heheh he he he
> > he who heoo
> the guy is an imbecilic troll spamming nonsense. Stupid like hell in
> anything else.

ha ha ha ha ha hoo eo eeeeeeeee yeeee

carl eto <carleto4157990662@gmail.com> wrote:
> With the LICK you should be able to read the astronaut's name tag. How
> come the photos have such low resolution. Surely, you can find better
> photos, unless the ISS is fake. Did you see the movie Gravity?
>

This may not occur to you, but the ISS is moving across the sky at a pretty
good clip. A full pass overhead takes about 5 minutes, horizon to horizon.

Large telescopes do not move this fast. They are built to track the motion
of stars in the sky due to the rotation of the earth, not to track
something in low-earth orbit.

To collect enough light to “read the astronaut’s name tag”, one of these
large telescopes would need to stay on target for several minutes at least.

As you can see, your idea is simply dead in the water technically.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

A satellite can resolve the license plate number of a car. So, an earth based 3,000 $ amateur telescope should be able to made to track the ISS and give a pretty good photo. Where is it ?

carl eto <carleto4157990662@gmail.com> wrote:
> A satellite can resolve the license plate number of a car. So, an earth
> based 3,000 $ amateur telescope should be able to made to track the ISS
> and give a pretty good photo. Where is it ?
>

The satellite camera that can read the license plate number on a car costs
40 million bucks. So if you look at amateur telescopes that cost 10,000
times less, then you’re going to get an image of accordingly lower quality.
There are lots of photos of the ISS of that lower quality. Lots and lots
and lots.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Here is a 1 million dollar watch

https://wristaficionado.com/products/richard-mille-rm-25-01-sylvester-stallone?variant=39325137731661&gclid=Cj0KCQiA8vSOBhCkARIsAGdp6RSCaTf978oCpPY5o7o93LfsmplfikfsUvHUDqRE20l32A-9-LeUlMcaAgMiEALw_wcB

yet this 13.99$ watch is just a accurate for most people.

https://www.amazon.com/Disney-Digital-Plastic-Casual-Watch/dp/B01I0A1CIA

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:27:24 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
> Here is a 1 million dollar watch
>
> https://wristaficionado.com/products/richard-mille-rm-25-01-sylvester-stallone?variant=39325137731661&gclid=Cj0KCQiA8vSOBhCkARIsAGdp6RSCaTf978oCpPY5o7o93LfsmplfikfsUvHUDqRE20l32A-9-LeUlMcaAgMiEALw_wcB
>
> yet this 13.99$ watch is just a accurate for most people.
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Disney-Digital-Plastic-Casual-Watch/dp/B01I0A1CI

The MM watch is also more arcuate.

On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 5:50:49 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:45:04 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
>
> > Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?
> Have you ever looked for them? They are easy to find...
>
> https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
>
> https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5fb7b693ca6aaa8fd28d620bf0c31f52.webp
>
> https://filmdaily.co/news/international-space-station-viewing/
>
> https://www.pinterest.com/cottonscience/iss-photographed-from-earth/
>
> https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/astrophotography-international-space-station-pic-in-front-of-moon-535437.html

On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 5:50:49 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:45:04 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
>
> > Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?
> Have you ever looked for them? They are easy to find...
>
> https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
>
> https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5fb7b693ca6aaa8fd28d620bf0c31f52.webp
>
> https://filmdaily.co/news/international-space-station-viewing/
>
> https://www.pinterest.com/cottonscience/iss-photographed-from-earth/
>
> https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/astrophotography-international-space-station-pic-in-front-of-moon-535437.html

There should be larger photos with better resolution taken from the earth by NASA. If the Apollo 11 is fake and the ISS is fake. Do you agree?

carl eto <carleto4157990662@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 5:50:49 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:45:04 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
>>
>>> Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?
>> Have you ever looked for them? They are easy to find...
>>
>> https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
>>
>>
>> https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5fb7b693ca6aaa8fd28d620bf0c31f52.webp
>>
>> https://filmdaily.co/news/international-space-station-viewing/
>>
>> https://www.pinterest.com/cottonscience/iss-photographed-from-earth/
>>
>> https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/astrophotography-international-space-station-pic-in-front-of-moon-535437.html
>
>
>
> There should be larger photos with better resolution taken from the earth by NASA.

I don’t think so. Why do you think so? I’ve already told you why large
ground telescopes don’t serve this purpose.

> If the Apollo 11 is fake and the ISS is fake. Do you agree?
>
>
>
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Celestron CGX-L 1400 EdgeHD 14" Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope

this telescope fitted with a tracking device should be able to give some pretty good images.

Where are NASA's images taken from the ground?

You should be able to see the ISS with the CGX---------has anyone seen It?

On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 10:47:49 AM UTC-8, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 5:50:49 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> >> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:45:04 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
> >>
> >>> Have you seen photos of the ISS taken from the earth?
> >> Have you ever looked for them? They are easy to find...
> >>
> >> https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/06/The_ISS_can_be_photographed_from_Earth_-_a_team_in_Munich_captured_this_detailed_image_on_12_June_2006
> >>
> >>
> >> https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5fb7b693ca6aaa8fd28d620bf0c31f52..webp
> >>
> >> https://filmdaily.co/news/international-space-station-viewing/
> >>
> >> https://www.pinterest.com/cottonscience/iss-photographed-from-earth/
> >>
> >> https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/astrophotography-international-space-station-pic-in-front-of-moon-535437.html
> >
> >
> >
> > There should be larger photos with better resolution taken from the earth by NASA.
> I don’t think so. Why do you think so? I’ve already told you why large
> ground telescopes don’t serve this purpose.
> > If the Apollo 11 is fake and the ISS is fake. Do you agree?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?

carl eto wrote:
....
> Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?

You're an lunatic idiot, give us a break...

https://www.google.com/search?q=amateur+iss+photos

On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> carl eto wrote:
> ...
> > Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?
> You're an lunatic idiot, give us a break...
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=amateur+iss+photos

Are any of these from NASA?

Idiot carl eto wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
>> carl eto wrote:
>> ...
>>> Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?
>> You're an lunatic idiot, give us a break...
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=amateur+iss+photos
>
>
> Are any of these from NASA?

They are not from NASA, you could have made them. You are an
psychopath.

On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 7:21:44 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> Idiot carl eto wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> >> carl eto wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?
> >> You're an lunatic idiot, give us a break...
> >>
> >> https://www.google.com/search?q=amateur+iss+photos
> >
> >
> > Are any of these from NASA?
> They are not from NASA, you could have made them. You are an
> psychopath.

But why not?

On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 7:21:44 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> Idiot carl eto wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> >> carl eto wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?
> >> You're an lunatic idiot, give us a break...
> >>
> >> https://www.google.com/search?q=amateur+iss+photos
> >
> >
> > Are any of these from NASA?
> They are not from NASA, you could have made them. You are an
> psychopath.

It is not physically possible to view the ISS from the earth.

On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 8:15:40 PM UTC-8, carl eto wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 7:21:44 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> > Idiot carl eto wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 6:45:14 PM UTC-8, Python wrote:
> > >> carl eto wrote:
> > >> ...
> > >>> Where are the NASA's photos of the ISS from the ground?
> > >> You're an lunatic idiot, give us a break...
> > >>
> > >> https://www.google.com/search?q=amateur+iss+photos
> > >
> > >
> > > Are any of these from NASA?
> > They are not from NASA, you could have made them. You are an
> > psychopath.
> It is not physically possible to view the ISS from the earth.

And yet millions of people see it every evening and morning... sometimes a couple of times a day... it can be one of the brightest objects in the sky...

And yet millions of people see it every evening and morning... sometimes a couple of times a day... it can be one of the brightest objects in the sky...

Show me a photo of the ISS taken in the day.