On Saturday, 2 April 2022 at 21:40:25 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since the result of Michelson's experiment was negative then what is the
> > purpose of Michelson-Morley experiment? To confirm a negative result is negative???
> >
> If you have a theory that demands there is gold six inches under your back
> yard, and another theory that says no gold, and you dig up your whole back
> yard and there’s a negative result, what do you learn?

Or if you have a theory that demands clocks to indicate
some time dilation idiocy, and you see TAI/UTC/GPS clocks
- all of them indicating t'=t - what do you learn?

Rutherford's exp

Rutherford's gold foil experiment is based on the conjecture that since alpha particles are reflected and propagate through a gold foil, atoms are composed mostly of empty space with a nucleus at the center of the atom where the alpha particles are reflected by the nucleus but Rutherford's experiment is based on Geiger-Marsden alpha particle source that alpha particles are propagating through the mica window of the glass tube alpha particle emitter but alpha particles that have a mass cannot propagate through the solid mica window. Massless gamma rays are transmitted through the mica window and forms Rutherford's effect since alpha particles that have a mass cannot propagate through the mica window or gold foil. Also, Rutherford does not explain how positively charged protons can exist within the nucleus or how negatively charged electrons, that produce forces, can exist within the atom.

Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Saturday, 2 April 2022 at 21:40:25 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Since the result of Michelson's experiment was negative then what is
> > > the purpose of Michelson-Morley experiment? To confirm a negative
> > > result is negative???
> > >
> > If you have a theory that demands there is gold six inches under your back
> > yard, and another theory that says no gold, and you dig up your whole back
> > yard and there's a negative result, what do you learn?
>
> Or if you have a theory that demands clocks to indicate
> some time dilation idiocy, and you see TAI/UTC/GPS clocks
> - all of them indicating t'=t - what do you learn?

That you don't undersytand what TAI is.
(but that is no news)

Please make your questions a bit more difficult,

Jan

On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 12:40:25 PM UTC-7, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since the result of Michelson's experiment was negative then what is the
> > purpose of Michelson-Morley experiment? To confirm a negative result is negative???
> >
> If you have a theory that demands there is gold six inches under your back
> yard, and another theory that says no gold, and you dig up your whole back
> yard and there’s a negative result, what do you learn?
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, table

No gold (ether).

This article will analyze a nuclear power plant. The fuel of a nuclear plant is uranium that is radioactive and extremely toxic. Uranium 238U is a silvery metal that is mined from the earth then the uranium ore is refined (hydrochloric acid) into pure uranium (yellow cake) that is melted into small cylindrical pellets (2 inch long and .25-inch diameter) that are inserted into a 12 ft hollow steel tube where 226 tubes filled with uranium pellets are stacked to form a 12 feet uranium rod (1,000 lb). In normal circumstances, after six years of use, the 200 uranium rods, undergoing fission, loss radioactivity which results in the decrease in the rate of fission. The uranium rods reduce (deplete) to an isotope of uranium 235U. The depleted (spent) used rods are replaced with new uranium rods 238U. These used uranium rods are still extremely dangerous since the used depleted uranium is an isotope of uranium that depleted uranium 235 has a half-life of 700 million years and can produce fission. The used (spent) fuel rods are stored in cooling pools (large swimming pools containing water) since the used rods can still produce fission but at a lower rate. The used rods are submerged in water to keep the rods cool. When the rods stored in a cooling pond are not cooled, the used fuel rods will produce fission chain reaction. The spent fuel uranium rods ponds will have to be maintained for 60,000 years since the depleted uranium is not in fact depleted but highly radioactive and will be as radioactive in 120,000 years as they are today, and, the deleted uranium can be used to make an atomic bomb. The overheated spent (depleted) fuel rods can produce a fission reaction and produce a nuclear explosion if hydrogen gas is trapped in the core.

There are an average of two reactors per nuclear power plant and 440 nuclear power plants in the world that store their used (spent) fuel rods in on site ponds which is an extremely precarious situation. If 40 reactors and their uranium rod pools were to meltdown and explode, all life on earth would terminate and never return. Nuclear power plant explosions are extremely dirty since a large amount of whole uranium is released as fallout. An atomic bomb contains 200 lb of uranium; whereas, a single 30 year old nuclear reactor power plant contains 1,000 tons of uranium. The combination of nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants plus the used uranium rod ponds is an extremely dire situation that can be minimized by encasing the rods in glass or cement and burying the rods in the desert. A nuclear reactor uses 200 uranium rods that are used for 6 years; therefore, a thirty-year-old nuclear plant with two reactors contains approximately 2,000 rods (1,000 tons) in pools which is five times the necessary uranium to run a nuclear plant. Tepco nuclear engineers built cooling pools next to the reactor core, near the top of the reactor core. When the reactor core exploded, the cooling pools filled with uranium rods became part of the Fukushima fallout and 100 ton corium fission-ball that melted through the core and cement base. The corium fission-ball (CFB) has stop at the granite bedrock but Tepco is flushing the CFB with water which becomes radioactive. Millions of gallons of radioactive water is being dump into the ocean every year. To stop the corium fission-ball, excavate around the CFB to eliminate the structural support around the corium fission-ball that is insulating the CFB. Opening up the support structure around the CFB will collapse the CFB and end the fission reaction. In addition,Tepco is improperly storing the contaminated soil since another tsunami could wash the contaminated soil into the ocean which would be catastrophic. The dose of 250 to 500 rad/yr (2.5 to 5 Sv/yr) would kill half the exposed population with radiation sickness. Fukushima city (45 miles from the nuclear power plant) produces 8 micro Sv/hr or 8 x 10-3 Sv/hr (24hr /day) (364 days/yr) = 70 Sv/yr = 7000 rad/yr.

Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 April 2022 at 21:40:25 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Since the result of Michelson's experiment was negative then what is the
>>> purpose of Michelson-Morley experiment? To confirm a negative result is negative???
>>>
>> If you have a theory that demands there is gold six inches under your back
>> yard, and another theory that says no gold, and you dig up your whole back
>> yard and there’s a negative result, what do you learn?
>
> Or if you have a theory that demands clocks to indicate
> some time dilation idiocy,

Not sure what you mean “demands to indicate”.
If you are saying relativity forbids clock designers from adjusting rate,
then you’re an idiot.

> and you see TAI/UTC/GPS clocks
> - all of them indicating t'=t - what do you learn?
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

The box normalized Bohr's atomic matter wave is depicted with Schrodinger's wave equation (equ 81) that box normalization eliminates the nucleus and replaces the effects of the nucleus with a hypothetical box; consequently, Schrodinger's derivation ends with the box normalization. The derivation of the equations of the atomic orbitals using Schrodinger's normalized wave function is outlandish.

On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 3:34:51 PM UTC-7, carl eto wrote:

Bohr represents a multiple proton nuclear atom (Bohr2, Part 2) but positively charged protons contained within the infinitesimal volume of the nucleus positively charged protons produce a repulsion force which would prevent the existence of protons within a nucleus. Neutrons are used to neutralize the protons' charges to allow positively charged protons to exist within the atomic nucleus but neutralizing the protons' charges would also eliminate the proton-electron force that forms the Bohr atom; consequently, in Bohr's multi-proton atom, only a single nuclear proton charge (+1) is attracting each of the orbiting electrons. The nuclear strong force (gravitational force) is used to bond the protons within the nucleus but the nuclear strong force is based on Newton's gravity equation (equ 23) but masses do not attract. Small pebbles are not adhering to the granite sides of Matterhorn mountain. Newton's gravity equation that represents the attractive force of the planets to the Sun is being used to describe the proton structure of a nucleus. Also, Bohr does not explain how a multiple proton atom can form a neutral change. Example, a 19 proton potassium atom contains 19 positively charged protons, within the nucleus, that changes are neutralized by neutrons yet a potassium atom's 19 electrons would form a -19 charge yet a potassium atom has a neutral change. Neutrons are used to allow the positively charged protons to exist within the nucleus but the neutrons eliminate the protons’ positive changes that form a neutral charged atom. Plus, Bohr does not explain how negatively charged electrons, that produce a repulsive force, can exist within the atom (d = 10-10 m).

On Saturday, 2 April 2022 at 23:54:49 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak <maluw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, 2 April 2022 at 21:40:25 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> carl eto <carleto4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Since the result of Michelson's experiment was negative then what is the
> >>> purpose of Michelson-Morley experiment? To confirm a negative result is negative???
> >>>
> >> If you have a theory that demands there is gold six inches under your back
> >> yard, and another theory that says no gold, and you dig up your whole back
> >> yard and there’s a negative result, what do you learn?
> >
> > Or if you have a theory that demands clocks to indicate
> > some time dilation idiocy,
> Not sure what you mean “demands to indicate”.
> If you are saying relativity forbids clock designers from adjusting rate,

Sure it does, poor halfbrain. That's why refuting
common sense was necessary in your moronic
religion, and your fellow cultists insist such clocks
are broken, improper or they are not clocks at all.

It is also envisioned that there are a large volume of buried data on the effect of LD radiation that have not been disclosed to the world among research, which is because positive data are publishable but negative ones are not even well-planned and precise as the research is (particularly with animal experiments).

The Effect of Low-Dose Internal Exposure of Multigeneration Chronic Oral Intake of 137Cs in Mice Offspring

Hiroo Nakajima

Low-Dose Radiation Effects on Animals and Ecosystems pp 221–235Cite as

2019

In 1992, when the first effects of the Chernobyl accident on the prevalence of thyroid cancer in children were reported, they were met with skepticism by the radiological community. Some of this skepticism was undoubtedly scientific (“iodine-131 has a low carcinogenic potential”), though some was not…It is a cautionary tale of how scientific instinct can mislead: help could have been provided more quickly had it not been for this debate.

https://apjjf.org/2014/12/49/Piers-Williamson/4232.html

What surprised Yamashita was the SPEEDI simulation maps that the national government disclosed on March 23, 2011. At that time, the standard for taking potassium iodide pills was when the equivalent dose at thyroid was expected to reach 100 mSv. In the simulation maps, the areas where the equivalent dose would exceed 100 mSv extended far outside the 30-kilometer radius from the plant.72]

Thats 100 mSv/hr...........wow

“The first case of thyroid cancer was reported on 12 September 2012 after 80,000 children had been tested.2 Since then, the numbers have risen steadily. As of writing, 56 have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer, 1 with a benign tumor, and a further 47 are suspected of having the cancer. This brings the probable total to 103 out of 296,026 eligible residents examined.3 Thus far, nearly all initially ‘suspected’ cancers have later been confirmed as malignant. The ‘normal’ cancer incidence rate amongst minors is one to two in a million.” (Williamson, Intro).

“The position of FMU (deputy director of Fukushima Medical University), as voiced by its two most prominent representatives, Professors Yamashita Shunichi (MD) and Suzuki Shinichi (MD), is that connection to radiation exposure is highly unlikely.” (Williamson, Intro).

I would say that your plan is not working.

SOFI TUKKER - Kakee (Official Video) [Ultra Records]

https://tubitv.com/movies/657051/the-adjustment-bureau?start=true&utm_source=google-feed&tracking=google-feed 43MIMU

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 2:49:55 PM UTC-7, thor stoneman wrote:
> https://tubitv.com/movies/657051/the-adjustment-bureau?start=true&utm_source=google-feed&tracking=google-feed 43MIMU
Roses are Red,
Violets are Blue.
Sugar is sweet,
And so are you.
…But the roses are wilting,
The violets are dead.
The sugar bowl's empty,
And so is your head.

what is the meaning of SR?

You only care about yourself that's why this is happening.

The preprint gives two methods for
estimating the amount of nuclear fuel: according to 137Cs balance, which gave more than 90 tonnes of uranium, and the
magnesium content, which gave a lower limit of uranium in the lavalike mass of 60 tonnes.
The total amount of fuel according to the uranium most likely ranges from 70 to 150 tonnes

Articles
Published: April 1995
How much nuclear fuel is present in the lavalike fuel-containing mass in the fourth power-generating unit of the chernobyl nuclear power plant?
A. N. Kiselev
Atomic Energy volume 78, pages252–255 (1995)Cite this article

47 Accesses

1 Citations

359 Altmetric

Metricsdetails

Download to read the full article text

Literature cited
A. N. Kiselev, A. Yu. Nenaglyadov, A. I. Surin, and K. P. Checherov, "Experimental investigations of the lavalike fuel-containing masses in the fourth power-generating unit of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (according to the results of investigations in 1986–1991)," Preprint IAE-5533/3 (1992).

E. B. Anderson, S. A. Bogatov, A. A. Borovoi, et al., "Lavalike fuel-containing masses of the object cover," Preprint 93-17 (1993).

The photo of the Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl) are fake.

Because the fuel rods have been cooling for more than 20 years already, it is not a situation like the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster or even like the original Chernobyl meltdown nearly 36 years ago, several nuclear energy experts told The Associated Press.

The International Atomic Energy Agency also said it “sees no critical impact on safety” at the plant, which was the site of the world's worst nuclear accident in April 19

Buttocks ....................The 200 tons of spent fuel that has a half-life of 700 million year may have melted down since they lost power and didn't know what the fuck to do.

Nuclear power is cheap --- so is life.

Chernobyl's nuclear fuel is smoldering again and there's a 'possibility' of another accident, scientists say
Joshua Zitser May 16, 2021, 8:40 AM

Nuclear reactions are smoldering again in uranium fuel masses deep inside an unreachable basement room of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, LiveScience reported.

It's probably too late. To bad. Sob.

Five meltdowns and a new one in Chernobyl and retards for physicists. Like wiping your ass with a banana when you get on your first date with Taylor Swift and using garlic as a mouth wash. Well I had a long and good life. We will do OK until the end. Get free food and rent. A dog and a cat and a nice garden. Maybe a fat maid to do the cooking. I could just close my eyes. Like everyone else does. Even Greenpeace and Democracy Now are being paid by the Nuclear companies not to look to hard since everything was right there and they did not say anything for all this time.