On 3/27/24 5:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu1sak$31de4$1@dont-email.me>,
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>> White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre became agitated during an
>> interview on Monday and hung up the phone after she was asked a couple of
>> fair questions about President Joe Biden.
>>
>> KJP lost her cool during an interview with Charlotte's WBT News Director Mark
>> Garrison during a live radio interview after Garrison asked her about Biden's
>> mental fitness for office and the high costs of everyday products.
>>
>> "When I told a number of people that I was talking to you today, it was
>> interesting, though, they all said, 'Would you please just ask her, does the
>> president have dementia?' So before I move on from that, does he?" Garrison
>> asked.
>>
>> "That Mark, Mark, I can't even believe you're asking me this question. That
>> is a credibly offensive question to ask," she fired back.
>>
>> "But you know people ask it," Garrison responded.
>
> And why do they ask it? Because every week brings another example of him
> being half-dead. We can see it with our eyes and no amount of
> gaslighting from Biden's diversity-hire spokeshole will convince us
> otherwise.
>
>> Wait. Oh let me-- no, no, no, no, no. You-- Mark, you, you, you, you, you're
>> taking us down this rabbit hole. Let me, let me, let me be very clear about
>> this," KJP responded. "For the past several years, the president's physician
>> has laid out very, in a comprehensive way, the president's health," she said.
>
> But every time he takes a physical, she's asked if he also took a mental
> acuity test and she says no, because he doesn't need it.
>
> So bringing up his physicals is a way of dodging the question. It
> doesn't matter how good his heart is if his brain is Swiss cheese. And
> the real reason they don't want him to take a mental acuity test is
> because if he does, that becomes part of the official records and is
> FOIA-able and the last thing they want is an official document making
> the rounds that says he has the mind of a 5-year-old.
>
>> "This is a president-- if you watch him every day, if you really pay
>> attention to his record and what he has done, you will see exactly how
>> focused he's been on the American people
>
> No, it means someone else in the White House-- probably his wife and
> chief of staff-- have been focused while he sits in the corner slurping
> pudding and watching the birds outside on the lawn.
>
>> And so I'm not even going to truly, truly, really, you know, take, take
>> the premise of your question. I think it is incredibly insulting. And and
>> so we can, you know, we can move on to the next question."
>>
>> Garrison then mentioned the high costs of groceries and gas and asked how
>> does Biden win votes when people are struggling to make ends meet.
>>
>> "Look, the president understands. He grew up in a middle-class family,
>> working class family in Scranton, Pennsylvania. He gets it," she claimed.
>> "He understands how difficult it is for Americans who are sitting around
>> their kitchen table every month trying to figure out what they're going to
>> pay for. You have to remember, when the president walked into this
>> administration, there were multiple crises happening. There was COVID, there
>> was, the economy was in a tailspin because of the last administration,
>> because of what President Trump left us with."
>>
>> "Now you're asking me about gas prices," she continued. "The president took
>> action on gas prices. Let's not forget Russia's invasion on Ukraine
>> skyrocketed prices of gas. And because the president took action, we see we
>> are in a different place than we were a year ago in gas prices. Eggs, milk,
>> seafood products, all the important groceries, those costs have gone down
>> because of what this president has been able to do.
>
> More gaslighting and outright lying. I was at the grocery store last
> night and bought both eggs and milk. The prices have most certainly NOT
> gone down. They were more expensive than ever. I bought six items, not
> even enough to fill one paper bag, and the bill was north of $50.
>
>> And with that, thank you so much, Mark. Have an amazing, amazing day."
>>
>> KJP then abruptly hung up the phone as the line went to a dial tone.
>
> This is what this woman does all the time. If you ask her any question
> that forces her to tell bald-face lies to cover for her boss, she just
> bails.
>
>> "Wow!" Garrison responded. "Wow!"

Did anyone tell you what went on when you were in that coma for 4 years?
I'm afraid you have an unpleasant surprise coming...

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

The Biden administration�s Department of the Interior (DOI) is set to
celebrate �transgender day of visibility� with a screening of a documentary
about LGBT inclusion in marine biology, an internal email obtained by The
Daily Wire reveals.

The department, tasked with the management and conservation of federal land,
announced that it would host a screening of �Diving for Rays: A Queer
Conservationist�s Story� in an employee digest email sent on March 26th that
was obtained exclusively by The Daily Wire

�Transgender Day of Visibility is an internationally recognized event that is
celebrated annually on March 31st to help raise awareness and increase
understanding of the challenges, importance and struggles of our transgender,
non-binary and gender non-conforming communities,� the email reads. �The
Department will mark this important occasion by showing a short documentary
called �Diving for Rays: A Queer Conservationist�s Story.�

The documentary that Interior is screening in celebration of transgenderism
details the experiences of Nicole Morris, a native of San Diego, California
who complains that the field of marine biology is saturated with straight
men.

�After realizing the lack of LGBTQ+ visibility in marine science led her to
abandon her childhood dream, Nicole Morris decided to re-route her life path
to try and become a marine biologist, to conserve endangered rays,� a
description of the film, posted to the National Park Service website reads.

�All I was ever exposed to were documentaries that had the perspectives of
straight men,� Morris bemoans in the documentary. �As I got older it became
harder and harder to imagine myself in those films,� she says before later
adding, �So I had to ask myself �was marine science something that a queer
woman could do?��

The film screening comes as President Joe Biden has directed the entire
federal bureaucracy to push leftist gender ideology and the diversity,
equity, and inclusion (DEI) agenda. Biden most recently reaffirmed his
commitment to far-left dogmas by declaring Easter Sunday as �Transgender Day
of Visibility,� a move that was widely condemned by his critics.

On Transgender Day of Visibility, we celebrate the joy, strength, and
absolute courage of some of the bravest people I know.

Today, we show millions of transgender and nonbinary Americans that
we see them, they belong, and they should be treated with dignity
and respect. pic.twitter.com/mhixHV9KC2

� Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) March 31, 2024

The film details Morris� journey to becoming a marine conservationist, with
her learning how to scuba dive before later being accepted into a graduate
school program.

�I think getting scuba certified helped me to finally see myself for the
first time. That helped me to see myself as both a marine conservationist and
as a queer woman,� she says at one point in the 22-minute long documentary.
�I like to think that even though I might be different from most marine
conservationists, my perspective as a queer woman in science is just as
important.�

�I am fully out and I am fully proud and I am a queer marine
conservationist,� Morris says at the end of the film.

An Interior spokesman told The Daily Wire that the screening is not
mandatory, though he did not answer questions pertaining to the cost of the
screening.

�Following the documentary, there will be a question-and-answer session with
the filmmaker, Nova, West, and a panel of representatives from multiple
LGBTQIA+ Employee Resource Groups from the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Bureau of Land
Management, and the National Park Service,� the email also states.

The email suggests that the screening was organized by Tristian Edgarian, who
leads Interior�s LGBTQ Employee Resource Group along with James Mosley. The
film screening comes as the wider federal bureaucracy has embraced far-left
views on both gender and race, institutionalizing ideology into their
practices and initiatives.

Even the intelligence community has pushed far-left dogmas under the Biden
administration. A recent Daily Wire investigation revealed that the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence sent out a DEI newsletter to the entire
intelligence community, including the FBI, CIA, and DOJ, instructing agents
to avoid using �problematic phrases� when discussing Islamic terrorism. The
same DEI document also featured an article from an anonymous intelligence
official who claimed that crossdressing makes him a �better intelligence
officer.�

DEI trainings have become commonplace throughout the federal bureaucracy,
with the Internal Revenue Service hosting a mandatory training for criminal
investigators that pulled material from a radical transgender academic who
called for the �death of whiteness� in an article titled �Dead Honky.�

Trump has signaled that he will take steps to gut the administrative state if
he is reelected, using tools like Schedule F, an executive order, to strip
civil service employment protections from bureaucrats who have influence over
the policy-making process.

�We will pass critical reforms making every executive branch employee
fireable by the president of the United States,� Trump said at a rally,
touting the plan. �The deep state must be brought to heel.�

--
Let's go Brandon!

On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:50:31 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:

>“After realizing the lack of LGBTQ+ visibility in marine science led her to
>abandon her childhood dream, Nicole Morris decided to re-route her life path
>to try and become a marine biologist, to conserve endangered rays,” a
>description of the film, posted to the National Park Service website reads.
>
>“All I was ever exposed to were documentaries that had the perspectives of
>straight men,” Morris bemoans in the documentary. “As I got older it became
>harder and harder to imagine myself in those films,” she says before later
>adding, “So I had to ask myself ‘was marine science something that a queer
>woman could do?’”

Which to me is ridiculous.

Scientifically the value of her work is how it's evaluated by her
profefssional peers, not her gender identity.

While I appreciate the sciences used to be an all-male domain that was
then this is now and hasn't been the case for a very long time.

So my response to the question in the last line of your quote is "of
course you can - go for it!"

On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:12:36 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:50:31 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
>wrote:
>
>>“After realizing the lack of LGBTQ+ visibility in marine science led her to
>>abandon her childhood dream, Nicole Morris decided to re-route her life path
>>to try and become a marine biologist, to conserve endangered rays,” a
>>description of the film, posted to the National Park Service website reads.
>>
>>“All I was ever exposed to were documentaries that had the perspectives of
>>straight men,” Morris bemoans in the documentary. “As I got older it became
>>harder and harder to imagine myself in those films,” she says before later
>>adding, “So I had to ask myself ‘was marine science something that a queer
>>woman could do?’”
>
>Which to me is ridiculous.

Yeah, I never understood why people feel the need to have someone to
look up to in that field that they want to enter. I never considered a
career because of who was in it. Only if I was interested in doing
that for a lifetime and could I earn a living. I didn't know anyone in
my first choice of a field (Chemical Engineering) and still can't name
anyone in it.

Now the career I did choose had a fair number of women in it (at least
at the schools I went to) from the beginning. So clearly women didn't
feel that they had to know some female computer science person before
entering the field.

>Scientifically the value of her work is how it's evaluated by her
>profefssional peers, not her gender identity.

That's true, but I will acknowledge that depending on where you are
you can run into sexism that could work against her. Not everywhere,
by any means, but the stories are out there.
>
>While I appreciate the sciences used to be an all-male domain that was
>then this is now and hasn't been the case for a very long time.
>
>So my response to the question in the last line of your quote is "of
>course you can - go for it!"