On 9/19/2021 3:08 PM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 9:32 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>
>>> oty alvey.
>>
>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special
>> kind of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is or
>> how much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just *has*
>> to have the last word.
>>
>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in
>> very good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>>
>
> "You're wasting your time here Keith. I'm one of those special kind of
> retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless I am, or how much
> of a total fucking moron I make of myself, I just *have* to have the
> last word. It's part of my attention whore personality disorder, and
> I'm in very good company sharing it with my FLC mates.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, yer an *honest* stupid cunt stinky. (just for the moment), in fact
you can join max, alvira and co. in the idiot creche....Shoo!. HAhahaha...

> "
>
> fixed it for you.
>

--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea. Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." — Gene
Spafford, 1992

On 19/09/2021 4:37 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 15:08:19 +1000, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>> On 19/09/2021 9:32 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>>
>>>> oty alvey.
>>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special
>>> kind of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is or
>>> how much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just *has*
>>> to have the last word.
>>>
>>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in
>>> very good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>>>
>> "You're wasting your time here Keith. I'm one of those special kind of
>> retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless I am, or how much
>> of a total fucking moron I make of myself, I just *have* to have the
>> last word. It's part of my attention whore personality disorder, and I'm
>> in very good company sharing it with my FLC mates. "
>>
>> fixed it for you.
> You'll need several shitloads more than that to fix what's wrong with Der
> Der...
>
>

at least I fixed what he said  :)

> alvey

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 19/09/2021 5:05 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 19/9/21 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>
>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>
>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking
>> a stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>
>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>
>> But you didn't do that.
>>
>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
>
> Still a valid question Darren. The word *car* was mentioned, the topic
> was *car* and this is a *car* related newsgroup.

lol! poor old noddy..

>
> The nuclear sub topic is the one that doesn't belong here. That might
> be better served over at aus.politics or similar given the political
> stoush those subs are stirring up. Hey, you even added your 1 cent's
> worth of uninformed bullshit.

yes

>
>> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
>> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
>> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
>> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
>> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
>> then there is something wrong with you.
>>
>> And one more thing.
>>
>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>> Usenet fix
>
> You don't post in other groups because your bullshit would see you
> hammered.
>
>> just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered with
>> anything else, but if I understand other people correctly you are
>> quite well known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid
>> questions which suggests to me that you are either remarkably
>> retarded or a fucking troll or possibly a combination of both.
>
> You are gazing into that mirror again Darren.
>>
>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you
>> a free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is
>> an unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions
>> as you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>> ridicule. This
>
> Don't forget - lies and bullshit from you.
>
>> group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of meat then the
>> door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you bring it on
>> yourself.
>>
>> Like you did in this post.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 19/09/2021 5:38 pm, jonz wrote:
> On 9/19/2021 3:08 PM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 9:32 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>>
>>>> oty alvey.
>>>
>>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special
>>> kind of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is or
>>> how much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just *has*
>>> to have the last word.
>>>
>>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in
>>> very good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>>>
>>
>> "You're wasting your time here Keith. I'm one of those special kind of
>> retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless I am, or how much
>> of a total fucking moron I make of myself, I just *have* to have the
>> last word. It's part of my attention whore personality disorder, and
>> I'm in very good company sharing it with my FLC mates.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Well, yer an *honest* stupid cunt stinky. (just for the moment), in fact
> you can join max, alvira and co. in the idiot creche....Shoo!. HAhahaha...

for a 70+ year old man, it has the brain of a 9 year old :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 19/09/2021 5:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 3:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>>
>>
>> an idiot in noddy's world is anyone who doesn't worship the ground he
>> walks on
>>
>>
> Are you Maxes brother?

They appear to share a brain cell between them.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 19/9/21 7:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 5:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 3:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> an idiot in noddy's world is anyone who doesn't worship the ground he
>>> walks on
>>>
>>>
>> Are you Maxes brother?
>
> They appear to share a brain cell between them.
>
>
>
You would have to have one to share one. Sadly lacking.

--

Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 19/09/2021 2:36 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:32:16 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>
>>> oty alvey.
>>
>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special kind
>> of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is or how
>> much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just *has* to have
>> the last word.
>>
>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in very
>> good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>
> Speaking of "good company"... You know that you've *really* been a flop
> when the groups resident cowardly fraud starts being your 'friend'.
>
>
> alvey
>
>
>

You're never really a narcissistic sociopaths friend. You're either
someone he needs and uses or someone not serving his needs and he abuses.

On 19/09/2021 3:05 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 4:33 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:10:52 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 19:23:37 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 18/09/2021 5:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 17:10:14 +1000, Max wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 2:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 12:00 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 11:52 am, jonz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2021 10:03 AM, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 5:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 5:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 4:36 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as the original poster goes if he's not actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trolling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the sake of it he should be able to determine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *himself* if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his lifestyle justifies the cost of owning a car. If he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then he should probably consider taking a bus, as no one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can do it for him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yearh well he probably is trolling as usual, but if he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as stupid as the level of his questions suggest, then he is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably unemployable and on benefits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agreed. I don't know of the guy other than what little crap he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts around here, but from what I *have* seen he's either
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remarkably stupid or 11 years old.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the same in several other NGs. In one he said that he
>>>>>>>>>>>> is doing
>>>>>>>>>>>> a uni computer course, the question that he asked would have
>>>>>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>>>> him laughed out of an introductory class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I got a uni computer degree a while back.  This is a new
>>>>>>>>>>> course I am
>>>>>>>>>>> doing and the last subject I did I got 93%.  Far from being
>>>>>>>>>>> laughed
>>>>>>>>>>> out of the class, I was helping others to do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now who looks stupid?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You!. (still) Judging by the Q's you have asked in usenet now
>>>>>>>>>> and in
>>>>>>>>>> the past.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>         You`re a dickhead troll, plain and simple.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't care about the opinion of someone who would use the word
>>>>>>>>> "dickhead".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's a question for you, with your degree in computer science
>>>>>>>> (Honours
>>>>>>>> or participation trophy?), what job do you have in the IT world?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am a programmer, but what is that got to do with the thread and
>>>>>>> what I
>>>>>>> said?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lol!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well that's put Keefy in a tizz. Does he choose A Really Lame
>>>>>> Response? Or
>>>>>> his traditional, preferred Runawayyyyy?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does alvey put in his usual irrelevant bon mot, a real little Oscar
>>>>> Wilde he thinks he is.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oty Keefy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oty alvey.
>>>>
>>>> So you've gone with that sub-section of 'Really Lame', Ye Olde
>>>> Cliche then
>>>> keith. Couldn't you have found a better use of the couple of hours
>>>> it took
>>>> you to come up with it?
>>>>
>>>> And if you want to attempt to be the judge of "irrelevant" then you
>>>> should
>>>> try explaining your wholly "irrelevant" question about the OPs job.
>>>>
>>>> oty keefy
>>>
>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>
>>> oty alvey.
>>
>> No probs "handsome"!
>>
>> For one thing, you'd didn't respond to the challenge of showing the nexus
>> between 'relevant' and your questioning of his job in IT world.
>
> It wasn't worth responding to (hint: just because you say so doesn't
> make it so)
>
>> For a second thing... Jaysus keefy! After a jibe at you for being a
>> cliche
>> flogger what do you come back with? Another bloody cliche!
>
> I bow to you as the NGs champion cliche flogger I know that I can never
> rise to your heights.
>
>> oty "hero".
>
> oty yuppy scum
>
>> alvey
>> Thinking how appropriate it is that keef works on things that don't
>> fly...
>
> And what do you work on little alvey - your wit?
>
He doesn't need to, he's already got you well and truly covered.

On 19/09/2021 8:22 am, Max wrote:
> On 18/09/2021 6:52 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 18/09/2021 12:00 pm, Max wrote:
>>> On 18/09/2021 11:52 am, jonz wrote:
>>
>>>>> Now who looks stupid?
>>>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> You!. (still) Judging by the Q's you have asked in usenet now and in
>>>> the past.
>>>>
>>>>      You`re a dickhead troll, plain and simple.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't care about the opinion of someone who would use the word
>>> "dickhead".
>>
>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>
>
> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go on
> holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that make me
> an "idiot" ?
>

No. Noddy sees himself as the resident authority here. Only he decides
if your posts are worthy.

He's quite deluded.

On 19/09/2021 7:24 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 5:38 pm, jonz wrote:
>> On 9/19/2021 3:08 PM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 9:32 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really
>>>>> are you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>>>
>>>>> oty alvey.
>>>>
>>>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special
>>>> kind of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is
>>>> or how much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just
>>>> *has* to have the last word.
>>>>
>>>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in
>>>> very good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> "You're wasting your time here Keith. I'm one of those special kind
>>> of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless I am, or how
>>> much of a total fucking moron I make of myself, I just *have* to
>>> have the last word. It's part of my attention whore personality
>>> disorder, and I'm in very good company sharing it with my FLC mates.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Well, yer an *honest* stupid cunt stinky. (just for the moment), in
>> fact you can join max, alvira and co. in the idiot creche....Shoo!.
>> HAhahaha...
>
> for a 70+ year old man, it has the brain of a 9 year old :)
>
>

it's just fun and games. life in these times is too serious. political
correctness, and other bs, has destroyed the fun, spontaneity, and
innocence of daily life.

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 19/09/2021 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 2:36 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:32:16 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>>
>>>> oty alvey.
>>>
>>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special kind
>>> of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is or how
>>> much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just *has* to
>>> have
>>> the last word.
>>>
>>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in very
>>> good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>>
>> Speaking of "good company"... You know that you've *really* been a flop
>> when the groups resident cowardly fraud starts being your 'friend'.
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
>
> You're never really a narcissistic sociopaths friend. You're either
> someone he needs and uses or someone not serving his needs and he abuses.

you do have a way with words..

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 20:07:45 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 19/09/2021 2:36 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:32:16 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/09/2021 9:10 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>>
>>>> oty alvey.
>>>
>>> You're wasting your time here Keith. Alvey is one of those special kind
>>> of retards where it doesn't matter how utterly clueless he is or how
>>> much of a total fucking moron he makes of himself, he just *has* to have
>>> the last word.
>>>
>>> It's part of his attention whore personality disorder, and he's in very
>>> good company sharing it with his FLC mates :)
>>
>> Speaking of "good company"... You know that you've *really* been a flop
>> when the groups resident cowardly fraud starts being your 'friend'.
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
>
> You're never really a narcissistic sociopaths friend. You're either
> someone he needs and uses or someone not serving his needs and he abuses.

Crikey! That sounds like an old pre-electric Dylan song! What a pity that
good lyrics are no longer used in 'music'. Cooda been a hit.

alvey
"But you're gonna have to serve somebody, yes
Indeed you're gonna have to serve somebody
Well, it may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you're gonna have to serve somebody"

Bob Dylan, 'Gotta Serve Somebody'.

On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:05:29 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 19/09/2021 4:33 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:10:52 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/09/2021 7:17 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 19:23:37 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 18/09/2021 5:37 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 17:10:14 +1000, Max wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 2:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 12:00 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 11:52 am, jonz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2021 10:03 AM, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 5:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 5:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 4:36 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as the original poster goes if he's not actually trolling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the sake of it he should be able to determine *himself* if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his lifestyle justifies the cost of owning a car. If he can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then he should probably consider taking a bus, as no one else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can do it for him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yearh well he probably is trolling as usual, but if he really is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as stupid as the level of his questions suggest, then he is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably unemployable and on benefits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agreed. I don't know of the guy other than what little crap he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts around here, but from what I *have* seen he's either
>>>>>>>>>>>>> remarkably stupid or 11 years old.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the same in several other NGs. In one he said that he is doing
>>>>>>>>>>>> a uni computer course, the question that he asked would have got
>>>>>>>>>>>> him laughed out of an introductory class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I got a uni computer degree a while back.  This is a new course I am
>>>>>>>>>>> doing and the last subject I did I got 93%.  Far from being laughed
>>>>>>>>>>> out of the class, I was helping others to do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now who looks stupid?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You!. (still) Judging by the Q's you have asked in usenet now and in
>>>>>>>>>> the past.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      You`re a dickhead troll, plain and simple.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't care about the opinion of someone who would use the word
>>>>>>>>> "dickhead".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's a question for you, with your degree in computer science (Honours
>>>>>>>> or participation trophy?), what job do you have in the IT world?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am a programmer, but what is that got to do with the thread and what I
>>>>>>> said?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lol!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well that's put Keefy in a tizz. Does he choose A Really Lame Response? Or
>>>>>> his traditional, preferred Runawayyyyy?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does alvey put in his usual irrelevant bon mot, a real little Oscar
>>>>> Wilde he thinks he is.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oty Keefy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oty alvey.
>>>>
>>>> So you've gone with that sub-section of 'Really Lame', Ye Olde Cliche then
>>>> keith. Couldn't you have found a better use of the couple of hours it took
>>>> you to come up with it?
>>>>
>>>> And if you want to attempt to be the judge of "irrelevant" then you should
>>>> try explaining your wholly "irrelevant" question about the OPs job.
>>>>
>>>> oty keefy
>>>
>>> Like I've said before, if you were twice as smart as you really are
>>> you'd only be half as smart as you think you are.
>>>
>>> oty alvey.
>>
>> No probs "handsome"!
>>
>> For one thing, you'd didn't respond to the challenge of showing the nexus
>> between 'relevant' and your questioning of his job in IT world.
>
> It wasn't worth responding to

Ahhh. The Most Popular reason for a Runaway gets a gallop.

> (hint: just because you say so doesn't make it so)

Ummm. This makes no sense. It was the OP questioning your relevance, not
me.
>
>> For a second thing... Jaysus keefy! After a jibe at you for being a cliche
>> flogger what do you come back with? Another bloody cliche!
>
> I bow to you as the NGs champion cliche flogger I know that I can never
> rise to your heights.

Another cliche!
You really are crap at this.
>> oty "hero".
>
> oty yuppy scum
>
>> alvey
>> Thinking how appropriate it is that keef works on things that don't fly...
>
> And what do you work on little alvey - your wit?

I'd certainly consider it if I knew how to.
Obviously no point in asking you about that subject is there...

alvey

On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:15:24 +1000, Noddy wrote:

> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>
>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>
>>
>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go on
>> holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that make me
>> an "idiot" ?
>
> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking a
> stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>
> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of different
> models on your short list, and you came in here asking people what they
> thought of each one that would be a *very* valid question to which I'm
> sure you would get *many* responses. Some helpful, and some not which is
> exactly how Usenet works.
>
> But you didn't do that.
>
> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.

What an idiot.
Look Der Der, if you want a decent analogy for "nonsensical", try this one.

"That's as nonsensical as saying that car prices have gone up over the
decades".

There you go.

snip sialorrhea

alvey

On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>
>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>
>>
>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go on
>> holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that make me
>> an "idiot" ?
>
> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking a
> stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>
> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of different
> models on your short list, and you came in here asking people what they
> thought of each one that would be a *very* valid question to which I'm
> sure you would get *many* responses. Some helpful, and some not which is
> exactly how Usenet works.
>
> But you didn't do that.
>
> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
> then there is something wrong with you.
>
> And one more thing.
>
> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around here.
> I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a Usenet fix
> just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered with anything
> else, but if I understand other people correctly you are quite well
> known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid questions which
> suggests to me that you are either remarkably retarded or a fucking
> troll or possibly a combination of both.
>
> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you a
> free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is an
> unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions as you
> like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and ridicule. This
> group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of meat then the
> door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you bring it on
> yourself.
>
> Like you did in this post.
>

You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup. That means I can troll,
irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do about
it. Capische?

In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup? You seem to be so
derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
like a deep delusion you have.

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:58:59 +1000, Max wrote:

> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>
>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go on
>>> holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that make me
>>> an "idiot" ?
>>
>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking a
>> stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>
>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of different
>> models on your short list, and you came in here asking people what they
>> thought of each one that would be a *very* valid question to which I'm
>> sure you would get *many* responses. Some helpful, and some not which is
>> exactly how Usenet works.
>>
>> But you didn't do that.
>>
>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
>> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
>> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
>> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
>> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
>> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
>> then there is something wrong with you.
>>
>> And one more thing.
>>
>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around here.
>> I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a Usenet fix
>> just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered with anything
>> else, but if I understand other people correctly you are quite well
>> known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid questions which
>> suggests to me that you are either remarkably retarded or a fucking
>> troll or possibly a combination of both.
>>
>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you a
>> free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is an
>> unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions as you
>> like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and ridicule. This
>> group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of meat then the
>> door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you bring it on
>> yourself.
>>
>> Like you did in this post.
>>
>
> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup. That means I can troll,
> irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do about
> it. Capische?

Squish up lads. Looks like The Fraudsters fabulous (snigger) killfail is
about to get another occupant. This is a good result for Max too, it'll
improve the quality of his help.

>
> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup? You seem to be so
> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
> like a deep delusion you have.

Quick Der Der! Plonk him. He's on to you! Run awayyyyyyyyyy.

alvey

On 20/9/21 8:58 am, Max wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>
>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>
>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking a
>> stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>
>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>
>> But you didn't do that.
>>
>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
>> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
>> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
>> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
>> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
>> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
>> then there is something wrong with you.
>>
>> And one more thing.
>>
>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>> Usenet fix just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered
>> with anything else, but if I understand other people correctly you are
>> quite well known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid
>> questions which suggests to me that you are either remarkably retarded
>> or a fucking troll or possibly a combination of both.
>>
>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you a
>> free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is an
>> unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions as
>> you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>> ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of
>> meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you
>> bring it on yourself.
>>
>> Like you did in this post.
>>
>
> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can troll,
> irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do about
> it.

You can and also anyone can tell you that you are a dickhead, capische.

  Capische?
>
> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?

Who said he is?

You seem to be so
> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
> like a deep delusion you have.
>
Yep, 100% troll, fuck off.

--
Daryl

On 20/09/2021 8:58 am, Max wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>
>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>
>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking
>> a stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>
>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>
>> But you didn't do that.
>>
>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
>> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
>> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
>> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
>> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
>> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
>> then there is something wrong with you.
>>
>> And one more thing.
>>
>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>> Usenet fix just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered
>> with anything else, but if I understand other people correctly you
>> are quite well known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid
>> questions which suggests to me that you are either remarkably
>> retarded or a fucking troll or possibly a combination of both.
>>
>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you
>> a free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is
>> an unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions
>> as you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>> ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of
>> meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you
>> bring it on yourself.
>>
>> Like you did in this post.
>>
>
> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can troll,
> irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do
> about it.  Capische?
>
> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?  You seem to be so
> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
> like a deep delusion you have.
>

it *is* a delusion he has! (among others)

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 20/09/2021 9:37 am, Daryl wrote:
> On 20/9/21 8:58 am, Max wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>>
>>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking
>>> a stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>>
>>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>>
>>> But you didn't do that.
>>>
>>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
>>> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
>>> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
>>> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
>>> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
>>> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
>>> then there is something wrong with you.
>>>
>>> And one more thing.
>>>
>>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>>> Usenet fix just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered
>>> with anything else, but if I understand other people correctly you
>>> are quite well known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid
>>> questions which suggests to me that you are either remarkably
>>> retarded or a fucking troll or possibly a combination of both.
>>>
>>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you
>>> a free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is
>>> an unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions
>>> as you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>>> ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of
>>> meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you
>>> bring it on yourself.
>>>
>>> Like you did in this post.
>>>
>>
>> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can troll,
>> irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do
>> about it.
>
> You can and also anyone can tell you that you are a dickhead, capische.
>

When did I say anyone couldn't?

>   Capische?
>>
>> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?
>
> Who said he is?
>
>  You seem to be so
>> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
>> like a deep delusion you have.
>>
> Yep, 100% troll, fuck off.
>

On 20/09/2021 9:37 am, Daryl wrote:
> On 20/9/21 8:58 am, Max wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>>
>>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking
>>> a stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>>
>>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>>
>>> But you didn't do that.
>>>
>>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about
>>> as utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or
>>> underpants. *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can
>>> tell you how affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect,
>>> one of those "general life" situations where no question needs to be
>>> asked because the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you
>>> can't see that then there is something wrong with you.
>>>
>>> And one more thing.
>>>
>>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>>> Usenet fix just from the shit that goes on around here to be
>>> bothered with anything else, but if I understand other people
>>> correctly you are quite well known in other groups for asking
>>> ridiculously stupid questions which suggests to me that you are
>>> either remarkably retarded or a fucking troll or possibly a
>>> combination of both.
>>>
>>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you
>>> a free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is
>>> an unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions
>>> as you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>>> ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup
>>> of meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when
>>> you bring it on yourself.
>>>
>>> Like you did in this post.
>>>
>>
>> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can
>> troll, irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you
>> can do about it.  Capische?
>
> You can and also anyone can tell you that you are a dickhead, capische.
>
>>
>> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?
>
> Who said he is?

the evidence stemming from his behaviour here strongly suggests it's a
long held assumption of the fraudster's, and one that has no correlation
with reality

(snip irrelevance)

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 20/09/2021 9:46 am, Max wrote:
> On 20/09/2021 9:37 am, Daryl wrote:
>> On 20/9/21 8:58 am, Max wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then
>>>>>> insert whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out
>>>>>> for themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to
>>>>> go on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would
>>>>> that make me an "idiot" ?
>>>>
>>>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and
>>>> asking a stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>>>
>>>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>>>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>>>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>>>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>>>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>>>
>>>> But you didn't do that.
>>>>
>>>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about
>>>> as utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or
>>>> underpants. *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can
>>>> tell you how affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect,
>>>> one of those "general life" situations where no question needs to
>>>> be asked because the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if
>>>> you can't see that then there is something wrong with you.
>>>>
>>>> And one more thing.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>>>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>>>> Usenet fix just from the shit that goes on around here to be
>>>> bothered with anything else, but if I understand other people
>>>> correctly you are quite well known in other groups for asking
>>>> ridiculously stupid questions which suggests to me that you are
>>>> either remarkably retarded or a fucking troll or possibly a
>>>> combination of both.
>>>>
>>>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give
>>>> you a free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here.
>>>> This is an unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid
>>>> questions as you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is
>>>> shit and ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not
>>>> your cup of meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't
>>>> whinge when you bring it on yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Like you did in this post.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can
>>> troll, irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you
>>> can do about it.
>>
>> You can and also anyone can tell you that you are a dickhead, capische.
>>
>
> When did I say anyone couldn't?
>
>
>>    Capische?
>>>
>>> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?
>>
>> Who said he is?
>>
>>   You seem to be so
>>> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king
>>> seems like a deep delusion you have.
>>>
>> Yep, 100% troll, fuck off.
>>
>
>

alvey.. who is (or are you) taking odds on how long before the fraudster
plonks max, and joins the better half of this ng in the infamous <or
insert appropriate adjective> killfail?

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 20/09/2021 9:46 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/09/2021 8:58 am, Max wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 10:22 am, Max wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Okay, you're a *fuckwit* then. Don't like that either? Then insert
>>>>> whatever adjective you like, but anyone who can't work out for
>>>>> themselves whether or not they should own a car is an *idiot*.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So no one can ask for advice ever?  If I want to know whether to go
>>>> on holiday to Italy or Spain, can I ask for advice, or would that
>>>> make me an "idiot" ?
>>>
>>> There is a world of difference between asking for advice, and asking
>>> a stupid question which is *exactly* what you did.
>>>
>>> Had you been thinking of buying a new car and had a number of
>>> different models on your short list, and you came in here asking
>>> people what they thought of each one that would be a *very* valid
>>> question to which I'm sure you would get *many* responses. Some
>>> helpful, and some not which is exactly how Usenet works.
>>>
>>> But you didn't do that.
>>>
>>> What you did was ask "Is it worth me having a car?" which is about as
>>> utterly nonsensical as asking if you should wear socks or underpants.
>>> *No one* can answer that for you, because *no one" can tell you how
>>> affected your life would be by it. It is, in effect, one of those
>>> "general life" situations where no question needs to be asked because
>>> the only person who can answer it is *you*, and if you can't see that
>>> then there is something wrong with you.
>>>
>>> And one more thing.
>>>
>>> I don't know you other than as a relatively recent blow in around
>>> here. I don't post in other groups as I get more than enough of a
>>> Usenet fix just from the shit that goes on around here to be bothered
>>> with anything else, but if I understand other people correctly you
>>> are quite well known in other groups for asking ridiculously stupid
>>> questions which suggests to me that you are either remarkably
>>> retarded or a fucking troll or possibly a combination of both.
>>>
>>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you
>>> a free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is
>>> an unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions
>>> as you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>>> ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of
>>> meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you
>>> bring it on yourself.
>>>
>>> Like you did in this post.
>>>
>>
>> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can troll,
>> irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do
>> about it.  Capische?
>>
>> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?  You seem to be so
>> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
>> like a deep delusion you have.
>>
>
> it *is* a delusion he has! (among others)
>

Noddy is the Phil Allison of aus.cars

On 20/09/2021 8:58 am, Max wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 12:15 pm, Noddy wrote:

>> If that's how you like to roll then kudo's to you, but I'll give you a
>> free tip right here and now: That shit *won't* work here. This is an
>> unmoderated forum and you're free to ask as many stupid questions as
>> you like, but if you do *all* you'll get in reply is shit and
>> ridicule. This group is *famous* for it, so if that's not your cup of
>> meat then the door's over there ---> Otherwise don't whinge when you
>> bring it on yourself.
>>
>> Like you did in this post.
>>
>
> You're right, it is an unmoderated newsgroup.  That means I can troll,
> irritate and post whatever I want, and there is nothing you can do about
> it.  Capische?

That's exactly where you're wrong. There *is* something I can do about
it, and that's to treat you with the contempt you deserve and there's
nothing you can do about *that*.

Do you get any of that, or is it too complicated for you?

> In any case, what makes you king of this newsgroup?  You seem to be so
> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
> like a deep delusion you have.

I knew trying to give you a "heads up" would be a waste of time :)

Just to clue you in, I'm not king of anything and I don't make the
rules. I'm just a regular and I'm telling you how the group rolls. If
you wish to make a fucking pest of yourself then go for gold, but it
won't take long for you to find that you'll be spending most of your
time talking to yourself if that's how you want to be.

Your call, dickhead.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:02:33 +1000, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>
>
> alvey.. who is (or are you) taking odds on how long before the fraudster
> plonks max, and joins the better half of this ng in the infamous <or
> insert appropriate adjective> killfail?

Had you kept this private then I would have said, "Within 10 posts is 1/2".
But now that The Fraud has read it, all bets are off.

alvey

On 20/09/2021 9:37 am, Daryl wrote:
> On 20/9/21 8:58 am, Max wrote:

>  You seem to be so
>> derided here by others that any idea you have of being the king seems
>> like a deep delusion you have.
>>
> Yep, 100% troll, fuck off.

Yep. Just *another* attention seeking dickhead with nothing better to
do. Perhaps he should go knock on the FLC's door, as I suspect it's
always open to new members like this fuckwit.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.