On 29/11/2021 7:46 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 12:12 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> you're sick in the head and need help
>
> And, as predicted, you wiped what would show you to be the simple sad
> old suck, lickspittle and dumb cunt you are, and *did exactly as I said
> you would: you ran away rather than answer*, to hide behind others
> skirts... as usual.
>
> What a spineless loser you are, Fetid.  "Grow some nuts" You?
> Hahahahahahaha  So predictable...
>
> Dont forget to remind everyone how intelligent you are again, after
> being shown to be an absolute dullard, Spazpecker. That is funny.:-D

I thought, like me, you were in his Killfile? If that's the case why
does the retard keep talking to you?

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 30/11/2021 9:51 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 7:46 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 29/11/2021 12:12 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> you're sick in the head and need help
>>
>> And, as predicted, you wiped what would show you to be the simple sad
>> old suck, lickspittle and dumb cunt you are, and *did exactly as I
>> said you would: you ran away rather than answer*, to hide behind
>> others skirts... as usual.
>>
>> What a spineless loser you are, Fetid.  "Grow some nuts" You?
>> Hahahahahahaha  So predictable...
>>
>> Dont forget to remind everyone how intelligent you are again, after
>> being shown to be an absolute dullard, Spazpecker. That is funny.:-D
>
> I thought, like me, you were in his Killfile? If that's the case why
> does the retard keep talking to you?
>
>
>
>

He's making it too easy now...

On 29/11/2021 8:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> I'll give you another chance to show the planes "without wings" (AS
>> YOU SAID) landing safely...   here's what *you* snipped, you sad old
>> spineless flog:
>>
>> "Show me where I'm wrong. Show me the P-47 missing a WHOLE wing. Show
>> me the F-15 crashing because it was missing a major part of it's wing.
>> Show me the original video you posted is real. Go, on Felix, in front
>> of everyone, show me where I'm wrong, and your right.
>>
>> Bet you'll attempt to take the intellectual high ground, but with
>> *nothing* to back up your shit.  You'll run away with your fingers in
>> your ears going nah nah nah, hurling abuse over your shoulder as you
>> usually do.
>>
>> Grow some nuts, and show me where I'm wrong, and your right.
>>
>> Show me."
>>
>> Waiting....

Still nothing....Sorry Fetid, I was going to let this slide, because
you obviously dont handle facts, truth and usenet too well, but fuckk
it, it's Felix.!!! The Banner Bearer for the FLC!!! :-D

>>
>>> you're sick in the head and need help
>>
>> And, as predicted, you wiped what would show you to be the simple sad
>> old suck, lickspittle and dumb cunt you are, and *did exactly as I
>> said you would: you ran away rather than answer*, to hide behind
>> others skirts... as usual.
>>
>> What a spineless loser you are, Fetid.  "Grow some nuts" You?
>> Hahahahahahaha  So predictable...
>>
>> Dont forget to remind everyone how intelligent you are again, after
>> being shown to be an absolute dullard, Spazpecker. That is funny.:-D
>>
>>
>>
>
> I have already explained it to you, but u are such a brainless idiot
> it's not getting thru.

No, you haven't. But I can spell better than you, Fetid. You've snipped
the lot, sauntered off claiming your intelligence is greater than Deep
Thought, and done the pigeon strut.

Here, let's try again, for the intellectually handicapped amongst us
(thats you, Felix, you fucking senile flog..)

> let me spell it out for you then.. you are a
> crass disgusting asshole who I have no wish or desire to know or talk
> to, which is why i ignore you,

Yet here you are, Spazpecker the Dull! .... Who created the post titled
"for linsey", you silly old flog? Just another Fetid fail. "which is
why i ignore you" ... You're not really showing yourself in a good
light, Fetid... :-D

> but since it seems I must reply... there
> is no 'right' or 'wrong' u fuckin moron.

So there's no left or right either? No port or starboard? No wing or
part thereof? No lift, or crash?

You don't get to make the rules, Fetid. YOU claimed planes can fly with
one wing. The examples you provided show planes with damaged wings still
flying. A big difference. You know what wings are for, right, Einstein?

> I posted a video of a plane flying with no wing.

*FFS*, *tell the truth!* if you can.!!!. You posted a video of a radio
controlled *model plane*. A toy, if you will. A fake video. A video,
which has a video of it's making. You fell for it. Sucker.

> I don't recall what I said about it, if anything,
> but it was shown by u and or others to be fake, and I accepted that.

Right *AFTER* you were told it was a fake. But it seems you didn't
accept it, Fetid, otherwise you wouldn't have made your post, titled
"for linsey", a few days ago. You posted a link to a utube vid of a P-47
with wing *damage*, (less than half gone - 1250mm), not fucking
"MISSING", you fucking stupid dickhead. Why, if not to attempt to
alleviate your hilarious whoopsie of a toy plane landing with a missing
wing... Then you admitted to the same thing with the F-15 video, except
the F-15's wing WASNT completely gone, has more thrust than weight, more
thrust than a newer F/A-18, and has large stabilizators to supply lift..
Whoops! :-D

> so I don't know what the fuck you are on about.

Felix, you don't know what the fuck YOU'RE on about. :-D It's a common
trait with the FLC.... Perhaps if you read, rather than snip....

> I have never tried to claim it was real, u dumb ass cunt!

Ohh, you "crass disgusting asshole"...! Bwahahahahahahahaa

Really? You sure about that? "I don't recall what I said about it, if
anything.." You don't recall, but you never tried to claim it was real?
:-D Another face-plant. :-D

> so now that you've dragged me into your
> sewer u must be happy,

I dragged you nowhere, Fetid. You created this thread,not me. You want
to poke, (linsey)? I'm happy to poke back. It's already been established
that you arent the sharpest knife in the drawer...

> and you've got a reply in language that makes
> sense to you, so now fuck off! EOD.

EOD for you, shitlips. You don't get to make the rules, Spazpecker. As
you like to bray, you make the claim, you get to back it up, right? You
started this thread, at least allow me the finish 1t :-)

So here you go :->>>>> Show me a *real* plane with it's *complete* wing
missing/removed, and capable of flight until it touches down on a
runway. Not a tot/RC model. Not a P-47 with some wing damage. Not an
F-15 D Eagle with massive wing damage but more thrust and
stabilazators... Anything!!!

And no, the toy video thats been modified, that you thought was real,
doesn't count. A real plane, Fetid. Not a toy. Not Lego. Away you go...

OTY.

On 29/11/2021 7:10 am, alvey wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:25:59 +1100, lindsay wrote:

>> I dont have a problem, felix. You just like to make out i have to stop
>> me laughing at my mindless stupidity.
>
> lol! What's that adage? Something like, "Truth will out."

Too slow, old man.... was dealt with earlier....

>>> is that everything has to be explained to you,
>>
>> Did you look at the F-a5 video, and LISTEN you fucking dumb cunt? I've
>> been doing the explaining, you've been doing the denying.

Did you notice your little acolyte didn't answer, and ran away? Of
course you did, but you just ignored your "little mate" running away...

Softcocks. Softcocks everywhere..

> But to balance your "explaining", you've been doing heavyweight denial
> about your little mate being a gigantic fraud.

Really? For "balance", when did you want me to ask *your* little mate
about his lies, bullshit and hypocrisy, hypocrite? SOZ. I'm too busy
laughing at your enablers., and with enablers like Felix and Tomas, you
need as much help as you can get. Maybe ask him which plane, besides the
toy, has landed with only one wing. Or your other spineless syphlitic
mate about his other "manifold lies" like his theft of others info like
the DNA, and his mindless hypocrisy. But you wont. And we *all* know
why. :-)

> snip trivial

Well, there's a surprise.. maybe not.
>
>
>
> alvey
>

On 30/11/2021 6:52 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:46:47 +1100, lindsay wrote:
>
>>
>> And, as predicted, you wiped what would show you to be the simple sad
>> old suck, lickspittle and dumb cunt you are, and *did exactly as I said
>> you would: you ran away rather than answer*, to hide behind others
>> skirts... as usual.
>>
>> What a spineless loser you are, Fetid. "Grow some nuts" You?
>> Hahahahahahaha So predictable...
>>
>> Dont forget to remind everyone how intelligent you are again, after
>> being shown to be an absolute dullard, Spazpecker. That is funny.:-D
>
> Imagine if felix had committed Fraudsters 'crimes'.

Imagine if YOU had, Alveyflog. If proven, you'd have to neck yourself.

We could always go back to the toaster and the bath..

> It wouldn't just be
> Loonsey's head that'd explode, it'd be all of him. And he'd flatten most of
> the State with the blast...

Devastating. What wit/shit. Bwahahahahahahahahhaa well done, garfish.

> alvey
> Marvelling at his being critical of a 'runaway'. Uh, hello. The FLC have a
> monopoly on killfail heroes champ.

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha "And there's *another own goal* by "Geriatrics
are us"...

OWN GOAL by the loudmouth!!!

"lol! What's that adage, dickhead? Something like, "Truth will out."
Alvey, 29/11/21 Bwahahahahahahaha. Mouth running away before the brain
kicks into gear :-D

Yes , you're correct !!!!. Spot on, Alveyflog. The FLC do have a
monopoly, *chump*.!!!!! You only need to look at Alvey's Acolytes...
Fetid Felix with his hokey-pokey killfile, that mutates faster than the
coronavirus; you know, half ignore, full ignore, in, out, and turn it
all about.... :-D

And your other suckhole enabler, Tomas Clasener, with his "supremely
gutless killfile" that you advised him to create. Bwahahahahahaha What a
team. :-D Own goal/gold! :-D

Nothing quite like the hypocrisy of Alvey... It's just *gold*.
Especially when he denies it... :-D As usual.

>

On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:44:29 +1100, lindsay wrote:

> On 29/11/2021 7:10 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:25:59 +1100, lindsay wrote:
>
>>> I dont have a problem, felix. You just like to make out i have to stop
>>> me laughing at my mindless stupidity.
>>
>> lol! What's that adage? Something like, "Truth will out."
>
> Too slow, old man.... was dealt with earlier....

No it wasn't old fella. A telling cock-up in usenet remains a telling
cock-up regardless of any subsequent weaselling. Perhaps you should
restrict your failing self to one of those sites that allow editing of your
posts for 30 minutes after posting?

>>>> is that everything has to be explained to you,
>>>
>>> Did you look at the F-a5 video, and LISTEN you fucking dumb cunt? I've
>>> been doing the explaining, you've been doing the denying.
>
> Did you notice your little acolyte didn't answer, and ran away? Of
> course you did, but you just ignored your "little mate" running away...
>
> Softcocks. Softcocks everywhere..

lol!
If "running away" equates to softcockery then The Fraudster and Deryl must
be the limpest dicks in town. And by some margin.
>> But to balance your "explaining", you've been doing heavyweight denial
>> about your little mate being a gigantic fraud.
>
> Really? For "balance", when did you want me to ask *your* little mate
> about his lies, bullshit and hypocrisy, hypocrite?

Eh? Why would I need to do that? You trot out your pissy list so frequently
that most know those major 'crimes' off by heart.

> SOZ. I'm too busy
> laughing at your enablers., and with enablers like Felix and Tomas, you
> need as much help as you can get. Maybe ask him which plane, besides the
> toy, has landed with only one wing. Or your other spineless syphlitic
> mate about his other "manifold lies" like his theft of others info like
> the DNA, and his mindless hypocrisy. But you wont. And we *all* know
> why. :-)

Nope. Despite being told "why" nearly as many times as The Fraudster has
lied, you clearly don't want to believe the truth, preferring to mindlessly
chant your barely coherent nonsense.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:55:30 +1100, lindsay wrote:

> On 30/11/2021 6:52 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:46:47 +1100, lindsay wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And, as predicted, you wiped what would show you to be the simple sad
>>> old suck, lickspittle and dumb cunt you are, and *did exactly as I said
>>> you would: you ran away rather than answer*, to hide behind others
>>> skirts... as usual.
>>>
>>> What a spineless loser you are, Fetid. "Grow some nuts" You?
>>> Hahahahahahaha So predictable...
>>>
>>> Dont forget to remind everyone how intelligent you are again, after
>>> being shown to be an absolute dullard, Spazpecker. That is funny.:-D
>>
>> Imagine if felix had committed Fraudsters 'crimes'.
>
> Imagine if YOU had, Alveyflog. If proven, you'd have to neck yourself.

So you're saying that the Fraudster should top himself. That's extreme. A
simple, permanent exit from the group would suffice.
>
> We could always go back to the toaster and the bath..

So far this is more like you've been going back to the Bundy and the Coke.
Frequently.
>
>> It wouldn't just be
>> Loonsey's head that'd explode, it'd be all of him. And he'd flatten most of
>> the State with the blast...
>
> Devastating. What wit/shit. Bwahahahahahahahahhaa well done, garfish.
>
>> alvey
>> Marvelling at his being critical of a 'runaway'. Uh, hello. The FLC have a
>> monopoly on killfail heroes champ.
>
> Bwahahahahahahahahahaha "And there's *another own goal* by "Geriatrics
> are us"...
>
> OWN GOAL by the loudmouth!!!
>
> "lol! What's that adage, dickhead? Something like, "Truth will out."
> Alvey, 29/11/21 Bwahahahahahahaha. Mouth running away before the brain
> kicks into gear :-D
>
> Yes , you're correct !!!!. Spot on, Alveyflog. The FLC do have a
> monopoly, *chump*.!!!!! You only need to look at Alvey's Acolytes...
> Fetid Felix with his hokey-pokey killfile, that mutates faster than the
> coronavirus; you know, half ignore, full ignore, in, out, and turn it
> all about.... :-D
>
> And your other suckhole enabler, Tomas Clasener, with his "supremely
> gutless killfile" that you advised him to create. Bwahahahahahaha What a
> team. :-D Own goal/gold! :-D
>
> Nothing quite like the hypocrisy of Alvey... It's just *gold*.
> Especially when he denies it... :-D As usual.

There's two options to explain the above mess.
1. You're blind drunk.
2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:

<snip>

> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>
>

Ouch. That's a bit harsh.

On 29/11/2021 12:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 12:17 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 28/11/2021 11:56 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 28/11/21 11:21 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ROTFL :)
>>>>
>>>> The "truck" video was enough to show anyone that this bloke is about
>>>> as clueless as you can possibly get. He posted that video here
>>>> thinking it was real, and he's the *only* person who ever did :)
>>>>
>>>> As I've said he's *so* fucking stupid he wouldn't know if his own
>>>> head was on fire, but he's also remarkably gutless, as he was too
>>>> pissweak to disconnect the booster hose on his 10 year old "new"
>>>> Lancer and see how wrong his clueless mentor Clasener was about
>>>> brake systems.
>>>
>>> You are the one showing you don't understand brake systems Darren.
>>> Clueless Darren the liar. Yeah, that's about right.
>>>
>>> *I* previously posted proof that drum brakes have inbuilt boosting
>>> arrangements through a concept known as *shoe factor*. Disc brakes do
>>> not have this *advantage* beyond a factor of 1.2 whereas a duo-servo
>>> drum system has.
>>>
>>> Here, go study the proof. Yes, I know proof, like truth, is anathema
>>> to you and is something you run from but here it is anyway;
>>>
>>> https://what-when-how.com/automobile/brake-shoe-and-pad-fundamentals-automobile/
>>>
>>>
>>> Warning, maths involved, gobbledygook in your parlance, but others
>>> who cast their eyes over it will surely understand the concepts
>>> involved - even if you have no hope of ever doing so.
>>
>>
>> you're wasting your time. their minds are dysfunctional. they're
>> mentally unbalanced.
>>
>>
>
> and retarded!
>
I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem appropriate.

On 3/12/2021 5:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 12:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 29/11/2021 12:17 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2021 11:56 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 28/11/21 11:21 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFL :)
>>>>>
>>>>> The "truck" video was enough to show anyone that this bloke is
>>>>> about as clueless as you can possibly get. He posted that video
>>>>> here thinking it was real, and he's the *only* person who ever did :)
>>>>>
>>>>> As I've said he's *so* fucking stupid he wouldn't know if his own
>>>>> head was on fire, but he's also remarkably gutless, as he was too
>>>>> pissweak to disconnect the booster hose on his 10 year old "new"
>>>>> Lancer and see how wrong his clueless mentor Clasener was about
>>>>> brake systems.
>>>>
>>>> You are the one showing you don't understand brake systems Darren.
>>>> Clueless Darren the liar. Yeah, that's about right.
>>>>
>>>> *I* previously posted proof that drum brakes have inbuilt boosting
>>>> arrangements through a concept known as *shoe factor*. Disc brakes
>>>> do not have this *advantage* beyond a factor of 1.2 whereas a
>>>> duo-servo drum system has.
>>>>
>>>> Here, go study the proof. Yes, I know proof, like truth, is anathema
>>>> to you and is something you run from but here it is anyway;
>>>>
>>>> https://what-when-how.com/automobile/brake-shoe-and-pad-fundamentals-automobile/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warning, maths involved, gobbledygook in your parlance, but others
>>>> who cast their eyes over it will surely understand the concepts
>>>> involved - even if you have no hope of ever doing so.
>>>
>>>
>>> you're wasting your time. their minds are dysfunctional. they're
>>> mentally unbalanced.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> and retarded!
>>
> I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem appropriate.

Perhaps "pretentious Pete". Lots of noise when supported with his flog
lying hypocritical mates, but falls short when it comes to stumping up
with some *facts*.

On 3/12/2021 12:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>>
>>
>
> Ouch. That's a bit harsh.

Poor old Alvey. Searching for relevance....
>

On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 19:03:22 +1100, lindsay wrote:

> On 3/12/2021 12:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ouch. That's a bit harsh.
>
> Poor old Alvey. Searching for relevance....
>>

Poor old Lindsay. Having to resort to 'The Fraudsters Idiots Guide To Being
A Loser On Usenet'.

At least I own a proper car *and* enjoy cars & driving. What's your
"relevance" here champ?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 3/12/2021 6:15 pm, alvey wrote:

> At least I own a proper status symbol *and* enjoy showing off & posing. What's your
> "relevance" here champ?

There I fixed it for you.

On 3/12/2021 5:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 12:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>> you're wasting your time. their minds are dysfunctional. they're
>>> mentally unbalanced.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> and retarded!
>>
> I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem appropriate.

You're being remarkably kind. I think "Fucktardo" is more accurate.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/12/2021 7:02 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 5:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:

>> I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem appropriate.
>
> Perhaps "pretentious Pete". Lots of noise when supported with his flog
> lying hypocritical mates, but falls short when it comes to stumping up
> with some *facts*.

He does what he's *always* done. All smiles and happiness when he dishes
it out, but then turns into the biggest whinging softcock when he gets
it back.

I simply couldn't count the number of times I've seen the fucking sook
play the "victim" card for what he brought entirely on himself. In fact
he's like a little kid that plays with matches. Cries like fuck when he
burns himself, but then is stupid enough to come back the next day and
do it all over again.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/12/2021 7:03 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 12:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ouch. That's a bit harsh.
>
> Poor old Alvey. Searching for relevance....

Story of his life. He's the ultimate attention whore.....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/12/2021 7:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 6:15 pm, alvey wrote:
>
>> At least I own a proper status symbol *and* enjoy showing off &
>> posing. What's your
>> "relevance" here champ?
>
> There I fixed it for you.

Nice work. Maybe we could all chip in and have a specially made chrome
plated badge that says "I'm a wanker" that he can put on the back of his
appendage compensator so next time he wakes the entire neighbourhood
when slowing down for a speed hump people can look and say "Oh, it's
okay. He's a professional".

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/12/21 7:35 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 5:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 29/11/2021 12:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>>> you're wasting your time. their minds are dysfunctional. they're
>>>> mentally unbalanced.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> and retarded!
>>>
>> I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem appropriate.
>
> You're being remarkably kind. I think "Fucktardo" is more accurate.
>
That's already taken - by you, Darren.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 3/12/21 7:39 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 7:03 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 12:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ouch. That's a bit harsh.
>>
>> Poor old Alvey. Searching for relevance....
>
> Story of his life. He's the ultimate attention whore.....
>
>
Nah, the ultimate attention whore is someone who couldn't make the grade
in life so *invented* a complete career to counter his utter failure.
Know anyone like that Darren? Go look in a mirror, you'll see one every
single time.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 12/3/2021 7:03 PM, lindsay wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 12:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ouch. That's a bit harsh.
>
> Poor old Alvey. Searching for relevance....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Alvira is keeping xenokyryp company in the bin, so I dunno what
that`s all about. <shrug>

>>
>

--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea. Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." — Gene
Spafford, 1992

On 3/12/2021 6:41 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 7:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 6:15 pm, alvey wrote:
>>
>>> At least I own a proper status symbol *and* enjoy showing off &
>>> posing. What's your
>>> "relevance" here champ?
>>
>> There I fixed it for you.
>
> Nice work. Maybe we could all chip in and have a specially made chrome
> plated badge that says "I'm a wanker" that he can put on the back of his
> appendage compensator so next time he wakes the entire neighbourhood
> when slowing down for a speed hump people can look and say "Oh, it's
> okay. He's a professional".

Just a number plate [W4NK3R]

On 29/11/2021 6:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 1:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 29/11/2021 12:17 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2021 11:56 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 28/11/21 11:21 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFL :)
>>>>>
>>>>> The "truck" video was enough to show anyone that this bloke is
>>>>> about as clueless as you can possibly get. He posted that video
>>>>> here thinking it was real, and he's the *only* person who ever did :)
>>>>>
>>>>> As I've said he's *so* fucking stupid he wouldn't know if his own
>>>>> head was on fire, but he's also remarkably gutless, as he was too
>>>>> pissweak to disconnect the booster hose on his 10 year old "new"
>>>>> Lancer and see how wrong his clueless mentor Clasener was about
>>>>> brake systems.
>
>
> strange how some ppls minds work isn't it. not wanting to mess with a
> brand new car under warranty is considered to be gutless. normal ppl
> would consider it sensible.
>
>

It's OK, NoddyLiar isn't allowed to work on his wifes car because he's
not qualified and if he did it would void the warranty :-)

On 3/12/2021 4:39 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 7:03 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 12:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 3/12/2021 3:40 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> 2. You've outsourced your replies to Jonz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ouch. That's a bit harsh.
>>
>> Poor old Alvey. Searching for relevance....
>
> Story of his life. He's the ultimate attention whore.....
>
>

Says the bloke who invented qualifications and trade experience to feel
relevant.

Except now you're just a proven fraud with absolutely zero credibility :-)

On 3/12/2021 5:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 12:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 29/11/2021 12:17 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2021 11:56 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 28/11/21 11:21 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFL :)
>>>>>
>>>>> The "truck" video was enough to show anyone that this bloke is
>>>>> about as clueless as you can possibly get. He posted that video
>>>>> here thinking it was real, and he's the *only* person who ever did :)
>>>>>
>>>>> As I've said he's *so* fucking stupid he wouldn't know if his own
>>>>> head was on fire, but he's also remarkably gutless, as he was too
>>>>> pissweak to disconnect the booster hose on his 10 year old "new"
>>>>> Lancer and see how wrong his clueless mentor Clasener was about
>>>>> brake systems.
>>>>
>>>> You are the one showing you don't understand brake systems Darren.
>>>> Clueless Darren the liar. Yeah, that's about right.
>>>>
>>>> *I* previously posted proof that drum brakes have inbuilt boosting
>>>> arrangements through a concept known as *shoe factor*. Disc brakes
>>>> do not have this *advantage* beyond a factor of 1.2 whereas a
>>>> duo-servo drum system has.
>>>>
>>>> Here, go study the proof. Yes, I know proof, like truth, is
>>>> anathema to you and is something you run from but here it is anyway;
>>>>
>>>> https://what-when-how.com/automobile/brake-shoe-and-pad-fundamentals-automobile/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warning, maths involved, gobbledygook in your parlance, but others
>>>> who cast their eyes over it will surely understand the concepts
>>>> involved - even if you have no hope of ever doing so.
>>>
>>>
>>> you're wasting your time. their minds are dysfunctional. they're
>>> mentally unbalanced.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> and retarded!
>>
> I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem appropriate.

and of course you believe everyone cares what you think

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 3/12/2021 8:15 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 3/12/21 7:35 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 5:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2021 12:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>>> you're wasting your time. their minds are dysfunctional. they're
>>>>> mentally unbalanced.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and retarded!
>>>>
>>> I think that you need a new 'nym, "Petulant Pete" would seem
>>> appropriate.
>>
>> You're being remarkably kind. I think "Fucktardo" is more accurate.
>>
> That's already taken - by you, Darren.
>

they're bogans. you can't talk sense to or reason with them. they lie,
and interpret things only at gutter level. and noddy is a coward. he
talks about ppl but not to them using his (pretend) killfile as an excuse

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry