Snit has brought this to us :
> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>> On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-08, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of
>>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
>>>>>>> every bit as described.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and
>>>>> now you have a special page.
>>
>>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported
>>>> accusations about him.
>>>
>>> Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
>>> there's no support.
>>
>> Which ones?
>>
>> Be specific.
>>
>> *I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record*.
>>
>>
>
> Carroll’s logic is still flawed. Say there are 100 accusations. Say you
> admitted to, or there was strong support for, 10 of them.
>
> The page would still be filled with unsupported accusations.

Then they would be decimated.

Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:16:16 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2021 20:25, Snit wrote:
>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
>>>>>> every bit as described.
>>>>>
>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
>>>>
>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and
>>>> now you have a special page.
>>>
>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported
>>> accusations about him. If you can show otherwise I would be curious to see it.
>>
>> Me too!
>
> I didn't say anything about "a page with unsupported accusations". I was
> referring to your special page at
> <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> You knew that, of course.
>
> If there's another page somewhere that contains unsupported accusations,
> I'm not aware of it. Got a link?
>
>

That’s the page with unsupported accusations.

Show where David asked to have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.

Hint: he never did — you lied.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> Snit has brought this to us :
>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-08, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of
>>>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
>>>>>>>> every bit as described.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and
>>>>>> now you have a special page.
>>>
>>>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported
>>>>> accusations about him.
>>>>
>>>> Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
>>>> there's no support.
>>>
>>> Which ones?
>>>
>>> Be specific.
>>>
>>> *I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record*.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Carroll’s logic is still flawed. Say there are 100 accusations. Say you
>> admitted to, or there was strong support for, 10 of them.
>>
>> The page would still be filled with unsupported accusations.
>
> Then they would be decimated.
>

:)

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

*On 11/12/2021 17:53, Shadow *LIED* - as always.

So sad. :-(

On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

Here's the simple question:

Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
> wrote:
>
> Here's the simple question:
>
> Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
>
><https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
> can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
> TIA
> []'s
>
>
> --
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy - Google 2012
> Google Fuchsia - 2021

Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

--
Helmut
"If you don't like Linux, you might tick incorrectly"

On 11/12/2021 18:07, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>> On 11/12/2021 03:45, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-10, philo <philo@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps the best part is that most here said I could not do it.
>>>
>>> Actually, "most" here said you can't do *specific* things, and you have
>>> not been able to do those specific things. For instance, you haven't
>>> been able to edit a FileVault protected volume. Nor have you been able
>>> to change or remove a Mac firmware password. : )
>>>
>>> You may think you can revise history and get away with it, but you can't
>>> change the Usenet record after the fact. Still, if dreaming up things
>>> makes you *feel* better, then by all means, go for it. It won't change
>>> reality though. All you are doing is making yourself look all the more
>>> foolish by lying about it.
>>>
>>>> That was exactly the challenge I needed .
>>>
>>> "Super philo rises to the challenge in the face of adversity" may make
>>> for an interesting fantasy, but it's still just a fantasy in your own
>>> mind. We get it: you are your own greatest hero. Revel in it if you
>>> must.
>>
>> The Art of War, written by Sun Tzu, he said, “If you know your enemy and
>> you know yourself, you need not fear the results of a hundred battles.
>
> There hasn't been any battle here - only little philo bleating like a
> proud sheep at having accomplished something relatively trivial.

I'm confident that Philo has forgotten more about computing that you
have ever learned.

Your manners are atrocious. Be kind, eh?

On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:31:59 GMT, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut
Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:

>On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Here's the simple question:
>>
>> Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
>>
>><https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>>
>> Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
>> can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
>> TIA
>> []'s
>>
>>
>
>Are snit and David Brooks the same person?

No, snit does drugs. BD drinks.
HTH
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On 11/12/2021 18:08, Kelly Phillips wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:24:30 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-08, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
>>>>>>> every bit as described.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and
>>>>> now you have a special page.
>>
>>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported
>>>> accusations about him.
>>>
>>> Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
>>> there's no support.
>>
>> Which ones?
>>
>> Be specific.
>>
>> *I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record*.
>
> Why, of course you do, David. Because you say so.

It's simply the truth.

> If anyone around here had access to your service records, I'm sure the
> story would be very different, but you're safe, for now. You can claim
> whatever you want.

The 'story' would forever be the same. Others are lying and will NEVER
find or show any evidence of misconduct on my part.

Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>That?s the page with unsupported accusations. Show where David asked to have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.

If your reading comprehension wasn't stuck at elementary school
level you would have noticed the site in question has MIDs which
you or anyone else can lookup and confirm for yourself that David
DID ask - he challenged the site admin to bring the page online
going so far as to tell the individual to do it NOW. The contents
of the page do not contain so much as a single unsupported
accusation. Every
single statement concerning David Brooks on that page is backed up
by MIDs where necessary.

>Hint: he never did

Suggestion: learn to read - David DID do what was written.

>you lied.

Nope. The only notorious lying piece of shit aside from David who
posts here currently is you. Here are two urls to backup our
accusation. We don't do unsupported anything.

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

>Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity.

You are the biggest troll and most insecure person posting here.
You just personally attacked Shadow and falsely accused him of
lying. You have a long standing and very well known track record
of accusing people of doing or being things they are not.

Why do you think you can hide what you are? Is it because you
initially completely snowed Apd and FromTheRafters into thinking
you weren't actually a troll but rather that you'd been
misunderstood and incorrectly labeled as a troll because of that.
Snit for the most part both of them have called you out for some
of the lies you've written about others. As well as called you
out for falsely labeling Gremlin as what you actually are: a
functionally illiterate fraud. They both told you about certain
things - providing urls to support all of it and point blank
asked you how this in anyway supports the label you worked so
hard to search engine seed for Gremlin.

Gremlin also provided examples of some of his work and
accomplishments and also asked you to support the accusations in
the slime you wrote about him. As everyone who read those threads
already knows - you failed to counter any! Of the examples Apd
FromTheRafters and Gremlin all shared when each asked you to
support your accusations that Gremlin was a functionally
illiterate fraud. You continue to be unable to support your
accusations.

The only poster here besides David Brooks who routinely writes
bullshit they cannot support about others is you. So in that
regard you're in very good company - if it's your intention and
goal to be known as a dishonest slime search engine seeding
troll?

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
> On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Here's the simple question:
>>
>> Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
>>
>> <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>>
>> Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
>> can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
>> TIA
>> []'s
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don't be evil - Google 2004
>> We have a new policy - Google 2012
>> Google Fuchsia - 2021
>
> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>

One of us is, the other isn’t.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Blau? Piss off

On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 11/12/2021 18:07, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/2021 03:45, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-10, philo <philo@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps the best part is that most here said I could not do it.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, "most" here said you can't do *specific* things, and you
>>>> have not been able to do those specific things. For instance, you
>>>> haven't been able to edit a FileVault protected volume. Nor have
>>>> you been able to change or remove a Mac firmware password. : )
>>>>
>>>> You may think you can revise history and get away with it, but you
>>>> can't change the Usenet record after the fact. Still, if dreaming
>>>> up things makes you *feel* better, then by all means, go for it. It
>>>> won't change reality though. All you are doing is making yourself
>>>> look all the more foolish by lying about it.
>>>>
>>>>> That was exactly the challenge I needed .
>>>>
>>>> "Super philo rises to the challenge in the face of adversity" may
>>>> make for an interesting fantasy, but it's still just a fantasy in
>>>> your own mind. We get it: you are your own greatest hero. Revel in
>>>> it if you must.
>>>
>>> The Art of War, written by Sun Tzu, he said, “If you know your enemy
>>> and you know yourself, you need not fear the results of a hundred
>>> battles.
>>
>> There hasn't been any battle here - only little philo bleating like a
>> proud sheep at having accomplished something relatively trivial.
>
> I'm confident that Philo has forgotten more about computing that you
> have ever learned.

You wouldn't know.

> Your manners are atrocious. Be kind, eh?

Nah. I'm under no obligation to be kind to stalkers, trolls, or liars.
Fuck off, Davie Boy.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> Wrote in message:

>Then they would be decimated.

That's right - continue to encourage the pile of shit. It's
obvious to most exactly what he is. And we appreciate it when
regulars go and show themselves as the troll feeding twats we've
already described them as being.

You don't even have a legitimate excuse for your reply. You know
nothing but the facts about David and the tekrider site have been
written here. Instead of informing snit he is incorrect you
attempt to disguise your support for his antics with a wannabe
smartass response.

You're basically bitchslapping BtS Shadow and others as you
happily feed a very well known usenet troll. And that is what
you're doing here.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:31:59 GMT, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut
> Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's the simple question:
>>>
>>> Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
>>>
>>><https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>>>
>>> Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
>>> can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
>>> TIA
>>> []'s
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>
> No, snit does drugs. BD drinks.
> HTH
> []'s
> --
> Don't be evil - Google 2004
> We have a new policy - Google 2012
> Google Fuchsia - 2021

Thanks.
I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
xposts.
Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.

--
Helmut
"If you don't like Linux, you might tick incorrectly"

David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 11/12/2021 18:08, Kelly Phillips wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:24:30 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-08, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
>>>>>>>> every bit as described.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and
>>>>>> now you have a special page.
>>>
>>>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported
>>>>> accusations about him.
>>>>
>>>> Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
>>>> there's no support.
>>>
>>> Which ones?
>>>
>>> Be specific.
>>>
>>> *I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record*.
>>
>> Why, of course you do, David. Because you say so.
>
> It's simply the truth.
>
>> If anyone around here had access to your service records, I'm sure the
>> story would be very different, but you're safe, for now. You can claim
>> whatever you want.
>
> The 'story' would forever be the same. Others are lying and will NEVER
> find or show any evidence of misconduct on my part.
>
>

Keep in mind they’re not even trying to have a discussion in good faith.
They’re trolling you trying to get attention.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 11/12/2021 22:40, LegionX wrote:
> Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> That?s the page with unsupported accusations. Show where David asked to have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.
>
> If your reading comprehension wasn't stuck at elementary school
> level you would have noticed the site in question has MIDs which
> you or anyone else can lookup and confirm for yourself that David
> DID ask - he challenged the site admin to bring the page online
> going so far as to tell the individual to do it NOW. The contents
> of the page do not contain so much as a single unsupported
> accusation. Every
> single statement concerning David Brooks on that page is backed up
> by MIDs where necessary.

There are *NO* MIDS supporting the use of the individual Pseudonyms

I'm 99% sure that some have been collected by nefarious activities. Can
you prove otherwise?

<SNIP>

> The only poster here besides David Brooks who routinely writes
> bullshit they cannot support about others is you.

That's a *LIE*!

Shadow lies on a daily basis and Wolffan and Dustin lie whenever they
turn up here.

David Brooks wrote:

> Blau? Piss off

What you snipped:
"Snit already has more dildos and rubber toys than he can use.
So does his wife.
And so does a certain local reverend and school board member because
for some odd reason snit cannot remember his own address when
ordering his sex toys online.
I'll bet the town of Prescott is a buzz with gossip regarding the
Glasser family.
Hey snit, are you having fun yet?"

Are you full of envy that snit, his wife, his daughter are getting free
sex toys?
Publish your addy and I'll see if I can have a blow up doll or butt
plug sent to you.
Hopefully it doesn't go to the local vicar's address with your name on
the address lable.
Shit happens.
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

--
Wilson

On 11/12/2021 22:40, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
>
> BD drinks.

BD does *NOT* drink. He stopped on 21 March 2018

On 11/12/2021 22:41, Snit wrote:
> Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
>> On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's the simple question:
>>>
>>> Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
>>>
>>> <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>>>
>>> Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
>>> can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
>>> TIA
>>> []'s
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Don't be evil - Google 2004
>>> We have a new policy - Google 2012
>>> Google Fuchsia - 2021
>>
>> Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
>>
>
> One of us is, the other isn’t.

:-D

David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
> On 11/12/2021 22:40, LegionX wrote:
>> Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>>
>>> That?s the page with unsupported accusations. Show where David asked to
>>> have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.
>>
>> If your reading comprehension wasn't stuck at elementary school
>> level you would have noticed the site in question has MIDs which
>> you or anyone else can lookup and confirm for yourself that David
>> DID ask - he challenged the site admin to bring the page online
>> going so far as to tell the individual to do it NOW. The contents
>> of the page do not contain so much as a single unsupported
>> accusation. Every
>> single statement concerning David Brooks on that page is backed up
>> by MIDs where necessary.
>
> There are *NO* MIDS supporting the use of the individual Pseudonyms
>
> I'm 99% sure that some have been collected by nefarious activities. Can
> you prove otherwise?
>
> <SNIP>
>
>> The only poster here besides David Brooks who routinely writes
>> bullshit they cannot support about others is you.
>
> That's a *LIE*!
>
> Shadow lies on a daily basis and Wolffan and Dustin lie whenever they
> turn up here.
>
>

Gremlin speaks and insults. Seems to be the only language he knows. Well,
other than threats.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 11/12/2021 22:42, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>> On 11/12/2021 18:07, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>>>> On 11/12/2021 03:45, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-12-10, philo <philo@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps the best part is that most here said I could not do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, "most" here said you can't do *specific* things, and you
>>>>> have not been able to do those specific things. For instance, you
>>>>> haven't been able to edit a FileVault protected volume. Nor have
>>>>> you been able to change or remove a Mac firmware password. : )
>>>>>
>>>>> You may think you can revise history and get away with it, but you
>>>>> can't change the Usenet record after the fact. Still, if dreaming
>>>>> up things makes you *feel* better, then by all means, go for it. It
>>>>> won't change reality though. All you are doing is making yourself
>>>>> look all the more foolish by lying about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> That was exactly the challenge I needed .
>>>>>
>>>>> "Super philo rises to the challenge in the face of adversity" may
>>>>> make for an interesting fantasy, but it's still just a fantasy in
>>>>> your own mind. We get it: you are your own greatest hero. Revel in
>>>>> it if you must.
>>>>
>>>> The Art of War, written by Sun Tzu, he said, “If you know your enemy
>>>> and you know yourself, you need not fear the results of a hundred
>>>> battles.
>>>
>>> There hasn't been any battle here - only little philo bleating like a
>>> proud sheep at having accomplished something relatively trivial.
>>
>> I'm confident that Philo has forgotten more about computing that you
>> have ever learned.
>
> You wouldn't know.

I DO know that Philo served his country before you were a twinkle in
your drunken daddy's eye.

>> Your manners are atrocious. Be kind, eh?
>
> Nah. I'm under no obligation to be kind to stalkers, trolls, or liars.
> Fuck off, Davie Boy.

Thank you for demonstrating EXACTLY what I said about you. Why are you
such a cunt?

Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>> On 11/12/2021 22:40, LegionX wrote:
>>> Snit <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>>>
>>>> That?s the page with unsupported accusations. Show where David asked to
>>>> have such inappropriate behavior targeted at him.
>>>
>>> If your reading comprehension wasn't stuck at elementary school
>>> level you would have noticed the site in question has MIDs which
>>> you or anyone else can lookup and confirm for yourself that David
>>> DID ask - he challenged the site admin to bring the page online
>>> going so far as to tell the individual to do it NOW. The contents
>>> of the page do not contain so much as a single unsupported
>>> accusation. Every
>>> single statement concerning David Brooks on that page is backed up
>>> by MIDs where necessary.
>>
>> There are *NO* MIDS supporting the use of the individual Pseudonyms
>>
>> I'm 99% sure that some have been collected by nefarious activities. Can
>> you prove otherwise?
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>>> The only poster here besides David Brooks who routinely writes
>>> bullshit they cannot support about others is you.
>>
>> That's a *LIE*!
>>
>> Shadow lies on a daily basis and Wolffan and Dustin lie whenever they
>> turn up here.
>>
>>
>
> Gremlin speaks and insults. Seems to be the only language he knows. Well,
> other than threats.
>

Gremlin speaks IN insults.

Autocarrot strikes again.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 11/12/2021 22:45, Helmut Achterberg wrote:

> I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
> xposts.
> Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.

You are welcome here, Helmut :-)

Shadow is an out-and-out liar.

On 11/12/2021 22:47, Snit wrote:
> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
>> On 11/12/2021 18:08, Kelly Phillips wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:24:30 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-12-08, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47:12 AM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
>>>>>> <87v1rgptp66a3o2erhtkssqokrfiec1852@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
>>>>>>>>> David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
>>>>>>>>> every bit as described.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Careful with those challenges. The last one didn't end well for you and
>>>>>>> now you have a special page.
>>>>
>>>>>> I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported
>>>>>> accusations about him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
>>>>> there's no support.
>>>>
>>>> Which ones?
>>>>
>>>> Be specific.
>>>>
>>>> *I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record*.
>>>
>>> Why, of course you do, David. Because you say so.
>>
>> *It's simply the truth*.
>>
>>> If anyone around here had access to your service records, I'm sure the
>>> story would be very different, but you're safe, for now. You can claim
>>> whatever you want.
>>
>> The 'story' would forever be the same. Others are lying and will NEVER
>> find or show any evidence of misconduct on my part.
>>
>>
>
> Keep in mind they’re not even trying to have a discussion in good faith.
> They’re trolling you trying to get attention.

I know, but thanks for confirming, Snit.

I have NEVER used a FALSE pseudonym EVER - each one has been REAL!

--
Warm regards,
David Dewgud