On 26/03/2022 9:45 am, Alan wrote:
> On 2022-03-25 3:57 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>> Alan wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-03-24 3:48 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2022-03-23 6:39 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 11:55 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 11:14 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 3:27 a.m., Alan LeHun wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t1bcnr$lre$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something you have been asked many times and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always failed to respond; who are the people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you claim told Masi, during the SC period,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to not apply the regulations?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never claimed they told him anything "DURING
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the SC period"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought that was what the claim was. Masi said no
>>>>>>>>>>>> lapping of cars and then suddenly changed his mind
>>>>>>>>>>>> and said six could lap.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems you are willing to believe there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge cover up but only if it involves a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy, to change the outcome of the race,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that only you claim exists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems you're willing to ignore that there was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly direction from above that led Masi to give
>>>>>>>>>>>>> special information to the teams prior to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start of the race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Masi, or more correctly, the race director, gives
>>>>>>>>>>>> special information to the teams before every race.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called a pre-race briefing or something.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This was UNIQUE instructions regarding how the safety
>>>>>>>>>>> car would be used.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's keep this simple.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You are lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you're "keeping it simple"...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...because you don't actually want to deny that those
>>>>>>>>> unique pre-race instructions were given...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...because you know I'll just bitch-slap you with the
>>>>>>>>> quotes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Quote away.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, but you need to take a definitive stand first.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you lied yet again. You are unable to "slap" any quotes
>>>>>> anywhere...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...as expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This thread is simply a litany of your lies now.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you won't take a stand.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Another lie, LIARBOY...
>>>
>>> I've asked the question.
>>>
>>> You've avoided answering it.
>>>
>>> What would you call it?
>>
>> Another lie, I haven't avoided answering any relevant questions or said
>
> By your insertion of the word "relevant" you admit there is a question
> you haven't answered.
>
> Liar.

Naa naa naa-naa naa

geoff

Alan wrote:

> On 2022-03-25 3:57 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > Alan wrote:
> >
> > > On 2022-03-24 3:48 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 2022-03-23 6:39 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2022-03-22 11:55 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 2022-03-22 11:14 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-03-22 3:27 a.m., Alan LeHun wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article <t1bcnr$lre$3@dont-email.me>,
> > > > > > > > > > > > nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something you have been asked many times and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > always failed to respond; who are the people
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that you claim told Masi, during the SC
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > period, to not apply the regulations?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I never claimed they told him anything "DURING
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the SC period"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I thought that was what the claim was. Masi
> > > > > > > > > > > > said no lapping of cars and then suddenly
> > > > > > > > > > > > changed his mind and said six could lap.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It wasn't.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems you are willing to believe there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is a huge cover up but only if it involves a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > conspiracy, to change the outcome of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > race, that only you claim exists.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems you're willing to ignore that there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > was clearly direction from above that led
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Masi to give special information to the teams
> > > > > > > > > > > > > prior to the start of the race.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Masi, or more correctly, the race director,
> > > > > > > > > > > > gives special information to the teams before
> > > > > > > > > > > > every race. It's called a pre-race briefing or
> > > > > > > > > > > > something.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This was UNIQUE instructions regarding how the
> > > > > > > > > > > safety car would be used.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep this simple.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You are lying.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm not.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And you're "keeping it simple"...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ...because you don't actually want to deny that those
> > > > > > > > > unique pre-race instructions were given...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ...because you know I'll just bitch-slap you with the
> > > > > > > > > quotes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Quote away.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, but you need to take a definitive stand first.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So you lied yet again. You are unable to "slap" any quotes
> > > > > > anywhere...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...as expected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This thread is simply a litany of your lies now.
> > > > >
> > > > > So you won't take a stand.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Another lie, LIARBOY...
> > >
> > > I've asked the question.
> > >
> > > You've avoided answering it.
> > >
> > > What would you call it?
> >
> > Another lie, I haven't avoided answering any relevant questions or
> > said
>
> By your insertion of the word "relevant" you admit there is a
> question you haven't answered.
>

No, you ignorant fool, it is just precision.
Do you know even know what relevant means.
By the same token you are admitting that your questions have not been
relevant. So duh!

> Liar.

Okay enough now.
You had every opportunity to put up.
I think we can leave this, as with many threads in which you
persistently fail to support your assertions, as yet another case of
you running your mouth until only falsehoods emerge.

You're an utter failure, LIARBOY.

Alan wrote:

> On 2022-03-25 3:54 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> >
> > Everyone has taken a stand.
> >
>
> You haven't.

I have, you just don't like it. I have clearly declared my position
several times.

>
> Liar.

Okay enough now.
You had every opportunity to put up. You can't.
I think we can leave this, as with many threads in which you
persistently fail to support your assertions, as yet another case of
you running your mouth until only falsehoods emerge.

You're an utter failure, LIARBOY.

On 2022-03-26 5:22 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> Alan wrote:
>
>> On 2022-03-25 3:54 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>
>>> Everyone has taken a stand.
>>>
>>
>> You haven't.
>
> I have, you just don't like it. I have clearly declared my position
> several times.

No. You have not.

I asked a simple yes/no question and you avoided answering it.

On 2022-03-26 5:19 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> Alan wrote:
>
>> On 2022-03-25 3:57 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-03-24 3:48 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 6:39 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 11:55 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 11:14 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 3:27 a.m., Alan LeHun wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t1bcnr$lre$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something you have been asked many times and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always failed to respond; who are the people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you claim told Masi, during the SC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> period, to not apply the regulations?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never claimed they told him anything "DURING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the SC period"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought that was what the claim was. Masi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> said no lapping of cars and then suddenly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed his mind and said six could lap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems you are willing to believe there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a huge cover up but only if it involves a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy, to change the outcome of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> race, that only you claim exists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems you're willing to ignore that there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was clearly direction from above that led
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masi to give special information to the teams
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prior to the start of the race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masi, or more correctly, the race director,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gives special information to the teams before
>>>>>>>>>>>>> every race. It's called a pre-race briefing or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This was UNIQUE instructions regarding how the
>>>>>>>>>>>> safety car would be used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let's keep this simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are lying.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And you're "keeping it simple"...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...because you don't actually want to deny that those
>>>>>>>>>> unique pre-race instructions were given...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...because you know I'll just bitch-slap you with the
>>>>>>>>>> quotes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Quote away.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, but you need to take a definitive stand first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you lied yet again. You are unable to "slap" any quotes
>>>>>>> anywhere...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...as expected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This thread is simply a litany of your lies now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you won't take a stand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Another lie, LIARBOY...
>>>>
>>>> I've asked the question.
>>>>
>>>> You've avoided answering it.
>>>>
>>>> What would you call it?
>>>
>>> Another lie, I haven't avoided answering any relevant questions or
>>> said
>>
>> By your insertion of the word "relevant" you admit there is a
>> question you haven't answered.
>>
>
> No, you ignorant fool, it is just precision.

It's a weasel word.

> Do you know even know what relevant means.

I know what it means.

Do you know what "no true Scotsman" means?

> By the same token you are admitting that your questions have not been
> relevant. So duh!

"No true Scotsman".

I suggest you look it up, Liar.

On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 13:04:36 +1300, geoff wrote:

> On 26/03/2022 9:45 am, Alan wrote:
>> On 2022-03-25 3:57 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-03-24 3:48 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 6:39 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 11:55 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 11:14 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-22 3:27 a.m., Alan LeHun wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t1bcnr$lre$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something you have been asked many times and always failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to respond; who are the people that you claim told Masi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during the SC period,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to not apply the regulations?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never claimed they told him anything "DURING the SC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> period"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought that was what the claim was. Masi said no lapping
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of cars and then suddenly changed his mind and said six
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could lap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems you are willing to believe there is a huge cover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up but only if it involves a conspiracy, to change the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome of the race, that only you claim exists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems you're willing to ignore that there was clearly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direction from above that led Masi to give special
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information to the teams prior to the start of the race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masi, or more correctly, the race director, gives special
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information to the teams before every race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called a pre-race briefing or something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This was UNIQUE instructions regarding how the safety car
>>>>>>>>>>>> would be used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let's keep this simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are lying.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And you're "keeping it simple"...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...because you don't actually want to deny that those unique
>>>>>>>>>> pre-race instructions were given...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...because you know I'll just bitch-slap you with the quotes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Quote away.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, but you need to take a definitive stand first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you lied yet again. You are unable to "slap" any quotes
>>>>>>> anywhere...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...as expected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This thread is simply a litany of your lies now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you won't take a stand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Another lie, LIARBOY...
>>>>
>>>> I've asked the question.
>>>>
>>>> You've avoided answering it.
>>>>
>>>> What would you call it?
>>>
>>> Another lie, I haven't avoided answering any relevant questions or
>>> said
>>
>> By your insertion of the word "relevant" you admit there is a question
>> you haven't answered.
>>
>> Liar.
>
> Naa naa naa-naa naa
>
> geoff

Worryingly that is the most coherent comment in this thread fro a long
time :-)

--
I'm rated PG-34!!

On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:26:04 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

> It's a weasel word.

this from the group weasel.
fuck off asshole.