On 30/01/2022 5:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 5:17 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:02:13 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely
>>>>>>>>> positively
>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>    And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you
>>>>>>> er, owned???
>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees with
>>>>>> the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because apparently
>>>>>> these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and can't relate to
>>>>>> the idea that people simply think whatever they're saying is complete
>>>>>> nonsense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
>>>>>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener was
>>>>>> right about the train incident in that it never happened and that I
>>>>>> was never there.
>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>>>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling apology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own
>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno
>>>>> taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said he taught
>>>> because the proof is irrefutable and can be cross-checked. Noddy posts
>>>> photos of cable ties and projects he copied from youtube but nothing
>>>> that proves he ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there is no record
>>>> of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>
>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term membership?
>>>> Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>
>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but even they must
>>>> wonder why he's so forthcoming with pointless chest-beating crap yet
>>>> when it comes to posting the only thing that could restore some
>>>> credibility and integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is qualified,
>>>> the keyboard tough guy that has been deriding, attacking, bullying and
>>>> false attributing his lies etc to others and demanding proof of claims
>>>> of others for decades suddenly develops a glass jaw and runs away,
>>>> sniping more lies as he goes.
>>>
>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly) attributed to
>>> Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over
>>> and over and expecting different results".
>>
>> lol.
>> You're basing your position on an unattributed and incorrect quote.
>>
>> The actual definition of insanity is, "Insanity. n. mental illness of
>> such
>> a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality,
>> cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis or is subject to
>> uncontrollable impulsive behavior". Psychology Today.
>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-therapy/200907/the-definition-insanity
>>
>>
>> So, you're off to a ripping start then and anything following that
>> fatally
>> flawed opening is redundant. But let's have a look anyway!
>>> Well you and xeno, and your two gutless enablers have been doing just
>>> that multiple times a day for years now. Even the meanest intellect must
>>> realise that no matter how many times you try, the result will always be
>>> the same.
>>
>> Well as one of the "meanest intellects" around that may be your
>> conclusion,
>> it isn't mine. There is absolutely nothing to say that that the result
>> will
>> always be the same.
>>
>>> You are achieving nothing other than wrecking the news group.
>>
>>  From that other intellect again, the alternative is even worse. If it's
>> "insanity" that you're trying to use as a reason then howabout this?
>> Why on
>> earth would anyone in their right mind allow a lying, hypocritical,
>> abusive, and cowardly fraud to continue on his rancid way untroubled?
>
> SSDD

Dodging another valid question keith?

On 30/01/2022 5:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 6:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 7:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely
>>>>>>>>> positively
>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>   And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you
>>>>>>> er, owned???
>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees
>>>>>> with the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because
>>>>>> apparently these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and
>>>>>> can't relate to the idea that people simply think whatever they're
>>>>>> saying is complete nonsense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
>>>>>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener
>>>>>> was right about the train incident in that it never happened and
>>>>>> that I was never there.
>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>>>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling apology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own
>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno
>>>>> taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said he taught
>>>> because the proof is irrefutable and can be cross-checked. Noddy
>>>> posts photos of cable ties and projects he copied from youtube but
>>>> nothing that proves he ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there is no
>>>> record of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>
>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term
>>>> membership? Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>
>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but even they
>>>> must wonder why he's so forthcoming with pointless chest-beating
>>>> crap yet when it comes to posting the only thing that could restore
>>>> some credibility and integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is
>>>> qualified, the keyboard tough guy that has been deriding, attacking,
>>>> bullying and false attributing his lies etc to others and demanding
>>>> proof of claims of others for decades suddenly develops a glass jaw
>>>> and runs away, sniping more lies as he goes.
>>>
>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly) attributed to
>>> Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
>>> over and over and expecting different results".
>>
>> You mean like claiming you're qualified for decades when all the
>> evidence shows you're not?
>>
>> Or telling grand lies that are easily disproved but sticking to them
>> in the face of cold hard evidence?
>>
>> Nobody in the history of aus.cars has done so much damage to the
>> group. Just look at the most recent attacks on people that dared ask
>> an automotive question FFS keith.
>>
>> Open your fucking eyes.
>>
>> That sort of thing?
>
> Do you even know who you're replying to?
>

"On 30/01/2022 5:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:"

Do you remember keith?

You're pretty vague these days mate and making less and less sense by
the day.

On 30/01/2022 8:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 1:14 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 29/01/2022 5:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely positively
>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>   And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you
>>>> er, owned???
>>
>> <snip shit>
>>
>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure apparently.
>>
>> Yep. There is no way you could make those comments had you ever
>> completed an apprenticeship.
>>
>>> Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener was right about
>>> the train incident in that it never happened and that I was never there.
>>
>> That's an an absolute lie.
>>
>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling apology.
>>>
>>
>> I had to do no such thing. Yet *another* lie.
>>
>> Go on you lying cunt, post proof that you're qualified and I'll give
>> you the "groveling apology" you're longing for.
>>
>> I fucking *dare* you.
>
>
> won't stop lying but still jonz will defend him. jonz has shown his true
> colours.
>

Jonz has never done anything more on usenet than coat tail others as a
yes man throwing out deranged unintelligible gibberish. The poor bastard
has never managed to contribute anything of value to any newsgroup.

On 30/01/2022 10:21 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 1:11 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, 30 January 2022 at 12:51:50 UTC+11, Fred Flintstone wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2022 12:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 30/1/2022 11:33 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They are of zero interest. The only point of contention as far as I'm
>>>>> concerned is his claim of having been a "teacher" at the Richmond
>>>>> Tech campus, and he was not. Nor does he have anything to prove
>>>>> otherwise :)
>>>>>
>>>> Well Darren, you are 100% wrong in that and some here have seen
>>>> irrefutable proof I was a teacher in automotive at Richmond. You, and
>>>> your enablers, on the other hand, have never been given access to it
>>>> and you know why that is so.
>>>> 16+ years at Richmond TAFE, most of which was spent at the Gleadell
>>>> Street Campus, the remainder at the new Cremorne Street Campus.
>>>> Let me see, 8 hours per week of teaching rounds Richmond TAFE during
>>>> teacher training in 1982, then from second term 1985 until end of 3rd
>>>> term 1994. After that we moved to the new Campus at Cremorne Street
>>>> and was there until March 2003 when I officially retired after 2 years
>>>> on sick leave. Want *exact dates* Darren? I have all the documentation
>>>> too. LOL
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Here is your answer nonuts so u can now STFU with this complete lie of
>>> yours. If you don't you're a proven liar and troll.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>    HUH?....Give it up pepe, 'tis gibberish ye be spewin'
>
>
> you know it's true liar.
>
>

I doubt he's seen it. If he saw it now the gibberish spewing halfwit
would die of embarrassment :-)

On 30/01/2022 9:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 5:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 6:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2022 7:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely
>>>>>>>>>> positively
>>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>   And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>>>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall
>>>>>>>> you er, owned???
>>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees
>>>>>>> with the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because
>>>>>>> apparently these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and
>>>>>>> can't relate to the idea that people simply think whatever
>>>>>>> they're saying is complete nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
>>>>>>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener
>>>>>>> was right about the train incident in that it never happened and
>>>>>>> that I was never there.
>>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>>>>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling
>>>>>>> apology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own
>>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno
>>>>>> taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said he
>>>>> taught because the proof is irrefutable and can be cross-checked.
>>>>> Noddy posts photos of cable ties and projects he copied from
>>>>> youtube but nothing that proves he ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there is no
>>>>> record of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term
>>>>> membership? Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>>
>>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but even they
>>>>> must wonder why he's so forthcoming with pointless chest-beating
>>>>> crap yet when it comes to posting the only thing that could restore
>>>>> some credibility and integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is
>>>>> qualified, the keyboard tough guy that has been deriding,
>>>>> attacking, bullying and false attributing his lies etc to others
>>>>> and demanding proof of claims of others for decades suddenly
>>>>> develops a glass jaw and runs away, sniping more lies as he goes.
>>>>
>>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly) attributed to
>>>> Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
>>>> over and over and expecting different results".
>>>
>>> You mean like claiming you're qualified for decades when all the
>>> evidence shows you're not?

What have I ever claimed to be qualified for?

>>> Or telling grand lies that are easily disproved but sticking to them
>>> in the face of cold hard evidence?

What evidence?

>>> Nobody in the history of aus.cars has done so much damage to the
>>> group. Just look at the most recent attacks on people that dared ask
>>> an automotive question FFS keith.

What damage have I done to the NG?

>>> Open your fucking eyes.
>>>
>>> That sort of thing?
>>
>> Do you even know who you're replying to?
>>
>
> "On 30/01/2022 5:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:"
>
>
> Do you remember keith?
>
> You're pretty vague these days mate and making less and less sense by
> the day.

I think that your the one who's vague, your remarks were obviously not
meant for me.

On 30/01/2022 9:33 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 5:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 5:17 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:02:13 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely
>>>>>>>>>> positively
>>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>    And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>>>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you
>>>>>>>> er, owned???
>>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because apparently
>>>>>>> these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and can't
>>>>>>> relate to
>>>>>>> the idea that people simply think whatever they're saying is
>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>> nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
>>>>>>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener was
>>>>>>> right about the train incident in that it never happened and that I
>>>>>>> was never there.
>>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>>>>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling
>>>>>>> apology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own
>>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno
>>>>>> taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said he taught
>>>>> because the proof is irrefutable and can be cross-checked. Noddy posts
>>>>> photos of cable ties and projects he copied from youtube but nothing
>>>>> that proves he ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there is no
>>>>> record
>>>>> of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term membership?
>>>>> Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>>
>>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but even they must
>>>>> wonder why he's so forthcoming with pointless chest-beating crap yet
>>>>> when it comes to posting the only thing that could restore some
>>>>> credibility and integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is qualified,
>>>>> the keyboard tough guy that has been deriding, attacking, bullying and
>>>>> false attributing his lies etc to others and demanding proof of claims
>>>>> of others for decades suddenly develops a glass jaw and runs away,
>>>>> sniping more lies as he goes.
>>>>
>>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly) attributed to
>>>> Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
>>>> over
>>>> and over and expecting different results".
>>>
>>> lol.
>>> You're basing your position on an unattributed and incorrect quote.
>>>
>>> The actual definition of insanity is, "Insanity. n. mental illness of
>>> such
>>> a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality,
>>> cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis or is subject to
>>> uncontrollable impulsive behavior". Psychology Today.
>>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-therapy/200907/the-definition-insanity
>>>
>>>
>>> So, you're off to a ripping start then and anything following that
>>> fatally
>>> flawed opening is redundant. But let's have a look anyway!
>>>> Well you and xeno, and your two gutless enablers have been doing just
>>>> that multiple times a day for years now. Even the meanest intellect
>>>> must
>>>> realise that no matter how many times you try, the result will
>>>> always be
>>>> the same.
>>>
>>> Well as one of the "meanest intellects" around that may be your
>>> conclusion,
>>> it isn't mine. There is absolutely nothing to say that that the
>>> result will
>>> always be the same.
>>>
>>>> You are achieving nothing other than wrecking the news group.
>>>
>>>  From that other intellect again, the alternative is even worse. If it's
>>> "insanity" that you're trying to use as a reason then howabout this?
>>> Why on
>>> earth would anyone in their right mind allow a lying, hypocritical,
>>> abusive, and cowardly fraud to continue on his rancid way untroubled?
>>
>> SSDD
>
>
> Dodging another valid question keith?

Exactly what is valid about it? It's just your little friend being
smartarsed as usual.

On Sunday, 30 January 2022 at 15:27:10 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 1:57 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 23:59:09 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely positively
> >>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
> >>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
> >>>> ~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
> >>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you er,
> >>>> owned???
> >>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees with
> >>> the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because apparently
> >>> these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and can't relate to
> >>> the idea that people simply think whatever they're saying is complete
> >>> nonsense.
> >>>
> >>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
> >>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener was
> >>> right about the train incident in that it never happened and that I
> >>> was never there.
> >>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
> >>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling apology.
> >>>
> >>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own mistakes.
> >>>
> >> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno taught
> >> where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Tuggy, tug, tug.....<G>
> facts are as big a problem for you as they are for the noddy it seems
~~~~~~~~~~~~`
I was simply commenting on your foibles Portnoy. <G> I havn`t made any comment on *where* .
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
> "my own words are irrelevant"
> -noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On Sunday, 30 January 2022 at 16:48:48 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 30/1/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>
> >>>
> >> The newsgroup was wrecked long before I entered the scene. When I came
> >> here there were about a dozen posters. There are still about a dozen
> >> posters.
> >
> > When I joined, the signal to noise was far higher than now.
> I am sure it was.
> >
> >> FWIW, I don't expect Darren to come up with proof so Einstein's quote
> >> does not apply.
> >
> > If you don't expect to achieve anything, what is the point of polluting
> > the place with the same old crap all day every day?
> I didn't say that I didn't expect to *achieve* anything. If there is
> *any* truth to the fact that Darren worked at Repco (and it wasn't as an
> apprentice anyway) then my next task is to catch up with one of my
> former colleagues who was a *workshop foreman* at Repco Footscray during
> the time span Darren claims to have been an apprentice auto machinist.
> Not many of the old colleagues left now, most have retired, so it'll be
> good to catch up and see how things have changed. New facilities at the
> new Docklands campus might be worth a look too. That was progressively
> opened up between 2006-2011 so I missed out on all of that.
> >
> >> It's difficult, if not impossible, to stump up proof *if said proof
> >> does not exist*. I *know* it does not exist! That doesn't mean I am
> >> not entitled to ask, especially since pressure was brought upon me to
> >> stump up with proof. I did just that. The ball is no longer in my court.
> >
> > You asked, so that should be an end to it.
> I'll keep on asking until he either gives a *valid* answer or pisses off
> outta here. I didn't start this shit, that was Darren, but I sure as
> shit will finish it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh my ,you scawwy (not).<FBG
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 30/01/2022 11:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 10:21 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 1:11 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 30 January 2022 at 12:51:50 UTC+11, Fred Flintstone wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 30/1/2022 11:33 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> They are of zero interest. The only point of contention as far as
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> concerned is his claim of having been a "teacher" at the Richmond
>>>>>> Tech campus, and he was not. Nor does he have anything to prove
>>>>>> otherwise :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well Darren, you are 100% wrong in that and some here have seen
>>>>> irrefutable proof I was a teacher in automotive at Richmond. You, and
>>>>> your enablers, on the other hand, have never been given access to it
>>>>> and you know why that is so.
>>>>> 16+ years at Richmond TAFE, most of which was spent at the Gleadell
>>>>> Street Campus, the remainder at the new Cremorne Street Campus.
>>>>> Let me see, 8 hours per week of teaching rounds Richmond TAFE during
>>>>> teacher training in 1982, then from second term 1985 until end of 3rd
>>>>> term 1994. After that we moved to the new Campus at Cremorne Street
>>>>> and was there until March 2003 when I officially retired after 2
>>>>> years
>>>>> on sick leave. Want *exact dates* Darren? I have all the
>>>>> documentation
>>>>> too. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Here is your answer nonuts so u can now STFU with this complete lie of
>>>> yours. If you don't you're a proven liar and troll.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>    HUH?....Give it up pepe, 'tis gibberish ye be spewin'
>>
>>
>> you know it's true liar.
>>
>>
>
> I doubt he's seen it. If he saw it now the gibberish spewing halfwit
> would die of embarrassment :-)

I thought Xeno sent it to him but I wasn't sure

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 30/01/2022 1:18 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 8:01 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9XOvOP7eW0
>>
>>
>
> here it is racing .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfWViRAqsCE
>

didn't anyone watch this?

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 30/01/2022 8:49 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 11:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 10:21 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2022 1:11 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, 30 January 2022 at 12:51:50 UTC+11, Fred Flintstone wrote:
>>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 30/1/2022 11:33 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are of zero interest. The only point of contention as far as
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> concerned is his claim of having been a "teacher" at the Richmond
>>>>>>> Tech campus, and he was not. Nor does he have anything to prove
>>>>>>> otherwise :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well Darren, you are 100% wrong in that and some here have seen
>>>>>> irrefutable proof I was a teacher in automotive at Richmond. You, and
>>>>>> your enablers, on the other hand, have never been given access to it
>>>>>> and you know why that is so.
>>>>>> 16+ years at Richmond TAFE, most of which was spent at the Gleadell
>>>>>> Street Campus, the remainder at the new Cremorne Street Campus.
>>>>>> Let me see, 8 hours per week of teaching rounds Richmond TAFE during
>>>>>> teacher training in 1982, then from second term 1985 until end of 3rd
>>>>>> term 1994. After that we moved to the new Campus at Cremorne Street
>>>>>> and was there until March 2003 when I officially retired after 2
>>>>>> years
>>>>>> on sick leave. Want *exact dates* Darren? I have all the
>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>> too. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Here is your answer nonuts so u can now STFU with this complete lie of
>>>>> yours. If you don't you're a proven liar and troll.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>    HUH?....Give it up pepe, 'tis gibberish ye be spewin'
>>>
>>>
>>> you know it's true liar.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I doubt he's seen it. If he saw it now the gibberish spewing halfwit
>> would die of embarrassment :-)
>
>
> I thought Xeno sent it to him but I wasn't sure
>

Xeno would know. Xeno?

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:27:01 +1100, Noddy wrote:

snip incomprable

> Echoed for Clasener's benefit. What about it Kryppy? Want to explain any
> of this?

Why don't you try setting an example and explain all your lies Fraudster?
Or at the very least, why you refuse to provide any proof of those lies?

Oty Der Der!

alvey
“It may come as a shock to you to learn, but when someone makes a claim
the onus falls on them to "prove" it if it is to be accepted as "true".
Fraudster, 25Mar16

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:57:08 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 5:35 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:02:05 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/01/2022 2:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> you'll write umpteen posts and several paras like here to say ppl are
>>>> wrong claiming you never did an apprenticeship and aren't qualified, but
>>>> not one sentence you prove you are. now why would that be?
>>>>
>>> Perhaps because he doesn't want to.
>>
>> We'll as I've often listed some of the many times Fraudster has demanded
>> that others prove their claims then that makes the Fraudster a flagrant
>> hypocrite. Right?
>>
>>> You've never mentioned anything that you've achieved in life,
>>> now why would that be?
>>
>> Wow!
>> There's that fabulous intellect laying waste to logic and reason again.
>>
>> How does it matter that felix hasn't made any claims keith?
>
> Everybody here barring you and felix have revealed details of what they
> have done in life. So what are you two so ashamed of that you don't want
> to talk about it?

Here's the deal keith. If you want a debate/conversation then you answer
the question put to you. That's *answer* keith, *not* respond. So one more
time;

"How does it matter that felix hasn't made any claims keith?"

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 30/01/2022 10:21 pm, Daryl wrote:
> On 30/1/22 8:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 6:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 30/1/2022 6:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/2022 3:48 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 30/1/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The newsgroup was wrecked long before I entered the scene. When I
>>>>>>> came here there were about a dozen posters. There are still about
>>>>>>> a dozen posters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I joined, the signal to noise was far higher than now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sure it was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't expect Darren to come up with proof so Einstein's
>>>>>>> quote does not apply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you don't expect to achieve anything, what is the point of
>>>>>> polluting the place with the same old crap all day every day?
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't say that I didn't expect to *achieve* anything.
>>>>
>>>> So you just want to be an arsehole wrecking the place then.
>>>
>>> No, I want the *wrecker* and fraudulent bullshit artist to leave.
>>> It's already improved now he's down from 1,000 posts a month to
>>> bugger all. It can only get better as his post count drops further.
>>
>> Maybe he was, but now you are. You used to complain about him posting
>> all the time, now you are him.
>>
>>>>   If there is
>>>>> *any* truth to the fact that Darren worked at Repco (and it wasn't
>>>>> as an apprentice anyway) then my next task is to catch up with one
>>>>> of my former colleagues who was a *workshop foreman* at Repco
>>>>> Footscray during the time span Darren claims to have been an
>>>>> apprentice auto machinist. Not many of the old colleagues left now,
>>>>> most have retired, so it'll be good to catch up and see how things
>>>>> have changed. New facilities at the new Docklands campus might be
>>>>> worth a look too. That was progressively opened up between
>>>>> 2006-2011 so I missed out on all of that.
>>>>
>>>> Basically what does it matter? He seem competent with cars so who
>>>> cares?
>>>
>>> I differ with that viewpoint.
>>
>> Reasons?
>
> He doesn't have any, he's just a trouble maker.

He's worse than that. He's a shit talking malignant cancer who passes
Google off as his own personal knowledge, and invents terms like
"transferred experience" in a bizarre attempt to be relevant to anything.

> Has he ever seen any examples of Noddy's work in person?

No he has not.

> Has he ever visited his workshop?

That's three for three.

> I (a Victorian qualified mechanic with the relevant certificate)  can
> answer yes to both and the evidence speaks for itself, no doubt that he
> is more than competent.

Call in some time over the week and I'll slip you your retainer :)

> If his answer to both questions is no then there is no way he is in any
> position to judge.

He's in no position to do *anything*. Remember, this is a moron who's
been in retirement for 25 years and who once whinged that his "skillset"
was suffering as a result.

I would suggest that given his complete lack of understanding of the
functions of *basic* things like carburetors an brake systems that his
"skillet" wasn't all that great to begin with.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 30/01/2022 11:36 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 January 2022 at 16:48:48 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>>>
>>> You asked, so that should be an end to it.
>> I'll keep on asking until he either gives a *valid* answer or pisses off
>> outta here. I didn't start this shit, that was Darren, but I sure as
>> shit will finish it.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Oh my ,you scawwy (not).<FBG

ROTFL :) Talk about delusions of grandeur, huh? :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 30/01/2022 11:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 30/01/2022 9:35 pm, Clocky wrote:

>>>> Or telling grand lies that are easily disproved but sticking to them
>>>> in the face of cold hard evidence?
>
> What evidence?

Lol :)

Ironically, he was talking about "dodging questions" earlier. Watch him
dodge this one :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:39:15 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 2:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> you'll write umpteen posts and several paras like here to say ppl are
>>> wrong claiming you never did an apprenticeship and aren't qualified,
>>> but not one sentence you prove you are. now why would that be?
>>>
>> Perhaps because he doesn't want to. You've never mentioned anything that
>> you've achieved in life, now why would that be?
>
> Because he apparently believes that anything relating to himself is off
> limits, yet my details have to be laid bare for all to see. Such is the
> hypocritical mentality of the FLC :)
>
> Felix has mentioned a number of times that he has "experience and
> qualifications" which permit him to talk with authority about things
> relating to AV, but he chooses not to state what they are and that's his
> right. No one continually hounds him to do so and he has no obligation
> to prove anything about himself to anyone else.
>
> But apparently as far as I'm concerned it's a different story. I've
> mentioned my qualifications and experience like many other people around
> here, but unlike anyone else I'm apparently obligated to prove every bit
> of it and for no reason other than some screaming shitbag ex teacher
> with a personality disorder claims I "have to".

Ummm. I'm not an "ex teacher" [sic] and neither do I have a PD.

> Which, as anyone with half a functioning brain realises, is a complete
> crock of shit.

Your feeble claim? It sure is! Quite a lot of crocks in fact.
>
> Like anyone else here in this group, I don't have to prove shit to
> anyone,

lol!
What a steaming pile of hypocrisy! As I've *proved* many times, demanding
proof of others used to be your go to tactic. How illuminating that it now
isn't.
> and if people choose not to believe what I say because of that
> then that's *their* business. It's not like there's a shitload of people
> here who's opinions I care about :)

In fact there's only one. Isn't that so Fraudster.

Anyhoo folks, if you ever wondered what sound a punctured and deflating
bully makes then you can stop wondering now.

Awwwww. Poor Der Der. Did the nasty people you've abused ask you to prove
your claims?

You're a joke Gibbens.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:59:46 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 3:48 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 30/1/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>> The newsgroup was wrecked long before I entered the scene. When I
>>>> came here there were about a dozen posters. There are still about a
>>>> dozen posters.
>>>
>>> When I joined, the signal to noise was far higher than now.
>>
>> I am sure it was.
>>>
>>>> FWIW, I don't expect Darren to come up with proof so Einstein's quote
>>>> does not apply.
>>>
>>> If you don't expect to achieve anything, what is the point of
>>> polluting the place with the same old crap all day every day?
>>
>> I didn't say that I didn't expect to *achieve* anything.
>
> So you just want to be an arsehole wrecking the place then.

Sooo many thing wrong with that sentence.
>
> If there is
>> *any* truth to the fact that Darren worked at Repco (and it wasn't as an
>> apprentice anyway) then my next task is to catch up with one of my
>> former colleagues who was a *workshop foreman* at Repco Footscray during
>> the time span Darren claims to have been an apprentice auto machinist.
>> Not many of the old colleagues left now, most have retired, so it'll be
>> good to catch up and see how things have changed. New facilities at the
>> new Docklands campus might be worth a look too. That was progressively
>> opened up between 2006-2011 so I missed out on all of that.
>
> Basically what does it matter? He seem competent with cars so who cares?

People who disagree with your assessment.
People who he's abused.
People who don't like liars.
People who worked to obtain qualifications.

hth

>>>> It's difficult, if not impossible, to stump up proof *if said proof
>>>> does not exist*. I *know* it does not exist! That doesn't mean I am
>>>> not entitled to ask, especially since pressure was brought upon me to
>>>> stump up with proof. I did just that. The ball is no longer in my court.
>>>
>>> You asked, so that should be an end to it.
>>
>> I'll keep on asking until he either gives a *valid* answer or pisses off
>> outta here. I didn't start this shit, that was Darren, but I sure as
>> shit will finish it.
>
> As I said being an arsehole for no good reason.

There's a coincidence. Fraudster frequently begins sentences with "As I
said...". Looks like one of those 'dogs and fleas' situations.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:40:37 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 8:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 6:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> I have a very good reason. The trade in Victoria needs a good cleanout
>>> - one fraud at a time.
>>
>> ROTFL, I bet not even you believe that.
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> He doesn't even live in Victoria and has had no trade connection of any
> kind for almost a quarter of a century.

So you're on a fairly equal footing then. Or were there things that you've
neglected to mention/failed to invent since you sold the fabled NAoA and
retired?

> How the fuck would he know
> *what* the state of play was down here? :)

How do you?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:21:53 +1100, Daryl wrote:

>
> He doesn't have any, he's just a trouble maker.
> Has he ever seen any examples of Noddy's work in person?
> Has he ever visited his workshop?

Do you ever answer searching question?
Hint, 'No'. And then you run away and put your fingers in your ears.

> I (a Victorian qualified mechanic with the relevant certificate) can
> answer yes to both and the evidence speaks for itself, no doubt that he
> is more than competent.
> If his answer to both questions is no then there is no way he is in any
> position to judge.

I wonder if it's worth seeing if there's a correlation between especially
cretinous posts from Darren & The Enablers and full moons?

For the umpteenth time Deryl, the quality of the Fraudsters work is
entirely immaterial. It's the *fact* that he's told so many lies that's the
issue.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:38:51 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 6:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 3:48 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 30/1/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>> I didn't say that I didn't expect to *achieve* anything.
>>
>> So you just want to be an arsehole wrecking the place then.
>
> Sucking oxygen you mean?
>
>>  If there is
>>> *any* truth to the fact that Darren worked at Repco (and it wasn't as
>>> an apprentice anyway) then my next task is to catch up with one of my
>>> former colleagues who was a *workshop foreman* at Repco Footscray
>>> during the time span Darren claims to have been an apprentice auto
>>> machinist. Not many of the old colleagues left now, most have retired,
>>> so it'll be good to catch up and see how things have changed. New
>>> facilities at the new Docklands campus might be worth a look too. That
>>> was progressively opened up between 2006-2011 so I missed out on all
>>> of that.
>>
>> Basically what does it matter? He seem competent with cars so who cares?
>
> Clasener cares, because his inferiority complex compels him to.
> Remember, this is the impeccably qualified "teacher" who can't get his
> head around basic brakes 101 and has no understanding of carburetors
> whatsoever :)
>
> Notice how he tries to pad his stories out with irrelevant bullshit?
> Just like he's done in this paragraph above. It's the irrelevant "window
> dressing" like he's put up here about "old colleagues" and "new
> Docklands Campus" that have nothing *whatsoever* to do with anything
> being discussed that he uses as "fill" in a pathetic attempt to give his
> ridiculous claims credit. And as usual he fails, because his little
> anecdotes are always nothing but fantasy.
>
> For the record, I worked at the Repco Footscray workshop, as well as
> short stints at Coburg, Richmond and Horsham, almost right through the
> 1980's and there was no "Foreman". There was a workshop manager and a
> leading hand, but no foreman.
>
> Ask me how I know... :)

Why?
No-one's interested and there's enough on your charge sheet already. And
why will you only answer *some* questions Fraudster?

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 19:06:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 5:17 pm, alvey wrote:

>>
>>> You are achieving nothing other than wrecking the news group.
>>
>> From that other intellect again, the alternative is even worse. If it's
>> "insanity" that you're trying to use as a reason then howabout this? Why on
>> earth would anyone in their right mind allow a lying, hypocritical,
>> abusive, and cowardly fraud to continue on his rancid way untroubled?
>
> SSDD

keith fails yet again to answer a question.

Tell me keith, out of ten, how do you rate yourself as an advocate/debater?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:08:05 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 30/01/2022 9:33 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 30/01/2022 5:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2022 5:17 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:02:13 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely
>>>>>>>>>>> positively
>>>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>    And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>>>>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you
>>>>>>>>> er, owned???
>>>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because apparently
>>>>>>>> these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and can't
>>>>>>>> relate to
>>>>>>>> the idea that people simply think whatever they're saying is
>>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>>> nonsense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
>>>>>>>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener was
>>>>>>>> right about the train incident in that it never happened and that I
>>>>>>>> was never there.
>>>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>>>>>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling
>>>>>>>> apology.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own
>>>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno
>>>>>>> taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said he taught
>>>>>> because the proof is irrefutable and can be cross-checked. Noddy posts
>>>>>> photos of cable ties and projects he copied from youtube but nothing
>>>>>> that proves he ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there is no
>>>>>> record
>>>>>> of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term membership?
>>>>>> Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but even they must
>>>>>> wonder why he's so forthcoming with pointless chest-beating crap yet
>>>>>> when it comes to posting the only thing that could restore some
>>>>>> credibility and integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is qualified,
>>>>>> the keyboard tough guy that has been deriding, attacking, bullying and
>>>>>> false attributing his lies etc to others and demanding proof of claims
>>>>>> of others for decades suddenly develops a glass jaw and runs away,
>>>>>> sniping more lies as he goes.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly) attributed to
>>>>> Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
>>>>> over
>>>>> and over and expecting different results".
>>>>
>>>> lol.
>>>> You're basing your position on an unattributed and incorrect quote.
>>>>
>>>> The actual definition of insanity is, "Insanity. n. mental illness of
>>>> such
>>>> a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality,
>>>> cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis or is subject to
>>>> uncontrollable impulsive behavior". Psychology Today.
>>>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-therapy/200907/the-definition-insanity
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, you're off to a ripping start then and anything following that
>>>> fatally
>>>> flawed opening is redundant. But let's have a look anyway!
>>>>> Well you and xeno, and your two gutless enablers have been doing just
>>>>> that multiple times a day for years now. Even the meanest intellect
>>>>> must
>>>>> realise that no matter how many times you try, the result will
>>>>> always be
>>>>> the same.
>>>>
>>>> Well as one of the "meanest intellects" around that may be your
>>>> conclusion,
>>>> it isn't mine. There is absolutely nothing to say that that the
>>>> result will
>>>> always be the same.
>>>>
>>>>> You are achieving nothing other than wrecking the news group.
>>>>
>>>>  From that other intellect again, the alternative is even worse. If it's
>>>> "insanity" that you're trying to use as a reason then howabout this?
>>>> Why on
>>>> earth would anyone in their right mind allow a lying, hypocritical,
>>>> abusive, and cowardly fraud to continue on his rancid way untroubled?
>>>
>>> SSDD
>>
>> Dodging another valid question keith?
>
> Exactly what is valid about it? It's just your little friend being
> smartarsed as usual.

Right. So it's "valid" for you to use your crazed opinions to reach a
conclusion, but it's invalid for someone to opine against your conclusion
regardless of how rational, reasonable and fact-based their opinion is.

Well you're certainly making yourself clear keith...

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:59:40 +1100, Noddy wrote:

>
> Sorry to disappoint him, but I'm not longing for an apology from anyone.
> If I was I would have already posted enough stuff to choke these useless
> cunts.

You are soooo full of shit Fraudster.

If you had any proof you'd post it in minutes. Like you did with the
(snigger) cable ties. Remember how you threw yourself headlong into that
trap? I do. Top giggle.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 31/01/2022 8:00 am, alvey wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:08:05 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2022 9:33 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2022 5:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/2022 5:17 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:02:13 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship. Absolutely
>>>>>>>>>>>> positively
>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>    And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer here (for
>>>>>>>>>> whatever reason) tell me more about this non synchro Vauxhall you
>>>>>>>>>> er, owned???
>>>>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who disagrees
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of mine, because apparently
>>>>>>>>> these fuckwits have the mentality of 10 year olds and can't
>>>>>>>>> relate to
>>>>>>>>> the idea that people simply think whatever they're saying is
>>>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>>>> nonsense.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100% sure
>>>>>>>>> apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure that Clasener was
>>>>>>>>> right about the train incident in that it never happened and that I
>>>>>>>>> was never there.
>>>>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where he was
>>>>>>>>> proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a grovelling
>>>>>>>>> apology.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their own
>>>>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know that Xeno
>>>>>>>> taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said he taught
>>>>>>> because the proof is irrefutable and can be cross-checked. Noddy posts
>>>>>>> photos of cable ties and projects he copied from youtube but nothing
>>>>>>> that proves he ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there is no
>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>> of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term membership?
>>>>>>> Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but even they must
>>>>>>> wonder why he's so forthcoming with pointless chest-beating crap yet
>>>>>>> when it comes to posting the only thing that could restore some
>>>>>>> credibility and integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is qualified,
>>>>>>> the keyboard tough guy that has been deriding, attacking, bullying and
>>>>>>> false attributing his lies etc to others and demanding proof of claims
>>>>>>> of others for decades suddenly develops a glass jaw and runs away,
>>>>>>> sniping more lies as he goes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly) attributed to
>>>>>> Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> and over and expecting different results".
>>>>>
>>>>> lol.
>>>>> You're basing your position on an unattributed and incorrect quote.
>>>>>
>>>>> The actual definition of insanity is, "Insanity. n. mental illness of
>>>>> such
>>>>> a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality,
>>>>> cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis or is subject to
>>>>> uncontrollable impulsive behavior". Psychology Today.
>>>>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-therapy/200907/the-definition-insanity
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you're off to a ripping start then and anything following that
>>>>> fatally
>>>>> flawed opening is redundant. But let's have a look anyway!
>>>>>> Well you and xeno, and your two gutless enablers have been doing just
>>>>>> that multiple times a day for years now. Even the meanest intellect
>>>>>> must
>>>>>> realise that no matter how many times you try, the result will
>>>>>> always be
>>>>>> the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well as one of the "meanest intellects" around that may be your
>>>>> conclusion,
>>>>> it isn't mine. There is absolutely nothing to say that that the
>>>>> result will
>>>>> always be the same.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are achieving nothing other than wrecking the news group.
>>>>>
>>>>>  From that other intellect again, the alternative is even worse. If it's
>>>>> "insanity" that you're trying to use as a reason then howabout this?
>>>>> Why on
>>>>> earth would anyone in their right mind allow a lying, hypocritical,
>>>>> abusive, and cowardly fraud to continue on his rancid way untroubled?
>>>>
>>>> SSDD
>>>
>>> Dodging another valid question keith?
>>
>> Exactly what is valid about it? It's just your little friend being
>> smartarsed as usual.
>
> Right. So it's "valid" for you to use your crazed opinions to reach a
> conclusion, but it's invalid for someone to opine against your conclusion
> regardless of how rational, reasonable and fact-based their opinion is.
>
> Well you're certainly making yourself clear keith...

tb:dr