On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 08:29:57 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 6:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 1/02/2022 6:49 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> as I've told you several times already, I don't care what you think.
>>>> It's only your ego that makes you think I would. like.. "omg, keefy
>>>> doesn't think much of me. maybe I should jump off the Westgate
>>>> bridge". and the bottom line.. what business is my life of yours
>>>> anyway? answer: it's none of your business. no one needs to lay their
>>>> life bare just to post on a newsgroup. I used to think you were
>>>> erudite and intelligent. now I just think you're a dickhead, because
>>>> there's ample evidence to support the view.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So what is it about your life that makes you so ashamed that you don't
>>> want to mention it?
>>
>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're making
>> yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you criticise for
>> doing it, right?
>>
>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>
> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he isn't
> prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.

Nope. Wrong again keith.

You're demanding that I provide details on things which I haven't claimed.
I'm asking Der Der to provide proof of claims that he *has* made.

Can you see the enormous difference?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 08:31:19 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 3/02/2022 7:32 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:24:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/02/2022 7:14 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:32:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/02/2022 5:48 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> your contributions to this newsgrope are truly outstanding! shirley you
>>>>>> must have studied long and hard to achieve such excellence!
>>>>>>
>>>>> It's all that the post deserved. Btw "shirley" is alveys signature
>>>>
>>>> Nope. Wrong again keith. Shirley you've seen 'Flying High' (aka
>>>> 'Airplane!') in the 40 odd years its been out?
>>>
>>> I was talking about this context alvey,
>>
>> Sorry. But I do have trouble following you.
>
> Maybe you are as clever as you think you are then.

Well written keith.

But anyhoo, "clever" is a relative thing...

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 3/02/2022 9:29 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:

>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're
>> making yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you criticise
>> for doing it, right?
>>
>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>
> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he isn't
> prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.

So do what I do and block the fucktards. You have control here. You
won't ever win an argument with these morons because they're completely
insane and totally incapable of any kind of conversation other than
repetitive lunacy, so shit-can them and you don't have to be bothered by it.

They're attention whores, and the best way to deal with them is to cut
off their oxygen.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/02/2022 8:38 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 9:31 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 7:32 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:24:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/02/2022 7:14 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:32:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/02/2022 5:48 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> your contributions to this newsgrope are truly outstanding!
>>>>>>> shirley you
>>>>>>> must have studied long and hard to achieve such excellence!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's all that the post deserved. Btw "shirley" is alveys signature
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Wrong again keith. Shirley you've seen 'Flying High' (aka
>>>>> 'Airplane!') in the 40 odd years its been out?
>>>>
>>>> I was talking about this context alvey,
>>>
>>> Sorry. But I do have trouble following you.
>>
>> Maybe you are as clever as you think you are then.
>
>
> yes, I think he is

Well it's all relative, I suppose that you have to look up to people of
even average intelligence.

>>>> even you should be able to comprehend that.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you should be clearer when you write?
>>>
>>>> felix is just aping his hero.
>>>
>>> Or he could be sharing a catchphrase, as people do, from a much loved
>>> movie. You just don't know.
>>>
>>>
>
> he hasn't seen it? shirley not!
>
>
>>> hth
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>>
>

On 3/02/2022 8:24 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 7:06 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:12:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Since you refuse to even mention them, there are really only two
>>> possible options either you don't have any or that they are so
>>> insignificant that you feel ashamed.
>> Again, that's a very good Fraudster impersonation keith. He also
>> routinely
>> brays that, "The only possibilities are...", when in fact, they aren't.
>> They're the only possibilities that suit his/your narrative.
>>
>> In this case, there's also the possibility that, again, unlike you and
>> Der
>> Der, felix isn't comfortable talking about himself.
>> Then there's the possibility he sees zero relevance to his achievments
>> and
>> knowing how to pull an engine apart.
>> Then there's the possibility that he believes there are some serious
>> nutters in this group so releasing any personal details is a bad idea.
>
>
> yes to all that! reason and logic are not keefy's forte.. along with
> other things
>
>
>>
>> And there's a few other "possibilities" that I won't waste time on as you
>> should get the drift by now.
>
>
> I worked for ASIO? I'm an illegal alien? I'm a hitman for hire? so many
> possibilities, so little time..

More likely a boring little man with nothing to report.

On 3/02/2022 9:41 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 6:38 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:52:51 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 4:56 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to
>>>>>>>>>>> another man.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump.
>>>>>>>>> Basically he's not
>>>>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like
>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away*
>>>>>>>> from bullies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem
>>>>>>>> gambler"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good
>>>>>> of you to
>>>>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used
>>>>>> to go out
>>>>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
>>>>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.
>>>>
>>>> So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me
>>>> because other
>>>> people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.
>>>
>>> You put shit on me all the time you buffoon. BTW How do you defame
>>> someone who doesn't actually exist. You're just a sock. No one here
>>> knows who the hell you are but you sure as shit throw enough crap
>>> around
>>> to have people think you are full of your own importance.
>>
>> You have a badly distorted lens Gumps. Irrepairably I suspect.
>>   And if I was "full of my own importance" then I'd be regaling you with
>> tales of my mighty achievements and glorious past. [Note: Where
>> "tales" &
>> "achievements" are not necessarily true].
>>
>> But speaking of "full of your own importance"!
>>
>> “No I'm just here to annoy the crap out of you! Mainly because you're
>> the
>> biggest troll I've seen on the net ever. I've beaten better one's than
>> you though.” Gumps, 26Oct18
>>
>> “True to form you don't have the intellect for an intelligent debate.”
>> Gumps, 14apr18
>>
>> “Noddy abused you from the word go because you deserved it. You're a
>> prententious wanker with tickets on yourself.” Gumps, 06Oct19
>>
>> “Perhaps it's time you grew up.” Gumps, 03Oct19
>>
>> “Unlike you, I have no need to tell lies to try and win an argument”,
>> Gump,
>> 21Jan18
>> “I guess I could ask Ant about uncle alvey and his gambling problems.”
>> Gumps, 10Jul17
>>
>> “you can also stump up an apology for besmirching my reputation.” Gumps,
>> 21Jan18
>>
>> Not a pretty picture eh Gumps?
>>
> No you're not a pretty picture. A dirty, smelly, holey old sock is
> what you are.
>

wot? you don't like ready your own words?

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/02/2022 9:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 02:00:18 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/02/2022 1:11 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 2/02/2022 10:09 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 10:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 3:52 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 4:56 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically he's not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away*
>>>>>>>>>>>> from bullies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> gambler"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good
>>>>>>>>>> of you to
>>>>>>>>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC)
>>>>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>> to go out
>>>>>>>>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta
>>>>>>>>>> larfs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from
>>>>>>>>> you and
>>>>>>>>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me
>>>>>>>> because other
>>>>>>>> people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You put shit on me all the time you buffoon. BTW How do you defame
>>>>>>> someone who doesn't actually exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know all my details and so does everyone else thanks to you
>>>>>> posting my personal details in this public forum without permission
>>>>>> for nefarious reasons *and* you then defamed me calling *me* a
>>>>>> "stalker".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You even admitted that you went too far.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A retraction and an apology will be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    You're just a sock. No one here
>>>>>>> knows who the hell you are
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know this how?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but you sure as shit throw enough crap around
>>>>>>> to have people think you are full of your own importance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You throw shit sometimes it comes back at you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it's ok to declare that you're a child molesting, tax dodging
>>>>>>>> necrophiliac then because your heroic mate hurls abuse at me most
>>>>>>>> days?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go right ahead. It will only confirm my opinion that there's more
>>>>>>> than a few sheep running loose in the top paddock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OIC but defaming someone as a "stalker" or another a "problem
>>>>>> gambler" is OK somehow?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're the victim when you have bullied, harassed and vilified me for
>>>>> years. Grow a brain idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Really? In that case I offer you a full retraction and unreserved
>>>> apology for every instance of bullying, harassment and vilification
>>>> for
>>>> which you provide evidence of.
>>>
>>> Your bullying me with this intimidation and a conditional apology which
>>> is not worth the time it took you to type it out. This is the first
>>> example as you are claiming something that is not the case. I posted
>>> what you had already divulged in the forum and it was not for nefarious
>>> reasons. You had already posted the information. Granted it was some
>>> time ago. You have called me a stalker on several occasions and I
>>> strongly object to that. I'll accept an unreserved apology, nothing
>>> more, nothing less.
>>
>> While "unreserved apologies" are in the air... "problem gambler" Gumps?
>
> But you're just a dirty smelly holey old sock. You're not a real person.
>

you must have that on speed dial..

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/2/2022 1:09 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 10:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 3:52 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 4:56 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another
>>>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically
>>>>>>>>> he's not
>>>>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away*
>>>>>>>> from bullies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem
>>>>>>>> gambler"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of
>>>>>> you to
>>>>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used
>>>>>> to go out
>>>>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
>>>>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.
>>>>
>>>> So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me
>>>> because other
>>>> people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.
>>>
>>> You put shit on me all the time you buffoon. BTW How do you defame
>>> someone who doesn't actually exist.
>>
>> You know all my details and so does everyone else thanks to you
>> posting my personal details in this public forum without permission
>> for nefarious reasons *and* you then defamed me calling *me* a "stalker".
>>
>> You even admitted that you went too far.
>>
>> A retraction and an apology will be fine.
>>
>>
>>
>>   You're just a sock. No one here
>>> knows who the hell you are
>>
>> You know this how?
>>
>> but you sure as shit throw enough crap around
>>> to have people think you are full of your own importance.
>>>>
>>>>> You throw shit sometimes it comes back at you.
>>>>
>>>> So it's ok to declare that you're a child molesting, tax dodging
>>>> necrophiliac then because your heroic mate hurls abuse at me most days?
>>>
>>> Go right ahead. It will only confirm my opinion that there's more
>>> than a few sheep running loose in the top paddock.
>>
>>
>> OIC but defaming someone as a "stalker" or another a "problem gambler"
>> is OK somehow?
>
> You're the victim when you have bullied, harassed and vilified me for
> years. Grow a brain idiot.

You clowns want to recreate history and nothing more. You rely on
everyone having a short memory.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 3/02/2022 10:54 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 8:38 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 9:31 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 3/02/2022 7:32 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:24:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/02/2022 7:14 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:32:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/02/2022 5:48 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> your contributions to this newsgrope are truly outstanding!
>>>>>>>> shirley you
>>>>>>>> must have studied long and hard to achieve such excellence!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's all that the post deserved. Btw "shirley" is alveys signature
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. Wrong again keith. Shirley you've seen 'Flying High' (aka
>>>>>> 'Airplane!') in the 40 odd years its been out?
>>>>>
>>>>> I was talking about this context alvey,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry. But I do have trouble following you.
>>>
>>> Maybe you are as clever as you think you are then.
>>
>>
>> yes, I think he is
>
>
> Well it's all relative, I suppose that you have to look up to people
> of even average intelligence.

I wouldn't be looking up to you then would I :)

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/02/2022 10:03 am, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 08:31:19 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 3/02/2022 7:32 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:24:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/02/2022 7:14 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:32:34 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/02/2022 5:48 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> your contributions to this newsgrope are truly outstanding! shirley you
>>>>>>> must have studied long and hard to achieve such excellence!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's all that the post deserved. Btw "shirley" is alveys signature
>>>>> Nope. Wrong again keith. Shirley you've seen 'Flying High' (aka
>>>>> 'Airplane!') in the 40 odd years its been out?
>>>> I was talking about this context alvey,
>>> Sorry. But I do have trouble following you.
>> Maybe you are as clever as you think you are then.
> Well written keith.
>
> But anyhoo, "clever" is a relative thing...
>
>

I thought he just missed out the 'not'

> alvey
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/02/2022 10:53 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 9:29 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're
>>> making yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you
>>> criticise for doing it, right?
>>>
>>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>>
>> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he
>> isn't prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.
>
> So do what I do and block the fucktards. You have control here. You
> won't ever win an argument

definitely because we use reason, logic, and facts and your lot only
insults and abuse

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/02/2022 6:18 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 8:01 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:49:34 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 6:25 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 2/2/2022 6:52 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> Go right ahead. It will only confirm my opinion that there's more than
>>>>> a few sheep running loose in the top paddock.
>>>> How odd! That was almost exactly the opinion I had formed of you. I was
>>>> thinking kangas bouncing around though for you sure are rattled lately.
>>> Not in your wildest dreams xeno. You have no credibility with me so
>>> therefore I take what you say with a grain of salt. Your Napoleonic
>>> complex is outstanding.
>> Oops! Couple of errors here Gumps.
>>
>> 1. It's "Napoleon Complex", not "Napoleonic".
>> 2. Nappo was actually taller than the average Frenchman of his day.
>
>
> yes, and quite handsome too.

Maybe due to his Italian heritage.

Josephine however had bad teeth! I've
> actually seen many of his personal items. there was an exhibition in
> Australia some time ago.
>
>

I hope Josephine's bad teeth weren't displayed as one of his personal
items. Ewww :-)

On 3/02/2022 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 8:24 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 7:06 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:12:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Since you refuse to even mention them, there are really only two
>>>> possible options either you don't have any or that they are so
>>>> insignificant that you feel ashamed.
>>> Again, that's a very good Fraudster impersonation keith. He also
>>> routinely
>>> brays that, "The only possibilities are...", when in fact, they aren't.
>>> They're the only possibilities that suit his/your narrative.
>>>
>>> In this case, there's also the possibility that, again, unlike you
>>> and Der
>>> Der, felix isn't comfortable talking about himself.
>>> Then there's the possibility he sees zero relevance to his
>>> achievments and
>>> knowing how to pull an engine apart.
>>> Then there's the possibility that he believes there are some serious
>>> nutters in this group so releasing any personal details is a bad idea.
>>
>>
>> yes to all that! reason and logic are not keefy's forte.. along with
>> other things
>>
>>
>>>
>>> And there's a few other "possibilities" that I won't waste time on
>>> as you
>>> should get the drift by now.
>>
>>
>> I worked for ASIO? I'm an illegal alien? I'm a hitman for hire? so
>> many possibilities, so little time..
>
> More likely a boring little man with nothing to report.
>

oh is this one of those 'mine is bigger than yours' things keefy?

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/02/2022 10:57 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 9:41 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 6:38 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:52:51 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/02/2022 4:56 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to
>>>>>>>>>>>> another man.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump.
>>>>>>>>>> Basically he's not
>>>>>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like
>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away*
>>>>>>>>> from bullies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem
>>>>>>>>> gambler"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good
>>>>>>> of you to
>>>>>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC)
>>>>>>> used to go out
>>>>>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me
>>>>> because other
>>>>> people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.
>>>>
>>>> You put shit on me all the time you buffoon. BTW How do you defame
>>>> someone who doesn't actually exist. You're just a sock. No one here
>>>> knows who the hell you are but you sure as shit throw enough crap
>>>> around
>>>> to have people think you are full of your own importance.
>>>
>>> You have a badly distorted lens Gumps. Irrepairably I suspect.
>>>   And if I was "full of my own importance" then I'd be regaling you
>>> with
>>> tales of my mighty achievements and glorious past. [Note: Where
>>> "tales" &
>>> "achievements" are not necessarily true].
>>>
>>> But speaking of "full of your own importance"!
>>>
>>> “No I'm just here to annoy the crap out of you! Mainly because
>>> you're the
>>> biggest troll I've seen on the net ever. I've beaten better one's than
>>> you though.” Gumps, 26Oct18
>>>
>>> “True to form you don't have the intellect for an intelligent debate.”
>>> Gumps, 14apr18
>>>
>>> “Noddy abused you from the word go because you deserved it. You're a
>>> prententious wanker with tickets on yourself.” Gumps, 06Oct19
>>>
>>> “Perhaps it's time you grew up.” Gumps, 03Oct19
>>>
>>> “Unlike you, I have no need to tell lies to try and win an
>>> argument”, Gump,
>>> 21Jan18
>>> “I guess I could ask Ant about uncle alvey and his gambling problems.”
>>> Gumps, 10Jul17
>>>
>>> “you can also stump up an apology for besmirching my reputation.”
>>> Gumps,
>>> 21Jan18
>>>
>>> Not a pretty picture eh Gumps?
>>>
>> No you're not a pretty picture. A dirty, smelly, holey old sock is
>> what you are.
>>
>
> wot? you don't like ready your own words?
>

'reading' not 'ready'

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 3/02/2022 11:56 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 6:18 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 8:01 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:49:34 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:25 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 2/2/2022 6:52 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> Go right ahead. It will only confirm my opinion that there's more
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> a few sheep running loose in the top paddock.
>>>>> How odd! That was almost exactly the opinion I had formed of you.
>>>>> I was
>>>>> thinking kangas bouncing around though for you sure are rattled
>>>>> lately.
>>>> Not in your wildest dreams xeno. You have no credibility with me so
>>>> therefore I take what you say with a grain of salt. Your Napoleonic
>>>> complex is outstanding.
>>> Oops! Couple of errors here Gumps.
>>>
>>> 1. It's "Napoleon Complex", not "Napoleonic".
>>> 2. Nappo was actually taller than the average Frenchman of his day.
>>
>>
>> yes, and quite handsome too.
>
> Maybe due to his Italian heritage.
>
>
>> Josephine however had bad teeth! I've actually seen many of his
>> personal items. there was an exhibition in Australia some time ago.
>>
>>
>
> I hope Josephine's bad teeth weren't displayed as one of his personal
> items. Ewww :-)

lol! no they weren't

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 10:53:50 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 3/02/2022 9:29 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're
>>> making yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you criticise
>>> for doing it, right?
>>>
>>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>>
>> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he isn't
>> prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.
>
> So do what I do and block the fucktards.

Yet strangely, there are multiple instances of you responding *directly* to
someone who you've brayed as being in your killfail.

> You have control here. You
> won't ever win an argument with these morons because they're completely
> insane and totally incapable of any kind of conversation other than
> repetitive lunacy, so shit-can them and you don't have to be bothered by it.
>
> They're attention whores, and the best way to deal with them is to cut
> off their oxygen.

lol.

You hide behind your killfail because you can't defend your claims Der Der.
*And* because you're a deflated blowhard.

alvey
"The difference between Ozliar and everyone else is that he's the only one
that goes out of his way to make grand claims about his personal life or
acomplishments and then gets his knickers in a severe twist when people
choose not to believe him. What's even more difficult to fathom is that
he'll happily tell you that he never volunteers information about himself
or that he doesn't care what other people think of him, yet everything we
know about the idiot comes from *him* and for someone who doesn't care he
sure makes a shitload of noise when his "stories" aren't well recieved".

Fraudster, projecting like buggery.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 2/02/2022 3:30 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 1/02/2022 11:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 1/02/2022 2:46 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 1/02/2022 1:03 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 31/01/2022 9:30 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 31/01/2022 11:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 31/01/2022 9:03 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 8:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 9:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 5:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 6:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 7:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 12:35 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 9:00 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:02 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 01:53:22 UTC+11,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/01/2022 12:13 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have *never* completed an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely positively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% sure of it. You are a fraud!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which speaks volumes about his enablers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   And heeerrrreeeeeesssssss pepe... <G> Just while yer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here (for whatever reason) tell me more about this non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synchro Vauxhall you er, owned???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I love this "enablers" bullshit. Apparently anyone who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disagrees with the "FLC" is automatically a supporter of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mine, because apparently these fuckwits have the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentality of 10 year olds and can't relate to the idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that people simply think whatever they're saying is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete nonsense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just like the comment of Jerky Birko's above. He's 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure apparently. Oddly enough, he was *also* 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Clasener was right about the train incident in that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it never happened and that I was never there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He was 100% sure about that *right* up to the point where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was proven to be conclusively wrong and had to make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grovelling apology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These fucking idiots apparently *never* learn from their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own mistakes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're the one who never learns to stop lying. we know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Xeno taught where he said he did, so you can just stfu!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Noddy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We know with 100% certainty that Xeno taught where he said
>>>>>>>>>>>>> he taught because the proof is irrefutable and can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cross-checked. Noddy posts photos of cable ties and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects he copied from youtube but nothing that proves he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever completed an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If he completed an apprenticeship how can it be that there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no record of it and he knows *nothing* about the process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why does the VACC have no record of his claimed long term
>>>>>>>>>>>>> membership? Where is his explanation for that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> His gutless enablers don't dare ask these questions but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even they must wonder why he's so forthcoming with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointless chest-beating crap yet when it comes to posting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only thing that could restore some credibility and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrity, IOW verifiable proof that he is qualified, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keyboard tough guy that has been deriding, attacking,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullying and false attributing his lies etc to others and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> demanding proof of claims of others for decades suddenly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> develops a glass jaw and runs away, sniping more lies as he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a quote popularly (and probably mistakenly)
>>>>>>>>>>>> attributed to Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is
>>>>>>>>>>>> doing the same thing over and over and expecting different
>>>>>>>>>>>> results".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean like claiming you're qualified for decades when all
>>>>>>>>>>> the evidence shows you're not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What have I ever claimed to be qualified for?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Or telling grand lies that are easily disproved but sticking
>>>>>>>>>>> to them in the face of cold hard evidence?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What evidence?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody in the history of aus.cars has done so much damage to
>>>>>>>>>>> the group. Just look at the most recent attacks on people
>>>>>>>>>>> that dared ask an automotive question FFS keith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What damage have I done to the NG?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Open your fucking eyes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That sort of thing?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you even know who you're replying to?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "On 30/01/2022 5:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you remember keith?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're pretty vague these days mate and making less and less
>>>>>>>>> sense by the day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that your the one who's vague, your remarks were
>>>>>>>> obviously not meant for me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They *are* meant for you in reference to the *fraud* which you
>>>>>>> pretend you don't understand.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At least, I hope you are pretending...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You reply to me with a direct attack on somebody else, you are
>>>>>> really losing it, must be the isolation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it was obvious what he did for anyone with at least half a brain
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> keith needs to see a doctor.
>>>
>>> I'm going to see my endocrinologist this week - good enough?
>>
>> That remains to be seen but I sincerely hope so for your sake.
>
> Well she's doing a good job of keeping my diabetes under control.

On 3/2/2022 9:41 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 6:38 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:52:51 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 4:56 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another
>>>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically
>>>>>>>>> he's not
>>>>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away*
>>>>>>>> from bullies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem
>>>>>>>> gambler"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of
>>>>>> you to
>>>>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used
>>>>>> to go out
>>>>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
>>>>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.
>>>>
>>>> So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me
>>>> because other
>>>> people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.
>>>
>>> You put shit on me all the time you buffoon. BTW How do you defame
>>> someone who doesn't actually exist. You're just a sock. No one here
>>> knows who the hell you are but you sure as shit throw enough crap around
>>> to have people think you are full of your own importance.
>>
>> You have a badly distorted lens Gumps. Irrepairably I suspect.
>> And if I was "full of my own importance" then I'd be regaling you with
>> tales of my mighty achievements and glorious past. [Note: Where "tales" &
>> "achievements" are not necessarily true].
>>
>> But speaking of "full of your own importance"!
>>
>> “No I'm just here to annoy the crap out of you! Mainly because you're the
>> biggest troll I've seen on the net ever. I've beaten better one's than
>> you though.” Gumps, 26Oct18
>>
>> “True to form you don't have the intellect for an intelligent debate.”
>> Gumps, 14apr18
>>
>> “Noddy abused you from the word go because you deserved it. You're a
>> prententious wanker with tickets on yourself.” Gumps, 06Oct19
>>
>> “Perhaps it's time you grew up.” Gumps, 03Oct19
>>
>> “Unlike you, I have no need to tell lies to try and win an argument”,
>> Gump,
>> 21Jan18
>> “I guess I could ask Ant about uncle alvey and his gambling problems.”
>> Gumps, 10Jul17
>>
>> “you can also stump up an apology for besmirching my reputation.” Gumps,
>> 21Jan18
>>
>> Not a pretty picture eh Gumps?
>>
> No you're not a pretty picture. A dirty, smelly, holey old sock is what
> you are.
>
You're still strange!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 3/2/2022 9:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 02:00:18 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/02/2022 1:11 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 2/02/2022 10:09 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 10:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 3:52 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 4:56 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically he's not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away*
>>>>>>>>>>>> from bullies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> gambler"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good
>>>>>>>>>> of you to
>>>>>>>>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used
>>>>>>>>>> to go out
>>>>>>>>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from
>>>>>>>>> you and
>>>>>>>>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me
>>>>>>>> because other
>>>>>>>> people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You put shit on me all the time you buffoon. BTW How do you defame
>>>>>>> someone who doesn't actually exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know all my details and so does everyone else thanks to you
>>>>>> posting my personal details in this public forum without permission
>>>>>> for nefarious reasons *and* you then defamed me calling *me* a
>>>>>> "stalker".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You even admitted that you went too far.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A retraction and an apology will be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    You're just a sock. No one here
>>>>>>> knows who the hell you are
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know this how?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but you sure as shit throw enough crap around
>>>>>>> to have people think you are full of your own importance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You throw shit sometimes it comes back at you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it's ok to declare that you're a child molesting, tax dodging
>>>>>>>> necrophiliac then because your heroic mate hurls abuse at me most
>>>>>>>> days?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go right ahead. It will only confirm my opinion that there's more
>>>>>>> than a few sheep running loose in the top paddock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OIC but defaming someone as a "stalker" or another a "problem
>>>>>> gambler" is OK somehow?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're the victim when you have bullied, harassed and vilified me for
>>>>> years. Grow a brain idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Really? In that case I offer you a full retraction and unreserved
>>>> apology for every instance of bullying, harassment and vilification for
>>>> which you provide evidence of.
>>>
>>> Your bullying me with this intimidation and a conditional apology which
>>> is not worth the time it took you to type it out. This is the first
>>> example as you are claiming something that is not the case. I posted
>>> what you had already divulged in the forum and it was not for nefarious
>>> reasons. You had already posted the information. Granted it was some
>>> time ago. You have called me a stalker on several occasions and I
>>> strongly object to that. I'll accept an unreserved apology, nothing
>>> more, nothing less.
>>
>> While "unreserved apologies" are in the air... "problem gambler" Gumps?
>
> But you're just a dirty smelly holey old sock. You're not a real person.
>
Actually, you're beyond strange, you're downright weird!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 3/2/2022 10:53 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 9:29 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're
>>> making yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you
>>> criticise for doing it, right?
>>>
>>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>>
>> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he
>> isn't prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.
>
> So do what I do and block the fucktards. You have control here. You
> won't ever win an argument with these morons because they're completely

There's no *argument* here Darren. I made a *statement* that you are a
liar and a fraud because your claims to be a 3 times apprenticed
tradesman are fake and fraudulent. No proof exists in any government
archive that backs your claims so you have no argument, none whatsoever.
What's more, you have run away from providing *conclusive proof*. I
mean, how hard can it be to proffer a bit of paper or two (with numbers)
that prove your claims? I'm sure you would love nothing more than
shooting me down in flames - so do it Darren!

> insane and totally incapable of any kind of conversation other than
> repetitive lunacy, so shit-can them and you don't have to be bothered by
> it.

You have claimed that for *years* now yet here you are still arguing the
point. As I said, there's no argument, your claims are fake and
fraudulent and you *know* you have no way of proving otherwise!
>
> They're attention whores, and the best way to deal with them is to cut
> off their oxygen.

You are giving me more than enough oxygen by the manner in which you
*run away* from substantiating your fraudulent claims.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 3/02/2022 2:55 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 3/2/2022 9:42 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:

>>
>> But you're just a dirty smelly holey old sock. You're not a real person.
>>
> Actually, you're beyond strange, you're downright weird!
>

Getting that from you is the ultimate compliment and proves that I am
sane. Unlike your acolytes.

On 3/2/2022 1:33 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 10:53:50 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 3/02/2022 9:29 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're
>>>> making yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you criticise
>>>> for doing it, right?
>>>>
>>>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>>>
>>> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he isn't
>>> prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.
>>
>> So do what I do and block the fucktards.
>
> Yet strangely, there are multiple instances of you responding *directly* to
> someone who you've brayed as being in your killfail.
>
>> You have control here. You
>> won't ever win an argument with these morons because they're completely
>> insane and totally incapable of any kind of conversation other than
>> repetitive lunacy, so shit-can them and you don't have to be bothered by it.
>>
>> They're attention whores, and the best way to deal with them is to cut
>> off their oxygen.
>
> lol.
>
> You hide behind your killfail because you can't defend your claims Der Der.
> *And* because you're a deflated blowhard.
>
That is a perfect description of Darren, a deflated blowhard. Love it.
>
>
> alvey
> "The difference between Ozliar and everyone else is that he's the only one
> that goes out of his way to make grand claims about his personal life or
> acomplishments and then gets his knickers in a severe twist when people
> choose not to believe him. What's even more difficult to fathom is that
> he'll happily tell you that he never volunteers information about himself
> or that he doesn't care what other people think of him, yet everything we
> know about the idiot comes from *him* and for someone who doesn't care he
> sure makes a shitload of noise when his "stories" aren't well recieved".
>
> Fraudster, projecting like buggery.
>
>
>
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 20:27:42 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 2/2/2022 7:49 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> > On 2/02/2022 6:25 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >> On 2/2/2022 6:52 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Go right ahead. It will only confirm my opinion that there's more
> >>> than a few sheep running loose in the top paddock.
> >>
> >> How odd! That was almost exactly the opinion I had formed of you. I
> >> was thinking kangas bouncing around though for you sure are rattled
> >> lately.
> >
> > Not in your wildest dreams xeno. You have no credibility with me so
> > therefore I take what you say with a grain of salt. Your Napoleonic
> > complex is outstanding.
> >
> > As someone said, it's like being beaten with a feather by your
> > grandmother in a nursing home.
> >
> > You're a loser xeno. Always have been, always will be.
> You puir wee little man!
~~~~~~~~
A very odd response by someone that, has in no uncertain terms, has had his arse handed to him!..
( Or maybe it was self recrimination? See if you can work out why one would think that!)
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 3/02/2022 10:55 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 10:53 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 9:29 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 8:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> Keith, you know by continually hounding Felix in this way you're
>>>> making yourself look just as batshit crazy as the people you
>>>> criticise for doing it, right?
>>>>
>>>> If Felix doesn't want to say, he doesn't have to. Who gives a shit?
>>>>
>>> He is an annoying little hypocrite who demands from others what he
>>> isn't prepared to provide himself. Same goes for alvey, even more so.
>>
>> So do what I do and block the fucktards. You have control here. You
>> won't ever win an argument
>
>
> definitely because we use reason, logic, and facts and your lot only
> insults and abuse
>
>
Truth, justice and the Australian way eh?

What you are, in fact, is just a bunch of mediocre pyromaniacs.

On 3/02/2022 10:58 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/02/2022 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 3/02/2022 8:24 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/02/2022 7:06 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:12:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Since you refuse to even mention them, there are really only two
>>>>> possible options either you don't have any or that they are so
>>>>> insignificant that you feel ashamed.
>>>> Again, that's a very good Fraudster impersonation keith. He also
>>>> routinely
>>>> brays that, "The only possibilities are...", when in fact, they aren't.
>>>> They're the only possibilities that suit his/your narrative.
>>>>
>>>> In this case, there's also the possibility that, again, unlike you
>>>> and Der
>>>> Der, felix isn't comfortable talking about himself.
>>>> Then there's the possibility he sees zero relevance to his
>>>> achievments and
>>>> knowing how to pull an engine apart.
>>>> Then there's the possibility that he believes there are some serious
>>>> nutters in this group so releasing any personal details is a bad idea.
>>>
>>>
>>> yes to all that! reason and logic are not keefy's forte.. along with
>>> other things
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> And there's a few other "possibilities" that I won't waste time on
>>>> as you
>>>> should get the drift by now.
>>>
>>>
>>> I worked for ASIO? I'm an illegal alien? I'm a hitman for hire? so
>>> many possibilities, so little time..
>>
>> More likely a boring little man with nothing to report.
>>
>
> oh is this one of those 'mine is bigger than yours' things keefy?
>
I have no idea felix, how big is yours then?