On 2/2/2022 9:11 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>
>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>
>
> Nothing. He's a nobody now. He's been offered an opportunity but as
> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's not
> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>
High school certificates can be *faked*, trade reg. numbers cannot.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 2/2/2022 9:17 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 9:11 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>
>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>
>>
>> Nothing. He's a nobody now. He's been offered an opportunity but as
>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's
>> not here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>
> They want to watch themselves, as the new anti electronic media anti
> bullying laws are in effect and they could trip some red flags with
> their daily bombardment of the same repetitive shit.
>
> Still, I don't think it would amount to much. They're pretty pissweak,
> and it's kinda like being bullied by your grandmother from her bed in a
> nursing home :)
>
Let me know when you've grown some balls Darren.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>
>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>
>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>
>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's not
>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>
>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away* from bullies.
>>
>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely hypocritical
>> stupid.
>>
>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>
> No I must have forgotten...
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>
> How's that syndicate going?

Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of you to
remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to go out
for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.

Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 2/2/2022 9:47 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 1/02/2022 6:24 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 1/02/2022 8:27 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 16:17:18 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>> Remember, you're the one who was too stupid to pass the year 9 exam so
>>>> you failed to even get an apprenticeship. Hell, you even skipped out on
>>>> the last 3 months of the school year. Why was that Darren? Knew you
>>>> weren't going to pass anyway? The school bullies giving you too much
>>>> stick? Or both of those?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``````````~~~
>>
>>>   Yer a prize dickhead kryppy, Is this a new twist on yer attack??
>>> Out of the two of ya, I`m pretty it *would not be noddy getting
>>> bullied....:)))
>>
>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure as well :)
>>
>> Notice the bullshit he has invented here? I never said *anything*
>> about not passing any "exams", and neither did I ever mention missing
>> the last 3 months of school. These are *his* insane inventions. What
>> *I* said was that I left school in the last few weeks as I had been
>> offered an apprenticeship and they wanted me to start straight away.
>> As to how long before the end of term I left I couldn't accurately
>> tell you as it was almost 45 years ago and I don't remember. Could
>> have been 5 weeks, and it could have been 2. Either way, the school
>> probably never noticed :)
>>
>> I have a document here from the Education Department of Victoria which
>> is an Intermediate Technical Examination certificate dated December
>> 15th, 1977 showing me passing in 5 subjects, and I'm happy to scan
>> this certificate and post it to a hosting site and make the link to it
>> available here in exchange for Clasener's guarantee that he admit that
>> everything he has ever claimed about my secondary school record has
>> been nothing but a complete falsehood, that he intentionally
>> fabricated his claims for no reason other than to attempt to pad out
>> his bullshit claim that my education standard was insufficient for me
>> to have qualified for an apprenticeship.
>>
>> Over to you, Kryppy. The ball's in your court now.
>>
>>
>
>
> That's not proof you completed your apprenticeship or are qualified
> champ, not even close and doesn't let you off the hook.

A pass at year 9 *still* doesn't get him an AME apprenticeship, he
needed year 10 for that. Darren's none too bright.
>
> You don't get to set the terms, you get to provide proof of *your*
> claims. That's how it works.
>
> You reminded other people of that often enough.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:11:48 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 2/02/2022 6:52 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:17:52 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 9:11 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>>
>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now. He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's not
>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>
>>> They want to watch themselves, as the new anti electronic media anti
>>> bullying laws are in effect and they could trip some red flags with
>>> their daily bombardment of the same repetitive shit.
>>
>> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
>> You are such a hoot Fraudster!
>>
>> 'Repetition' isn't a problem Der Der. Your normal bile, abuse and
>> defamatory squeals however makes you *easily* the 'Most Likely' to get
>> punted.
>>
>
> Indeed but not just him. There is a clear cut case for defamation from
> one of his mates too.

Prolly.
I'm confident that none of the Fraudsters' mob have read the new Laws.
Could be some interesting times ahead...

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>>
>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>
>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>
>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's not
>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>
>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away* from bullies.
>>>
>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely hypocritical
>>> stupid.
>>>
>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>>
>> No I must have forgotten...
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>
>> How's that syndicate going?
>
> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of you to
> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to go out
> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>
> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>
You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize. You throw shit
sometimes it comes back at you.

On 2/2/2022 1:29 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>
>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically
>>>>> he's not
>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>>
>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away* from
>>>> bullies.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>> hypocritical
>>>> stupid.
>>>>
>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>>>
>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>
>>>
>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>
>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of you to
>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to
>> go out
>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>
>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>
> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize. You throw shit
> sometimes it comes back at you.
>
Your own shit has certainly blown back in your face, eh?

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:32:18 +1100, Xeno wrote:

> On 2/2/2022 12:53 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 12:07 am, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 1/2/2022 11:35 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 1/02/2022 8:45 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 1/2/2022 9:24 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure as well :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Notice the bullshit he has invented here? I never said *anything*
>>>>>> about not passing any "exams", and neither did I ever mention
>>>>>> missing the last 3 months of school. These are *his* insane
>>>>>> inventions. What *I* said was that I left school in the last few
>>>>>> weeks as I had been offered an apprenticeship and they wanted me to
>>>>>> start straight away. As to how long before the end of term I left I
>>>>>> couldn't accurately tell you as it was almost 45 years ago and I
>>>>>> don't remember. Could have been 5 weeks, and it could have been 2.
>>>>>> Either way, the school probably never noticed :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a document here from the Education Department of Victoria
>>>>>> which is an Intermediate Technical Examination certificate dated
>>>>>> December 15th, 1977 showing me passing in 5 subjects, and I'm happy
>>>>>> to scan this certificate and post it to a hosting site and make the
>>>>>> link to it available here in exchange for Clasener's guarantee that
>>>>>> he admit that everything he has ever claimed about my secondary
>>>>>> school record has been nothing but a complete falsehood, that he
>>>>>> intentionally fabricated his claims for no reason other than to
>>>>>> attempt to pad out his bullshit claim that my education standard
>>>>>> was insufficient for me to have qualified for an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over to you, Kryppy. The ball's in your court now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just post your trade qualification numbers Darren. They are the only
>>>>> thing that absolutely cannot be faked. Those numbers can also be
>>>>> *independently verified* with no restrictions. Keeps frauds under
>>>>> control, you see. What's more, the numbers also include encoded
>>>>> details of the person concerned.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, no deals. your claims, you get to prove them. It's what you
>>>>> impressed upon other, follow your own rules!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Of course you couldn't take the deal xeno. It was to be expected
>>>> because you know that if was qualified enough to undertake an
>>>> apprenticeship your whole argument loses value. You then are in an
>>>> extremely precarious
>>>
>>> Wrong. Darren claimed he was an AME(engines) apprentice. Even if he
>>> had year 9 passes in *10* subjects, he *still* couldn't enter into
>>> *any* AME apprenticeship because the entry level to any and all AME
>>> apprenticeship is and always has been year 10 passes in *specific
>>> subjects*. It is at year 10 level because it is a technician level
>>> apprenticeship. The first 3 years of study are at Cert 3, the 4th year
>>> at TAFE brings it up to Cert 4 level. My L-AME friend Graeme is on
>>> LinkedIn, go and put the question to him - I did. He is a
>>> L-AME(engines), L-AME(electrical) and L-AME(airframe). The L in the
>>> name means *Licenced*. He is licenced to work on *turbines*, the
>>> engine types Qantas had when he did his AME apprenticeship with them
>>> back about the same time I did my apprenticeship as a motor mechanic.
>>> As for the claim to the other two apprenticeships Darren claims to
>>> have done, well he could not have done them until the laws were
>>> *repealed* in 1992. Go look them up. You will find them in a link
>>> inadvertently provided by Daryl. In that same link is the *proof* that
>>> the AME apprenticeship requires 4 years attendance at TAFE (1280
>>> hours). Of course, there is the fact that neither the trade
>>> qualifications database nor the archives at PROV contain *any*
>>> reference to Darren Thomas Gibbens having even been signed up to any
>>> apprenticeship ever nor having been issued with any trade registration
>>> numbers. *You* can verify this yourself at PROV.
>>>
>>> Now run along now and crawl back under your rock.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> that's good advice. he only pops up to throw shit
>>
> The odd thing is, it was Darren himself who said he skipped the last
> three months of year 9. It was only when I pointed it out to him that
> would invalidate him from sitting the exam that he tried to claim he sat
> the exam anyway. What he didn't realise that passing, or even being
> *eligble* to sit, an exam requires attendance above a set percentage. 3
> months out, forget it, you're done. I have consistently made the 3 month
> claim, after he mentioned it, and *now* is the first time he says he
> attended classes right up to the exam. The smell of bullshit is strong
> in this one!

Ooh oh!

"I left school before the end of year nine because I'd been *offered* the
job I actually wanted and apparently that's a "fail"." Fraudster, 02Dec19

"I left school early because I was offered my job on the strength of my
work experience performance, but I'm the failure and he isn't." 08Oct19

"As I've said I went to the end of third form, or about 6 weeks short of it
as I'd been given an apprenticeship and I didn't see much point in hanging
around for the last few weeks of school when I *already* had the job I
wanted. My birthday's in January, and I left school a couple of months
before turning 15." 06Jul19

Hmmm. Nothing about taking exams, and in Qld Yr 9 exams were well within 6
weeks prior to end of year.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 2/02/2022 1:50 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:32:18 +1100, Xeno wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/2022 12:53 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 12:07 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 1/2/2022 11:35 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 1/02/2022 8:45 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/2/2022 9:24 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure as well :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Notice the bullshit he has invented here? I never said *anything*
>>>>>>> about not passing any "exams", and neither did I ever mention
>>>>>>> missing the last 3 months of school. These are *his* insane
>>>>>>> inventions. What *I* said was that I left school in the last few
>>>>>>> weeks as I had been offered an apprenticeship and they wanted me to
>>>>>>> start straight away. As to how long before the end of term I left I
>>>>>>> couldn't accurately tell you as it was almost 45 years ago and I
>>>>>>> don't remember. Could have been 5 weeks, and it could have been 2.
>>>>>>> Either way, the school probably never noticed :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a document here from the Education Department of Victoria
>>>>>>> which is an Intermediate Technical Examination certificate dated
>>>>>>> December 15th, 1977 showing me passing in 5 subjects, and I'm happy
>>>>>>> to scan this certificate and post it to a hosting site and make the
>>>>>>> link to it available here in exchange for Clasener's guarantee that
>>>>>>> he admit that everything he has ever claimed about my secondary
>>>>>>> school record has been nothing but a complete falsehood, that he
>>>>>>> intentionally fabricated his claims for no reason other than to
>>>>>>> attempt to pad out his bullshit claim that my education standard
>>>>>>> was insufficient for me to have qualified for an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over to you, Kryppy. The ball's in your court now.
>>>>>> Just post your trade qualification numbers Darren. They are the only
>>>>>> thing that absolutely cannot be faked. Those numbers can also be
>>>>>> *independently verified* with no restrictions. Keeps frauds under
>>>>>> control, you see. What's more, the numbers also include encoded
>>>>>> details of the person concerned.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, no deals. your claims, you get to prove them. It's what you
>>>>>> impressed upon other, follow your own rules!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you couldn't take the deal xeno. It was to be expected
>>>>> because you know that if was qualified enough to undertake an
>>>>> apprenticeship your whole argument loses value. You then are in an
>>>>> extremely precarious
>>>> Wrong. Darren claimed he was an AME(engines) apprentice. Even if he
>>>> had year 9 passes in *10* subjects, he *still* couldn't enter into
>>>> *any* AME apprenticeship because the entry level to any and all AME
>>>> apprenticeship is and always has been year 10 passes in *specific
>>>> subjects*. It is at year 10 level because it is a technician level
>>>> apprenticeship. The first 3 years of study are at Cert 3, the 4th year
>>>> at TAFE brings it up to Cert 4 level. My L-AME friend Graeme is on
>>>> LinkedIn, go and put the question to him - I did. He is a
>>>> L-AME(engines), L-AME(electrical) and L-AME(airframe). The L in the
>>>> name means *Licenced*. He is licenced to work on *turbines*, the
>>>> engine types Qantas had when he did his AME apprenticeship with them
>>>> back about the same time I did my apprenticeship as a motor mechanic.
>>>> As for the claim to the other two apprenticeships Darren claims to
>>>> have done, well he could not have done them until the laws were
>>>> *repealed* in 1992. Go look them up. You will find them in a link
>>>> inadvertently provided by Daryl. In that same link is the *proof* that
>>>> the AME apprenticeship requires 4 years attendance at TAFE (1280
>>>> hours). Of course, there is the fact that neither the trade
>>>> qualifications database nor the archives at PROV contain *any*
>>>> reference to Darren Thomas Gibbens having even been signed up to any
>>>> apprenticeship ever nor having been issued with any trade registration
>>>> numbers. *You* can verify this yourself at PROV.
>>>>
>>>> Now run along now and crawl back under your rock.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> that's good advice. he only pops up to throw shit
>>>
>> The odd thing is, it was Darren himself who said he skipped the last
>> three months of year 9. It was only when I pointed it out to him that
>> would invalidate him from sitting the exam that he tried to claim he sat
>> the exam anyway. What he didn't realise that passing, or even being
>> *eligble* to sit, an exam requires attendance above a set percentage. 3
>> months out, forget it, you're done. I have consistently made the 3 month
>> claim, after he mentioned it, and *now* is the first time he says he
>> attended classes right up to the exam. The smell of bullshit is strong
>> in this one!
> Ooh oh!
>
> "I left school before the end of year nine because I'd been *offered* the
> job I actually wanted and apparently that's a "fail"." Fraudster, 02Dec19
>
> "I left school early because I was offered my job on the strength of my
> work experience performance, but I'm the failure and he isn't." 08Oct19
>
> "As I've said I went to the end of third form, or about 6 weeks short of it
> as I'd been given an apprenticeship and I didn't see much point in hanging
> around for the last few weeks of school when I *already* had the job I
> wanted. My birthday's in January, and I left school a couple of months
> before turning 15." 06Jul19
>
> Hmmm. Nothing about taking exams, and in Qld Yr 9 exams were well within 6
> weeks prior to end of year.
>

he aint no Red Baron. he gets shot down every time he tries to fly!  :)

>
> alvey
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 2/02/2022 12:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 2/2/2022 9:11 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>
>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>
>>
>> Nothing. He's a nobody now. He's been offered an opportunity but as
>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's
>> not here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>
> By verifying Darren's bona fides, I *am discussing cars*. He made
> claims here in order to big himself up and *appear trade relevant*.
> Ok, now it's time for him to *prove it*. After all, the Govt. of
> Victoria has *no record whatsoever* of him linked to any trade nor any
> apprenticeship ever. Remember, PROV houses TAFE college apprentice
> records as well as trade registrations. Under all student record in
> the relevant alphabetical designation, only 4 were held by persons
> having the surname Gibbens and none had Darren Thomas as first names.
> What's more, none were in automotive and one was female, a
> hairdresser. That puts into question *all* his *claimed*
> apprenticeships. His claim to a motor mechanic's apprenticeship was so
> full of holes that blind Freddy could see it was bullshit through and
> through.
>
>
>

what say you grumps? or are you putting your running shoes on? (again!)
Oh, but wait!! maybe darren is the hairdresser??? hmmm...he does make
lots of remarks about male private parts..

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 2/02/2022 1:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 9:05 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 11:13 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>
>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically
>>>>> he's not
>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>>
>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away* from
>>>> bullies.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>> hypocritical
>>>> stupid.
>>>>
>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>>>
>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>
>>>
>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> oh lookey here.. grubby posting something unrelated from elsewhere to
>> attempt to denigrate someone. how untypical, NOT!
>
> Nor does it in any way, shape or form establish that Alvey is a
> "problem gambler".

I didn't even bother reading it. my point was grubby stalking again.

>
>
>
>>  pity you couldn't find a video, hey?
>>
>>
>
> Clear pattern of behaviour you reckon?

ya!

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 2/02/2022 1:40 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 2/2/2022 1:29 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically
>>>>>> he's not
>>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away* from
>>>>> bullies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely
>>>>> hypocritical
>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>>>>
>>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>
>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of
>>> you to
>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to
>>> go out
>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>
>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>
>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize. You throw shit
>> sometimes it comes back at you.
>>
> Your own shit has certainly blown back in your face, eh?
>

exactly. it's his own shit he's copping

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 2/02/2022 10:50 am, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:32:18 +1100, Xeno wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/2022 12:53 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 12:07 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 1/2/2022 11:35 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 1/02/2022 8:45 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/2/2022 9:24 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure as well :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Notice the bullshit he has invented here? I never said *anything*
>>>>>>> about not passing any "exams", and neither did I ever mention
>>>>>>> missing the last 3 months of school. These are *his* insane
>>>>>>> inventions. What *I* said was that I left school in the last few
>>>>>>> weeks as I had been offered an apprenticeship and they wanted me to
>>>>>>> start straight away. As to how long before the end of term I left I
>>>>>>> couldn't accurately tell you as it was almost 45 years ago and I
>>>>>>> don't remember. Could have been 5 weeks, and it could have been 2.
>>>>>>> Either way, the school probably never noticed :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a document here from the Education Department of Victoria
>>>>>>> which is an Intermediate Technical Examination certificate dated
>>>>>>> December 15th, 1977 showing me passing in 5 subjects, and I'm happy
>>>>>>> to scan this certificate and post it to a hosting site and make the
>>>>>>> link to it available here in exchange for Clasener's guarantee that
>>>>>>> he admit that everything he has ever claimed about my secondary
>>>>>>> school record has been nothing but a complete falsehood, that he
>>>>>>> intentionally fabricated his claims for no reason other than to
>>>>>>> attempt to pad out his bullshit claim that my education standard
>>>>>>> was insufficient for me to have qualified for an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over to you, Kryppy. The ball's in your court now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just post your trade qualification numbers Darren. They are the only
>>>>>> thing that absolutely cannot be faked. Those numbers can also be
>>>>>> *independently verified* with no restrictions. Keeps frauds under
>>>>>> control, you see. What's more, the numbers also include encoded
>>>>>> details of the person concerned.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, no deals. your claims, you get to prove them. It's what you
>>>>>> impressed upon other, follow your own rules!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you couldn't take the deal xeno. It was to be expected
>>>>> because you know that if was qualified enough to undertake an
>>>>> apprenticeship your whole argument loses value. You then are in an
>>>>> extremely precarious
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. Darren claimed he was an AME(engines) apprentice. Even if he
>>>> had year 9 passes in *10* subjects, he *still* couldn't enter into
>>>> *any* AME apprenticeship because the entry level to any and all AME
>>>> apprenticeship is and always has been year 10 passes in *specific
>>>> subjects*. It is at year 10 level because it is a technician level
>>>> apprenticeship. The first 3 years of study are at Cert 3, the 4th year
>>>> at TAFE brings it up to Cert 4 level. My L-AME friend Graeme is on
>>>> LinkedIn, go and put the question to him - I did. He is a
>>>> L-AME(engines), L-AME(electrical) and L-AME(airframe). The L in the
>>>> name means *Licenced*. He is licenced to work on *turbines*, the
>>>> engine types Qantas had when he did his AME apprenticeship with them
>>>> back about the same time I did my apprenticeship as a motor mechanic.
>>>> As for the claim to the other two apprenticeships Darren claims to
>>>> have done, well he could not have done them until the laws were
>>>> *repealed* in 1992. Go look them up. You will find them in a link
>>>> inadvertently provided by Daryl. In that same link is the *proof* that
>>>> the AME apprenticeship requires 4 years attendance at TAFE (1280
>>>> hours). Of course, there is the fact that neither the trade
>>>> qualifications database nor the archives at PROV contain *any*
>>>> reference to Darren Thomas Gibbens having even been signed up to any
>>>> apprenticeship ever nor having been issued with any trade registration
>>>> numbers. *You* can verify this yourself at PROV.
>>>>
>>>> Now run along now and crawl back under your rock.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> that's good advice. he only pops up to throw shit
>>>
>> The odd thing is, it was Darren himself who said he skipped the last
>> three months of year 9. It was only when I pointed it out to him that
>> would invalidate him from sitting the exam that he tried to claim he sat
>> the exam anyway. What he didn't realise that passing, or even being
>> *eligble* to sit, an exam requires attendance above a set percentage. 3
>> months out, forget it, you're done. I have consistently made the 3 month
>> claim, after he mentioned it, and *now* is the first time he says he
>> attended classes right up to the exam. The smell of bullshit is strong
>> in this one!
>
> Ooh oh!
>
> "I left school before the end of year nine because I'd been *offered* the
> job I actually wanted and apparently that's a "fail"." Fraudster, 02Dec19
>
> "I left school early because I was offered my job on the strength of my
> work experience performance, but I'm the failure and he isn't." 08Oct19
>
> "As I've said I went to the end of third form, or about 6 weeks short of it
> as I'd been given an apprenticeship and I didn't see much point in hanging
> around for the last few weeks of school when I *already* had the job I
> wanted. My birthday's in January, and I left school a couple of months
> before turning 15." 06Jul19
>
> Hmmm. Nothing about taking exams, and in Qld Yr 9 exams were well within 6
> weeks prior to end of year.
>
>
>
> alvey
>

As I've said it many times, his own words condemn him.
Every time.

On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 09:17:55 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 9:11 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> > On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
> >>
> >> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
> >>
> >
> > Nothing. He's a nobody now. He's been offered an opportunity but as
> > usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's not
> > here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
> They want to watch themselves, as the new anti electronic media anti
> bullying laws are in effect and they could trip some red flags with
> their daily bombardment of the same repetitive shit.
>
> Still, I don't think it would amount to much. They're pretty pissweak,
> and it's kinda like being bullied by your grandmother from her bed in a
> nursing home :
~~~~~~~~~
Heh, good analogy.

> --
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On 2/2/2022 1:50 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:32:18 +1100, Xeno wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/2022 12:53 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 12:07 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 1/2/2022 11:35 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 1/02/2022 8:45 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/2/2022 9:24 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure as well :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Notice the bullshit he has invented here? I never said *anything*
>>>>>>> about not passing any "exams", and neither did I ever mention
>>>>>>> missing the last 3 months of school. These are *his* insane
>>>>>>> inventions. What *I* said was that I left school in the last few
>>>>>>> weeks as I had been offered an apprenticeship and they wanted me to
>>>>>>> start straight away. As to how long before the end of term I left I
>>>>>>> couldn't accurately tell you as it was almost 45 years ago and I
>>>>>>> don't remember. Could have been 5 weeks, and it could have been 2.
>>>>>>> Either way, the school probably never noticed :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a document here from the Education Department of Victoria
>>>>>>> which is an Intermediate Technical Examination certificate dated
>>>>>>> December 15th, 1977 showing me passing in 5 subjects, and I'm happy
>>>>>>> to scan this certificate and post it to a hosting site and make the
>>>>>>> link to it available here in exchange for Clasener's guarantee that
>>>>>>> he admit that everything he has ever claimed about my secondary
>>>>>>> school record has been nothing but a complete falsehood, that he
>>>>>>> intentionally fabricated his claims for no reason other than to
>>>>>>> attempt to pad out his bullshit claim that my education standard
>>>>>>> was insufficient for me to have qualified for an apprenticeship.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over to you, Kryppy. The ball's in your court now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just post your trade qualification numbers Darren. They are the only
>>>>>> thing that absolutely cannot be faked. Those numbers can also be
>>>>>> *independently verified* with no restrictions. Keeps frauds under
>>>>>> control, you see. What's more, the numbers also include encoded
>>>>>> details of the person concerned.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, no deals. your claims, you get to prove them. It's what you
>>>>>> impressed upon other, follow your own rules!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you couldn't take the deal xeno. It was to be expected
>>>>> because you know that if was qualified enough to undertake an
>>>>> apprenticeship your whole argument loses value. You then are in an
>>>>> extremely precarious
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. Darren claimed he was an AME(engines) apprentice. Even if he
>>>> had year 9 passes in *10* subjects, he *still* couldn't enter into
>>>> *any* AME apprenticeship because the entry level to any and all AME
>>>> apprenticeship is and always has been year 10 passes in *specific
>>>> subjects*. It is at year 10 level because it is a technician level
>>>> apprenticeship. The first 3 years of study are at Cert 3, the 4th year
>>>> at TAFE brings it up to Cert 4 level. My L-AME friend Graeme is on
>>>> LinkedIn, go and put the question to him - I did. He is a
>>>> L-AME(engines), L-AME(electrical) and L-AME(airframe). The L in the
>>>> name means *Licenced*. He is licenced to work on *turbines*, the
>>>> engine types Qantas had when he did his AME apprenticeship with them
>>>> back about the same time I did my apprenticeship as a motor mechanic.
>>>> As for the claim to the other two apprenticeships Darren claims to
>>>> have done, well he could not have done them until the laws were
>>>> *repealed* in 1992. Go look them up. You will find them in a link
>>>> inadvertently provided by Daryl. In that same link is the *proof* that
>>>> the AME apprenticeship requires 4 years attendance at TAFE (1280
>>>> hours). Of course, there is the fact that neither the trade
>>>> qualifications database nor the archives at PROV contain *any*
>>>> reference to Darren Thomas Gibbens having even been signed up to any
>>>> apprenticeship ever nor having been issued with any trade registration
>>>> numbers. *You* can verify this yourself at PROV.
>>>>
>>>> Now run along now and crawl back under your rock.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> that's good advice. he only pops up to throw shit
>>>
>> The odd thing is, it was Darren himself who said he skipped the last
>> three months of year 9. It was only when I pointed it out to him that
>> would invalidate him from sitting the exam that he tried to claim he sat
>> the exam anyway. What he didn't realise that passing, or even being
>> *eligble* to sit, an exam requires attendance above a set percentage. 3
>> months out, forget it, you're done. I have consistently made the 3 month
>> claim, after he mentioned it, and *now* is the first time he says he
>> attended classes right up to the exam. The smell of bullshit is strong
>> in this one!
>
> Ooh oh!
>
> "I left school before the end of year nine because I'd been *offered* the
> job I actually wanted and apparently that's a "fail"." Fraudster, 02Dec19
>
> "I left school early because I was offered my job on the strength of my
> work experience performance, but I'm the failure and he isn't." 08Oct19
>
> "As I've said I went to the end of third form, or about 6 weeks short of it
> as I'd been given an apprenticeship and I didn't see much point in hanging
> around for the last few weeks of school when I *already* had the job I
> wanted. My birthday's in January, and I left school a couple of months
> before turning 15." 06Jul19
>
> Hmmm. Nothing about taking exams, and in Qld Yr 9 exams were well within 6
> weeks prior to end of year.
>
>
>
> alvey
>
Same in Vic. I recalled all the bullshit he spun. Such a pity for Darren
that, by skipping the end of school, and the exams, he *failed to
qualify* for any apprenticeship in aviation and automotive. He's been
hung by his own words. Darren might well have been offered an
apprenticeship but any offer would be predicated upon him meeting the
minimum educational requirements which, for automotive was year 9 and ,
for aviation, year 10. The more the clown stirs the pot, the more the
bullshit rises to the surface. And there's a real thick scum layer of
bullshit there now.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 2/2/2022 2:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 12:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 2/2/2022 9:11 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>
>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now. He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's
>>> not here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>
>> By verifying Darren's bona fides, I *am discussing cars*. He made
>> claims here in order to big himself up and *appear trade relevant*.
>> Ok, now it's time for him to *prove it*. After all, the Govt. of
>> Victoria has *no record whatsoever* of him linked to any trade nor any
>> apprenticeship ever. Remember, PROV houses TAFE college apprentice
>> records as well as trade registrations. Under all student record in
>> the relevant alphabetical designation, only 4 were held by persons
>> having the surname Gibbens and none had Darren Thomas as first names.
>> What's more, none were in automotive and one was female, a
>> hairdresser. That puts into question *all* his *claimed*
>> apprenticeships. His claim to a motor mechanic's apprenticeship was so
>> full of holes that blind Freddy could see it was bullshit through and
>> through.
>>
>>
>>
>
> what say you grumps? or are you putting your running shoes on? (again!)
> Oh, but wait!! maybe darren is the hairdresser??? hmmm...he does make
> lots of remarks about male private parts..
>
>
Only if his name is Julie. Oh, and is *older than I.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 11:52:55 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 6:57 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:34:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I just think that you are rather a sad little person who is so ashamed
> >> of what he has achieved in life that he doesn't want to talk about it.
> > There's another trait you have in common with The Fraudster keith. Neither
> > of you could reach a correct conclusion if you had your own GPS satellite
> > network, a team of top tracker dogs and Bear Grylls as a guide. I'd opine
> > the problem is that you're blinded by ego.
> >
> interesting to note..
>
> 1. when attempting to denigrate his fellow humans he invariably uses the
> adjectival term 'little'. this is an attempt at intimidation intended to
> make the addressee feel insignificant and inferior. (keefy considers
> himself superior to others). this is his obvious intent, as he has no
> idea about the physical characteristics of his intended victim. they may
> in fact be 6'4'' and 150 kilos.- not someone any sensible person would
> describe as little.
~~~~~~~~~~`
` Hey, you**little** cunt, how about some proof of yer accusation that *I* am a liar???

>
> 2. apart from being 'little' I am supposedly 'sad', and I have to wonder
> what the basis or evidence for that conclusion is?

You are *definitely* a *saddo*.. My take!.

I'd opine it's just
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Doncha mean *whine*?.

> said as an attempt to reinforce the intended belittling effect of
> 'little' as described above.
>
> 2. he suggests something rather curios- that someone would be ashamed of
> their achievements.

He prolly should have prefaced that comment with 'Lack of'.. BTW, yer sans a U!.

isn't an achievement by it's very nature something
> to be proud of? why would someone be ashamed of an achievement? perhaps
> a remorseful Mafia Don could be, if such an animal could or would ever
> exist, and successful criminal activity could be described as
> achievement, but no keefy, sorry to disappoint you (well, not really
> sorry) I am not ashamed of any of my achievements in life. but perhaps
> you may wonder- would I have liked to have achieved more? sure, but I'm
> certain I'm not Robinson Caruso in that. however, my life is not yet
> over, so who knows what I may still achieve? but should there be
> anything of significance, it would be for me to know, and you not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hey, you little saddo, Its Robinson Crusoe.

I see Keith didn`t just 'touch a nerve' he took a cattle prod to yer whole nervous system. Pissa!. :)))

>
>
> >
> > alvey
> >
>
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
> "my own words are irrelevant"
> -noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 2/02/2022 11:13 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:

>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>
> No I must have forgotten...
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>
> How's that syndicate going?

Lol :)

Alvey playing the "fucking sook" card now, is he? Jesus. Talk about a
hypocritical bunch of fucking soft cocks :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 2/02/2022 1:29 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:

>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>
>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of you to
>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to
>> go out
>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>
>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>
> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize. You throw shit
> sometimes it comes back at you.

ROTFL :)

These fragile as meringue fucktards should stay the fuck away from the
internet :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:13:57 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/02/2022 8:48 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:11:41 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/02/2022 6:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:29:10 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lick lick. You're another who's balls are attached to another man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What? No response to Xeno Gumps? What say you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing. He's a nobody now.
>>>>
>>>> Right. So no response from you then. There's a surprise.
>>>>
>>>>> He's been offered an opportunity but as
>>>>> usual runs away faster and further than Forrest Gump. Basically he's not
>>>>> here to discuss cars, he's here to bully and harass much like you.
>>>>
>>>> Not a great choice of analogy there Gumps. Forrest ran *away* from bullies.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the "opportunity" he was offered was a load of hugely hypocritical
>>>> stupid.
>>>>
>>>> Btw, did you ever apologise to me for calling me a "problem gambler"?
>>>>
>>> No I must have forgotten...
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/aus.sport.cricket/c/dN9ANYza7lk/m/mJT2PARI6_gJ
>>>
>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>
>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of you to
>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to go out
>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>
>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>
> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize.

So you won't retract a defamatory statement you made about me because other
people put shit on you. That's a novel defence Gumps.

> You throw shit sometimes it comes back at you.

So it's ok to declare that you're a child molesting, tax dodging
necrophiliac then because your heroic mate hurls abuse at me most days?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 2/2/2022 4:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 1:29 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>
>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>
>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of
>>> you to
>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to
>>> go out
>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>
>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>
>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize. You throw shit
>> sometimes it comes back at you.
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> These fragile as meringue fucktards should stay the fuck away from the
> internet :)
>
Speaking of *fragile as meringue*, how's your killfail going? You know,
the killfail you're hiding behind! You must be feeling really fragile
now given your desperate attempts to shift focus.

So, how about a bit of evidence that really matters Darren? You know the
evidence I mean - those trade registration numbers. They are where all
this all started and it's the only way this will end. You either have
them or you don't. I say you don't, care to prove me wrong? No
distractions now, mind!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:15:24 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 2/02/2022 1:29 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 2/02/2022 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
>
>>>> How's that syndicate going?
>>>
>>> Could be wrong, but I don't think that it ever kicked off. Good of you to
>>> remind me of the Golden Age of usenet though. We (the QCCCC) used to
>>> go out
>>> for drinks at various seedy Briz CBD drinking spots. Lotta larfs.
>>>
>>> Anyhoo Gumps, an apology for that defamation please.
>>>
>> You're out of your mind. When I cop as much shit as I do from you and
>> your mates, there's no way I'm going to apologize. You throw shit
>> sometimes it comes back at you.
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> These fragile as meringue fucktards should stay the fuck away from the
> internet :)

"They're fragile!" said the Fraudster from behind his killfail. Buffoon.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 1/02/2022 6:49 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 1/02/2022 6:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 31/01/2022 11:26 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 31/01/2022 11:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 31/01/2022 6:25 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:57:08 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 5:35 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 15:02:05 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30/01/2022 2:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you'll write umpteen posts and several paras like here to say
>>>>>>>>> ppl are
>>>>>>>>> wrong claiming you never did an apprenticeship and aren't
>>>>>>>>> qualified, but
>>>>>>>>> not one sentence you prove you are. now why would that be?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps because he doesn't want to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We'll as I've often listed some of the many times Fraudster has
>>>>>>> demanded
>>>>>>> that others prove their claims then that makes the Fraudster a
>>>>>>> flagrant
>>>>>>> hypocrite. Right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You've never mentioned anything that you've achieved in life,
>>>>>>>> now why would that be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wow!
>>>>>>> There's that fabulous intellect laying waste to logic and reason
>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does it matter that felix hasn't made any claims keith?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everybody here barring you and felix have revealed details of what
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> have done in life. So what are you two so ashamed of that you
>>>>>> don't want
>>>>>> to talk about it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the deal keith. If you want a debate/conversation then you
>>>>> answer
>>>>> the question put to you. That's *answer* keith, *not* respond. So
>>>>> one more
>>>>> time;
>>>>>
>>>>> "How does it matter that felix hasn't made any claims keith?"
>>>>
>>>> It might change peoples perception of him. He is currently viewed as
>>>> a naive little fellow on the left hand side of the bell curve
>>>
>>>
>>> only by ppl who don't matter
>>
>> Don't matter to you maybe
>>
>>>> who asks very basic questions and gets upset when the answers don't
>>>> suit him.
>>>
>>>
>>> that's rubbish. you're just parroting noddy who is the biggest liar
>>> here. but feel free to cite examples. last time I asked you to back
>>> up some spurious claim of yours, you just did what you usually do..
>>> ran away. but, as I mention below, I care not for what you think
>>> anyway. (just so you know)
>>
>> Not parroting anybody, just personal observation
>>
>>>> He is naive enough to believe that Nulon makes your car run better,
>>>
>>>
>>> did you drive my car? no
>>
>> Dont need to, there is e
>
>
> what is 'e', dare I ask?
>
>
>>
>>>> and Monster HDMI cables give a better picture than other brands.
>>>
>>>
>>> you have no idea what I said on the matter so you should just stfu
>>
>> on 14 April 2018 @09:16:48 felix said
>>
>> you don't have to take my word, but I object to you telling me that I
>> don't see what I'm seeing. case in point.. I recently bought the bees
>> knees of monster HDMI cables
>> [https://monsterproducts.com.au/shop/cables/hdmi/black-platinum-ultrahd-hdmi-cable]
>>
>> just to experiment with, and (but of course you won't believe it) I
>> found it produced poorer results than what I had been using.
>> theoretically it should have produced better.
>>
>> and here's something for you to consider. just because it's claimed that
>> a cable meets a certain spec, doesn't mean that it will in practice.
>
>
> no shit sherlock! thanks for that. I would never have known..
>
>
>> also you fail to consider the relevance of the equipment being connected.
>
>
> do I? how would you know? but you should tell noddy. he thinks all tv
> tuners produce the same picture quality.
>
>
>>
>>>> He has said that he has qualifications but has published no proof of
>>>> this, he has not even specified what which qualifications he has.
>>>
>>>
>>> so? how is that relevant to any discussion here?
>>
>> It affects your credibility considerably
>
>
> how so? ppl can believe it or not. it's not relevant to any discussion.
>
>
>>
>>>> If he posts some of his achievements perhaps he would be better
>>>> regarded around here.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am well regarded by ppl I respect and or know. I don't care what
>>> you think about me. I don't have enough respect for you to care.
>>
>>
>> Really, see Clocky's comments on your views on Monster cables and Nulon.
>
>
> yes, but Clocky is wrong. :)  like you he never drove my car sans nulon
> and with it. and his comments on cables are based entirely on
> specifications, while mine are based on decades of practical experience.
>
>
>>
>> I just think that you are rather a sad little person who is so ashamed
>> of what he has achieved in life that he doesn't want to talk about it.
>>
>>
>
> as I've told you several times already, I don't care what you think.
> It's only your ego that makes you think I would. like.. "omg, keefy
> doesn't think much of me. maybe I should jump off the Westgate bridge".
> and the bottom line.. what business is my life of yours anyway? answer:
> it's none of your business. no one needs to lay their life bare just to
> post on a newsgroup. I used to think you were erudite and intelligent.
> now I just think you're a dickhead, because there's ample evidence to
> support the view.
>
>
So what is it about your life that makes you so ashamed that you don't
want to mention it?

On 2/02/2022 5:57 am, alvey wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:34:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I just think that you are rather a sad little person who is so ashamed
>> of what he has achieved in life that he doesn't want to talk about it.
>
> There's another trait you have in common with The Fraudster keith. Neither
> of you could reach a correct conclusion if you had your own GPS satellite
> network, a team of top tracker dogs and Bear Grylls as a guide. I'd opine
> the problem is that you're blinded by ego.

Meaningless twaddle.

On 2/02/2022 10:52 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 2/02/2022 6:57 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:34:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I just think that you are rather a sad little person who is so ashamed
>>> of what he has achieved in life that he doesn't want to talk about it.
>> There's another trait you have in common with The Fraudster keith.
>> Neither
>> of you could reach a correct conclusion if you had your own GPS satellite
>> network, a team of top tracker dogs and Bear Grylls as a guide. I'd opine
>> the problem is that you're blinded by ego.
>>
>
> interesting to note..
>
> 1. when attempting to denigrate his fellow humans he invariably uses the
> adjectival term 'little'. this is an attempt at intimidation intended to
> make the addressee feel insignificant and inferior. (keefy considers
> himself superior to others). this is his obvious intent, as he has no
> idea about the physical characteristics of his intended victim. they may
> in fact be 6'4'' and 150 kilos.- not someone any sensible person would
> describe as little.

You can be 6'4" and still be insignificant.

> 2. apart from being 'little' I am supposedly 'sad', and I have to wonder
> what the basis or evidence for that conclusion is?  I'd opine it's just
> said as an attempt to reinforce the intended belittling effect of
> 'little' as described above.

> 2. he suggests something rather curios- that someone would be ashamed of
> their achievements. isn't an achievement by it's very nature something
> to be proud of? why would someone be ashamed of an achievement? perhaps
> a remorseful Mafia Don could be, if such an animal could or would ever
> exist, and successful criminal activity could be described as
> achievement, but no keefy, sorry to disappoint you (well, not really
> sorry) I am not ashamed of any of my achievements in life. but perhaps
> you may wonder- would I have liked to have achieved more? sure, but I'm
> certain I'm not Robinson Caruso in that. however, my life is not yet
> over, so who knows what I may still achieve? but should there be
> anything of significance, it would be for me to know, and you not.

Since you refuse to even mention them, there are really only two
possible options either you don't have any or that they are so
insignificant that you feel ashamed.