Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote

> - flush -

It was always obvious that you are a dunny full of very smelly shit.

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in
news:op.1i2wjnp0byq249@pvr2.lan:

> Chad Prion <madcow@chad.net> wrote
>> Trevor Wilson wrote
>
>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>
>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-
>>> 10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>
>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves
>>> in SA.
>
>> Pumped hydro will be needed sooner or later...
>
> We have had that for more than half a century now, you pig ignorant
> yank.
>
>> once the coal burners drop off the twig.
>
> Taint gunna happen.
>

Isn't some coal powered station in NSW being shut down in the near future ?

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Fast_Train_Joint_Venture>
>>
>>>>>>> The Very Fast Train remains the most substantial investment into a
>>>>>>> high-speed rail project in Australia, and the only proposal to
>>>>>>> involve 100% private funding.
>>
>>>>>> Bullshit it did. If it had done, it would not have needed a
>>>>>> favourable
>>>>>> taxation
>>>>>> agreement with the Federal Government. That's govt funding, stupid.
>>
>>>>>>> Although there have been numerous subsequent studies
>>>>>>> intohigh-speed
>>>>>>> rail since the VFT, none have come as close to realisation.
>>
>>>>>> Because it is never going to be economically viable, let alone
>>>>>> privately funded.
>>
>>>>>> And in those days there was no free for all with airline fares.
>>
>>>>>> It can never hope to compete with the current vastly lower fares on
>>>>>> that route.
>>
>>>>> Finally a good point.
>>
>>>>> Yes fares have been driven down, but not sure if by enough to make a
>>>>> Syd/Melbourne VFT unprofitable?
>>
>>>> Corse it would given that the fares would have to be much higher
>>>> than flying and the time is much higher than flying so only climate
>>>> change nut cases would actually be stupid enough to use it.
>>
>>> Presently $89 onje way
>>
>> Wrong, as always.

> Just had a quick look before posting. Bidens fuel hike

It has nothing to do with Biden.

> will push fares up dramatically

Bullshit. The hike won't last long.

>>> not sure what a VFT would cost

>> Has to be much more given the billions a VFT line would cost.

> Would not be a problem for private investment,

Bullshit. If it had not been, they would have gone ahead
without the federal govt tax lurk they were demanding.

> at the time was a problem for Macquarie Bank, who setlobbyists, to
> sack Barry Unsworth. NSW, Premier.

It had nothing to do with any NSW premier.

And no lobbyist gets any say on sacking any premier.

> Macquarie Bank have their claws into all NSW Premiers.
> <https://www.portnews.com.au/story/943306/revealed-millions-of-dollars-worth-of-claims-made-by-former-premiers/>
> https://tinyurl.com/y8292kb2

Just because some fool claims something...

> Premiers and perks ... Neville Wran, Nick Greiner, Bob Carr,Morris
> Iemma, Barrie Unsworth and Kristina Keneally.

Separate matter entirely.

> But the head of Infrastructure NSW, Nick Greiner, has cost taxpayers
> millions over the past 20 years because of entitlements given to
> former premiers who have served for at least four years.

More irrelevant bullshit.

> According to figures released by the Department of Premierand Cabinet
> as part of a freedom of information request, MrGreiner has claimed the
> most in entitlements over the pastthree years. He is followed by
> Neville Wran and Bob Carr.

More irrelevant bullshit.

>>> they have no fuel costs, powered by Snowy 2.0

>> More of your mindless pig ignorant bullshit.

> The major investment cost will be the high speed tracks

Yes, and that means a massive hike in the fare cost.

> Maintenance, energy, employees willbe far less than to run a Jet
> Aircraft.

BULLSHIT.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:35:35 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:28:21 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:59:09 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:36:34 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
>>> <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 17:34:40 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 16:59:18 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
>>>>> - snip -
>>>>> > Yes fares have been driven down, but not sure if by enough to make
>>>>> a
>>>>> > Syd/Melbourne VFT unprofitable?
>>>>> Fares down means more flights and more pollution from jet engines.
>>>>> Who pays for the cost of the ill health? The damage to the
>>>>> environment?
>>>>
>>>> Has there been a comparison between the pollution done
>>>> by a proper coal power plant and an airport?
>>
>>> VFT are electric
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> Snowy 2.0?
>>
>> That isn't free electricity, stupid.
>>
> Well it's powere by Sun/wind
> Admitadly it has been the price of instalation paid for by West
> Austrailian iron ore and coal exports
>>
>>> Coal power in NSW is being switched off?
>>
>> Bullshit it is.

> Not if you believe Matt Keen and Labor

Who get no say what so ever on that.

> <https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/the-emissions-obsession-isnt-confined-to-labor-and-the-greenleft/video/68d870f8fdee91584518741ad00bffb9>
> https://tinyurl.com/y8al7an7

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Chad Prion <madcow@chad.net> wrote
>>> Trevor Wilson wrote

>>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:

>>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html

>>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves
>>>> in SA.

>>> Pumped hydro will be needed sooner or later...

>> We have had that for more than half a century now, you pig ignorant
>> yank.

>>> once the coal burners drop off the twig.

>> Taint gunna happen.

> Reality does not count anymore,

Bullshit.

> Political decisions override economics,medicine, law, fact, reason,
> brilliance.

Bullshit.

> Witch hunting is now back.

Bullshit.

> Both major parties as corrupt as each other

Bullshit. The coalition in NSW is nowhere
near as utterly corrupt as NSW Labor.

> ideas investments are put in by lobbyist bribery.

Bullshit.

> Never reality

Bullshit.

> Look at the yanks banning media if it tells truthful fact.
> QAN are latest to be banned
> <https://www.oann.com/liz-harrington-discusses-resignation-of-prosecutors-investigating-trump/>
> https://tinyurl.com/yakqobfc
> Liz Harrington Discusses Resignation Of Prosecutors Investigating Trump.
> *********************************

All irrelevant to what happens here.

> What you think happened to this girl in Russia.
> https://tinyurl.com/ybqkmabz
> “NO WAR. Stop the war. Don’t believe propaganda. They are lying to you
> here.”

She just got fined.

On 15/03/2022 12:06 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>
>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>
> Bet the voters feel otherwise.

**We'll see. Scummo fucks up every single day.

>
>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>
>
>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in SA.
>
> But Snowy 2.0 will keep working for much longer.

**Read the whole article. Snowy 2.0 will be FIVES TIMES over budget and
4 years (at least) late. Think on that for a bit. Would you employ a
builder to build you home, after he quoted you $1 million to build that
home, then, after he started, told you the cost was to be $5 million and
4 years late?

I'd sack him. I'd sack government that is just as incompetent.

On 15/03/2022 2:29 pm, Petzl wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:17:04 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>
>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>
>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in SA.
>>
>> Let's do the nation a favour and get rid of the COALition.
>>
> Batteries cannot be as of yet be recycled.

**Not yet, but research is on-going:

https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/energy-storage/battery-recycling

A bit like CCS (which the COALition promotes).

However, you are assuming Li-Ion batteries are used. That need not be
the case. There are other, recyclable, battery technologies that can be
used for stationary storage.

> Rod Speed has a lot of faith in hydro storage, I also believe may
> work.

**It already works. Has done for decades. My points are these:

* Snowy 2.0 is FIVES TIMES over budget.
* Snowy 2.0 is FOUR YEARS (at least) late.
* Snowy 2.0 has despoiled one of our finest National Parks and worse
damage is yet to come.

Local battery storage makes far more sense.

You are right in it is a $$$$ gamble to find out

**It was, yet another, colossal waste of taxpayer funds by the COALition.

> The problems with Solar/Wind is they need a storage capability before
> they work reliably

**Indeed. Which is why large scale, distributed battery storage makes
perfect sense.

I saw my husband wanking to a picture of a pig with my face photoshopped
on it. Should I buy a piggy fancy dress with a curly tail to spice up
our love life?

On 16/03/2022 11:29, Fran wrote:
> I saw my husband wanking to a picture of a pig with my face photoshopped
> on it. Should I buy a piggy fancy dress with a curly tail to spice up
> our love life?

sorry wrong group

Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote

>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:

>> Bet the voters feel otherwise.

> We'll see.

We will indeed, you clowns face down in the mud, as always.

> Scummo fucks up every single day.

More of your mindless silly lies.

>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html

>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in
>>> SA.

>> But Snowy 2.0 will keep working for much longer.

> Read the whole article.

Don't need to.

> Snowy 2.0 will be FIVES TIMES over budget and 4 years (at least) late.

Who cares ? It will last a fucking sight longer than any fucking battery.

> Think on that for a bit.

Don't need to.

> Would you employ a builder to build you home, after he quoted you $1
> million to build that home, then, after he started, told you the cost
> was to be $5 million and 4 years late?

Major infrastructure doesn't work like that, stupid.

> I'd sack him.

Only a fool would do that and have a tent erected instead.

You are that fool.

> I'd sack government that is just as incompetent.

You can't, Turdbull fell on his sword, fuckwit.

And the alternative hasn't proposed pulling the plug on
Snowy 2.0 anyway so you would get a far more useless
govt instead and would still have Snowy 2.0 anyway.

Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
> Petzl wrote
>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote

>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>>
>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>>
>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in
>>> SA.
>>>
>>> Let's do the nation a favour and get rid of the COALition.
>>>
>> Batteries cannot be as of yet be recycled.

> Not yet, but research is on-going:
> https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/energy-storage/battery-recycling

No point in going that route unless it turns out to be viable.

> A bit like CCS (which the COALition promotes).

> However, you are assuming Li-Ion batteries are used. That need not be
> the case. There are other, recyclable, battery technologies that can be
> used for stationary storage.

But have the same problem, a completely fucked life compared with Snowy 2.0

>> Rod Speed has a lot of faith in hydro storage, I also believe may
>> work.

> It already works. Has done for decades.

But we need much more now that there is so much
more fucked 'renewable' power generation now.

> My points are these:

> * Snowy 2.0 is FIVES TIMES over budget.
> * Snowy 2.0 is FOUR YEARS (at least) late.

Irrelevant, what matters is which is the best approach.

> * Snowy 2.0 has despoiled one of our finestNational Parks and worse
> damage is yet to come.

Still plenty left that will not be affected.

> Local battery storage makes far more sense.

Bullshit it does given the pathetic life of the batterys.

> You are right in it is a $$$$ gamble to find out

Nope, we already know that the life is pathetic.

> It was, yet another, colossal waste of taxpayer funds by the COALition.

More of your mindless pig ignorant bullshit.

>> The problems with Solar/Wind is they need astorage capability before
>> they work reliably

> Indeed. Which is why large scale, distributedbattery storage makes
> perfect sense.

Bullshit it does compared with pumped hydro.

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 03:26:28 UTC+11, Rod Speed wrote:
-flush-
Rodturd Speedily flushed.

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 08:27:04 UTC+11, petzl wrote:

> The major investment cost will be the high speed tracks
> Maintenance, energy, employees will be far less than to run a Jet
> Aircraft.

And it will last for ever.

Wed, 16 Mar 2022 11:38:08 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:51:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 15/03/2022 2:29 pm, Petzl wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:17:04 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>>>
>>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in
>>>> SA.
>>>>
>>>> Let's do the nation a favour and get rid of the COALition.
>>>>
>>> Batteries cannot be as of yet be recycled.
>>
>> **Not yet, but research is on-going:
>>
>> https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/energy-storage/battery-recycling
>>
>> A bit like CCS (which the COALition promotes).
>>
>> However, you are assuming Li-Ion batteries are used. That need not be
>> the case. There are other, recyclable, battery technologies that can be
>> used for stationary storage.
>>
>>> Rod Speed has a lot of faith in hydro storage, I also believe may
>>> work.
>>
>> **It already works. Has done for decades. My points are these:
>>
>> * Snowy 2.0 is FIVES TIMES over budget.
>> * Snowy 2.0 is FOUR YEARS (at least) late.
>> * Snowy 2.0 has despoiled one of our finest National Parks and worse
>> damage is yet to come.
>>
>> Local battery storage makes far more sense.
>>
>> You are right in it is a $$$$ gamble to find out
>>
>> **It was, yet another, colossal waste of taxpayer funds by the
>> COALition.
>>
>>> The problems with Solar/Wind is they need a storage capability before
>>> they work reliably
>>
>> **Indeed. Which is why large scale, distributed battery storage makes
>> perfect sense.

> My last post vannished

It is still here fine.

> Seems Australia is already making a non-replaceable hydrogen battery
> uses a litre of tap water to make DC power, but not cheap over $30K
> for one provides 5K watts for 20 hours, works with solar charging.
> https://lavo.com.au
> https://tinyurl.com/y7oxavnn
> Seller of solar/wind Australian batteries world first
>
> When the Chinese copy it will be cheaper
> https://youtu.be/yL1AgOqnYYE

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote

> -flush-

You always were a dunny full of very smelly shit.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote
> petzl wrote

>> The major investment cost will be the high speed tracks
>> Maintenance, energy, employees will be far less than to run a Jet
>> Aircraft.

> And it will last for ever.

Nothing does, moron.

On 16/03/2022 10:43 am, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/03/2022 12:06 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>
>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>
>> Bet the voters feel otherwise.
>
> **We'll see. Scummo fucks up every single day.
>
>>
>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>>
>>
>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in
>>> SA.
>>
>> But Snowy 2.0 will keep working for much longer.
>
> **Read the whole article. Snowy 2.0 will be FIVES TIMES over budget and
> 4 years (at least) late. Think on that for a bit. Would you employ a
> builder to build you home, after he quoted you $1 million to build that
> home, then, after he started, told you the cost was to be $5 million and
> 4 years late?
>
> I'd sack him. I'd sack government that is just as incompetent.

It's not the incompetence that worries me as much as the corruption.
This lot are jsut rampantly corrupt and it's got to to be (almost) as
corrupt as the Askin govt or Bjelke-Petersen govt.

-flush-
Rodturd flushed Speedily

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 13:35:12 UTC+11, Rod Speed wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote
> > petzl wrote
>
> >> The major investment cost will be the high speed tracks
> >> Maintenance, energy, employees will be far less than to run a Jet
> >> Aircraft.
>
> > And it will last for ever.
> Nothing does, moron.
Your arseholiness does, google will see to that.

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote
>> petzl wrote

>>> The major investment cost will be the high speed tracks
>>> Maintenance, energy, employees will be far less than to run a Jet
>>> Aircraft.

>> And it will last for ever.

> Save a great many lives,

Bullshit.

> create a more healthy Sydney.

More mindless bullshit.

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>> Petzl wrote
>>>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote

>>>>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>>>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves
>>>>>> in SA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's do the nation a favour and get rid of the COALition.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Batteries cannot be as of yet be recycled.
>>>>
>>>> **Not yet, but research is on-going:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/energy-storage/battery-recycling
>>>>
>>>> A bit like CCS (which the COALition promotes).
>>>>
>>>> However, you are assuming Li-Ion batteries are used. That need not be
>>>> the case. There are other, recyclable, battery technologies that can
>>>> be
>>>> used for stationary storage.
>>>>
>>>>> Rod Speed has a lot of faith in hydro storage, I also believe may
>>>>> work.
>>>>
>>>> **It already works. Has done for decades. My points are these:
>>>>
>>>> * Snowy 2.0 is FIVES TIMES over budget.
>>>> * Snowy 2.0 is FOUR YEARS (at least) late.
>>>> * Snowy 2.0 has despoiled one of our finest National Parks and worse
>>>> damage is yet to come.
>>>>
>>>> Local battery storage makes far more sense.
>>>>
>>>> You are right in it is a $$$$ gamble to find out
>>>>
>>>> **It was, yet another, colossal waste of taxpayer funds by the
>>>> COALition.
>>>>
>>>>> The problems with Solar/Wind is they need a storage capability before
>>>>> they work reliably
>>>>
>>>> **Indeed. Which is why large scale, distributed battery storage makes
>>>> perfect sense.
>>
>>> My last post vannished
>>
>> It is still here fine.
>>
>>> Seems Australia is already making a non-replaceable hydrogen battery
>>> uses a litre of tap water to make DC power, but not cheap over $30K
>>> for one provides 5K watts for 20 hours, works with solar charging.
>>> https://lavo.com.au
>>> https://tinyurl.com/y7oxavnn
>>> Seller of solar/wind Australian batteries world first
>>>
>>> When the Chinese copy it will be cheaper
>>> https://youtu.be/yL1AgOqnYYE

> I don't use a kill filter, but thought I would try to reduce the
> current flood.

> May have shot my self in the foot!

Yeah, very likely.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:56:47 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:54:56 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:32:02 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Wed, 16 Mar 2022 11:38:08 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:51:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 15/03/2022 2:29 pm, Petzl wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:17:04 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>>>>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> SA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's do the nation a favour and get rid of the COALition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Batteries cannot be as of yet be recycled.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Not yet, but research is on-going:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/energy-storage/battery-recycling
>>>>>
>>>>> A bit like CCS (which the COALition promotes).
>>>>>
>>>>> However, you are assuming Li-Ion batteries are used. That need not be
>>>>> the case. There are other, recyclable, battery technologies that can
>>>>> be
>>>>> used for stationary storage.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Speed has a lot of faith in hydro storage, I also believe may
>>>>>> work.
>>>>>
>>>>> **It already works. Has done for decades. My points are these:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Snowy 2.0 is FIVES TIMES over budget.
>>>>> * Snowy 2.0 is FOUR YEARS (at least) late.
>>>>> * Snowy 2.0 has despoiled one of our finest National Parks and worse
>>>>> damage is yet to come.
>>>>>
>>>>> Local battery storage makes far more sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are right in it is a $$$$ gamble to find out
>>>>>
>>>>> **It was, yet another, colossal waste of taxpayer funds by the
>>>>> COALition.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The problems with Solar/Wind is they need a storage capability
>>>>>> before
>>>>>> they work reliably
>>>>>
>>>>> **Indeed. Which is why large scale, distributed battery storage makes
>>>>> perfect sense.
>>>
>>>> My last post vannished
>>>
>>> It is still here fine.
>>>
>>>> Seems Australia is already making a non-replaceable hydrogen battery
>>>> uses a litre of tap water to make DC power, but not cheap over $30K
>>>> for one provides 5K watts for 20 hours, works with solar charging.
>>>> https://lavo.com.au
>>>> https://tinyurl.com/y7oxavnn
>>>> Seller of solar/wind Australian batteries world first
>>>>
>>>> When the Chinese copy it will be cheaper
>>>> https://youtu.be/yL1AgOqnYYE
>>>
>> I don't use a kill filter, but thought I would try to reduce the
>> current flood.
>> May have shot my self in the foot!
>>
> All OK now? Deleted the kill filter

Yeah, clearly that was the problem.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:45:33 +1100, Fran <LNPtrollbust1@loonynutters.com>
wrote:

> On 16/03/2022 10:43 am, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/03/2022 12:06 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote
>>>
>>>> ......here's one more reason to boot the morons out:
>>>
>>> Bet the voters feel otherwise.
>> **We'll see. Scummo fucks up every single day.
>>
>>>
>>>> https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-on-snowy-2-0-emerges-as-a-10-billion-white-elephant-20220310-p5a3ge.html
>>>
>>>> $10 billion would have bought a HUGE amount of distributed storage
>>>> (batteries). Those same batteries have already paid for themselves in
>>>> SA.
>>>
>>> But Snowy 2.0 will keep working for much longer.
>> **Read the whole article. Snowy 2.0 will be FIVES TIMES over budget
>> and 4 years (at least) late. Think on that for a bit. Would you employ
>> a builder to build you home, after he quoted you $1 million to build
>> that home, then, after he started, told you the cost was to be $5
>> million and 4 years late?
>> I'd sack him. I'd sack government that is just as incompetent.
>
> It's not the incompetence that worries me as much as the corruption.
> This lot are jsut rampantly corrupt and it's got to to be (almost) as
> corrupt as the Askin govt or Bjelke-Petersen govt.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote

> -flush-

It was always obvious that you are a stinking dunny filled with stinking
shit.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote
>>> petzl wrote

>> >> The major investment cost will be the high speed tracks
>> >> Maintenance, energy, employees will be far less than to run a Jet
>> >> Aircraft.

>>> And it will last for ever.

>> Nothing does, moron.

> Your arseholiness does, google will see to that.

Nope, even google won't last forever, you watch.