On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 06:59:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>>> They don't all pirate it, because there's morons like you that pay when they don't have to.
>>>
>>> Oh, but I definitely *do* "have to" pay for it, because I'm not
>>> "moronic" enough to think there's no consequence to pirating it, even
>>> if you ignore the dishonesty of it. I actually have knowledge of
>>> software development such that I am not stupid enough, like you, to
>>> think it really defeats the licensing schemes of commercial software.
>>> You can't seriously believe that the pirates have decompiled every
>>> last bit of Windows, and somehow ensured that they've completely
>>> defeated it. That is just plain delusional.
>>
>>I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>
>
>Idiot. <plonk>

Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
have to see their nonsense in quotes.

On 2022-06-03 9:29 a.m., Ken Blake wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 06:59:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> They don't all pirate it, because there's morons like you that pay when they don't have to.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, but I definitely *do* "have to" pay for it, because I'm not
>>>> "moronic" enough to think there's no consequence to pirating it, even
>>>> if you ignore the dishonesty of it. I actually have knowledge of
>>>> software development such that I am not stupid enough, like you, to
>>>> think it really defeats the licensing schemes of commercial software.
>>>> You can't seriously believe that the pirates have decompiled every
>>>> last bit of Windows, and somehow ensured that they've completely
>>>> defeated it. That is just plain delusional.
>>>
>>> I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>>
>>
>> Idiot. <plonk>
>
> Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
> have to see their nonsense in quotes.
>

He's been in my shit bin for ages, and others like him also.

Rene

Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:

>>Idiot [Kinsey]. <plonk>
>
>Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
>have to see their nonsense in quotes.

I've had enough of his foolishness. Win11 is for people who want to
work with the system. He can have fun with his 20 second freezes.

--
Joel Crump

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:36:50 +0100, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bill <nonegiven@att.net> wrote:
>> On 6/3/2022 6:59 AM, Joel wrote:
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>>>
>>> Idiot. <plonk>
>>
>> There you go. You lost a "friend" over this!
>
>
> He's just a numbskull to me. I tried to make the most of his presence
> in the group, but it's going nowhere fast, at this point.

You'll get nowhere in life until you stop seeing Jesus Christ.

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:36:50 +0100, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bill <nonegiven@att.net> wrote:
>> On 6/3/2022 6:59 AM, Joel wrote:
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>>>
>>> Idiot. <plonk>
>>
>> There you go. You lost a "friend" over this!
>
> He's just a numbskull to me. I tried to make the most of his presence
> in the group, but it's going nowhere fast, at this point.

Hey, I thought you plonked me? How did you read this message?

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:29:51 +0100, Bill <nonegiven@att.net> wrote:

> On 6/3/2022 6:59 AM, Joel wrote:
>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> They don't all pirate it, because there's morons like you that pay when they don't have to.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, but I definitely *do* "have to" pay for it, because I'm not
>>>> "moronic" enough to think there's no consequence to pirating it, even
>>>> if you ignore the dishonesty of it. I actually have knowledge of
>>>> software development such that I am not stupid enough, like you, to
>>>> think it really defeats the licensing schemes of commercial software.
>>>> You can't seriously believe that the pirates have decompiled every
>>>> last bit of Windows, and somehow ensured that they've completely
>>>> defeated it. That is just plain delusional.
>>>
>>> I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>>
>>
>> Idiot. <plonk>
>>
>
> There you go. You lost a "friend" over this!

I do not make friends who are religious.

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:29:30 +0100, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 06:59:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> They don't all pirate it, because there's morons like you that pay when they don't have to.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, but I definitely *do* "have to" pay for it, because I'm not
>>>> "moronic" enough to think there's no consequence to pirating it, even
>>>> if you ignore the dishonesty of it. I actually have knowledge of
>>>> software development such that I am not stupid enough, like you, to
>>>> think it really defeats the licensing schemes of commercial software.
>>>> You can't seriously believe that the pirates have decompiled every
>>>> last bit of Windows, and somehow ensured that they've completely
>>>> defeated it. That is just plain delusional.
>>>
>>> I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>>
>> Idiot. <plonk>
>
> Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
> have to see their nonsense in quotes.

Why do you require others to plonk me for you? Can't you do it by yourself? Hint: block replies to me.

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 16:11:58 +0100, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote:

> On 2022-06-03 9:29 a.m., Ken Blake wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 06:59:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> They don't all pirate it, because there's morons like you that pay when they don't have to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, but I definitely *do* "have to" pay for it, because I'm not
>>>>> "moronic" enough to think there's no consequence to pirating it, even
>>>>> if you ignore the dishonesty of it. I actually have knowledge of
>>>>> software development such that I am not stupid enough, like you, to
>>>>> think it really defeats the licensing schemes of commercial software.
>>>>> You can't seriously believe that the pirates have decompiled every
>>>>> last bit of Windows, and somehow ensured that they've completely
>>>>> defeated it. That is just plain delusional.
>>>>
>>>> I have used everything for free since 1982. You haven't. I win. There were never any consequences, you worry about what has never happened. You'll be telling me the end of the world is nigh soon. Fuck off you religious cunt.
>>>
>>>
>>> Idiot. <plonk>
>>
>> Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
>> have to see their nonsense in quotes.
>>
>
> He's been in my shit bin for ages, and others like him also.

Clearly not as you're discussing my post right now.

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 16:24:18 +0100, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
>
>>> Idiot [Kinsey]. <plonk>
>>
>> Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
>> have to see their nonsense in quotes.
>
> I've had enough of his foolishness. Win11 is for people who want to
> work with the system. He can have fun with his 20 second freezes.

People who want to work with systems get Linux. Windows is for people who just want the computer to run smoothly.

Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:37:52 +0100, ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Joel wrote:
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It was very easy to use the Windows [email] app, because my
>>>>> Microsoft account
>>>>> email address was already set up in it, natively, and it easily added
>>>>> my Gmail account as well.  Admittedly, though, there are times I go on
>>>>> the Web to write a reply.
>>>>
>>>> So you're not one of those like me who refuses to have a MS account?
>>>
>>> I actually had the email address before Microsoft bought out Hotmail
>>> in the late '90s.  But certainly there are advantages to having a
>>> Microsoft account as a Windows user.
>>>
>>>> Their email program is shit by the way.  It has the most security
>>>> holes, and was once fooled into thinking an attachment existed by
>>>> typing the word begin.
>>>
>>> You're thinking of Outlook Express, the one today is not the same one.
>>
>> ...and about a email client that ceased development 16 yrs ago in 2006.
>> At that time all email clients were security holes.
>
> No, just Outhouse Distress, it was infamous for it.  MS loved to make
> everything look the same, let's make en email look like a webpage and
> run everything inside it before you tell it to.  Yeah, really good idea.

Yes. The 'begin issue' was resolved in 2004 with XP Service Pack 2. Two
years before OE development ceased. Again at that time, the holes in all
email clients were present but not necessarily targeted and later new
and more security holes showed up with current ones still being
fixed/patched today.

The webpage(html) look of OE(released in 1997) was for similarity in a
free client vs. the Html/Rich Text available the Outlook(included in
Offce 97 and bundled with Exchange Server) and also a marketing tool in
the conusmer arena for the already present html based and growing
stationery scripting community and html formatting email preferred user.

--
....w¡ñ§±¤ñ

On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 06:15:44 +0100, ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:37:52 +0100, ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Joel wrote:
>>>> "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It was very easy to use the Windows [email] app, because my
>>>>>> Microsoft account
>>>>>> email address was already set up in it, natively, and it easily added
>>>>>> my Gmail account as well. Admittedly, though, there are times I go on
>>>>>> the Web to write a reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're not one of those like me who refuses to have a MS account?
>>>>
>>>> I actually had the email address before Microsoft bought out Hotmail
>>>> in the late '90s. But certainly there are advantages to having a
>>>> Microsoft account as a Windows user.
>>>>
>>>>> Their email program is shit by the way. It has the most security
>>>>> holes, and was once fooled into thinking an attachment existed by
>>>>> typing the word begin.
>>>>
>>>> You're thinking of Outlook Express, the one today is not the same one.
>>>
>>> ...and about a email client that ceased development 16 yrs ago in 2006.
>>> At that time all email clients were security holes.
>>
>> No, just Outhouse Distress, it was infamous for it. MS loved to make
>> everything look the same, let's make en email look like a webpage and
>> run everything inside it before you tell it to. Yeah, really good idea.
>
> Yes. The 'begin issue' was resolved in 2004 with XP Service Pack 2. Two
> years before OE development ceased. Again at that time, the holes in all
> email clients were present but not necessarily targeted and later new
> and more security holes showed up with current ones still being
> fixed/patched today.

I've never heard of anything happening with non-MS email clients, I have in fact always used outdated free ones. Mine ceased getting updated 10 years ago, and it does support html. But it supports it properly, it doesn't just run stuff willy nilly. You'd have to a be monumentally stupid programmer to put in a security hole like that. Stuff runs when the user says run.

Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
[...]

> Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
> have to see their nonsense in quotes.

FWIW, for this particular person (CK), you can killfile direct
responses to his posts, so you will see less of his "nonsense in
quotes".

You can also killfile indirect responses, but then you might as well
kill the thread, as - by killfiling indirect responses - you will
probably lose non-nonsense responses as well.

I don't want to tell you how do that as that would aid the culprit as
well. Hopefully you can figure it out from his headers. It's rather
obvious.

On Mon, 06 Jun 2022 19:34:16 +0100, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

> Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Thanks for plonking him. The more such people are plonked, the less I
>> have to see their nonsense in quotes.
>
> FWIW, for this particular person (CK), you can killfile direct
> responses to his posts, so you will see less of his "nonsense in
> quotes".

You can do that to anyone, duh.

> You can also killfile indirect responses, but then you might as well
> kill the thread, as - by killfiling indirect responses - you will
> probably lose non-nonsense responses as well.

You can killfile only responses in the tree below me.

> I don't want to tell you how do that as that would aid the culprit as
> well. Hopefully you can figure it out from his headers. It's rather
> obvious.

You don't even need to look at any headers. And I already know how to do it.

Clearly you don't as you're actually reading replies to me!