On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
>>> George J. Dance wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Guess Who?
>>>
>>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
>>>> At least that's what they say.
>>>> The Village People love my work
>>>> And I'm not even gay.
>>>
>>>> The most prolific poet
>>>> The internet has known,
>>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
>>>> In the past week alone.
>>>
>>>> I sit at my computer
>>>> And dream of South and North,
>>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
>>>> The poems come gushing forth.
>>>
>>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
>>>> They all come out so fast,
>>>> And some of them are really long
>>>> While some are just half-vast.
>>>
>>>> I've never learned poetics;
>>>> I know that I don't need 'em
>>>> Because I simply write the poems;
>>>> Let other people read 'em.
>>>
>>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
>>>> But didn't praise my work
>>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
>>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
>>>
>>>> I know he's simply jealous,
>>>> Like all those guys, of me.
>>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
>>>> It's a conspiracy.
>>>
>>>> I know I could be published
>>>> And everyone would buy,
>>>> But knowing the conspiracy
>>>> Why would I even try?
>>>
>>>> So I just stay on usenet
>>>> Where true success depends,
>>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
>>>> But on your online friends.
>>>
>>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
>>>> True poets just like me.
>>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
>>>> With the conspiracy.)
>>>
>>>> They say my poems are perfect,
>>>> And all I have to do
>>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
>>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
>>>
>>>> ~~
>>>> GJD
>>>
>>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
>> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
>>
>> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
>> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
>> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
>> it works there, too.
>>
>> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
>> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
>> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
>
> So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?

Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.

> Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!

I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Guess Who?
> >>>
> >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> >>>> At least that's what they say.
> >>>> The Village People love my work
> >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> >>>
> >>>> The most prolific poet
> >>>> The internet has known,
> >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> >>>> In the past week alone.
> >>>
> >>>> I sit at my computer
> >>>> And dream of South and North,
> >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> >>>
> >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> >>>> They all come out so fast,
> >>>> And some of them are really long
> >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> >>>
> >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> >>>
> >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> >>>> But didn't praise my work
> >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> >>>
> >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> >>>
> >>>> I know I could be published
> >>>> And everyone would buy,
> >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> >>>> Why would I even try?
> >>>
> >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> >>>> Where true success depends,
> >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> >>>> But on your online friends.
> >>>
> >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> >>>> True poets just like me.
> >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> >>>
> >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> >>>> And all I have to do
> >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> >>>
> >>>> ~~
> >>>> GJD
> >>>
> >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> >>
> >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> >> it works there, too.
> >>
> >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> >
> > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
>
> Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
>
> > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
>
> I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.

There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Guess Who?
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > >>>
> > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > >>>> The internet has known,
> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > >>>
> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > >>>
> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I know I could be published
> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > >>>
> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > >>>
> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > >>>> And all I have to do
> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > >>>
> > >>>> ~~
> > >>>> GJD
> > >>>
> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > >> it works there, too.
> > >>
> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > >
> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> >
> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> >
> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> >
> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.

Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetive bullshit.
Let ME know how that works out for you.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 19:53:23 UTC-4, ME wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> ~~
> > > >>>> GJD
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > >> it works there, too.
> > > >>
> > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > >
> > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > >
> > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > >
> > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > >
> > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetitive bullshit.
> Let ME know how that works out for you.

ME wrote:

> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
>> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
>> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Guess Who?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
>> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
>> > >>>> The Village People love my work
>> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> The most prolific poet
>> > >>>> The internet has known,
>> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
>> > >>>> In the past week alone.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I sit at my computer
>> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
>> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
>> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
>> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
>> > >>>> And some of them are really long
>> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
>> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
>> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
>> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
>> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
>> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
>> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
>> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
>> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
>> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I know I could be published
>> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
>> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
>> > >>>> Why would I even try?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
>> > >>>> Where true success depends,
>> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
>> > >>>> But on your online friends.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
>> > >>>> True poets just like me.
>> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
>> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
>> > >>>> And all I have to do
>> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
>> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> ~~
>> > >>>> GJD
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
>> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
>> > >>
>> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
>> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
>> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
>> > >> it works there, too.
>> > >>
>> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
>> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
>> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
>> > >
>> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
>> >
>> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
>> >
>> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
>> >
>> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
>> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
>> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
>> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
>> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.

> Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetive

You seemed interested earlier.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 20:05:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> ME wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> >> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> >> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Guess Who?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> >> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> >> > >>>> The Village People love my work
> >> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> The most prolific poet
> >> > >>>> The internet has known,
> >> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> >> > >>>> In the past week alone.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I sit at my computer
> >> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> >> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> >> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> >> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> >> > >>>> And some of them are really long
> >> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> >> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> >> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> >> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> >> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> >> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> >> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> >> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> >> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> >> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I know I could be published
> >> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> >> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> >> > >>>> Why would I even try?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> >> > >>>> Where true success depends,
> >> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> >> > >>>> But on your online friends.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> >> > >>>> True poets just like me.
> >> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> >> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> >> > >>>> And all I have to do
> >> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> >> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> ~~
> >> > >>>> GJD
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> >> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> >> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> >> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> >> > >> it works there, too.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> >> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> >> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> >> > >
> >> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> >> >
> >> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> >> >
> >> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> >> >
> >> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> >> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> >> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> >> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> >> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetive
>
> You seemed interested earlier.

ONve again you lack of reading comprehension fails you, will.

ME <rivermutant27@gmail.com> wrote in
news:5ebe4a22-13cb-4465-b378-23e824114e3dn@googlegroups.com:

> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 19:53:23 UTC-4, ME wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
>> > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
>> > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Guess Who?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
>> > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
>> > > >>>> The Village People love my work
>> > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> The most prolific poet
>> > > >>>> The internet has known,
>> > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
>> > > >>>> In the past week alone.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I sit at my computer
>> > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
>> > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
>> > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
>> > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
>> > > >>>> And some of them are really long
>> > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
>> > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
>> > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
>> > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
>> > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
>> > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
>> > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
>> > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
>> > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
>> > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I know I could be published
>> > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
>> > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
>> > > >>>> Why would I even try?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
>> > > >>>> Where true success depends,
>> > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
>> > > >>>> But on your online friends.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
>> > > >>>> True poets just like me.
>> > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
>> > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
>> > > >>>> And all I have to do
>> > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
>> > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> ~~
>> > > >>>> GJD
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
>> > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back
>> > > >> to the OP.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it.
>> > > >> The meter's good, and it's one I've never used before. As for
>> > > >> the content, it is satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather
>> > > >> than profound, and I'd say it works there, too.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section
>> > > >> of mainly satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I
>> > > >> expand that section in the collected volume I'm planning, this
>> > > >> will fit right in.
>> > > >
>> > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
>> > >
>> > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly
>> > > that.
>> > >
>> > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm
>> > > > sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of
>> > > > "jism"!
>> > >
>> > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems
>> > > with someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said
>> > > they don't have a permanent home online, I could repost them as
>> > > new threads, one by-one, and you could comment after you know
>> > > what you're talking about.
>> > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the
>> > time is right to bring that, as well.
>> Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetitive
>> bullshit. Let ME know how that works out for you.

That's why I have a newsreader with a killfile. I get to poke the
fuckweasels with pointy sticks and don't see a thing from them.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 20:12:27 UTC-4, ME wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 20:05:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > ME wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > >> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > >> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Guess Who?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > >> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > >> > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > >> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > >> > >>>> The internet has known,
> > >> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > >> > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > >> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > >> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > >> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > >> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > >> > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > >> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > >> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > >> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > >> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > >> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > >> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > >> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > >> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > >> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > >> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I know I could be published
> > >> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > >> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > >> > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > >> > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > >> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > >> > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > >> > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > >> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > >> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > >> > >>>> And all I have to do
> > >> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > >> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> ~~
> > >> > >>>> GJD
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > >> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > >> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > >> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > >> > >> it works there, too.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > >> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > >> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > >> >
> > >> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > >> >
> > >> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > >> >
> > >> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > >> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > >> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > >> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > >> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetive
> >
> > You seemed interested earlier.
> Once again you lack of reading comprehension fails you, will.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 8:12:27 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 20:05:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > ME wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > >> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > >> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Guess Who?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > >> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > >> > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > >> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > >> > >>>> The internet has known,
> > >> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > >> > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > >> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > >> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > >> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > >> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > >> > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > >> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > >> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > >> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > >> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > >> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > >> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > >> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > >> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > >> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > >> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I know I could be published
> > >> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > >> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > >> > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > >> > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > >> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > >> > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > >> > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > >> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > >> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > >> > >>>> And all I have to do
> > >> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > >> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> ~~
> > >> > >>>> GJD
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > >> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > >> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > >> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > >> > >> it works there, too.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > >> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > >> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > >> >
> > >> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > >> >
> > >> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > >> >
> > >> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > >> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > >> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > >> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > >> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetive
> >
> > You seemed interested earlier.
> ONve again you lack of reading comprehension fails you, will.

I don't expect you to admit that you're interested, ME.

HTH and HAND.

On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> Guess Who?
>
> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> At least that's what they say.
> The Village People love my work
> And I'm not even gay.
>
> The most prolific poet
> The internet has known,
> I've written fifty thousand poems
> In the past week alone.
>
> I sit at my computer
> And dream of South and North,
> And just like vomit from a drunk
> The poems come gushing forth.
>
> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> They all come out so fast,
> And some of them are really long
> While some are just half-vast.
>
> I've never learned poetics;
> I know that I don't need 'em
> Because I simply write the poems;
> Let other people read 'em.
>
> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> But didn't praise my work
> So I hung up on him. He's just
> A pissbum and a jerk.
>
> I know he's simply jealous,
> Like all those guys, of me.
> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> It's a conspiracy.
>
> I know I could be published
> And everyone would buy,
> But knowing the conspiracy
> Why would I even try?
>
> So I just stay on usenet
> Where true success depends,
> Not on your money, or your fame,
> But on your online friends.
>
> I'm friends with half a dozen
> True poets just like me.
> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> With the conspiracy.)
>
> They say my poems are perfect,
> And all I have to do
> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> Their poems are perfect, too.
>
> ~~
> GJD

Wait a minute, this thing is about me. No wonder it has gathered 800 views and counting.

Mr. Dance, use me any way you'd like, if it gathers you 'hits' I'm all for it. Move over Dockery/Rocky/Zod-er-Sulzbach.

"Made it ma, top of the world".

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 20:22:24 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 8:12:27 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 20:05:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > ME wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:51:12 UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > >> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > >> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > >> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > >> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > >> > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > >> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > >> > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > >> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > >> > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > >> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > >> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > >> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > >> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > >> > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > >> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > >> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > >> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > >> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > >> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > >> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > >> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > >> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > >> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > >> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > >> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > >> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > >> > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > >> > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > >> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > >> > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > >> > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > >> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > >> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > >> > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > >> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > >> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>> ~~
> > > >> > >>>> GJD
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > >> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > >> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > >> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > >> > >> it works there, too.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > >> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > >> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > >> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > >> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > >> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > >> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > > Will and dance, flood the group with more of your repetive
> > >
> > > You seemed interested earlier.
> > ONve again you lack of reading comprehension fails you, will.
> I don't expect you to admit that you're interested, ME.
>

Aaaww will, no one is really interested in you.
Sometimes we just like poking the really stupid fat kid with a stick.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 8:34:39 PM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > Guess Who?
> >
> > I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > At least that's what they say.
> > The Village People love my work
> > And I'm not even gay.
> >
> > The most prolific poet
> > The internet has known,
> > I've written fifty thousand poems
> > In the past week alone.
> >
> > I sit at my computer
> > And dream of South and North,
> > And just like vomit from a drunk
> > The poems come gushing forth.
> >
> > It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > They all come out so fast,
> > And some of them are really long
> > While some are just half-vast.
> >
> > I've never learned poetics;
> > I know that I don't need 'em
> > Because I simply write the poems;
> > Let other people read 'em.
> >
> > Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > But didn't praise my work
> > So I hung up on him. He's just
> > A pissbum and a jerk.
> >
> > I know he's simply jealous,
> > Like all those guys, of me.
> > That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > It's a conspiracy.
> >
> > I know I could be published
> > And everyone would buy,
> > But knowing the conspiracy
> > Why would I even try?
> >
> > So I just stay on usenet
> > Where true success depends,
> > Not on your money, or your fame,
> > But on your online friends.
> >
> > I'm friends with half a dozen
> > True poets just like me.
> > (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > With the conspiracy.)
> >
> > They say my poems are perfect,
> > And all I have to do
> > Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > Their poems are perfect, too.
> >
> > ~~
> > GJD
> Wait a minute, this thing is about me. No wonder it has gathered 800 views and counting.
>
> Mr. Dance, use me any way you'd like, if it gathers you 'hits' I'm all for it. Move over Dockery/Rocky/Zod-er-Sulzbach.
>
> "Made it ma, top of the world".

LOLz OF TEH DAY!1!

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Guess Who?
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > >>>
> > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > >>>> The internet has known,
> > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > >>>
> > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > >>>
> > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I know I could be published
> > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > >>>
> > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > >>>
> > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > >>>> And all I have to do
> > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > >>>
> > >>>> ~~
> > >>>> GJD
> > >>>
> > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > >> it works there, too.
> > >>
> > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > >
> > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> >
> > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> >
> > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> >
> > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.

KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here, but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> ~~
> > > >>>> GJD
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > >> it works there, too.
> > > >>
> > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > >
> > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > >
> > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > >
> > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > >
> > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here, but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...

There is a certain quiet, perhaps all has been said and said and said. Perhaps it will turn into poetry rather than tit tats
give the dog a bone.

The good side will always overcome. Patience is a virtue. The fat lady has sung.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
>
> I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.

If knowing what "I'm talking about" means being like you, I will remain ignorant but still retaining my dignity!

I have read your "work"... and how much it came across as you inadvertently speaking about yourself. They say when you point a finger at someone, there's the other three fingers of yours pointing right back at 'ya!

You're the only conspirapid poster here, speaking of fake news, media control and Faucism. And look what kept popping up in your "work":

"Like all those guys, of me.
That's why they bury all my stuff;
It's a ***CONSPIRACY***.

"I know I could be published
And everyone would buy,
But knowing the ***CONSPIRACY***
Why would I even try? "

"I'm friends with half a dozen
True poets just like me.
(Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
With the conspiracy.)

Your buddy Zod tries to tell everyone here that he, Will and you are the only "real" poets here.

This is definitely you writing about YOU! Look at included commentary you got for the proof! Nasty Georgie, you such a set yourself up artist!
"They say my poems are perfect,
And all I have to do
Is thank all six, and tell them all
Their poems are perfect, too. "

GZ: "Second read, quite excellent poetry.... "
GD: "Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP."
"Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
it works there, too."

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:17:17 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > >
> > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > >
> > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > >
> > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > >
> > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here, but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> There is a certain quiet, perhaps all has been said and said and said. Perhaps it will turn into poetry rather than tit tats
> give the dog a bone.
>
> The good side will always overcome. Patience is a virtue. The fat lady has sung.

Indeed, the wind has been let out of the bags.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:42:01 PM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:17:17 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here, but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> > There is a certain quiet, perhaps all has been said and said and said. Perhaps it will turn into poetry rather than tit tats
> > give the dog a bone.
> >
> > The good side will always overcome. Patience is a virtue. The fat lady has sung.
> Indeed, the wind has been let out of the bags.
Don't be so hard on yourself, Senetto.

I'm sure you have a little hot air left.

🙂

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> ~~
> > > >>>> GJD
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > >> it works there, too.
> > > >>
> > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > >
> > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > >
> > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > >
> > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > >
> > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here,

True, I skip and ignore a lot, myself.

but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:20:39 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:42:01 PM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:17:17 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here, but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> > > There is a certain quiet, perhaps all has been said and said and said.. Perhaps it will turn into poetry rather than tit tats
> > > give the dog a bone.
> > >
> > > The good side will always overcome. Patience is a virtue. The fat lady has sung.
> > Indeed, the wind has been let out of the bags.
> Don't be so hard on yourself, Senetto.
>
> I'm sure you have a little hot air left.
>
> 🙂

Here's the facts...Dance tosses the stick and you two mutts go fetch. It isn't anymore complicated as that.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:32:22 PM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:20:39 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:42:01 PM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:17:17 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo..ca wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > > > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > > > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here, but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> > > > There is a certain quiet, perhaps all has been said and said and said. Perhaps it will turn into poetry rather than tit tats
> > > > give the dog a bone.
> > > >
> > > > The good side will always overcome. Patience is a virtue. The fat lady has sung.
> > > Indeed, the wind has been let out of the bags.
> > Don't be so hard on yourself, Senetto.
> >
> > I'm sure you have a little hot air left.
> >
> > 🙂
> Here's the facts...Dance tosses the stick and you two mutts go fetch. It isn't anymore complicated as that.

In your simple, feeble imagination, you mean.

HTH and HAND.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:23:59 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > >
> > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > >
> > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > >
> > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > >
> > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here,
> True, I skip and ignore a lot, myself.
> but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...

That's a good one!!! You say I'm faking about being blind but you're sure acting like I'm not seeing a single thing here!!

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:21:13 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:23:59 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here,
> > True, I skip and ignore a lot, myself.
> > but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> That's a good one!!! You say I'm faking about being blind

That's bullshit, I never said that you were faking, but I don't think much about your personal life.

I just go by what you post, blind or not.

> but you're sure acting like I'm not seeing a single thing here!!

It's not my problem what you think you see or pretend not to see.

HTH and HAND.

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 8:34:39 PM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > Guess Who?
> >
> > I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > At least that's what they say.
> > The Village People love my work
> > And I'm not even gay.
> >
> > The most prolific poet
> > The internet has known,
> > I've written fifty thousand poems
> > In the past week alone.
> >
> > I sit at my computer
> > And dream of South and North,
> > And just like vomit from a drunk
> > The poems come gushing forth.
> >
> > It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > They all come out so fast,
> > And some of them are really long
> > While some are just half-vast.
> >
> > I've never learned poetics;
> > I know that I don't need 'em
> > Because I simply write the poems;
> > Let other people read 'em.
> >
> > Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > But didn't praise my work
> > So I hung up on him. He's just
> > A pissbum and a jerk.
> >
> > I know he's simply jealous,
> > Like all those guys, of me.
> > That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > It's a conspiracy.
> >
> > I know I could be published
> > And everyone would buy,
> > But knowing the conspiracy
> > Why would I even try?
> >
> > So I just stay on usenet
> > Where true success depends,
> > Not on your money, or your fame,
> > But on your online friends.
> >
> > I'm friends with half a dozen
> > True poets just like me.
> > (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > With the conspiracy.)
> >
> > They say my poems are perfect,
> > And all I have to do
> > Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > Their poems are perfect, too.
> >
> > ~~
> > GJD
> Wait a minute, this thing is about me. No wonder it has gathered 800 views and counting.
>
> Mr. Dance, use me any way you'd like, if it gathers you 'hits' I'm all for it. Move over Dockery/Rocky/Zod-er-Sulzbach.
>
> "Made it ma, top of the world".

Which way did Ego?

On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:41:03 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:21:13 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:23:59 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here,
> > > True, I skip and ignore a lot, myself.
> > > but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> > That's a good one!!! You say I'm faking about being blind
> That's bullshit, I never said that you were faking, but I don't think much about your personal life.
>
> I just go by what you post, blind or not.
> > but you're sure acting like I'm not seeing a single thing here!!
> It's not my problem what you think you see or pretend not to see.

Yes it is your problem just like it was the Danish fleet's. You didn't see what I posted about Horatio Nelson...
> HTH and HAND.

On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:59:33 AM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:41:03 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:21:13 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 10:23:59 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 9:09:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:51:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:34:36 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2022-06-06 8:14 p.m., Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 7:12:10 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > > > > > > >> On 2022-06-06 6:17 p.m., General-Zod wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Guess Who?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I'm usenet's greatest poet,
> > > > > > > >>>> At least that's what they say.
> > > > > > > >>>> The Village People love my work
> > > > > > > >>>> And I'm not even gay.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> The most prolific poet
> > > > > > > >>>> The internet has known,
> > > > > > > >>>> I've written fifty thousand poems
> > > > > > > >>>> In the past week alone.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I sit at my computer
> > > > > > > >>>> And dream of South and North,
> > > > > > > >>>> And just like vomit from a drunk
> > > > > > > >>>> The poems come gushing forth.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> It's sometimes hard to type them,
> > > > > > > >>>> They all come out so fast,
> > > > > > > >>>> And some of them are really long
> > > > > > > >>>> While some are just half-vast.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I've never learned poetics;
> > > > > > > >>>> I know that I don't need 'em
> > > > > > > >>>> Because I simply write the poems;
> > > > > > > >>>> Let other people read 'em.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Oh once Bob Dylan phoned me
> > > > > > > >>>> But didn't praise my work
> > > > > > > >>>> So I hung up on him. He's just
> > > > > > > >>>> A pissbum and a jerk.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I know he's simply jealous,
> > > > > > > >>>> Like all those guys, of me.
> > > > > > > >>>> That's why they bury all my stuff;
> > > > > > > >>>> It's a conspiracy.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I know I could be published
> > > > > > > >>>> And everyone would buy,
> > > > > > > >>>> But knowing the conspiracy
> > > > > > > >>>> Why would I even try?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> So I just stay on usenet
> > > > > > > >>>> Where true success depends,
> > > > > > > >>>> Not on your money, or your fame,
> > > > > > > >>>> But on your online friends.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I'm friends with half a dozen
> > > > > > > >>>> True poets just like me.
> > > > > > > >>>> (Sometimes we write, sometimes we fight
> > > > > > > >>>> With the conspiracy.)
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> They say my poems are perfect,
> > > > > > > >>>> And all I have to do
> > > > > > > >>>> Is thank all six, and tell them all
> > > > > > > >>>> Their poems are perfect, too.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> ~~
> > > > > > > >>>> GJD
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Second read, quite excellent poetry....
> > > > > > > >> Thanks, Zod. I appreciate your trying to get the thread back to the OP.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Maybe "excellent" is to high praise, but I am happy with it. The meter's
> > > > > > > >> good, and it's one I've never used before. As for the content, it is
> > > > > > > >> satire, so it's meant to be humorous rather than profound, and I'd say
> > > > > > > >> it works there, too.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> It doesn't belong on the blog or wiki, but I do have a section of mainly
> > > > > > > >> satire on other poets in the /Doggerel/ book -- if I expand that section
> > > > > > > >> in the collected volume I'm planning, this will fit right in.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So your "poetry book" is satire of other poets?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not all of it, silly; but the month of April (NaPoMo) is mainly that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Seeing your satire work here and how nasty you have become, I'm sure your satire is "Dogshitflinging" with gratuitous use of "jism"!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can't think of any stupider idea than debating one of my poems with
> > > > > > > someone who's never read it. If you'd like, since as I said they don't
> > > > > > > have a permanent home online, I could repost them as new threads, one
> > > > > > > by-one, and you could comment after you know what you're talking about.
> > > > > > There's new interest in your Unsampled series also, perhaps the time is right to bring that, as well.
> > > > > KK, I could be wrong because I don't waste time reading half of what is here,
> > > > True, I skip and ignore a lot, myself.
> > > > but I didn't see the captive audience expressing any interest in anything-- we might want to call a bus-- I believe the audience is a goner-- death by asphyxiation by forced feeding of spam...
> > > That's a good one!!! You say I'm faking about being blind
> > That's bullshit, I never said that you were faking, but I don't think much about your personal life.
> >
> > I just go by what you post, blind or not.
> > > but you're sure acting like I'm not seeing a single thing here!!
> > It's not my problem what you think you see or pretend not to see.
> Yes it is your problem just like it was the Danish fleet's. You didn't see what I posted about Horatio Nelson...
>
> > HTH and HAND.

I'll need to Google Horatio Nelson, I'm not familiar with him.