On 10/01/2022 7:57 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>>> available information here...
>>>
>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>
>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>
> Heh :)
>
> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker.

You would know all about that.

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 07:47:59 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 04:14:13 -0800 (PST), jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:58:36 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >>> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >>>>
> >>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> >>>> pathetic philosophy.
> >>>>
> >>> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's their
> >>> way or the highway.
> >> Umm Gumps. Which poster in this ng would have issued the most "fuck off"
> >> directives?
> >>>
> >>> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
> >>> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
> >> You're not *just* an arsehole Gumps. You're a delusional arsehole.
> >>>
> >>> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
> >> lol. That's right! I recall the Gumpian Logic! 'If more than one person is
> >> attacking an individual then this is wrong and that individual must be
> >> supported'.
> >>> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
> >>> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
> >> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back is the
> >> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
> > An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other than
> > a crap spewing,
> Opinion.
>
> > shit stirring,
>
> Opinion.
>
> > running away
>
> Ahh! A definitive! There's no-one in my kf champ.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nor mine. (At the moment.) see if you can work out why.
>
> > CUNT,
>
> Could never understood
~~~~~~~~~~~~
HUH?, (Grammatical fuck-up notwithstanding, you would have done well to stop there.

how that part of the anatomy, the one that most
> males spent 90% of their time thinking about and chasing, can be an insult.
> But then I'm not a knuckle-dragging misogynist.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No, *much* more likely to be a shirt lifter. (However *still* a knuckle dragger, owing to your stance and parentage.)
henceforth to be addressed as *Ankles*

>
> I do tend to not read most of your posts because if you're not prepared to
> make them passably readable why then should I have to waste time having to
> decipher them?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Tell someone that cares ankles.. <Shrug>
BTW.... The question was:
'An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other than
> > a crap spewing,' etc...
No reply to that Q, so the status quo remains.

>
>
> alvey
> alvey
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 11/01/2022 3:50 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:57:47 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>>>> available information here...
>>>>
>>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>>
>>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>>
>> Heh :)
>>
>> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all about
>> that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
>
> Bingo!
> The Fraudster adds a room to his house of lies. Split level too!
>
> He is referring to this post of mine of 01Oct21;
>
> "Tell me why you, who claimed to be very well off after selling the fabled
> NA of A, had to borrow a pissy amount years *after* the sale. Step right up
> Der Der!"
>
> On the ... errr base level, the problem for Der Der is that no-one
> responded to that post. So his reference above is just *another* example of
> Der Der's "I don't read anything he posts! (Unless someone responds, or I'm
> on my old lappy. Or Jupiter aligns with Mars)" being yet another lie.
>
> And on the 'higher' level, the question remains unanswered. So why did Der
> Der, who regularly claims to be fabulously wealthy, need to borrow a pissy
> amount [$150k] years *after* the sale of the fabled NA of A? "Step right up
> Der Der!"
>
> I know it's all you have Fraudster, but you really should give up calling
> people fools/idiots/retards etc while you blunder about like this.
>
> Bye now!
>
>
>
> alvey
>
>

It's laughable how he counts that as stalking when there are so many
things he refers to when attacking me that I have never shared publicly
and wouldn't be known to anyone else here. He's either stalking himself
or another stalker is feeding him information, there can't be any other
explanation.

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 09:36:45 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 8:26 am, John_H wrote:
> > Noddy wrote:
>
> >> Two things. Firstly, avoiding the mandatory quarantine requirements
> >> wasn't what we were talking about. We were talking about people actually
> >> getting in to the country, not what they had to do once they were here.
> >
> > We were talking about the rules being bent, as they frequently are,
> > and that includes both the quarantine rules, administered by the
> > states, as well as the issuing of visas by the feds.
> Yeah, well, okay. I thought we were talking about visa applications but
> anyway.....
> > The connection to Djokovic, in case it isn't obvious, is the inclusion
> > of sporting heroes and their hangers on with the notable exception of
> > Djokovic himself but including those who'd also been issued with visas
> > (on the basis of medical exemptions) that weren't revoked by Border
> > Security at the airport.
> And who were they?
> > The Federal Court has now ruled he was unfairly discriminated against
> > and Government politicians have egg on their faces, there being no
> > failure to provide requested documentation as originally reported by
> > the media (which later became incorrect documentation).
> I haven't been out to get the paper yet this morning, but from what I
> could make out on the nightly news last night the Judge's ruling seemed
> to be about a point of law.
> > The Happy Clapper's response is that the rules are clear, backed by
> > his deputy who says visa applicants have to be double vaccinated and
> > another who claims medical exemptions only apply to those who can't be
> > vaccinated at the time.... If they seriously believe their own spin
> > let them appeal the court ruling but my guess is they won't because
> > even if they win we're likely to find out who issued the directive to
> > sink the boots into Djokovic and possibly how many visas have
> > previously been issued to anti-vaxxers.
> That's purely speculation and we won't know exactly what happened until
> all the details are laid on the table.
> > Of course there's also the option of having the Minister for
> > Immigration revoke the visa which normally carries a three year ban on
> > re-entering the country. My guess is that won't happen either as
> > it'll show them up as sore losers even if the ban is dispensed with.
> Personally I think everyone associated with this affair has been
> embarrassed enough and they won't want to push it any further, which is
> wrong in and of itself if the rules *weren't* adhered to as they were
> supposed to be.
> > It's also been suggested they could enter into an arrangement with
> > Djokovic which allows him to play tennis and would no doubt be
> > conditional upon him not suing them for damages and probably include a
> > couple of token restrictions under the pretext of looking out for
> > public health.
> Haven't heard that.
> > Anything's possible at this point, including Djokovic telling them to
> > go forth and multiply (him being a religious person) and then leaving
> > the country of his own accord, subsequently taking his revenge by
> > campaigning internationally for the long term detainees who have
> > nowhere else to go.
> He can do what he likes, but as the majority seem to see him as a
> contemptible piece of shit (and even more so now after the emergence of
> him posing with a group of hapless people a day after his last positive
> test result) I don't think too many people would give a shit.
> > Whatever the outcome the Morrison Government has stuffed up bigtime
> > and their attempt to appear tough on border protection at Djokovic's
> > expense (since there can be no other logical reason) has failed
> > miserably.
> Yeah, apart from a willingness to blame the Federal government for
> everything that happens, I really don't see how you can reach this
> conclusion. We don't know anywhere near enough detail to know who to
> rightly point the finger at, and the involvement in this affair at
> Federal government level has been absolutely minimal.
>
> It's not like there was a government campaign to block NoVax at the
> border, or one to ensure he was packed off home once he was. It was
> procedure carried out by officials that had nothing to do with politics.
> > Stiff shit for those who subsequently had their visas cancelled by
> > Border Security in a feeble attempt to demonstrate that the same rules
> > were being applied to all.
> You seem big on this theory, but as I demonstrated yesterday there
> doesn't seem to be any evidence to support it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~~~~!~~
Two things:

> *It`s not *what* you know, rather *who* you know.

* Money talks!.
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On 9/01/2022 1:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 9/01/2022 3:17 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 9:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at the
>>> posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an angel, but
>>> I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of replying to
>>> *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the same "I hate
>>> you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>
>> Well you used to, back in the day you used to reply to virtually every
>> post by xeno and he, not unreasonably, winged about it.
>
> Not exactly.
>
> He and I, and the clog wearing fuckwit, would have long running
> arguments about the same shit over and over, and I don't recall either
> of those two dickheads ever complaining about it. In fact they *lived*
> for it which is why they would never let any comment go unanswered.
>
> I just woke up one day and was sick of it,

Hahahaha.... no, you were held to a question you couldn't answer so you
ran off and started sniping from behind a killfail you lying, falsely
attributing fraud!

It's amazing that someone who has made so many comments to others about
them needing to prove *their* claims developed such a glass jaw when he
was asked to prove his own.

On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 16:53:27 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 9/01/2022 3:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 9/01/2022 1:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >> On 9/01/2022 7:57 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>> On 8/01/2022 11:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 8/01/2022 7:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>> Fucking mental. The cunts were smacking each other with shovels
> >>>>>>> when Wog A came home and saw what he did :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Kind of like around here really.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yep, the FLCJC in spades.
> >>>>
> >>>> You need to look in the mirror, you and your mates are just as bad
> >>>> these days quite possibly worse.
> >>>
> >>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at
> >>> the posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an
> >>> angel, but I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of
> >>> replying to *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the
> >>> same "I hate you" bullshit over and over and over.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yet all you have to do is post proof of your claimed qualifications
> >> to make us all go away but you curiously you won't so...
> >>
> >> Unlike myself, Grumpy and you obviously have no moral objection to
> >> snooping and posting information publicly because he posted mine with
> >> your full support even encouragement, so Grumpy - post verifiable
> >> proof of Darren's qualifications and we'll be off for good.
> >>
> >> Help your mate out here.
> >
> >
> > Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
> > snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
> > on the internet.
> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno sites.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Really?, I have to ask how *you* would know such things?. From what you`ve said you apparently have *seen* such child porno sites??. Hmmmmm.

> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Ankles on the Fraudster

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 14:02:39 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> > On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
> >> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
> >>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can see how
> >>>>>>> that would work for you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to sling a
> >>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other than sit
> >>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
> >>>>
> >>> QED
> >>
> >> Really?
> >>
> >> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster is a
> >> fraud have been proven?
> >>
> >>
> >> alvey
> >>
> >
> >
> > Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>
> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> pathetic philosophy.
~~~~~~~~
Pathetic PPL.

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:11:28 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 11/01/2022 3:50 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:57:47 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>>>>> available information here...
>>>>>
>>>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>>>
>>>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>>>
>>> Heh :)
>>>
>>> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all about
>>> that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
>>
>> Bingo!
>> The Fraudster adds a room to his house of lies. Split level too!
>>
>> He is referring to this post of mine of 01Oct21;
>>
>> "Tell me why you, who claimed to be very well off after selling the fabled
>> NA of A, had to borrow a pissy amount years *after* the sale. Step right up
>> Der Der!"
>>
>> On the ... errr base level, the problem for Der Der is that no-one
>> responded to that post. So his reference above is just *another* example of
>> Der Der's "I don't read anything he posts! (Unless someone responds, or I'm
>> on my old lappy. Or Jupiter aligns with Mars)" being yet another lie.
>>
>> And on the 'higher' level, the question remains unanswered. So why did Der
>> Der, who regularly claims to be fabulously wealthy, need to borrow a pissy
>> amount [$150k] years *after* the sale of the fabled NA of A? "Step right up
>> Der Der!"
>>
>> I know it's all you have Fraudster, but you really should give up calling
>> people fools/idiots/retards etc while you blunder about like this.
>>
>> Bye now!
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
>
> It's laughable how he counts that as stalking when there are so many
> things he refers to when attacking me that I have never shared publicly
> and wouldn't be known to anyone else here. He's either stalking himself
> or another stalker is feeding him information, there can't be any other
> explanation.

I'd pick the latter. Fraudster doesn't have the patience, knowledge or
comprehension ability(a) to be an internet stalker/researcher. I'm not
saying that you need those qualities in abundance, it's just that Der Der
has next to nil of 'em.

alvey
Footnoting: (a) Like, how many times have we laughed at him when his
'supporting' links turn out to be the opposite of what he's claimed? That'd
be a shedload.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 11/01/2022 12:30 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 16:53:27 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
>> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno sites.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Really?, I have to ask how *you* would know such things?. From what you`ve said you apparently have *seen* such child porno sites??. Hmmmmm.

He likes to call people "pedophiles", so maybe there's a bit of
projection going on there.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:22:20 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 9/01/2022 1:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 3:17 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 9:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at the
>>>> posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an angel, but
>>>> I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of replying to
>>>> *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the same "I hate
>>>> you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>>
>>> Well you used to, back in the day you used to reply to virtually every
>>> post by xeno and he, not unreasonably, winged about it.
>>
>> Not exactly.
>>
>> He and I, and the clog wearing fuckwit, would have long running
>> arguments about the same shit over and over, and I don't recall either
>> of those two dickheads ever complaining about it. In fact they *lived*
>> for it which is why they would never let any comment go unanswered.
>>
>> I just woke up one day and was sick of it,
>
> Hahahaha.... no, you were held to a question you couldn't answer so you
> ran off and started sniping from behind a killfail you lying, falsely
> attributing fraud!
>
> It's amazing that someone who has made so many comments to others about
> them needing to prove *their* claims developed such a glass jaw when he
> was asked to prove his own.

On the scale of 'Amazement', I'd rate that comfortably lower than the
inability of his remaining enablers to accept his blatant lies, abusive
behaviour and staggering hypocrisy. It's quite fascinating, in a grisly and
depressing fashion.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 10/01/2022 6:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 5:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>>
>>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>>
>>
>> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.
>
> He's just a pathetic sook :)
>
> You can just imagine it, can't you? He'd print out 76 pages of text
> covering newsgroup exchanges over a period of years, and trot down to
> the local Police station where he would confidently plonk it on the
> counter claiming he wanted to press charges for "Libel".
>

LOL very funny but that's not the process at all.

On 11/1/22 7:02 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:38:38 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 7:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 3:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
>>>> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
>>>> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
>>>> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
>>>
>>> ROTFL, from the guy spending his days sucking up to alvey, xeno, and
>>> clocky.
>>
>> Felix is pretty stupid :)
>>
>> It's pretty easy Fetid. I was there, and Clasener wasn't. It's that
>> simple :)
>
> Bad news Fraudster. The reality is that we're years past your claims having
> any credibility. He has proof, you don't. "It's that simple".
>
>
>
> alvey
>
Have to give Darren one point, he didn't say what or where *there* is.
Such vagueness is a hallmark of his.

Let's clarify it for him.

Darren was lying about doing it (an apprenticeship, working in the
trade) and I was doing it (apprenticeship completed, trade experience
amassed) and it was the depth and breadth of my post apprenticeship
training and experience that permitted me to be employed as an
automotive teacher. Normally requires advance trade at technician level
for entry. You know, what is regarded as Cert 4 these days.

And I provided proof - though not to Darren given what he threatened to
do with it. Remember what he said - he would have put it *all around the
internet* and the poor little troll is worried about someone (re)posting
*his* precious pics. Darren seems to believe that the rules he applies
to others don't apply to him.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/1/22 7:10 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:04:13 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 11:22 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
>>>>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
>>>>>> on the internet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must
>>>>> be ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
>>>>> sites.
>>>>>
>>>> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen
>>>> to share everything that they don't seem to care.
>>>
>>> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should be
>>> commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other people's
>>> photos for his own advantage.
>>>
>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>> breach of any law.
>>>
>>
>> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
>
> You should. It's hilarious. Shirley you haven't forgotten this classic by
> the Rumpole of Bumhole?
>
> Der Der: For something to be considered "factual" it needs to be able to be
> demonstrated to be true, and that doesn't apply in this case as the
> "evidence" has not been demonstrated to everyone. The evidence has only
> been demonstrated to *some* people, and their "say so" is being used as
> confirmation of it being true.
> In legal terms, this is called "hearsay".
>
> alvey: At base, "hearsay" is repeating something that someone told you.
>
> People giving an opinion on what they personally witnessed is, "in legal
> terms", evidence.
>
> Ahhhh. Still makes me lol.
>
>
>
> alvey
>
>
Yep, Darren was *wedged good and proper* there. His desperation was showing.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 4:29 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>
> Anyone watch the last session of the SCG Test?
>
> If you thought it was tense, spare a thought for those of us who'd put
> their money on a draw. "Could I have another bourbon and beta blocker
> thanks?"
>
>
>
> alvey
>
>
>
>

LOL, it was a good fight to the end by England. If only Cummings had
declared as soon as Khawaja had scored his century... the outcome might
have been different.

On 11/1/22 7:15 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:50:30 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
>>>> been called, you've been found wanting.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Walled up car collections included.
>>
>> Lol :)
>>
>> Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
>> person here.
>
> Yep, have to agree with that. Countless times you've proved beyond any
> doubt that you're a liar, fraud, hypocrite and abusive cretin.
> Congratulations!
>
>
>
> alvey
>
+1

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/1/22 7:29 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>
> Anyone watch the last session of the SCG Test?
>
> If you thought it was tense, spare a thought for those of us who'd put
> their money on a draw. "Could I have another bourbon and beta blocker
> thanks?"
>
>
>
> alvey

Watched it, saw the Pom's strategy - block everything, no wild risks of
getting out. After that finish, my wife's become a bit of a cricket
tragic. She watched as much of the cricket as she watched of the tennis.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 12:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 3:50 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:57:47 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>>>>> available information here...
>>>>>
>>>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>>>
>>>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>>>
>>> Heh :)
>>>
>>> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all
>>> about
>>> that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
>>
>> Bingo!
>> The Fraudster adds a room to his house of lies. Split level too!
>>
>> He is referring to this post of mine of 01Oct21;
>>
>> "Tell me why you, who claimed to be very well off after selling the
>> fabled
>> NA of A, had to borrow a pissy amount years *after* the sale. Step
>> right up
>> Der Der!"
>>
>> On the ... errr base level, the problem for Der Der is that no-one
>> responded to that post. So his reference above is just *another*
>> example of
>> Der Der's "I don't read anything he posts! (Unless someone responds,
>> or I'm
>> on my old lappy. Or Jupiter aligns with Mars)" being yet another lie.
>>
>> And on the 'higher' level, the question remains unanswered. So why
>> did Der
>> Der, who regularly claims to be fabulously wealthy, need to borrow a
>> pissy
>> amount [$150k] years *after* the sale of the fabled NA of A? "Step
>> right up
>> Der Der!"
>>
>> I know it's all you have Fraudster, but you really should give up
>> calling
>> people fools/idiots/retards etc while you blunder about like this.
>>
>> Bye now!
>>
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>
>
> It's laughable how he counts that as stalking when there are so many
> things he refers to when attacking me that I have never shared
> publicly and wouldn't be known to anyone else here. He's either
> stalking himself or another stalker is feeding him information, there
> can't be any other explanation.
>
>

maybe it's both :)

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 11/1/22 9:36 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 8:26 am, John_H wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Two things. Firstly, avoiding the mandatory quarantine requirements
>>> wasn't what we were talking about. We were talking about people actually
>>> getting in to the country, not what they had to do once they were here.
>>
>> We were talking about the rules being bent, as they frequently are,
>> and that includes both the quarantine rules, administered by the
>> states, as well as the issuing of visas by the feds.
>
> Yeah, well, okay. I thought we were talking about visa applications but
> anyway.....
>
>> The connection to Djokovic, in case it isn't obvious, is the inclusion
>> of sporting heroes and their hangers on with the notable exception of
>> Djokovic himself but including those who'd also been issued with visas
>> (on the basis of medical exemptions) that weren't revoked by Border
>> Security at the airport.
>
> And who were they?
>
>> The Federal Court has now ruled he was unfairly discriminated against
>> and Government politicians have egg on their faces, there being no
>> failure to provide requested documentation as originally reported by
>> the media (which later became incorrect documentation).
>
> I haven't been out to get the paper yet this morning, but from what I
> could make out on the nightly news last night the Judge's ruling seemed
> to be about a point of law.
>
>> The Happy Clapper's response is that the rules are clear, backed by
>> his deputy who says visa applicants have to be double vaccinated and
>> another who claims medical exemptions only apply to those who can't be
>> vaccinated at the time.... If they seriously believe their own spin
>> let them appeal the court ruling but my guess is they won't because
>> even if they win we're likely to find out who issued the directive to
>> sink the boots into Djokovic and possibly how many visas have
>> previously been issued to anti-vaxxers.
>
> That's purely speculation and we won't know exactly what happened until
> all the details are laid on the table.
>
>> Of course there's also the option of having the Minister for
>> Immigration revoke the visa which normally carries a three year ban on
>> re-entering the country.  My guess is that won't happen either as
>> it'll show them up as sore losers even if the ban is dispensed with.
>
> Personally I think everyone associated with this affair has been
> embarrassed enough and they won't want to push it any further, which is
> wrong in and of itself if the rules *weren't* adhered to as they were
> supposed to be.
>
>> It's also been suggested they could enter into an arrangement with
>> Djokovic which allows him to play tennis and would no doubt be
>> conditional upon him not suing them for damages and probably include a
>> couple of token restrictions under the pretext of looking out for
>> public health.
>
> Haven't heard that.
>
>> Anything's possible at this point, including Djokovic telling them to
>> go forth and multiply (him being a religious person) and then leaving
>> the country of his own accord, subsequently taking his revenge by
>> campaigning internationally for the long term detainees who have
>> nowhere else to go.
>
> He can do what he likes, but as the majority seem to see him as a
> contemptible piece of shit (and even more so now after the emergence of

Ho, look at that! A contemptible piece of shit projecting his own
situation onto others. Hey Darren, Djoko has one real big advantage over
you, what he says he's done (on court in his case) is real and actually
did happen. The contemptible piece of shit is you for claiming to have
done things that you never did.

> him posing with a group of hapless people a day after his last positive
> test result) I don't think too many people would give a shit.
>
>> Whatever the outcome the Morrison Government has stuffed up bigtime
>> and their attempt to appear tough on border protection at Djokovic's
>> expense (since there can be no other logical reason) has failed
>> miserably.
>
> Yeah, apart from a willingness to blame the Federal government for
> everything that happens, I really don't see how you can reach this
> conclusion. We don't know anywhere near enough detail to know who to
> rightly point the finger at, and the involvement in this affair at
> Federal government level has been absolutely minimal.
>
> It's not like there was a government campaign to block NoVax at the
> border, or one to ensure he was packed off home once he was. It was
> procedure carried out by officials that had nothing to do with politics.
>
>> Stiff shit for those who subsequently had their visas cancelled by
>> Border Security in a feeble attempt to demonstrate that the same rules
>> were being applied to all.
>
> You seem big on this theory, but as I demonstrated yesterday there
> doesn't seem to be any evidence to support it.
>
>
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 12:30 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 16:53:27 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 3:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 1:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 7:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 7:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Fucking mental. The cunts were smacking each other with shovels
>>>>>>>>> when Wog A came home and saw what he did :)
>>>>>>>> Kind of like around here really.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, the FLCJC in spades.
>>>>>> You need to look in the mirror, you and your mates are just as bad
>>>>>> these days quite possibly worse.
>>>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at
>>>>> the posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an
>>>>> angel, but I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of
>>>>> replying to *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the
>>>>> same "I hate you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yet all you have to do is post proof of your claimed qualifications
>>>> to make us all go away but you curiously you won't so...
>>>>
>>>> Unlike myself, Grumpy and you obviously have no moral objection to
>>>> snooping and posting information publicly because he posted mine with
>>>> your full support even encouragement, so Grumpy - post verifiable
>>>> proof of Darren's qualifications and we'll be off for good.
>>>>
>>>> Help your mate out here.
>>>
>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
>>> on the internet.
>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
>> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno sites.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Really?, I have to ask how *you* would know such things?. From what you`ve said you apparently have *seen* such child porno sites??. Hmmmmm.
>

no never. it's well known via media reports. you should watch the news
sometime.

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 11/01/2022 8:11 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 9:38 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 11:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>>
>>>> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back
>>>> is the
>>>> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>>> An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other
>>> than a crap spewing, shit stirring, running away  CUNT, in ANY group
>>> that you have infested.?...
>>
>> Not that I have the slightest interest in looking, but I'll bet my
>> left ball
>
>
> nobody would want to win that bet
>
>

He's bet his balls before and lost both, evidently :-)

On 11/1/22 9:38 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 11:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>
>>> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back
>>> is the
>>> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other
>> than a crap spewing, shit stirring, running away  CUNT, in ANY group
>> that you have infested.?...
>
> Not that I have the slightest interest in looking, but I'll bet my left
> ball that the fucking imbecile is just as well liked in any other group
> he hangs out in as he is in here :)
>
> Some people just don't get the message apparently....
>
>
Well, you don't, obviously. Only post in one newsgroup Darren? No points
for guessing why that is, one need only look at your behaviour here in
aus.cars.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/1/22 11:11 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 9:38 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 11:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>>
>>>> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back
>>>> is the
>>>> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>>> An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other
>>> than a crap spewing, shit stirring, running away  CUNT, in ANY group
>>> that you have infested.?...
>>
>> Not that I have the slightest interest in looking, but I'll bet my
>> left ball
>
>
> nobody would want to win that bet
>
>
>> that the fucking imbecile is just as well liked in any other group he
>> hangs out in as he is in here :)
>>
>> Some people just don't get the message apparently....
>>
>>
>
You would actually have to *assume* he actually has a left ball. Given
his displayed cowardice, I doubt he has *any balls*.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/1/22 1:20 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 12:30 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 16:53:27 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
>>> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
>>> sites.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Really?, I have to ask how *you* would know such things?. From what
>> you`ve said you apparently have *seen*  such child porno sites??. Hmmmmm.
>
> He likes to call people "pedophiles", so maybe there's a bit of
> projection going on there.
>
>
Nope, just reacting to the *image* you project here when posting about
10 year olds and sand up little girl's vaginas. You are the one with the
fetish, not felix.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/1/22 2:10 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 8:11 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 11/01/2022 9:38 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 11:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given
>>>>> back is the
>>>>> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>>>> An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other
>>>> than a crap spewing, shit stirring, running away  CUNT, in ANY group
>>>> that you have infested.?...
>>>
>>> Not that I have the slightest interest in looking, but I'll bet my
>>> left ball
>>
>>
>> nobody would want to win that bet
>>
>>
>
>
> He's bet his balls before and lost both, evidently :-)

Nah, he was born sans balls. That's why Darren father called him Noddy,
wasn't sure whether he was Arthur or Martha so went with Noddy instead
as that was the best fit for his level of stupidity. Darren's done
nothing but confirmed that every day of his life ever since.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 10:20 am, alvey wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:22:20 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>
>> On 9/01/2022 1:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 3:17 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at the
>>>>> posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an angel, but
>>>>> I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of replying to
>>>>> *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the same "I hate
>>>>> you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>>>
>>>> Well you used to, back in the day you used to reply to virtually every
>>>> post by xeno and he, not unreasonably, winged about it.
>>>
>>> Not exactly.
>>>
>>> He and I, and the clog wearing fuckwit, would have long running
>>> arguments about the same shit over and over, and I don't recall either
>>> of those two dickheads ever complaining about it. In fact they *lived*
>>> for it which is why they would never let any comment go unanswered.
>>>
>>> I just woke up one day and was sick of it,
>>
>> Hahahaha.... no, you were held to a question you couldn't answer so you
>> ran off and started sniping from behind a killfail you lying, falsely
>> attributing fraud!
>>
>> It's amazing that someone who has made so many comments to others about
>> them needing to prove *their* claims developed such a glass jaw when he
>> was asked to prove his own.
>
> On the scale of 'Amazement', I'd rate that comfortably lower than the
> inability of his remaining enablers to accept his blatant lies, abusive
> behaviour and staggering hypocrisy. It's quite fascinating, in a grisly and
> depressing fashion.
>
>
> alvey
>

That it is, that it is.