On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 21:08:19 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/1/22 8:50 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> >
> >>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
> >>> been called, you've been found wanting.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> Walled up car collections included.
> >
> > Lol :)
> >
> > Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
> > person here. Clasener, not so much :)
> >
> Well, yes, you have proven beyond any shadow of doubt that you are a
> lying delusional sociopath!
>
> Yet the thing that you harped on so much about, your *claimed*
> qualifications, you don't show them. It's Ok Darren, I know why that is.
> You can't show what you don't have. I get that! That's why you only
> waffle on about *experience* these days. It's all you have left but, it
> has to be said, *experience as a TA* isn't going to cut it as a mechanic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The *CARS* xenokryp, why are you avoiding supplying an answer?.
Because its a *BULLSHIT* story?, is that it?
Surely not. Over to you kryppy.

> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 11:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 12:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 11/01/2022 3:50 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:57:47 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>>>>>> available information here...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>>>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>>>>
>>>>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>>>>
>>>> Heh :)
>>>>
>>>> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all
>>>> about
>>>> that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
>>>
>>> Bingo!
>>> The Fraudster adds a room to his house of lies. Split level too!
>>>
>>> He is referring to this post of mine of 01Oct21;
>>>
>>> "Tell me why you, who claimed to be very well off after selling the
>>> fabled
>>> NA of A, had to borrow a pissy amount years *after* the sale. Step
>>> right up
>>> Der Der!"
>>>
>>> On the ... errr base level, the problem for Der Der is that no-one
>>> responded to that post. So his reference above is just *another*
>>> example of
>>> Der Der's "I don't read anything he posts! (Unless someone responds,
>>> or I'm
>>> on my old lappy. Or Jupiter aligns with Mars)" being yet another lie.
>>>
>>> And on the 'higher' level, the question remains unanswered. So why
>>> did Der
>>> Der, who regularly claims to be fabulously wealthy, need to borrow a
>>> pissy
>>> amount [$150k] years *after* the sale of the fabled NA of A? "Step
>>> right up
>>> Der Der!"
>>>
>>> I know it's all you have Fraudster, but you really should give up
>>> calling
>>> people fools/idiots/retards etc while you blunder about like this.
>>>
>>> Bye now!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>>
>>
>> It's laughable how he counts that as stalking when there are so many
>> things he refers to when attacking me that I have never shared
>> publicly and wouldn't be known to anyone else here. He's either
>> stalking himself or another stalker is feeding him information, there
>> can't be any other explanation.
>>
>>
>
> maybe it's both :)
>

It could be, but Alvey made a good point in regards to that.

On 11/01/2022 2:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 11/1/22 1:20 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 11/01/2022 12:30 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 16:53:27 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
>>>> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
>>>> sites.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Really?, I have to ask how *you* would know such things?. From what
>>> you`ve said you apparently have *seen*  such child porno sites??.
>>> Hmmmmm.
>>
>> He likes to call people "pedophiles", so maybe there's a bit of
>> projection going on there.
>>
>>
> Nope, just reacting to the *image* you project here when posting about
> 10 year olds and sand up little girl's vaginas. You are the one with
> the fetish, not felix.
>

+1. and not to mention his anal fetish also. disgusting creature it is.

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 11/01/2022 2:24 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 11:08 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 11/01/2022 12:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2022 3:50 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:57:47 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>>>>>>> available information here...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>>>>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heh :)
>>>>>
>>>>> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all
>>>>> about
>>>>> that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
>>>>
>>>> Bingo!
>>>> The Fraudster adds a room to his house of lies. Split level too!
>>>>
>>>> He is referring to this post of mine of 01Oct21;
>>>>
>>>> "Tell me why you, who claimed to be very well off after selling the
>>>> fabled
>>>> NA of A, had to borrow a pissy amount years *after* the sale. Step
>>>> right up
>>>> Der Der!"
>>>>
>>>> On the ... errr base level, the problem for Der Der is that no-one
>>>> responded to that post. So his reference above is just *another*
>>>> example of
>>>> Der Der's "I don't read anything he posts! (Unless someone
>>>> responds, or I'm
>>>> on my old lappy. Or Jupiter aligns with Mars)" being yet another lie.
>>>>
>>>> And on the 'higher' level, the question remains unanswered. So why
>>>> did Der
>>>> Der, who regularly claims to be fabulously wealthy, need to borrow
>>>> a pissy
>>>> amount [$150k] years *after* the sale of the fabled NA of A? "Step
>>>> right up
>>>> Der Der!"
>>>>
>>>> I know it's all you have Fraudster, but you really should give up
>>>> calling
>>>> people fools/idiots/retards etc while you blunder about like this.
>>>>
>>>> Bye now!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> alvey
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's laughable how he counts that as stalking when there are so many
>>> things he refers to when attacking me that I have never shared
>>> publicly and wouldn't be known to anyone else here. He's either
>>> stalking himself or another stalker is feeding him information,
>>> there can't be any other explanation.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> maybe it's both :)
>>
>
> It could be, but Alvey made a good point in regards to that.

yes I saw that later. I wasn't being terribly serious, as the fraudster
is not really the stalking type, just an arsehole  :)

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 10/01/2022 6:08 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/1/22 8:50 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
>>>> been called, you've been found wanting.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Walled up car collections included.
>>
>> Lol :)
>>
>> Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
>> person here. Clasener, not so much :)
>>
> Well, yes, you have proven beyond any shadow of doubt that you are a
> lying delusional sociopath!
>
> Yet the thing that you harped on so much about, your *claimed*
> qualifications, you don't show them. It's Ok Darren, I know why that is.
> You can't show what you don't have. I get that! That's why you only
> waffle on about *experience* these days. It's all you have left but, it
> has to be said, *experience as a TA* isn't going to cut it as a mechanic.
>

When was the last time he worked alongside anyone who was qualified to
be considered a trade assistant?

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 21:38:40 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 7:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 3:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
> >> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
> >> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
> >> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
> >> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Sucking up* felix? I`ve mentioned in here *many* times the *FACT* that I suck up to *NOBODY*. I simply call things as *I* see them.. The *dark side* felix?, enlighten moi on what you see as being such a thing/place/person?.... Do try.
> >
> > ROTFL, from the guy spending his days sucking up to alvey, xeno, and
> > clocky.
> Felix is pretty stupid :)
!~~~~~~~~~~
She is certainly proving that statement to be fact!.
>
> It's pretty easy Fetid. I was there, and Clasener wasn't. It's that
> simple :)
> --
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 23:04:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 11:22 am, Noddy wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
> >>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
> >>>> on the internet.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
> >>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must
> >>> be ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
> >>> sites.
> >>>
> >> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen
> >> to share everything that they don't seem to care.
> >
> > Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should be
> > commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other people's
> > photos for his own advantage.
> >
> > Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
> > Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
> > breach of any law.
> >
> >
>
> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
You are in need of a criminal lawyer. They excel at springing the guilty.. <G>

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 01:08:47 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 8:55 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 5:09 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >> On 10/01/2022 3:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>> On 10/01/2022 2:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should
> >>>> be commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other
> >>>> people's photos for his own advantage.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> who's photos have I used for my own advantage? put up or shut up.
> >
> > ROTFL :) This bloke *surely* can't be this stupid by accident :)
> >
> >> I seem to recall having you issued with a takedown notice for a photo
> >> you took of mine and posted on your own website. Remember that?
> >
> > Yep. That's what I was thinking of, and there were also the photos I
> > put up of the trailer I built (you know, the one Clasner claimed that
> > someone else built and just dragged over to my place for me to weld a
> > couple of brackets on so I could brag about it in here), that Felix
> > helped himself to by posting to some hosting site.
> the way you posted them ppl had to clik each one, and they loaded
> slowly, as some complained. I put them all on one page, and as I recall
> at least one person was appreciative. I think it was fred. but you being
> the mental retard that you are, couldn't fathom that that was a good
> thing. doing something nice for your fellow man is never in your agenda,
> or what passes for your mind.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```
Diddums want a hanky?.... <G>

> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 11/01/2022 3:56 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:06:42 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 1:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 10/1/22 1:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> All I ever objected to was his nonsensical claim that he taught "shop"
>>>>>> at Richmond tech, as I know for a *fact* that he never did and no
>>>>>> "piece
>>>>>> of paper" he has will ever prove that :)
>>>>> Ah Darren but I did teach *prac* (and theory) at Richmond and it wasn't
>>>>> proven with a *piece of paper*. That's a wrong guess by you right there.
>>>>> I taught at Richmond for 16 of my 20 years in education, the remainder
>>>>> at Sunshine Tech in the TAFE wing. You, on the other hand, have never
>>>>> seen the inside of an apprentice classroom, ever.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, how do you *know for a fact*???? Seems to me like your delusions are
>>>>> getting really bad of late. You should seek help. Start here;
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bacchusmarshpsychologyclinic.com.au/contact
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>   Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>>>
>>>>> Darren, you've *never* been relevant to the automotive trade
>>>>> and you proved it by inventing trade qualifications you have *never
>>>>> possessed*. That's your inferiority complex driving your actions there.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Turns that *FACT* into a *NO YOU*..... APU.
>>>>
>>>>>> It's delusional, and bordering on certifiably insane.
>>>> ~~~~~~~
>>>>   And again!.
>>>>> Your delusions certainly are.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Xeno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
>>>>> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
>>>
>>> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
>>> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
>>> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
>>> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
>>>
>>
>> Good question. Jonz knows for a fact that Xeno taught at Richmond TAFE
>> so why isn't he correcting him on this?
>
> That's a very good question. I look forward to the response. [He said.
> Using a months quota of irony].
>
>> It must be a condition of FLCJC membership that you throw your integrity
>> and dignity out the window.
>
> Given their aim & co-ordination that could take days...
>
>
>
> alvey
>

lol :-)

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 01:18:17 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 10:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 2:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 10/01/2022 2:58 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm an arsehole
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ok
> >>
> > I see what you did there felix, very clever and witty too clap clap clap.
> >
> > Alvey will have to watch out, if you keep this standard of work up, he
> > may become surplus to requirements.
> I'm not as clever as he
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
*HE* being a flog of the first water!. Yet You class yerself as *not as clever* IE: stupider, dumber, more noisome, and a bigger cunt than ol' ankles.
Wow!!!!....<FFS>
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 07:10:52 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:04:13 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>
> > On 10/01/2022 11:22 am, Noddy wrote:
> >> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
> >>>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
> >>>>> on the internet.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
> >>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must
> >>>> be ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
> >>>> sites.
> >>>>
> >>> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen
> >>> to share everything that they don't seem to care.
> >>
> >> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should be
> >> commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other people's
> >> photos for his own advantage.
> >>
> >> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
> >> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
> >> breach of any law.
> >>
> >
> > There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
> You should. It's hilarious. Shirley you haven't forgotten this classic by
> the Rumpole of Bumhole?
>
> Der Der: For something to be considered "factual" it needs to be able to be
> demonstrated to be true, and that doesn't apply in this case as the
> "evidence" has not been demonstrated to everyone. The evidence has only
> been demonstrated to *some* people, and their "say so" is being used as
> confirmation of it being true.
> In legal terms, this is called "hearsay".
>
> alvey: At base, "hearsay" is repeating something that someone told you.
>
> People giving an opinion on what they personally witnessed is, "in legal
> terms", evidence.
>
> Ahhhh. Still makes me lol.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Natch, once you become a 'loathsome old lickspittle' there is *no* going back. suck it up ankles..

>
>
>
> alvey
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 09:38:22 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 11:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>
> >> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back is the
> >> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
> > An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other than a crap spewing, shit stirring, running away CUNT, in ANY group that you have infested.?...
> Not that I have the slightest interest in looking, but I'll bet my left
> ball that the fucking imbecile is just as well liked in any other group
> he hangs out in as he is in here :)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
he has form in Aus.cricket.
>
> Some people just don't get the message apparently....
> --
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 12:11:35 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 3:50 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:57:47 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
> >>>>> available information here...
> >>>>
> >>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
> >>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
> >>>
> >>> By accident? Pull the other one.
> >>
> >> Heh :)
> >>
> >> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all about
> >> that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
> >
> > Bingo!
> > The Fraudster adds a room to his house of lies. Split level too!
> >
> > He is referring to this post of mine of 01Oct21;
> >
> > "Tell me why you, who claimed to be very well off after selling the fabled
> > NA of A, had to borrow a pissy amount years *after* the sale. Step right up
> > Der Der!"
> >
> > On the ... errr base level, the problem for Der Der is that no-one
> > responded to that post. So his reference above is just *another* example of
> > Der Der's "I don't read anything he posts! (Unless someone responds, or I'm
> > on my old lappy. Or Jupiter aligns with Mars)" being yet another lie.
> >
> > And on the 'higher' level, the question remains unanswered. So why did Der
> > Der, who regularly claims to be fabulously wealthy, need to borrow a pissy
> > amount [$150k] years *after* the sale of the fabled NA of A? "Step right up
> > Der Der!"
> >
> > I know it's all you have Fraudster, but you really should give up calling
> > people fools/idiots/retards etc while you blunder about like this.
> >
> > Bye now!
> >
> >
> >
> > alvey
> >
> >
> It's laughable how he counts that as stalking when there are so many
> things he refers to when attacking me that I have never shared publicly
> and wouldn't be known to anyone else here. He's either stalking himself
> or another stalker is feeding him information, there can't be any other
> explanation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ooooh, them paranoic feels......HAHAHAHA

On 11/01/2022 5:26 am, John_H wrote:
> Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 7:54 am, John_H wrote:
>>> Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>>> Where were you when Kerry Stokes, Tom Hanks, Matt Damon, Danni Manogue
>>>>> and Nicole Kidman were able to jet and in out at will while bypassing
>>>>> the usual quarantine requirements?
>>>>
>>>> Have you got a cite to show they did anything that anyone else was
>>>> unable to do?
>>>
>>> Try googling it for yourself since they're all well documented
>>> examples of being able to avoid the mandatory quarantine
>>> requirements. You might start with *kerry stokes aspen* since it was
>>> the first example I gave.
>>
>> Two things. Firstly, avoiding the mandatory quarantine requirements
>> wasn't what we were talking about. We were talking about people actually
>> getting in to the country, not what they had to do once they were here.
>
> We were talking about the rules being bent, as they frequently are,
> and that includes both the quarantine rules, administered by the
> states, as well as the issuing of visas by the feds.
>
> The connection to Djokovic, in case it isn't obvious, is the inclusion
> of sporting heroes and their hangers on with the notable exception of
> Djokovic himself but including those who'd also been issued with visas
> (on the basis of medical exemptions) that weren't revoked by Border
> Security at the airport.
>
> The Federal Court has now ruled he was unfairly discriminated against
> and Government politicians have egg on their faces, there being no
> failure to provide requested documentation as originally reported by
> the media (which later became incorrect documentation).
>
> The Happy Clapper's response is that the rules are clear, backed by
> his deputy who says visa applicants have to be double vaccinated and
> another who claims medical exemptions only apply to those who can't be
> vaccinated at the time.... If they seriously believe their own spin
> let them appeal the court ruling but my guess is they won't because
> even if they win we're likely to find out who issued the directive to
> sink the boots into Djokovic and possibly how many visas have
> previously been issued to anti-vaxxers.
>
> Of course there's also the option of having the Minister for
> Immigration revoke the visa which normally carries a three year ban on
> re-entering the country. My guess is that won't happen either as
> it'll show them up as sore losers even if the ban is dispensed with.
>
> It's also been suggested they could enter into an arrangement with
> Djokovic which allows him to play tennis and would no doubt be
> conditional upon him not suing them for damages and probably include a
> couple of token restrictions under the pretext of looking out for
> public health.
>
> Anything's possible at this point, including Djokovic telling them to
> go forth and multiply (him being a religious person) and then leaving
> the country of his own accord, subsequently taking his revenge by
> campaigning internationally for the long term detainees who have
> nowhere else to go.
>
> Whatever the outcome the Morrison Government has stuffed up bigtime
> and their attempt to appear tough on border protection at Djokovic's
> expense (since there can be no other logical reason) has failed
> miserably.
>
> Stiff shit for those who subsequently had their visas cancelled by
> Border Security in a feeble attempt to demonstrate that the same rules
> were being applied to all.
>

I'm no fan of Morrison but that's just a lot of baseless and mindless
rambling, something that you're getting pretty good at it must be said.

Question 2 below is pretty clear but he answered no - yet there is
evidence he traveled to Spain and elsewhere in the two weeks prior to
arrival.

https://content.api.news/v3/images/bin/b9c2e136beb8793267b93d27a1e3f2a6

If he lied he can be sent packing, and justifiably so.

On 11/1/22 2:31 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 6:08 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 10/1/22 8:50 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
>>>>> been called, you've been found wanting.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Walled up car collections included.
>>>
>>> Lol :)
>>>
>>> Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
>>> person here. Clasener, not so much :)
>>>
>> Well, yes, you have proven beyond any shadow of doubt that you are a
>> lying delusional sociopath!
>>
>> Yet the thing that you harped on so much about, your *claimed*
>> qualifications, you don't show them. It's Ok Darren, I know why that
>> is. You can't show what you don't have. I get that! That's why you
>> only waffle on about *experience* these days. It's all you have left
>> but, it has to be said, *experience as a TA* isn't going to cut it as
>> a mechanic.
>>
>
> When was the last time he worked alongside anyone who was qualified to
> be considered a trade assistant?
>
Given that nobody could work with the toxic little turd, you may have a
point.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 2:46 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 01:08:47 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> the way you posted them ppl had to clik each one, and they loaded
>> slowly, as some complained. I put them all on one page, and as I recall
>> at least one person was appreciative. I think it was fred. but you being
>> the mental retard that you are, couldn't fathom that that was a good
>> thing. doing something nice for your fellow man is never in your agenda,
>> or what passes for your mind.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```
> Diddums want a hanky?.... <G>

Felix, you're a fucking idiot. If I *wanted* that done I'm more than
capable of doing it myself. I don't need a retard the likes of you to
"help" me. Quite simply, how & where I posted them was none of your
business, and it wasn't your job to correct it.

Glad to have jogged your memory, but you need to appreciate that not
everyone wants you to do them "favours".

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 11/01/2022 2:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 23:04:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:

>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>> breach of any law.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
> You are in need of a criminal lawyer. They excel at springing the guilty.. <G>

No one would bother "consulting" with the fucktard, as it doesn't matter
how plainly the law is laid out in front of him he is incapable of
understanding it. Look at how much of an utter fucktard he made of
himself over the snake killing debate?

Besides, if I practiced law he couldn't afford me :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 13:59:00 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 11/1/22 7:02 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:38:38 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/01/2022 7:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 10/01/2022 3:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>
> >>>> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
> >>>> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
> >>>> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
> >>>> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
> >>>
> >>> ROTFL, from the guy spending his days sucking up to alvey, xeno, and
> >>> clocky.
> >>
> >> Felix is pretty stupid :)
> >>
> >> It's pretty easy Fetid. I was there, and Clasener wasn't. It's that
> >> simple :)
> >
> > Bad news Fraudster. The reality is that we're years past your claims having
> > any credibility. He has proof, you don't. "It's that simple".
> >
> >
> >
> > alvey
> >
> Have to give Darren one point, he didn't say what or where *there* is.
> Such vague

\

>
> Let's clarify it for him.
>
> Darren was lying about doing it (an apprenticeship, working in the
> trade) and I was doing it (apprenticeship completed, trade experience
> amassed) and it was the depth and breadth of my post apprenticeship
> training and experience that permitted me to be employed as an
> automotive teacher. Normally requires advance trade at technician level
> for entry. You know, what is regarded as Cert 4 these days.
>
> And I provided proof - though not to Darren given what he threatened to
> do with it. Remember what he said - he would have put it *all around the
> internet* and the poor little troll is worried about someone (re)posting
> *his* precious pics. Darren seems to believe that the rules he applies
> to others don't apply to him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, somebody poasts yer bits of paper?, So what? why would it matter?...They`re no fucking use to *anybody*!!.
How about the *CARS* kryppy?, I for one really would like to know the, ahem, TRUTH???. Waiting!.

>
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 14:01:00 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 4:29 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anyone watch the last session of the SCG Test?
> >
> > If you thought it was tense, spare a thought for those of us who'd put
> > their money on a draw. "Could I have another bourbon and beta blocker
> > thanks?"
> >
> >
> >
> > alvey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> LOL, it was a good fight to the end by England. If only Cummings had
> declared as soon as Khawaja had scored his century... the outcome might
> have been different.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cummings??. What position does he play in?. Do tell, Oh knowledgeable one <G>

On 11/1/22 5:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 2:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 23:04:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>>> breach of any law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> You are in need of a criminal lawyer. They excel at springing the
>> guilty.. <G>
>
> No one would bother "consulting" with the fucktard, as it doesn't matter
> how plainly the law is laid out in front of him he is incapable of
> understanding it. Look at how much of an utter fucktard he made of
> himself over the snake killing debate?
>
> Besides, if I practiced law he couldn't afford me :)
>
Going to fake law qualifications now too, are you?

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 14:03:19 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 11/1/22 7:29 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anyone watch the last session of the SCG Test?
> >
> > If you thought it was tense, spare a thought for those of us who'd put
> > their money on a draw. "Could I have another bourbon and beta blocker
> > thanks?"
> >
> >
> >
> > alvey
> Watched it, saw the Pom's strategy - block everything, no wild risks of
> getting out. After that finish, my wife's become a bit of a cricket
> tragic. She watched as much of the cricket as she watched of the tennis.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It was (in the main) a dismal debacle. Not surprised yer cook liked it.
After all, a dismal debacle is what she is used to.

> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 11/01/2022 2:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 2:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 23:04:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>>> breach of any law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> You are in need of a criminal lawyer. They excel at springing the
>> guilty.. <G>
>
> No one would bother "consulting" with the fucktard, as it doesn't matter
> how plainly the law is laid out in front of him he is incapable of
> understanding it. Look at how much of an utter fucktard he made of
> himself over the snake killing debate?
>

You broke the law plain as day.

> Besides, if I practiced law he couldn't afford me :)
>

Nobody can afford to lose, that's why you consult a real one :-)

On 11/01/2022 11:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 2:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 11/1/22 1:20 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2022 12:30 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 16:53:27 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
>>>>> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
>>>>> sites.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Really?, I have to ask how *you* would know such things?. From what
>>>> you`ve said you apparently have *seen*  such child porno sites??.
>>>> Hmmmmm.
>>>
>>> He likes to call people "pedophiles", so maybe there's a bit of
>>> projection going on there.
>>>
>>>
>> Nope, just reacting to the *image* you project here when posting about
>> 10 year olds and sand up little girl's vaginas. You are the one with
>> the fetish, not felix.
>>
>
> +1. and not to mention his anal fetish also. disgusting creature it is.
>
>

Yet the faux outrage and threats of legal action over a link to some
horse porn or whatever it was... and it turns out I was 100% correct on
the law and he was 100% wrong.

The fucking glass jawed idiot :-)

On 11/1/22 6:28 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 2:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 11/01/2022 2:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 23:04:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>>>> breach of any law.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>>> You are in need of a criminal lawyer. They excel at springing the
>>> guilty.. <G>
>>
>> No one would bother "consulting" with the fucktard, as it doesn't
>> matter how plainly the law is laid out in front of him he is incapable
>> of understanding it. Look at how much of an utter fucktard he made of
>> himself over the snake killing debate?
>>
>
> You broke the law plain as day.
>
>> Besides, if I practiced law he couldn't afford me :)
>>
>
> Nobody can afford to lose, that's why you consult a real one :-)
>
You're not wrong. Taking on a fake lawyer could work out ridiculously
expensive. Fake lawyers have no training, no qualifications and no
experience. Hmmm, just like Darren in automotive.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:59:55 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 11/01/2022 2:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 23:04:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>>> breach of any law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> You are in need of a criminal lawyer. They excel at springing the guilty.. <G>
>
> No one would bother "consulting" with the fucktard, as it doesn't matter
> how plainly the law is laid out in front of him he is incapable of
> understanding it. Look at how much of an utter fucktard he made of
> himself over the snake killing debate?
>
> Besides, if I practiced law he couldn't afford me :)

Der Der's comprehension problem strikes again!

It's the *top* 1% that Law takes Der Der. Not your end of the table...

alvey
Chuckling somewhat hysterically at the thought of Fraudster LLB.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus