On 13/01/2022 1:31 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 11:50:56 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 6:37 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 6:10 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 10:53 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>>>>>>>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>>>>>>> By accident? Pull the other one.
>>>>>> Heh :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all
>>>>>> about that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, your mates are the stalkers. That said, you are shit at it.
>>>>>
>>>> This comes from somebody who went to some trouble to rifle through
>>>> semi public record in order to get something on noddy. Can we say
>>>> extreme hypocrisy.
>>> *Twice* mind you, and failed both times. Can we say certifiably insane
>>> fatal attraction?
>>>
>>> Ask Alvey what the name of the young Asian chick he pretended to be in
>>> order to get into my Facebook page was :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I take it you have some evidence to back up this claim or is this just
>> another episode of baseless finger pointing that you *never* get right?
>>
>> Even if true (as unlikely as that is) how does that compare to say, oh I
>> dunno, fraudulently pretending to be qualified for personal gain do you
>> reckon?
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Should have left it at *oh I dunno* ticcy. <FBG>

so jonzie, you YOU believe your new BFF is a qualified auto-mechanic?
it's a very simple question. it only requires a yes or no answer. even
you should be able to manage that.

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:36:38 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:37:53 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ask Alvey what the name of the young Asian chick he pretended to be in
> >> order to get into my Facebook page was :)
> > Wow!! What a wondorous post. It may be a record for the number of stuffups
> > in a sentence. Let's count 'em!
> >
> > 1. It's a lie.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOPE!
> >
> > 2. Fraudster, of all people, having a whinge about someone pretending to be
> > something they're not. Classic!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He`s not, however it *is* you admitting you did that which he calls you on.
> >
> > 3. What exactly is wrong with adopting a nom de plume in social media,
> > *Noddy*?
~~~~~~~~~
Nothing, per se!. Why do U ask?.
> >
> > 4. Being a 5th rate sociopath, Der Der's post has added to my voiced
> > suspicion that this Facie 'group' was populated entirely by his creations.
> > Like, iirc there were 3 mods and 100 'people' in it. So how is it "my
> > Facebook page" Der Der?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*He* created it.. Most definitely *HIS*

(And what *did* you tell the other mods to justify
> > switching it from public to private Fraudster?)
~~~~~~~~~~
Coz an inbred cunt was causing trouble..Only thing said fucktard is capable of!.
~~~~~~

Brought to you by ol' gobbledegook 'imself.

Well played (Not) alvira.

> >
> > alvey
> >
> nailed it (him). and it's his SOP to repeat a lie long enough and enough
> times in the hope ppl may believe it. eg. clocky sold toasters, I was a
> teacher, etc.,
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 12/1/22 9:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 7:57 pm, Daryl wrote:
>> On 12/1/22 4:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> I've been flogging off some Holley carburetors lately as at last
>>> count I had 13 of the things in various guises laying around that I'm
>>> never going to use, so I recondition them and sell them. They come up
>>> really nice. I rebush the throttle shafts, recolour the zinc bodies
>>> and put a kit through them and I've been getting more for them today
>>> as "reconditioned" carburetors than what they cost new 2 years ago.
>>>
>>> It's crazy.
>>>
>>
>> Glad I'm not building a house, I'm getting a carport built behind my
>> garage and an arbor in the garden on the other side of the house, the
>> price of the timber is nuts.
>> 4 135mmx135mmx3mtr treated pine posts $225 each.
>
> It's fucked, but I'd be surprised if it ever returns to normal. People
> have accepted the current madness as the "new normal", and once
> production and supply gets back to pre-covid levels along with wholesale
> prices retailers will rub their hands together and claim the massive
> markups for themselves.
>
>
>
Very likely , a mate who is a retired builder reckons its a massive scam
and most suppliers are just using Covid as an excuse to raise prices.

--
Daryl

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:43:59 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 11:59 am, Clocky wrote:
> > On 12/01/2022 6:41 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2022 6:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/2022 6:45 am, alvey wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> You're not even as clever as alvey? You poor thing, you must be the
> >>>>> weakest link.
> >>>>
> >>>> St. Keith - Patron saint of the Trite and Predictable.
> >>>
> >>> Alvey patron saint of nothing but a world class smartarse.
> >>
> >> I would disagree with that assessment. To call someone a "smartarse"
> >> implies that there is some level of intelligence present, and Alvey
> >> has *clearly* demonstrated on *many* occasions that he is in fact
> >> totally devoid of anything approaching intelligent behaviour.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > You're as dumb as a box of hammers so you're not qualified to judge
> > others on their intelligence either.
> >
> >
> even fish are smarter :)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Definitely smarter than U...You fuckin' guppy, Here was a course devised to produce *NO* failures And U *DID* <FBG>
>
> https://www.9news.com.au/world/goldfish-taught-to-drive-by-israel-scientists/c8b71b4f-ed99-4ce3-ae73-fddcb37c2297
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:53:01 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 1:17 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 23:24:59 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2022 11:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/2022 10:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 12/01/2022 6:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>> sure. I have no wish to be harmful. unlike some nasty ppl here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Like alvey you mean.
> >> no
> >>> Another fantastic bundle of irony from the bloke who calls people
> >>> "pedophiles" when he doesn't get his own way :)
> >>>
> >> more shit talking from the guy who has no integrity.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~
> > *Integrity* WTF?. You did *exactly* that.
> dumbass. if he had integrity he wouldn't keep repeating it after
> accepting an apology.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~
Uh-huh so, U and the chorus of clowns don`t keep repeating over, and over, and over, the same unsubstantiated crap. Day after day!!.
Even after utilising the remaining neurones *of the *lot* of you twonks* *Nothing original*....*EVER*
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:54:15 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 1:26 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 23:37:20 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2022 10:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/2022 6:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>> On 12/01/2022 5:52 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>> On 12/01/2022 6:59 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:25:39 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 11/01/2022 6:29 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Anyone watch the last session of the SCG Test?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If you thought it was tense, spare a thought for those of us
> >>>>>>>> who'd put
> >>>>>>>> their money on a draw. "Could I have another bourbon and beta
> >>>>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>> thanks?"
> >>>>>>> Not a single fuck was given around here.
> >>>>>> Little Known Fact: There are actually two 'Mile High Clubs'. The
> >>>>>> one where
> >>>>>> you have a meaningful interface mid-flight, and the lesser known
> >>>>>> one where
> >>>>>> something passes a mile over your head.
> >>>>> Not a single fuck is given around here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> btw keith, am still waiting for you to answer my question to you re
> >>>>>> your
> >>>>>> opinion on the validity of *all* the Fraudsters' Big Claims.
> >>>>> I have no evidence on which to base an opinion about "The
> >>>>> Fraudsters' Big Claims". The only evidence the I have about Noddy is
> >>>>> his address and the business name that he owns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Come to that, I have no evidence that you own a Merc and live on the
> >>>>> sunshine coast, for all I know, you could be an elderly lesbian
> >>>>> living on a disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a 1968
> >>>>> Corolla.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have no evidence that Clocky is a qualified mechanic or even an
> >>>>> unqualified one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know xenos address, but have no evidence about anything else that
> >>>>> he claims.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know that Felix asks stupid questions and then complains if the
> >>>>> answers do not match the ones that he wants to hear.
> >>>>
> >>>> do you? such as? put up or shut up.
> >>> Tyres, magnas, fuel additives etc etc
> >> yeah? what stupid questions did I ask and what answers did I complain
> >> about? Oh, and you can differentiate between complaining, disagreeing,
> >> and discussing, I hope? and not to mention what constitutes a stupid
> >> question instead of it being relevant in an automotive context? but
> >> then, being you, probably not. perhaps you should stick to drilling out
> >> rivets on rusty old aircraft.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > UH-HUH.
> > 'Sometimes it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt'
> yes, you should!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sigh, sooo, that`s all you have eh petey???
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 12/01/2022 6:19 am, alvey wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:04:01 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2022 10:28 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 11/1/22 11:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 11/01/2022 8:10 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nothing that was worthwhile reading.
>>>>
>>>> You just don't get it xeno. Nobody gives a toss about your obsession.
>>>> Build a bridge.
>>>>
>>
>> Snipped more bile.
>
> "bile"? Jaysus Gumps! If that was bile, how would you describe the average
> Fraudster post? (You do read them don't you?)
>
>> You DON'T get it do you. NOBODY cares.
>
> I care! Sorry... I CARE!

Since you're a nobody, grumps is correct.

>> Get over your obsession.
>
> Gumpspeak: Something that looks like English but isn't.

Alveyspeak, tries desperately to seem witty but isn't.

On 12/01/2022 8:41 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 6:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 6:45 am, alvey wrote:
>
>>>> You're not even as clever as alvey? You poor thing, you must be the
>>>> weakest link.
>>>
>>> St. Keith - Patron saint of the Trite and Predictable.
>>
>> Alvey patron saint of nothing but a world class smartarse.
>
> I would disagree with that assessment. To call someone a "smartarse"
> implies that there is some level of intelligence present, and Alvey has
> *clearly* demonstrated on *many* occasions that he is in fact totally
> devoid of anything approaching intelligent behaviour.

Well no, being a smartarse does not indicate intelligence, rather it's
bravado being used to disguise the lack of it.

Alvey would do well to remember the fate of the inventor of the infinite
improbability drive.

On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can see
>>>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>>>> is a
>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>
>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster is
>>> a fraud have been proven?
>>
>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>
> Copout!
>
> Answer the question.
>
>
With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
just go and fuck yourself.

On 12/01/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 6:03 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:02:38 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can see how
>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> QED
>>>>>
>>>>> Really?
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>>> is a
>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> alvey
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>
>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>
>> Speaking of "pathetic" keith... I notice that while you've managed to
>> reply
>> to Clock's response (technically anyway) to moi, you haven't replied
>> to the
>> question I put to you. Why's that keith?
>
> Unless you are the grand inquisitor (nobody expects the Spanish
> inquisition) answers to the questions of jumped up little smartarses are
> purely optional.

That a pathetic cop-out, even for you.

On 13/01/2022 12:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>> is a fraud have been proven?
>>>
>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>
>> Copout!
>>
>> Answer the question.
>>
>>
> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
> been adequately answered elsewhere.

....and yet another pathetic juvenile cop-out.

Easy to see why the fraud has been hot on your tail chasing you around
with his rubber stamp for weeks.

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:07:18 -0800 (PST), jonz@ nothere.com wrote:

> On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:36:38 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 13/01/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:37:53 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ask Alvey what the name of the young Asian chick he pretended to be in
>>>> order to get into my Facebook page was :)
>>> Wow!! What a wondorous post. It may be a record for the number of stuffups
>>> in a sentence. Let's count 'em!
>>>
>>> 1. It's a lie.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> NOPE!

To be clear, you are agreeing with the Fraudster's assertion that I
pretended to be an "Asian chick" in order to "get into his Facie page" (The
MRAG page). Could I have a Yes or No response please?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 13/01/2022 3:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 8:41 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 6:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 6:45 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>>>>> You're not even as clever as alvey? You poor thing, you must be the
>>>>> weakest link.
>>>>
>>>> St. Keith - Patron saint of the Trite and Predictable.
>>>
>>> Alvey patron saint of nothing but a world class smartarse.
>>
>> I would disagree with that assessment. To call someone a "smartarse"
>> implies that there is some level of intelligence present, and Alvey
>> has *clearly* demonstrated on *many* occasions that he is in fact
>> totally devoid of anything approaching intelligent behaviour.
>
> Well no, being a smartarse does not indicate intelligence, rather it's
> bravado being used to disguise the lack of it.

I stand corrected.

> Alvey would do well to remember the fate of the inventor of the infinite
> improbability drive.

He would indeed. Or, at least he would if he had any brains.....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:

>>>
>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>
>> Copout!
>>
>> Answer the question.
>>
>>
> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
> been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
> just go and fuck yourself.

Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how he stamps his feet and
demands an answer from you as if he runs the place?

He's done it for years. It's that "Sheriff" disorder at work.....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:09:39 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 13/01/2022 12:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>>> is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>
>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>
>>> Copout!
>>>
>>> Answer the question.
>>>
>>>
>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
>> been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
>> just go and fuck yourself.
>
> ...and yet another pathetic juvenile cop-out.

'Fraid so. And scarily familiar to this Fraudian response to a Nasty
Question.

"That you asked about my business is perfectly rational, but that's where
your rationality ended. That you demanded to see proof of the existence
of said business is where your narcissism took over from your curiosity
as not only are you wrong to expect me to have to give you an answer,
but you steadfastly refuse to accept the answer I *have* given you,
which was "go fuck yourself". Fraudster, 08Jul19

Spooky innit?

Thought: Is there one of those "Idiot's Guide to..." books out there like,
"The Idiot's Guide to Making A Fool Of Yourself In Usenet"?
> Easy to see why the fraud has been hot on your tail chasing you around
> with his rubber stamp for weeks.

Well Der Der does take whatever he can get...

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>> is a fraud have been proven?
>>>
>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>
>> Copout!
>>
>> Answer the question.
>>
>>
> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
> been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
> just go and fuck yourself.

so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have had.
duly noted then.

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 13/01/2022 3:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 6:03 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:02:38 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>
>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>
>>> Speaking of "pathetic" keith... I notice that while you've managed
>>> to reply
>>> to Clock's response (technically anyway) to moi, you haven't replied
>>> to the
>>> question I put to you. Why's that keith?
>>
>> Unless you are the grand inquisitor (nobody expects the Spanish
>> inquisition) answers to the questions of jumped up little smartarses
>> are purely optional.
>
> That a pathetic cop-out, even for you.
>

keefy keeps sinking in the mire these days. he'll eventually end up in
the sewer with the rest of the FLCJC

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 13/01/2022 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 12:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>>> is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>
>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>
>>> Copout!
>>>
>>> Answer the question.
>>>
>>>
>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
>> been adequately answered elsewhere.
>
> ...and yet another pathetic juvenile cop-out.
>
> Easy to see why the fraud has been hot on your tail chasing you around
> with his rubber stamp for weeks.

LOL. yes indeed..

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 13/01/2022 5:39 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:07:18 -0800 (PST), jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:36:38 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 13/01/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:37:53 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ask Alvey what the name of the young Asian chick he pretended to be in
>>>>> order to get into my Facebook page was :)
>>>> Wow!! What a wondorous post. It may be a record for the number of stuffups
>>>> in a sentence. Let's count 'em!
>>>>
>>>> 1. It's a lie.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> NOPE!
> To be clear, you are agreeing with the Fraudster's assertion that I
> pretended to be an "Asian chick" in order to "get into his Facie page" (The
> MRAG page). Could I have a Yes or No response please?
>

keefy is as adept at running as the rest of the FLCJC these days..

>
> alvey
>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 13/1/22 6:00 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 3:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 8:41 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 6:07 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 12/01/2022 6:45 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> You're not even as clever as alvey? You poor thing, you must be the
>>>>>> weakest link.
>>>>>
>>>>> St. Keith - Patron saint of the Trite and Predictable.
>>>>
>>>> Alvey patron saint of nothing but a world class smartarse.
>>>
>>> I would disagree with that assessment. To call someone a "smartarse"
>>> implies that there is some level of intelligence present, and Alvey
>>> has *clearly* demonstrated on *many* occasions that he is in fact
>>> totally devoid of anything approaching intelligent behaviour.
>>
>> Well no, being a smartarse does not indicate intelligence, rather it's
>> bravado being used to disguise the lack of it.
>
> I stand corrected.
>
>> Alvey would do well to remember the fate of the inventor of the
>> infinite improbability drive.
>
> He would indeed. Or, at least he would if he had any brains.....
>
>
If you had any brains, you might actually have *qualified* for an
apprenticeship instead of *lying* about completing year 9 exams.

If you had any brains, you might actually have *completed* an
apprenticeship instead of *lying* about completing one.

If you had any brains, you might actually have owned a real business
instead of *lying* about owning one.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 15:08:49 UTC+11, Daryl wrote:
> On 12/1/22 9:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 12/01/2022 7:57 pm, Daryl wrote:
> >> On 12/1/22 4:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >
> >>> I've been flogging off some Holley carburetors lately as at last
> >>> count I had 13 of the things in various guises laying around that I'm
> >>> never going to use, so I recondition them and sell them. They come up
> >>> really nice. I rebush the throttle shafts, recolour the zinc bodies
> >>> and put a kit through them and I've been getting more for them today
> >>> as "reconditioned" carburetors than what they cost new 2 years ago.
> >>>
> >>> It's crazy.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Glad I'm not building a house, I'm getting a carport built behind my
> >> garage and an arbor in the garden on the other side of the house, the
> >> price of the timber is nuts.
> >> 4 135mmx135mmx3mtr treated pine posts $225 each.
> >
> > It's fucked, but I'd be surprised if it ever returns to normal. People
> > have accepted the current madness as the "new normal", and once
> > production and supply gets back to pre-covid levels along with wholesale
> > prices retailers will rub their hands together and claim the massive
> > markups for themselves.
> >
> >
> >
> Very likely , a mate who is a retired builder reckons its a massive scam
> and most suppliers are just using Covid as an excuse to raise prices.
~~~~~~~~~~
However, the *suppliers* can`t get supplies coz theres a worldwide *shortage* of shipping containers, pallets etc.. When there are said items available there is either no shipping available, or the ships are stacked up coz there is no labour available....And on it goes, a catch 22 in spades. And thats just surface transport...Air freight is in the same boat. (NPI)
So, not a tin foil hat situation at all. (Prolly can`t get them either.) :(
>
> --
> Daryl

On 13/1/22 6:01 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>
>>> Copout!
>>>
>>> Answer the question.
>>>
>>>
>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
>> been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
>> just go and fuck yourself.
>
> Don't you find it ridiculously amusing how he stamps his feet and
> demands an answer from you as if he runs the place?
>
> He's done it for years. It's that "Sheriff" disorder at work.....
>
Well, it's what *you* did too - until it became abundantly clear you
didn't even understand the question.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 13/01/2022 6:03 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:09:39 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>
>> On 13/01/2022 12:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>>>> is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>> Copout!
>>>>
>>>> Answer the question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
>>> been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
>>> just go and fuck yourself.
>> ...and yet another pathetic juvenile cop-out.
> 'Fraid so. And scarily familiar to this Fraudian response to a Nasty
> Question.
>
> "That you asked about my business is perfectly rational, but that's where
> your rationality ended. That you demanded to see proof of the existence
> of said business is where your narcissism took over from your curiosity
> as not only are you wrong to expect me to have to give you an answer,
> but you steadfastly refuse to accept the answer I *have* given you,
> which was "go fuck yourself". Fraudster, 08Jul19
>
> Spooky innit?
>
> Thought: Is there one of those "Idiot's Guide to..." books out there like,
> "The Idiot's Guide to Making A Fool Of Yourself In Usenet"?
>
>> Easy to see why the fraud has been hot on your tail chasing you around
>> with his rubber stamp for weeks.
> Well Der Der does take whatever he can get...
>
>

which lately has been a village idiot and a vain old codger

> alvey
>
>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 15:35:37 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 6:19 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:04:01 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/01/2022 10:28 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>> On 11/1/22 11:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >>>> On 11/01/2022 8:10 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Nothing that was worthwhile reading.
> >>>>
> >>>> You just don't get it xeno. Nobody gives a toss about your obsession.
> >>>> Build a bridge.
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Snipped more bile.
> >
> > "bile"? Jaysus Gumps! If that was bile, how would you describe the average
> > Fraudster post? (You do read them don't you?)
> >
> >> You DON'T get it do you. NOBODY cares.
> >
> > I care! Sorry... I CARE!
>
> Since you're a nobody, grumps is correct.
>
> >> Get over your obsession.
> >
> > Gumpspeak: Something that looks like English but isn't.
>
> Alveyspeak, tries desperately to seem witty but isn't.
~~~~~~~
Anyone who called him such was half right. ;)

On 13/01/2022 3:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to
>>>>>>>>>>>> sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other
>>>>>>>>>>> than sit
>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster
>>>>> is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>
>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>
>>> Copout!
>>>
>>> Answer the question.
>>>
>>>
>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it has
>> been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect, you can
>> just go and fuck yourself.
>
>
> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have had.
> duly noted then.
>

He asks a lot of questions for a bloke who dodges answering them. At
least we now know what he considers to be the acceptable response to his
questions.