On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 14:58:42 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >
> > ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> > pathetic philosophy.
> >
> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's their
> way or the highway.
>
> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
>
> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
>
> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
12+ poasts in a row a day or two ago.........

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 15:58:14 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 2:58 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >
> > I'm an arsehole
> >
> >
>
> Ok

````````````````````````````````````
Absolutely and completely *out of context* you silly old cunt!.

> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 11:58 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>
>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>
>>> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's
>>> their way or the highway.
>>>
>>> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
>>> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
>>>
>>> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
>>>
>>> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
>>> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Really, so can you please show where I revealed anything about you in
>> this group or linked to information public or otherwise?
>>
>> It seems to me the unwarranted name calling and making public stuff
>> that's none of your business and libeling of people is all coming from
>> one source... you.
>>
>> The evidence certainly supports it and there is no shortage of it.
>>
>>
> Allegations without evidence.

I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 16:59:38 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 11:58 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >>>
> >>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> >>> pathetic philosophy.
> >>>
> >> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's
> >> their way or the highway.
> >>
> >> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
> >> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
> >>
> >> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
> >>
> >> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
> >> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Really, so can you please show where I revealed anything about you in
> > this group or linked to information public or otherwise?
> >
> > It seems to me the unwarranted name calling and making public stuff
> > that's none of your business and libeling of people is all coming from
> > one source... you.
> >
> > The evidence certainly supports it and there is no shortage of it.
> >
> >
> Allegations without evidence. You are not worth responding to as you
> have accused me of so much without evidence providing the opportunity
> for the rest of the idiots to pile on like rabid dogs.
>
> You are nothing but a schoolyard bully.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yep! However, only from behind the safety of a keyboard, for obvious reasons. <FBG>

On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:

>> Allegations without evidence.
>
> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>

Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.

On 10/1/22 4:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 11:58 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>
>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>>
>>> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's
>>> their way or the highway.
>>>
>>> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
>>> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
>>>
>>> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
>>>
>>> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
>>> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Really, so can you please show where I revealed anything about you in
>> this group or linked to information public or otherwise?
>>
>> It seems to me the unwarranted name calling and making public stuff
>> that's none of your business and libeling of people is all coming from
>> one source... you.
>>
>> The evidence certainly supports it and there is no shortage of it.
>>
>>
> Allegations without evidence. You are not worth responding to as you
> have accused me of so much without evidence providing the opportunity
> for the rest of the idiots to pile on like rabid dogs.
>
> You are nothing but a schoolyard bully.

Isn't it past time for you to run away and cry in a corner? Hurry off!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/1/22 5:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>
>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>
>
> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.

If you call a statement of fact like that bullying, you have a real
problem with the real world.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:19 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else could
>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>
> Clearly it wasn't about brake systems, carburetors or timing chains :)
>
> He was a teacher, huh? The useless cunt couldn't teach anyone how to
> catch a fucking cold..

It looks like this pair are in competition to see who can come up with the
pissiest insult.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 10/1/22 5:11 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 2:11 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
> Snipped another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.
>
Run along now Grumpy, the heat in the kitchen is obviously way too much
for you to handle. I must say, I can see why you liked field service
work, no workmates to bully you. LOL

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/01/2022 10:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 3:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 1:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 7:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 7:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fucking mental. The cunts were smacking each other with shovels
>>>>>>>>> when Wog A came home and saw what he did :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind of like around here really.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, the FLCJC in spades.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to look in the mirror, you and your mates are just as bad
>>>>>> these days quite possibly worse.
>>>>>
>>>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at
>>>>> the posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an
>>>>> angel, but I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of
>>>>> replying to *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the
>>>>> same "I hate you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yet all you have to do is post proof of your claimed qualifications
>>>> to make us all go away but you curiously you won't so...
>>>>
>>>> Unlike myself, Grumpy and you obviously have no moral objection to
>>>> snooping and posting information publicly because he posted mine
>>>> with your full support even encouragement, so Grumpy - post
>>>> verifiable proof of Darren's qualifications and we'll be off for good.
>>>>
>>>> Help your mate out here.
>>>
>>>
>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
>>> on the internet.
>>
>>
>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must be
>> ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno sites.
>>
> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen to
> share everything that they don't seem to care.

Sometimes information is available that doesn't concern anyone here and
you haven't made public yourself. Decent people with morals and
integrity don't take it upon themselves to post such details into a
public space.

Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
available information here...

In theory he shouldn't object but in reality you get libeled as a
"stalker" having never revealed anything about him here. He absurdly and
illogically perceives saying you would never do such a thing is a veiled
threat to do the opposite.

To have integrity you have to keep your word and I'm quite comfortable
in stating that my integrity is well intact having kept mine. He knows
that and he already admitted he went too far yet he is intent on just
digging a bigger hole for himself.

That's his problem, not mine.

On 7/01/2022 8:09 am, lindsay wrote:
>
>
> "Morrison and his like have dared attack Novak to bring Serbia to its
> knees," Mr Djokovic said.
>
> "To it's knees"? WTF? But the fruitcake didnt say *why*...
>
> and:
>
> "They're stomping all over Novak to stomp all over Serbia and Serbian
> people."
>
> Huh? ramblings of a man with severe issues...
>
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-07/novak-djokovic-dad-says-deportation-is-politically-motivated/100743158

So he's won his case, and free to play. His dad still needs help. Lots.

Be funny if he falls in the 1/4's. :-)

Be interesting if we get to see who is made the scapegoat. Without
knowing the whole drama, someone's gunna be butt-fucked for this. TA?
>
>
>
>
>

On 10/1/22 6:42 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:19 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else could
>>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>
>> Clearly it wasn't about brake systems, carburetors or timing chains :)
>>
>> He was a teacher, huh? The useless cunt couldn't teach anyone how to
>> catch a fucking cold..
>
> It looks like this pair are in competition to see who can come up with the
> pissiest insult.
>
>
>
> alvey
>
But they give their own foibles away when they do that. For instance,
they are currently banging on about relevance deprivation. Well, it's
clear to see that the relevance deprived are they and they are just
trying on a dose of projection. Sadly for them, it's not working.

;-)

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/01/2022 2:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>
>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>
>
> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.

Still have the evidence.

On 10/1/22 6:46 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 10:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 3:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 1:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 9/01/2022 7:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 7:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fucking mental. The cunts were smacking each other with
>>>>>>>>>> shovels when Wog A came home and saw what he did :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kind of like around here really.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep, the FLCJC in spades.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You need to look in the mirror, you and your mates are just as
>>>>>>> bad these days quite possibly worse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at
>>>>>> the posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an
>>>>>> angel, but I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of
>>>>>> replying to *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the
>>>>>> same "I hate you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet all you have to do is post proof of your claimed qualifications
>>>>> to make us all go away but you curiously you won't so...
>>>>>
>>>>> Unlike myself, Grumpy and you obviously have no moral objection to
>>>>> snooping and posting information publicly because he posted mine
>>>>> with your full support even encouragement, so Grumpy - post
>>>>> verifiable proof of Darren's qualifications and we'll be off for good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Help your mate out here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
>>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
>>>> on the internet.
>>>
>>>
>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must
>>> be ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
>>> sites.
>>>
>> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen
>> to share everything that they don't seem to care.
>
> Sometimes information is available that doesn't concern anyone here and
> you haven't made public yourself. Decent people with morals and
> integrity don't take it upon themselves to post such details into a
> public space.
>
> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
> available information here...

That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?

What kind of IT person can't do simple shit like Facebook security? On
his own Facebook account!
>
> In theory he shouldn't object but in reality you get libeled as a
> "stalker" having never revealed anything about him here. He absurdly and
> illogically perceives saying you would never do such a thing is a veiled
> threat to do the opposite.
>
> To have integrity you have to keep your word and I'm quite comfortable
> in stating that my integrity is well intact having kept mine. He knows
> that and he already admitted he went too far yet he is intent on just
> digging a bigger hole for himself.
>
> That's his problem, not mine.

Careful, Grumpy is on the verge of crying. Queensland's got enough water
already.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:09:40 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 10/01/2022 3:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 2:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should be
>>> commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other people's
>>> photos for his own advantage.
>>
>> who's photos have I used for my own advantage? put up or shut up.
>>
>
> I seem to recall having you issued with a takedown notice for a photo
> you took of mine and posted on your own website. Remember that?

Yep.

Who could forget the idiocy of someone complaining about a public photo on
the interweb being reposted to a public page on the interweb? Landmark.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 10/01/2022 5:09 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 2:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should
>>> be commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other
>>> people's photos for his own advantage.
>>
>>
>> who's photos have I used for my own advantage? put up or shut up.
>>
>
> I seem to recall having you issued with a takedown notice for a photo
> you took of mine and posted on your own website. Remember that?

oh yes. but what 'advantage' did I receive from that?

>
>>>
>>> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
>>> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
>>> breach of any law.
>>>
>>>
>>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:02:38 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can see how
>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something to sling a
>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life, other than sit
>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>
>>>> QED
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the Fraudster is a
>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>>
>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>
> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> pathetic philosophy.

Speaking of "pathetic" keith... I notice that while you've managed to reply
to Clock's response (technically anyway) to moi, you haven't replied to the
question I put to you. Why's that keith?

alvey
Hoping for a change and that a hackneyed and inappropriate cliche *isn't*
winging its way up the M1.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 10/01/2022 6:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/1/22 5:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>>
>>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>>
>>
>> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.
>
> If you call a statement of fact like that bullying, you have a real
> problem with the real world.
>

every time he fires a shot he misses  :)

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 10/01/2022 5:42 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:19 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else could
>>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>
>> Clearly it wasn't about brake systems, carburetors or timing chains :)
>>
>> He was a teacher, huh? The useless cunt couldn't teach anyone how to
>> catch a fucking cold..
>
> It looks like this pair are in competition to see who can come up with the
> pissiest insult.

Afraid of losing your title?

On 10/01/2022 3:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 10/1/22 1:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> All I ever objected to was his nonsensical claim that he taught "shop"
>>>> at Richmond tech, as I know for a *fact* that he never did and no
>>>> "piece
>>>> of paper" he has will ever prove that :)
>>> Ah Darren but I did teach *prac* (and theory) at Richmond and it wasn't
>>> proven with a *piece of paper*. That's a wrong guess by you right there.
>>> I taught at Richmond for 16 of my 20 years in education, the remainder
>>> at Sunshine Tech in the TAFE wing. You, on the other hand, have never
>>> seen the inside of an apprentice classroom, ever.
>>>
>>> So, how do you *know for a fact*???? Seems to me like your delusions are
>>> getting really bad of late. You should seek help. Start here;
>>>
>>> https://bacchusmarshpsychologyclinic.com.au/contact
>>>>
>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else
>>>> could
>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>   Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>
>>> Darren, you've *never* been relevant to the automotive trade
>>> and you proved it by inventing trade qualifications you have *never
>>> possessed*. That's your inferiority complex driving your actions there.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Turns that *FACT* into a *NO YOU*..... APU.
>>
>>>> It's delusional, and bordering on certifiably insane.
>> ~~~~~~~
>>   And again!.
>>> Your delusions certainly are.
>>> --
>>> Xeno
>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
>>> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
>
>
> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..

ROTFL, from the guy spending his days sucking up to alvey, xeno, and clocky.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:27:23 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 10/01/2022 2:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>
>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>
>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>> pathetic philosophy.
>
> It's that ten year old in a treehouse mentality again.

Wrong again Der Der.
While you absolutely love playing the spokesman, as neurally damaged goods
you have absolutely no idea about the mentality of *any* age group. Just
another thing that you're not qualified to do.

> I wonder if they
> all sit around on Zoom wearing paper pirate hats and fake eye patches
> and have little "Jolly Roger" flags dangling in the background while
> they all compliment each other on how "rooly rooly bad" they are.

Thanks, but there's no need for another example...

alvey
Reminding Der Der that the frequency of his inept "10 yo" and "little girl
with sand up her vagina" analogies could justify him being called a pedo.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:32:14 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 10/01/2022 11:27 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 2:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>
>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>
>> It's that ten year old in a treehouse mentality again. I wonder if they
>> all sit around on Zoom wearing paper pirate hats and fake eye patches
>> and have little "Jolly Roger" flags dangling in the background while
>> they all compliment each other on how "rooly rooly bad" they are.
>>
>
> Now *that* is projection writ large!

More likely to be wishful thinking. Can you see jonz et al being able to
set-up *and* work a telecon? I can't.

alvey
Imagining much shouting and many black screens. Which, come to think of it,
describes that mob pretty well. All noise but no information.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:58:36 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>
>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>> pathetic philosophy.
>>
> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's their
> way or the highway.

Umm Gumps. Which poster in this ng would have issued the most "fuck off"
directives?
>
> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.

You're not *just* an arsehole Gumps. You're a delusional arsehole.
>
> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.

lol. That's right! I recall the Gumpian Logic! 'If more than one person is
attacking an individual then this is wrong and that individual must be
supported'.

> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.

Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back is the
recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 10/1/22 6:46 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 7/01/2022 8:09 am, lindsay wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Morrison and his like have dared attack Novak to bring Serbia to its
>> knees," Mr Djokovic said.
>>
>> "To it's knees"? WTF? But the fruitcake didnt say *why*...
>>
>> and:
>>
>> "They're stomping all over Novak to stomp all over Serbia and Serbian
>> people."
>>
>> Huh? ramblings of a man with severe issues...
>>
>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-07/novak-djokovic-dad-says-deportation-is-politically-motivated/100743158
>
>
> So he's won his case, and free to play. His dad still needs help. Lots.
>
> Be funny if he falls in the 1/4's. :-)

LOL, I was thinking (hoping) the same thing:-)
>
> Be interesting if we get to see who is made the scapegoat. Without
> knowing the whole drama, someone's gunna be butt-fucked for this. TA?
>>
>>

Details are certainly thin on the ground but someones arse will be in
the firing line, my guess is TA.

--
Daryl

On 10/1/22 7:32 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:58:36 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>
>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
>>> pathetic philosophy.
>>>
>> Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's their
>> way or the highway.
>
> Umm Gumps. Which poster in this ng would have issued the most "fuck off"
> directives?
>>
>> I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
>> already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
>
> You're not *just* an arsehole Gumps. You're a delusional arsehole.
>>
>> You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
>
> lol. That's right! I recall the Gumpian Logic! 'If more than one person is
> attacking an individual then this is wrong and that individual must be
> supported'.
>
>> They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
>> whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
>
> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back is the
> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
>
Please don't do that. The imagery is now burnt into my brain. Yuck!
>
>
> alvey
>
>
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)