On 14/1/22 9:48 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 14/01/2022 7:05 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:36:01 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
>>>>>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Copout!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Answer the question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
>>>>>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
>>>>>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
>>>>>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
>>>>>> had. duly noted then.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
>>>>> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
>>>>> repetitive shit.
>>>>
>>>> You refuse answer fair and relevant questions and respond with childish
>>>> nonsense so who the fuck are you to talk?
>>>
>>> Fair and relevant question? I don't recall seeing any of those.
>>
>> Righhht.
>>
>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business"
>> yet
>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>>
>> Yes or No would be good.
>> "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.
>
> If that is what you demand perhaps you should be required to produce
> proof of the things that you claim like do you actually own a Merc? A
> couple of photos don't really do it.
>
> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian living on a
> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla. There is
> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a sock
> puppet.

Even a sock puppet has to have a person behind the scenes "pulling the
strings" as it were.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:48:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 14/01/2022 7:05 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:36:01 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
>>>>>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Copout!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Answer the question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
>>>>>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
>>>>>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
>>>>>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
>>>>>> had. duly noted then.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
>>>>> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
>>>>> repetitive shit.
>>>>
>>>> You refuse answer fair and relevant questions and respond with childish
>>>> nonsense so who the fuck are you to talk?
>>>
>>> Fair and relevant question? I don't recall seeing any of those.
>>
>> Righhht.
>>
>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>>
>> Yes or No would be good.
>> "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.
>
> If that is what you demand perhaps you should be required to produce
> proof of the things that you claim like do you actually own a Merc? A
> couple of photos don't really do it.
>
> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian living on a
> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla. There is
> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a sock puppet.

You're a waste of time.
Game Over.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 01:09:09 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 6:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 13/01/2022 3:07 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:36:38 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>> On 13/01/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:37:53 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ask Alvey what the name of the young Asian chick he pretended to be in
> >>>>> order to get into my Facebook page was :)
> >>>> Wow!! What a wondorous post. It may be a record for the number of
> >>>> stuffups
> >>>> in a sentence. Let's count 'em!
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. It's a lie.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> NOPE!
> >
> > That's right, it's not. The stupid cunt dobbed himself in around here :)
> >
> >>>> 2. Fraudster, of all people, having a whinge about someone
> >>>> pretending to be
> >>>> something they're not. Classic!
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> He`s not, however it *is* you admitting you did that which he calls
> >> you on.
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> >>>> 3. What exactly is wrong with adopting a nom de plume in social media,
> >>>> *Noddy*?
> >> ~~~~~~~~~
> >> Nothing, per se!. Why do U ask?.
> >
> >>>> 4. Being a 5th rate sociopath, Der Der's post has added to my voiced
> >>>> suspicion that this Facie 'group' was populated entirely by his
> >>>> creations.
> >>>> Like, iirc there were 3 mods and 100 'people' in it. So how is it "my
> >>>> Facebook page" Der Der?
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> *He* created it.. Most definitely *HIS*
> >
> > I did indeed create it, and there was only one Admin. Me. Of course, he
> > couldn't know any details about it at all without actually being there.
> > Could you Alvey? Or should I say Ching Wu?
> >
> > This is the fake account he used to join the group:
> >
> >> https://tinyurl.com/eefbxv5m
> >
> > Anyone want to follow that up with Facebook and see where it leads?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prolly wont`t get far. took a *lens* shot, *no match*. A generic pic. from his favourite porn site maybe. Millions look exactly the same.
Not on facebook apparently.

> You make the accusation you get to prove that's Alvey. That's how it works.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nah, looks like million other asian shielas....
>
>
> <snip lack of supporting evidence>

On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 07:35:20 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:27:34 -0800 (PST), jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 17:40:02 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:07:18 -0800 (PST), jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 14:36:38 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>> On 13/01/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:37:53 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ask Alvey what the name of the young Asian chick he pretended to be in
> >>>>>> order to get into my Facebook page was :)
> >>>>> Wow!! What a wondorous post. It may be a record for the number of stuffups
> >>>>> in a sentence. Let's count 'em!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. It's a lie.
> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> NOPE!
> >> To be clear, you are agreeing with the Fraudster's assertion that I
> >> pretended to be an "Asian chick" in order to "get into his Facie page" (The
> >> MRAG page). Could I have a Yes or No response please?
> >> alvey
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Just as Keith is wont to say in response to your honours
> > q`s.....*Go fuck yerself*.... <G>
> So you'll call someone a liar, provide no proof, and then tell them to fuck
> off when they ask for proof. That's pretty sad.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You *did NOT* ask for proof of *anything* bozo. You asked if *I* believed noddys assertion!..(have a look, just a couple of lines above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I provided a facetious answer, coz thats all arsewipes such as your self deserve.
However, in a break with tradition, *YES* I believe him. That sort of slimy action would, for sure be part of your M/O.
Go take a long walk on a short pier!.

>
>
>
> alvey
> "As a species, we deserve to go extinct". Joe Goldberg, 'You'.
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 14/01/2022 7:16 am, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:26:58 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> That long winded post of mine was not aimed at them, as doing so would
>> be a complete waste of time. It was for the benefit of anyone who may
>> have been wondering what Clasener was screaming about, and to remind
>> people what a shit talking lunatic with zero grip on reality he actually
>> is.
>>
>> There is virtually *nothing* he ever claims about me that has any
>> relevance to the real world,
> Problem there Fraudster. Big one too. Reliable sources believe that that
> 'honesty' is pretty highly regarded in the "real world". Why there's even
> Laws about it!
>
>> and the reason for that is because if he
>> had to rely on fact and reality to make an argument he would have
>> absolutely *nothing* to argue about.
> Hmmm. More problems Fraudster. The Reality is that he *has* Facts and you
> don't.
>
> Btw Fraudster, as there's a seasonal whiff of the Law about, how come
> you've never threatened action against me for repeatedly calling you a
> liar, fraud, hypocrite, coward etc etc etc? It's not as if you don't have
> form.

because he knows it's true and therefore indefensible? :)

>
>
> alvey
>
>
>
>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 14/01/2022 7:05 am, alvey wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:36:01 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >
> >> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>> On 13/01/2022 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> QED
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
> >>>>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
> >>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Copout!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Answer the question.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
> >>>>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
> >>>>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
> >>>>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
> >>>>> had. duly noted then.
> >>>>>
> >>>> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
> >>>> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
> >>>> repetitive shit.
> >>>
> >>> You refuse answer fair and relevant questions and respond with childish
> >>> nonsense so who the fuck are you to talk?
~~~~~~~~~~~
*FAIR* and *RELEVANT are two words that are completely *IRRELEVANT* when it comes to you.
> >>
> >> Fair and relevant question? I don't recall seeing any of those.
> >
> > Righhht.
> >
> > So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
> > my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
> > *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*
> >
> > Yes or No would be good.
> > "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.
> If that is what you demand perhaps you should be required to produce
> proof of the things that you claim like do you actually own a Merc? A
> couple of photos don't really do it.
>
> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian living on a
> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla. There is
> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a sock puppet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Luv yer work!. :)))

On 14/01/2022 8:05 am, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:36:01 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 13/01/2022 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
>>>>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>>>>> Copout!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Answer the question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
>>>>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
>>>>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
>>>>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
>>>>> had. duly noted then.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
>>>> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
>>>> repetitive shit.
>>> You refuse answer fair and relevant questions and respond with childish
>>> nonsense so who the fuck are you to talk?
>> Fair and relevant question? I don't recall seeing any of those.
> Righhht.
>
> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?

and not to mention proof of three apprenticeships

>
> Yes or No would be good.
> "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.
>
>
> alvey
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 14/01/2022 6:48 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 14/01/2022 7:05 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:36:01 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
>>>>>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Copout!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Answer the question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
>>>>>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
>>>>>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
>>>>>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
>>>>>> had. duly noted then.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
>>>>> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
>>>>> repetitive shit.
>>>>
>>>> You refuse answer fair and relevant questions and respond with childish
>>>> nonsense so who the fuck are you to talk?
>>>
>>> Fair and relevant question? I don't recall seeing any of those.
>>
>> Righhht.
>>
>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business"
>> yet
>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>>
>> Yes or No would be good.
>> "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.
>
> If that is what you demand perhaps you should be required to produce
> proof of the things that you claim like do you actually own a Merc? A
> couple of photos don't really do it.
>
> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian living on a
> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla. There is
> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a sock
> puppet.

no dice, you lose.

Give it up keith, you are *really* shit at this.

On 14/01/2022 11:36 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 07:35:20 UTC+11, alvey wrote:

>> So you'll call someone a liar, provide no proof, and then tell them to fuck
>> off when they ask for proof. That's pretty sad.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> You *did NOT* ask for proof of *anything* bozo. You asked if *I* believed noddys assertion!..(have a look, just a couple of lines above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I provided a facetious answer, coz thats all arsewipes such as your self deserve.
> However, in a break with tradition, *YES* I believe him. That sort of slimy action would, for sure be part of your M/O.
> Go take a long walk on a short pier!.

Kind of funny how he criticises you for calling someone a liar and then
providing no proof, when that's *exactly* what he does :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:01:37 +0800, Clocky wrote:

>
> Give it up keith, you are *really* shit at this.

Tom: And our first loser on Hard Quiz tonight is keith. keith's special
subject is 'Tired Old Cliches'.[pause] I can see why you chose that keith".

Anyhoo, keith certainly does have one key qualification for joining
Fraudster & The Enablers. His Dunning-Kruger effect. Crikey! It could light
up a medium-sized town.

And btw, have you noticed how many of that group have it? By my
recollection, all of them except Deryl have frequently felt the need to
tell everyone how much smarter they are than [whoever]. And of course, the
opposite. How stupid [whoever] is. Some bad news for them, if you have to
tell people how smart you are, you're not.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 14/1/22 11:54 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 14/01/2022 8:05 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:36:01 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QED
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
>>>>>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
>>>>>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
>>>>>>>> Copout!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Answer the question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
>>>>>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
>>>>>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
>>>>>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
>>>>>> had. duly noted then.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
>>>>> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
>>>>> repetitive shit.
>>>> You refuse answer fair and relevant questions and respond with childish
>>>> nonsense so who the fuck are you to talk?
>>> Fair and relevant question? I don't recall seeing any of those.
>> Righhht.
>>
>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business"
>> yet
>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>
>
> and not to mention proof of three apprenticeships

There is a lot of proof to say that Darren can never stump up the proof.
If there is no record of him in the trade registration database, no
trade registration *number*, no TAFE card at PROV, no trade number and,
in fact, no record of Darren *anywhere*.
Darren can, of course, feel free to shoot me down in flames and stump up
with some/any proof. That proof, of course, will need to include a
*trade registration number*, or two in Darren's case, so that his
*proof* can be verified against government records. After all, since
he's such a liar, I wouldn't put it past him to dummy up some fake
proof. It needs to be noted, both Clocky and I have proved, with trade
reg numbers, that we have qualifications.

The ball's in Darren's court.
>
>
>>
>> Yes or No would be good.
>> "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 14/01/2022 11:52 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:

>>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
>>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
> Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*

ROTFL :)

Isn't this grouse? He makes himself sound like he works for the fucking
CIA, yet the biggest complaint I heard from the fuckwit back when I was
still listening to his diatribe was that he could find no record of the
business in the Yellow Pages. Kind of what I would expect really given
that I never had anything to do with it.

"Research" :) What a fucking *moron* :)

>>> Yes or No would be good.
>>> "Fuck off" or "I've already answered that" = Game Over.

Look at this self absorbed brain tumor go, demanding that people respond
to his questions as if he owns the place :)

>> If that is what you demand perhaps you should be required to produce
>> proof of the things that you claim like do you actually own a Merc? A
>> couple of photos don't really do it.

He *did* inadvertently post a picture of his house. Unit 2 McIlwraith
Street, wasn't it? Mext time I'm up North taking care of business I
might just wander around and bang on the door to see if he invites me in
for a drink.

>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian living on a
>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla. There is
>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a sock puppet.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Luv yer work!. :)))

I've often suspected he was a 12 year old kid typing "naughty shit" on
the PC while his mum wasn't looking. That would account for a fair
degree of the mentality.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:18:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 14/01/2022 11:52 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
>>>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>>>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
>> Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> Isn't this grouse? He makes himself sound like he works for the fucking
> CIA, yet the biggest complaint I heard from the fuckwit back when I was
> still listening to his diatribe was that he could find no record of the
> business in the Yellow Pages. Kind of what I would expect really given
> that I never had anything to do with it.
>
> "Research" :) What a fucking *moron* :)

Despite being a wretched louse of a person Fraudster does have one
redeemable quality. He's a very obvious liar. May as well wave a flag.

Anyhoo Fraudster, back to the Big Picture. Why won't you provide any proof
to support your Big Claims? You've "demanded" others prove their claims
many times, yet when someone asks you to do the same you go into Dementer
mode. Just post some proof Fraudster, how hard can it be?

snip stoopid

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 15/01/2022 4:37 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:18:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 14/01/2022 11:52 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>>>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
>>>>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>>>>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
>>> Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*
>>
>> ROTFL :)
>>
>> Isn't this grouse? He makes himself sound like he works for the fucking
>> CIA, yet the biggest complaint I heard from the fuckwit back when I was
>> still listening to his diatribe was that he could find no record of the
>> business in the Yellow Pages. Kind of what I would expect really given
>> that I never had anything to do with it.
>>
>> "Research" :) What a fucking *moron* :)
>
> Despite being a wretched louse of a person Fraudster does have one
> redeemable quality. He's a very obvious liar. May as well wave a flag.
>
> Anyhoo Fraudster, back to the Big Picture. Why won't you provide any proof
> to support your Big Claims? You've "demanded" others prove their claims
> many times, yet when someone asks you to do the same you go into Dementer
> mode. Just post some proof Fraudster, how hard can it be?
>
> snip stoopid
>
>
> alvey
>

Soooooooo many photos... but never the only ones that matter.

It speaks volumes.

On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:21:36 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 15/01/2022 4:37 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:18:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 14/01/2022 11:52 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
>>>>>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
>>>>>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
>>>> Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*
>>>
>>> ROTFL :)
>>>
>>> Isn't this grouse? He makes himself sound like he works for the fucking
>>> CIA, yet the biggest complaint I heard from the fuckwit back when I was
>>> still listening to his diatribe was that he could find no record of the
>>> business in the Yellow Pages. Kind of what I would expect really given
>>> that I never had anything to do with it.
>>>
>>> "Research" :) What a fucking *moron* :)
>>
>> Despite being a wretched louse of a person Fraudster does have one
>> redeemable quality. He's a very obvious liar. May as well wave a flag.
>>
>> Anyhoo Fraudster, back to the Big Picture. Why won't you provide any proof
>> to support your Big Claims? You've "demanded" others prove their claims
>> many times, yet when someone asks you to do the same you go into Dementer
>> mode. Just post some proof Fraudster, how hard can it be?
>>
>> snip stoopid
>>
>> alvey
>>
>
> Soooooooo many photos... but never the only ones that matter.
>
> It speaks volumes.

Deafeningly.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 15/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 15/01/2022 4:37 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:18:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 14/01/2022 11:52 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful
>>>>>> business" yet
>>>>>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating
>>>>>> that it
>>>>>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>    Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
>>>>         Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*
>>>
>>> ROTFL :)
>>>
>>> Isn't this grouse? He makes himself sound like he works for the fucking
>>> CIA, yet the biggest complaint I heard from the fuckwit back when I was
>>> still listening to his diatribe was that he could find no record of the
>>> business in the Yellow Pages. Kind of what I would expect really given
>>> that I never had anything to do with it.
>>>
>>> "Research" :) What a fucking *moron* :)
>>
>> Despite being a wretched louse of a person Fraudster does have one
>> redeemable quality. He's a very obvious liar. May as well wave a flag.
>>
>> Anyhoo Fraudster, back to the Big Picture. Why won't you provide any
>> proof
>> to support your Big Claims? You've "demanded" others prove their claims
>> many times, yet when someone asks you to do the same you go into
>> Dementer
>> mode. Just post some proof Fraudster, how hard can it be?
>>
>> snip stoopid
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>
>
> Soooooooo many photos... but never the only ones that matter.
>
> It speaks volumes.

yes indeed

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 20:26:25 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 5:41 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 13/01/2022 6:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 13/01/2022 5:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>> On 13/01/2022 3:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 13/01/2022 11:21 am, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>> On 12/01/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 10/01/2022 3:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 11:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> QED
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Really?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
> >>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
> >>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> alvey
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is
> >>>>>>>> a pathetic philosophy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
> >>>>>>> Fraudster is a fraud have been proven?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm saying that if you're not with us you must be against us is a
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Copout!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Answer the question.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> With respect SIR, I decline your demand on this occasion since it
> >>>> has been adequately answered elsewhere. So, with all due respect,
> >>>> you can just go and fuck yourself.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> so IOW you would rather align yourself with the fraudster than retain
> >>> any semblance of honesty, integrity, and decency you may once have
> >>> had. duly noted then.
> >>>
> >> I don't align myself with anybody, but, right at the moment he isn't
> >> as annoying as the little group polluting the place with reams of
> >> repetitive shit. You and your little mates need to wake up to
> >> yourselves and realise that you are achieving absolutely nothing,
> >> except to wreck what could be an interesting and useful forum. I'm not
> >> holding my breath though, your common mental condition is not going to
> >> cure itself in the short term if at all ever.
> >
> >
> > says the guy who replies with "little felix peeked..etc." and "go and
> > fuck yourself"
> >
> And your point is?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As per, he has *no* point..... Keeps getting his arse handed to him, but still thinks he deserves a mention in dispatches for nil achievement. Just like his sisters in arms. <Shrug>

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 21:40:26 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 9:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 13/01/2022 6:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 13/01/2022 5:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>>> Easy to see why the fraud has been hot on your tail chasing you
> >>>> around with his rubber stamp for weeks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> LOL. yes indeed..
> >>
> >> Have you ever had an original thought? It seems like you have to wait
> >> around for something to agree to.
> >
> > He does "me too's" really well.
> >
> > The problem with Felix, as has been mentioned before, is that he's
> > remarkably gullible. He believes what people tell him "not" based on
> > whether what he's being told sounds reasonable, but on how he relates
> > to whoever is feeding him. That's why he hovers in orbit around
> > Clasener and swallows every word he says. Not because he has any idea
> > if the bullshit Clasener feeds him is right, but because he pats Felix
> > on the head and calls him a "good boy" and makes Felix feel like he
> > "belongs".
> >
> > Clasener bought Felix cheap, and for that poor old Felix gives his
> > undying loyalty in return. It's fucking bizarre to be honest, but
> > that's the way it flies :)
> >
> >
> except for the fact that none of it is true of course. but then lying is
> SOP for you. other than that, as several ppl here have told you, you
> have mental issues, one of which is that your perception of things is at
> odds with reality, and how 'normal' ppl perceive them to be. or put
> simply, you're delusional.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*None* of that little spit is yer *own* thoughts/opinions.
Its *all* been fed to you by imbeciles inc.
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey the Fraudster

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 22:22:31 UTC+11, Daryl wrote:
> On 13/1/22 6:21 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 15:08:49 UTC+11, Daryl wrote:
> >> On 12/1/22 9:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/2022 7:57 pm, Daryl wrote:
> >>>> On 12/1/22 4:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I've been flogging off some Holley carburetors lately as at last
> >>>>> count I had 13 of the things in various guises laying around that I'm
> >>>>> never going to use, so I recondition them and sell them. They come up
> >>>>> really nice. I rebush the throttle shafts, recolour the zinc bodies
> >>>>> and put a kit through them and I've been getting more for them today
> >>>>> as "reconditioned" carburetors than what they cost new 2 years ago.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's crazy.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Glad I'm not building a house, I'm getting a carport built behind my
> >>>> garage and an arbor in the garden on the other side of the house, the
> >>>> price of the timber is nuts.
> >>>> 4 135mmx135mmx3mtr treated pine posts $225 each.
> >>>
> >>> It's fucked, but I'd be surprised if it ever returns to normal. People
> >>> have accepted the current madness as the "new normal", and once
> >>> production and supply gets back to pre-covid levels along with wholesale
> >>> prices retailers will rub their hands together and claim the massive
> >>> markups for themselves.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Very likely , a mate who is a retired builder reckons its a massive scam
> >> and most suppliers are just using Covid as an excuse to raise prices.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~
> > However, the *suppliers* can`t get supplies coz theres a worldwide *shortage* of shipping containers, pallets etc.. When there are said items available there is either no shipping available, or the ships are stacked up coz there is no labour available....And on it goes, a catch 22 in spades. And thats just surface transport...Air freight is in the same boat. (NPI)
> > So, not a tin foil hat situation at all. (Prolly can`t get them either.) :(
> I don't completely agree with my builder mate and whilst there is no
> doubt issues that affect prices there is also an element of taking
> advantage so a bit of both.
~~~~~~
Fairynuff.
>
> --
> Daryl

On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 23:10:40 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 13/01/2022 5:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 13/01/2022 8:28 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 13/01/2022 5:44 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>> On 13/01/2022 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 13/01/2022 5:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>> On 13/01/2022 3:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>> On 12/01/2022 3:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 10/01/2022 6:03 pm, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:02:38 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:14 pm, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:22:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 10:11 am, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/1/22 11:07 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 8:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, she rules the roost and you cringe and cower. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can see how
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would work for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you actively sit at the keyboard waiting for something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sling a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tired insult at? The evidence seems to indicate that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has very little else to do with his miserable life,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than sit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> around waiting for his heart to stop.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are pissed off being exposed as a faker, eh?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> QED
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Really?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So you're saying that *none* of the allegations that the
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster is a
> >>>>>>>>>>> fraud have been proven?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> alvey
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> >>>>>>>>> pathetic philosophy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Speaking of "pathetic" keith... I notice that while you've
> >>>>>>>> managed to reply
> >>>>>>>> to Clock's response (technically anyway) to moi, you haven't
> >>>>>>>> replied to the
> >>>>>>>> question I put to you. Why's that keith?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Unless you are the grand inquisitor (nobody expects the Spanish
> >>>>>>> inquisition) answers to the questions of jumped up little
> >>>>>>> smartarses are purely optional.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That a pathetic cop-out, even for you.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> keefy keeps sinking in the mire these days. he'll eventually end up
> >>>>> in the sewer with the rest of the FLCJC
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Poor little felix peeked from behind the curtain and having made
> >>>> sure that it was safe and that his friends were protecting him,
> >>>> squeaked "Me too".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> thank you for your significant contribution to the forum
> >>>
> >> Thank you for providing the opportunity to point out how insignificant
> >> your contribution to the discussion is.
> >
> >
> > thank you for continuing to reinforce my current opinion of you
> >
> Keith had all the tickets on himself... and still lost.
~~~~~~~~~
Names have been changed to protect the guilty... <G>

On Saturday, 15 January 2022 at 07:37:17 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:18:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
> > On 14/01/2022 11:52 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 09:48:19 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> >
> >>>> So when the Fraudster claimed, "I owned and ran a successful business" yet
> >>>> my research could find no proof of its existance, you are stating that it
> >>>> *wasn't* "fair and relevant" to ask him to substantiate his claim?
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> Back to basics then. *Your research*??.
> >> Yer just another *STALKING CUNT*
> >
> > ROTFL :)
> >
> > Isn't this grouse? He makes himself sound like he works for the fucking
> > CIA, yet the biggest complaint I heard from the fuckwit back when I was
> > still listening to his diatribe was that he could find no record of the
> > business in the Yellow Pages. Kind of what I would expect really given
> > that I never had anything to do with it.
> >
> > "Research" :) What a fucking *moron* :)
> Despite being a wretched louse of a person Fraudster does have one
> redeemable quality. He's a very obvious liar. May as well wave a flag.
>
> Anyhoo Fraudster, back to the Big Picture. Why won't you provide any proof
> to support your Big Claims? You've "demanded" others prove their claims
> many times, yet when someone asks you to do the same you go into Dementer
> mode. Just post some proof Fraudster, how hard can it be?
~~~~~~~~
Harry Potter now?. FFS.
>
> snip stoopid
~~~~
You didn`t tho, all yer crap is still extant. STOOPID.
> alvey
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 12/1/22 12:51 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 7:51 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 11/01/2022 6:35 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> Yeah. Didn't understand the concept of valve *float* and valve
>>> *overshoot*, both circumstances that can lead to valve impact if
>>> insufficient clearance is allowed - and a thinner shim head gasket
>>> will take that clearance down by a *lot*. I didn't expect Darren to
>>> be able to do it but I did expect Daryl to know how it's done. He is
>>> *supposedly* qualified after all. Too much time pushing a broom I
>>> guess. Checking piston to valve clearance isn't rocket science by any
>>> means and there's plenty of info on the net for the uninitiated. But
>>> to fit a thinner head gasket and *not* check the clearance, that's
>>> nothing short of *criminal*.
>>> The funny thing is, I was expecting it to be a more esoteric cause,
>>> lean combustion, injectors at 100% duty cycle or MAF sensor pinning.
>>> I was overthinking it and not making sufficient allowance for the two
>>> clowns who were working on the 4AGE(20). I trust Les has learnt his
>>> lesson.
>>>
>> So it's his fault the engine failed even though he advised Les that
>> there were serious issues with the engine and failure was likely.
>
> Actually, it was *not* my fault that the engine died, and I'll go into
> some detail as to why that is to put this ridiculous bullshit claim of
> Clasener's to bed :)
>
>> I'm  guessing Les wanted to compete and went with the motor anyway as
>> availability of a replacement motor in a limited timeframe may have
>> been an issue.
>
> The issue with this engine was that Les was trying to build it on a
> budget, using parts from an engine that had already failed before I ever
> laid my hands on it.
>
>> Wouldn't be the first time someone has failed to take advice and it's
>> cost them dearly.
>
> No, but in fairness to Les and myself, the cause of this engine's demise
> had nothing to do with either of us. Well, at least certainly not me :)
>
> For those who don't know and who may be half interested in discovering
> the truth of this matter, the engine in question was a Toyota 4AGE 20
> valve, known as a "Gold Top" of I remember correctly, and this is the
> engine here:

Toyota never made a Gold Top, they only made a Black Top and a Silver
Top in the 4A-GE20
>
>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME69PME
>
> It's a 1600cc 4 cylinder "high performance" engine that has a fairly
> high output for it's capacity and a healthy appetite for rpm, which

You want horsepower from a small capacity, you have to have revs. That's
the way it works Darren.

> Daryl's mate Les used to use in his Lotus 7 Replica for competition work:
>
>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME69Q3J
>
> Now, it's been Clasener's claim for a while that this engine died as a
> result of insufficient piston to valve clearance, and this is claim is
> absolutely fraudulent. It is a complete fabrication invented by Clasener
> for the sole purpose of having something to argue about. In reality, and

Not a fabrication Darren, *a diagnostic assessment* based on the
evidence presented. Oh, and an understanding of what goes on *inside* an
engine Darren. It's what you learn *during an apprenticeship* and then
you continue to build on that during your life. No need to fake it till
you make it - your MO. And you never made it either, faking it even now.

> as usual, he is *completely* wrong and has achieved nothing other than
> making a complete moron out of himself.

In fact, the engine made a complete moron out of you.
>
> Allow me to show how :)
>

You're joking, right?

<bullshit snipped>

>
> Now, to the keen eye there's a few things to observe in these pics.

A keen eye needs a keen brain behind it. Uh oh, there's your problem.
>
> In the first instance, you can see the three used pistons which were in
> excellent shape, and the one new one. Secondly, you can see the
> competition head gasket that was used, which is a compressible gasket
> and not a "shim" as Clasener incorrectly refers to it, and lastly you

But it is *used* as a shim gasket Darren, thinner, reduces the head
height/combustion chamber size and increases the CR. And reduces piston
to valve *clearance*.

> can see the remains of the pink plasticine that was used to check the
> pison to valve clearances on the exhaust valve releifs of the number one
> piston :)

Doesn't look like plasticine to me.

Anyway, Daryl dobbed you into it when he said he couldn't do the check.
Why am I not surprised?
>
> Inlet and exhaust clearances where checked on all four pistons which is
> standard procedure, and especially in an engine using non standard

No, standard procedure is to check *one piston*. All other factors being
equal, all other cylinders should be *identical* or well within
*tolerances*.

> connecting rods, but residue of the plasticine only remained on the
> exhaust cut outs on the number one piston as they were a rough "as cast"
> finish where all the other surfaces were machined smooth. I wasn't all
> that fussed about cleaning it off as it would burn off the moment the
> engine was first fired :)

What a load of codswallop.
>
> Setting the valve clearances was the last major task:

You bloody fool! Setting the valve clearances is done *before* you check
piston to valve clearance. You seem to have matters arse about here.
What's the point of checking the piston to valve clearance and then
*changing* the valve clearances which will, in turn, change the piston
to valve clearances? Don't you understand the concepts here. Oh, that's
right, you think a *static check* will do the job - if the engine
rotates by hand, all is well. No concept of dynamic operation at all. I
propose that you never checked piston to valve clearances at all and
you've had plenty of opportunity (3+ years) to dummy up a couple of
photos with something that, quite frankly, doesn't look like remnants of
plasticine. Either that, or you didn't have a clue *how* to check the
clearances on an engine with VVT.
>
>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME69PM9
>
<snipped bullshit>

> Finally, the clearances were set and the camshafts installed for good,
> and it was ready for it's timing belt and to be put back into the car.
>
>> https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME69S4W
>
> So, after all this long winded chest beating, what have we learned?

That you are a bullshit artist. But we knew that long ago, you just
confirmed it yet again.
>
> What we've learned is that apart from a little bit of piston to bore
> clearance variation which Les was advised could lead to a bit of ring
> flutter and oil control problem, this engine went together well and had

Excessive ring groove clearances will cause ring flutter, oil
consumption (through pumping) and a small degree of compression loss.
You should know that, and you would have done had you ever completed an
auto machining or motor mechanic apprenticeship. FWIW, ring flutter is a
natural phenomenon related to ring pack *mass* that the engine designers
try to engineer so it occurs *above* the normal working range of the
engine. Ring groove or ring side wear will aggravate the situation and
bring the flutter down to the normal *upper* working range of the engine.

> no clearance issues whatsoever. The engine was installed back into the

Umm, clearance issues, yes it did have them. Bathurst, remember? That
clearance issue was a *biggie* and turned the engine into a *disposable*
unit in very short order. Well done you.

> car and test fired by me and it fired straight up with excellent oil
> pressure and had no temperature issues.

It won't have temperature issues *under no load* you clown.
>
> At this point the car was handed back to Les were it was booked into a
> dyno session. It ran the dyno session successfully where it bed in
> nicely, and as Les was still playing with tune settings a second dyno
> session was booked not long after. Subsequently to this it did a full
> test and tune day at Winton raceway before it was packed onto it's

Winton raceway is flat, no great RPM stresses because there's no long
downhill run. Been there, and on the track too.

> trailer and taken to Bathurst for a class race meeting which was the
> ultimate purpose of having done all this work in the first place.
>
> And it was at Bathurst where things turned to shit.

It was actually in your workshop where things turned to shit. It just
wasn't *evident* until Bathurst.
>
> On the seventh Lap of Les's race, as he was coming through the Chase at
> the end of Conrod Straight, the engine had a change of exhaust note and

On Saturday, 15 January 2022 at 23:48:18 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 12/1/22 12:51 am, Noddy wrote:
> > On 11/01/2022 7:51 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >> On 11/01/2022 6:35 pm, Xeno wrote:
> >
> >>> Yeah. Didn't understand the concept of valve *float* and valve
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Reams of garbage flushed to where it belongs.
(Apologies to RS.)
Well, if any more evidence of xenokryps slide into dementia was required, *That* load of word soup was *IT*.
Disagreement for the sake of it, from the mayor of the (Demented) know all, know nothing brigade!.

On 16/01/2022 11:31 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 January 2022 at 23:48:18 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>> On 12/1/22 12:51 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2022 7:51 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 11/01/2022 6:35 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Didn't understand the concept of valve *float* and valve
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
> Reams of garbage flushed to where it belongs.
> (Apologies to RS.)

Making another long winded but completely irrelevant goalpost shift in
an attempt to recover from the profound *moron* he made of himself, is he?

> Well, if any more evidence of xenokryps slide into dementia was required, *That* load of word soup was *IT*.
> Disagreement for the sake of it, from the mayor of the (Demented) know all, know nothing brigade!.

In all seriousness, in all my time coming into contact with people in
the "automotive" sector I've met some amazing people. I've met people
who have amazing recall who could quote specs for obscure engines at
will. I've met people who have *immense* experience and who could feel a
thousandth of an inch variation using nothing other than a set of
antiquated calipers, and I've met people who were the most innovative
lateral thinkers who had more smarts in their shit than most people
acquire over the course of their working lives. I feel very proud and
privileged to not only have met and worked with some of them, but to
have taken a small bit of their knowledge and experience with me on
occasion which has gone a long way to helping me through my working life.

And of course, along with meeting the brilliant people you also get to
meed the oxygen theives who are just there to make up the numbers and
that's the same in any field I expect. You know the types. The people
who work hard all day trying to *look* busy rather than actually doing
any work and being too stupid to realise that if they did what was
expected of them they'd find it easier. Or the types who don't progress
past the basic level of what they do because they lack either the
motivation or intelligence (or perhaps both) to do anything more
complicated. And then there's the types who are full of themselves that
think they know more about everything than anyone else yet in reality
they know very little and are usually *way* out of their depth when it
comes to dealing directly with any problem.

We all know the types and we've all dealt with them.

Yet in all my years of dealing with people I have *never* come across
anyone who is *so* keen to beat their chest and portray themselves as an
"expert" in virtually every conversation, while at the same time doing
little *other* than proving to all and sundry how thoroughly clueless
they actually are than than I have in Tom Clasener.

He is an *imbecile* beyond belief who's knowledge of all things
automotive is scant at best and you need to look no further than his
utterly nonsensical comments about carburetors, brake systems or even
this issue of the dropped valve to see how little he actually knows.
Moreover, he is no doubt aware of that himself yet in trying to pass
Google off as his own personal knowledge he achieves little other than
revealing his lack of personal experience. "Transferred Experience" is a
ridiculous concept he invented, and the only reason anyone would ever
resort to such lunacy is to try to cover the fact that their own real
world hands on experience is remarkably lacking :)

You also don't need to be Sigmund Freud to understand that this moron
has a personality disorder the size of Nebraska, and that's abundantly
clear when you look at things like him insisting that he and "Krypsis"
are in fact separate individuals, and that I deleted posts. *Anyone* who
is prepared to resort to *that* kind of profoundly embarrassing nonsense
and make themselves look like a total fruitcake rather than just admit
they got it wrong is simply not playing with a full deck, and when it
comes to this loser the 8's, 9's and 10's are missing along with all the
picture cards.

Yet he'll rant, and he'll rave, and he'll post *reams* of irrelevant
shit that has nothing whatsoever to do with anything other than the
voices in his head because that's the kind of fucked up cunt that he is,
and the funniest thing about it is the fact that the *only* person
around here who buys a single word of it is Felix, and *he's* that
stupid that he can't tall the difference between a real airplane and a
toy one :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 16/1/22 12:23 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 16/01/2022 11:31 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Saturday, 15 January 2022 at 23:48:18 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 12/1/22 12:51 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 11/01/2022 7:51 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 11/01/2022 6:35 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah. Didn't understand the concept of valve *float* and valve
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>>   Reams of garbage flushed to where it belongs.
>>       (Apologies to RS.)
>
> Making another long winded but completely irrelevant goalpost shift in
> an attempt to recover from the profound *moron* he made of himself, is he?
>
>> Well, if any more evidence of xenokryps slide into dementia was
>> required, *That* load of word soup was *IT*.
>>     Disagreement for the sake of it, from the mayor of the (Demented)
>> know all, know nothing brigade!.
>
> In all seriousness, in all my time coming into contact with people in
> the "automotive" sector I've met some amazing people. I've met people
> who have amazing recall who could quote specs for obscure engines at
> will. I've met people who have *immense* experience and who could feel a
> thousandth of an inch variation using nothing other than a set of
> antiquated calipers, and I've met people who were the most innovative

Those people are wankers like you Darren.

> lateral thinkers who had more smarts in their shit than most people
> acquire over the course of their working lives. I feel very proud and
> privileged to not only have met and worked with some of them, but to
> have taken a small bit of their knowledge and experience with me on
> occasion which has gone a long way to helping me through my working life.

A very small bit of knowledge and SFA experience since, at best, you
were their TA.
>
> And of course, along with meeting the brilliant people you also get to
> meed the oxygen theives who are just there to make up the numbers and

You mena there are more like you out there? Don't we have enough of an
oxygen thief with just you?

> that's the same in any field I expect. You know the types. The people
> who work hard all day trying to *look* busy rather than actually doing
> any work and being too stupid to realise that if they did what was
> expected of them they'd find it easier. Or the types who don't progress
> past the basic level of what they do because they lack either the
> motivation or intelligence (or perhaps both) to do anything more
> complicated. And then there's the types who are full of themselves that
> think they know more about everything than anyone else yet in reality
> they know very little and are usually *way* out of their depth when it
> comes to dealing directly with any problem.
>
> We all know the types and we've all dealt with them.

Yep, people just like you. Real oxygen thieves who have to live a life
of lies. People like you are the reason trade registration papers have
*unique numbers* linked to a *name*, the name of the person who worked
for and *earned* the recognition. I have one of those trade registration
numbers Darren, as does Clocky, you don't.
>
> Yet in all my years of dealing with people I have *never* come across
> anyone who is *so* keen to beat their chest and portray themselves as an
> "expert" in virtually every conversation, while at the same time doing
> little *other* than proving to all and sundry how thoroughly clueless
> they actually are than than I have in Tom Clasener.

Aw Gee Darren, I'm still getting under your skin, eh? It shows.
>
> He is an *imbecile* beyond belief who's knowledge of all things
> automotive is scant at best and you need to look no further than his
> utterly nonsensical comments about carburetors, brake systems or even
> this issue of the dropped valve to see how little he actually knows.
> Moreover, he is no doubt aware of that himself yet in trying to pass
> Google off as his own personal knowledge he achieves little other than
> revealing his lack of personal experience. "Transferred Experience" is a
> ridiculous concept he invented, and the only reason anyone would ever
> resort to such lunacy is to try to cover the fact that their own real
> world hands on experience is remarkably lacking :)
>
> You also don't need to be Sigmund Freud to understand that this moron
> has a personality disorder the size of Nebraska, and that's abundantly
> clear when you look at things like him insisting that he and "Krypsis"
> are in fact separate individuals, and that I deleted posts. *Anyone* who
> is prepared to resort to *that* kind of profoundly embarrassing nonsense
> and make themselves look like a total fruitcake rather than just admit
> they got it wrong is simply not playing with a full deck, and when it
> comes to this loser the 8's, 9's and 10's are missing along with all the
> picture cards.
>
> Yet he'll rant, and he'll rave, and he'll post *reams* of irrelevant
> shit that has nothing whatsoever to do with anything other than the

Totally relevant to the point I was making, and with relevant links as
appropriate.

> voices in his head because that's the kind of fucked up cunt that he is,
> and the funniest thing about it is the fact that the *only* person
> around here who buys a single word of it is Felix, and *he's* that
> stupid that he can't tall the difference between a real airplane and a
> toy one :)

Keep reading my posts Darren.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)