On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:47:28 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 8:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 7:39 am, Clocky wrote:
>
>>> Would you throw your whole life out into the open? You made comments
>>> recently about safeguarding what you put out into the public.
>>
>> Throw your whole life out there? We're talking about a couple of
>> qualifications. Xeno's name and address are common knowledge, what else
>> are they likely to reveal?
>>
>> Personally, I don't really care what qualifications he may or may not
>> have, but he is repetitiously demanding that noddy reveal his so it
>> would seem reasonable that he does what he demands of others.
>
> A more important, and often overlooked point, is why these cretins think
> they have a *right* to my personal information. Clasener and Jerkoff
> volunteered their information without anyone asking for it or giving a
> fuck about it to be honest, and *now* they're of the misguided belief
> that because they've laid themselves bare (to a select few people) that
> I have some obligation to hand over anything they want about myself.

There's more than just a whiff of madness in Der Der's posts today.

Right. So let's get back to simple reality.

You've made a number of claims Gibbens which a number of people have
doubted. You have been asked, as is the norm, to substantiate these claims.
You haven't. This is incriminating enough, but then add in the frequently
documented and undeniable proof of you stating the exact opposite to your
current position and you now look not just guilty of being a lying fraud,
but guilty of being a monumental hypocrite *and* a lying fraud.

snip dribble

In your own words Hypocrite.

“The *only* person doing the squirming here is the person who refuses to
lift a finger to prove his *own* claims.” Fraudster, 04Mar18

"I'm not the one making any claims here, dickhead. You're doing all the
claiming around here, and you get to prove it." Fraudster, 02Jun17

“At the end of the day it is Oz and Oz alone who makes the claims about
himself, and the onus to prove them rests with him. Doing so would be such
a simple affair and it would shut up every single one of his detractors
around here for good, but that's *not* what he wants. He craves attention,
and as long as he does all you'll keep hearing from him is unconfirmed
fantasy and fairytales.” Fraudster, 21/12/07

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/01/2022 1:15 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 10:25 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 01:34:48 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> so because I agree with someone, I'm incapable of independent
>>> intelligent thought.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~
>>   That`s how you come across. Yer a coat tailer,  a yes man, no more
>> no less.
>>
>>   that's illogical, but typical for you.
>>        ~~~
>>    nup, its a case of *just the facts Ma'am.
>
> It's not *because* he agrees with someone, but *why* he does.
>
> There is nothing wrong with agreeing with someone if you share their
> sentiment and believe what they're saying is accurate. People do it
> all the time and it's no big deal. But by and large Felix doesn't do
> that.
>
> he doesn't agree with people based on veracity of what they're saying,
> but rather on who is making the comment. 99 times out of 100 that I've
> seen he has no idea of what's being talked about, and simply chooses
> to agree with comments from "Person X" without having any idea if what
> they're saying is accurate or not.
>
> He does it all the time and repeatedly demonstrates that he is in fact
> an automaton who is quite incapable of independent intelligent thought.
>
>
>

that is nothing but lies and bullshit.

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 11:26 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 11:55 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/1/2022 11:37 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, 20 January 2022 at 08:59:56 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:39 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 5:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:24 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/1/22 4:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:34 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> After all, I said I was a *qualified mechanic*, I proved it. I
>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>> I was a *TAFE teacher*, I proved that too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did you? I don't remember seeing any proof.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You weren't included in the initial viewing. Supply me with a valid
>>>>>>>> email addy and I might consider it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not just put them up somewhere like  on dropbox and post a
>>>>>>> link so
>>>>>>> that everybody can see them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you throw your whole life out into the open? You made comments
>>>>>> recently about safeguarding what you put out into the public.
>>>>> Throw your whole life out there? We're talking about a couple of
>>>>> qualifications. Xeno's name and address are common knowledge, what
>>>>> else
>>>>> are they likely to reveal?
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally, I don't really care what qualifications he may or may not
>>>>> have, but he is repetitiously demanding that noddy reveal his so it
>>>>> would seem reasonable that he does what he demands of others.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>   Some ppl seem to use er, qualifications (scraps of paper) as a
>>>> crutch. Because thats *all they have* A *badge of honour* if you like.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to reveal my qualifications as a software engineer -
>>>>> absolutely none, but it didn't prevent me from a successful career
>>>>> at it.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   Absolutely!!. In a nutshell.
>>>>
>>>>>> The fraud encourages the posting stuff that *wasn't* made public,
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> you make your whole life public and hand them everything? I wouldn't.
>>>>>> I'm just glad I didn't share Xeno's history with the FLCJC member who
>>>>>> was pretending to be trustworthy at one time but proved himself to be
>>>>>> the exact opposite. My decision totally vindicated there.
>>>> ~~~~~~
>>>>   UH-HUH.
>>>
>>> Yeah interesting. His memory of issues seems to be quite self
>>> aggrandizing. His bullying and threats to me over the years have been
>>> quite well documented in the group.
>>>
>>> I didn't share the photo of him that I found on facebook which was
>>> done to me. I only ever shared information he himself had put on the
>>> newsgroup. Yes he had shared his name here before. He conveniently
>>> forgets that. He also constantly taunts me about having poor IT
>>> skills because he found xeno's photo, but then accuses me of being a
>>> stalker. Hmm HE found xeno's photo.... He states above I didn't share
>>> xeno's history.... I wonder who is the stalker. He accuses others of
>>> the very things he does himself.
>>>
>>>
>> Stalkers (like you) use those things for nefarious gains. Clocky
>> didn't hence not a stalker.
>
> What gain did I get? Clocky has used information to belittle me

You have some proof of that or are you just going to continue defaming me?

On 20/01/2022 1:47 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 8:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 7:39 am, Clocky wrote:
>
>>> Would you throw your whole life out into the open? You made comments
>>> recently about safeguarding what you put out into the public.
>>
>> Throw your whole life out there? We're talking about a couple of
>> qualifications. Xeno's name and address are common knowledge, what
>> else are they likely to reveal?
>>
>> Personally, I don't really care what qualifications he may or may not
>> have, but he is repetitiously demanding that noddy reveal his so it
>> would seem reasonable that he does what he demands of others.
>
> A more important, and often overlooked point, is why these cretins
> think they have a *right* to my personal information. Clasener and
> Jerkoff volunteered their information without anyone asking for it or
> giving a fuck about it to be honest, and *now* they're of the
> misguided belief that because they've laid themselves bare (to a
> select few people) that I have some obligation to hand over anything
> they want about myself.
>
> It's nonsensical, but then this is the level of mentality that you're
> dealing with here, and it's been going on for years. These people are
> fucking lunatics :)

my god you're a moron. it is not 'your personal information' when you
claim to a qualified automotive mechanic and ply for business with the
public on that basis. anyone has a right to ask for your credentials.

>
>> I'm happy to reveal my qualifications as a software engineer -
>> absolutely none, but it didn't prevent me from a successful career at
>> it.
>
> As I've said many times, qualifications don't automatically guarantee
> that the person who holds them has any idea what they're talking
> about, and you'll see no better examples of that than looking at the
> two biggest qualification braggarts in this group, namely Xeno and
> Clocky.
>
> Here are two people who have seemingly pandered to their massive
> inferiority complexes by going out of their way to prove to the group
> (well, a small number of people in the group) of their qualification
> status, yet these very same two people have made some of the most
> completely clueless and utterly nonsensical comments about automotive
> practices you could possibly ever find. Comments about brake systems,
> carburetors or valve clearances that are bordering on complete
> cluelessness, or a total lack of understanding of something as basic
> as windscreen composition. One of these fucking idiots even seriously
> contemplated the idea of retrimming his poverty pack Commodore using
> his wife's Janome sewing machine.
>
> It does not get any more clueless than this, yet these people brag
> about their qualifications on a virtual daily basis which to me does
> little other than to show how *easy* it is for retards to slip through
> the craps and become "clueless experts".
>
> Thanks, but no thanks. I couldn't care less what bits of paper you can
> wave under my nose. If I'm looking to hire someone I'm more interested
> in their ability.
>
>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:46:43 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 19/01/2022 11:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 19/01/2022 5:28 pm, alvey wrote:
>
>>>
>>> What is your favourite colour?
>>> (You have 15 minutes)
>>
>> Pantone 368.
>>
>> I have worked out why you are reluctant to show your face - you're in a
>> witless protection scheme.
>
> Lol :)
>
> I think Alvey's biggest worry would be that he doesn't want anyone to
> discover that he's as much of an utter fucktard in real life as he is
> here :)

Nothing. You have nothing except schoolboy insults Fraudster. And that's a
truly pathetic look for a man who is sixty next year.

alvey
“My old man was a returned serviceman Ron (he fought in Korea) and *hated*
Asians with a passion…” Fraudster, 09Oct08.
There is no DVA record of *any* Gibbens being in the Korean conflict.
https://nominal-rolls.dva.gov.au/

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:22:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 19/01/2022 5:28 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:13:35 +1000, alvey wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context. it
>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>
>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>
>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>
>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>
>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>
>> Thought that might prove a bit too tricky.
>> So here's a question more suited to your abilities keith.
>>
>> What is your favourite colour?
>> (You have 15 minutes)
>
> Pantone 368.
>
> I have worked out why you are reluctant to show your face - you're in a
> witless protection scheme.

Entering (in quotes) the phrase "witless protection scheme" into Goog only
gives 550 hits. Thought it would have been *much* higher than that.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:48:24 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 19/01/2022 6:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 19/01/2022 1:46 am, Clocky wrote:
>
>>> The is a public forum, so answer them publicly. You expect answers to
>>> your questions.
>>
>> In polite society, which you obviously aren't a member of, you ASK a
>> question and an answer is requested not DEMANDED. You'd have made a good
>> Gestapo interrogator "Answer ze question, ve haf ways to make you talk".
>
> Not just that, but if you ask a question and it becomes clear even to a
> concrete statue that you're not going to get an answer, then continuing
> to stamp your feet and ask the same question over and over does nothing
> other than make you look like a complete moron :)

Ooooh no it doesn't. It makes the person who refuses all requests to
substantiate their claim a complete liar and fraud.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>
>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know you're
>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>
>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero differentiates
>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>
>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>> "Yosemite sam"
>
> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.

Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?

hth

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/1/2022 7:20 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know you're
>>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>>
>>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero differentiates
>>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>>
>>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>>> "Yosemite sam"
>>
>> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
>> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
>
> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>
> hth
>
>
> alvey
>
>
Yes, I thought I'd made it quite clear that if he proffered up two trade
certificates, with individual numbers, I'd be sooooo embarrassed that
I'd just have to do a Darren and scoot off. I'll never be forced to do
that because Darren has never signed up to any apprenticeship ever so
possesses no trade papers.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:10:35 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:14:44 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context.
>>>>>>>>>>> it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>
>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>
>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments you
>>> made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way to go
>>> and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain what purpose?
>>>
>>> And this seems reasonable to you does it?
>>
>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get some
>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or attempt
>> to anyway.
>
> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only thing
> that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not even
> any pertinent questions.
>
> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
> "Grubby", "Village idiot" etc etc.

Could be worse keith. I could have made some boring posts about geriatric
and insignificant aircraft...

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/01/2022 6:10 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:14:44 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>> context.
>>>>>>>>>>> it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>
>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>
>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments you
>>> made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way to go
>>> and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain what
>>> purpose?
>>>
>>> And this seems reasonable to you does it?
>>
>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get
>> some
>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or
>> attempt
>> to anyway.
>
> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only
> thing that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not
> even any pertinent questions.
>
> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
> "Grubby"

hey, that was mine! I named him that after he stalked me trying to find
my identity, and then cackled with glee when he found a video of some
schoolteacher he thought was me, and posted it here. noddy jumped on the
band wagon rubbishing me, and even told ppl on another ng I was an
ex-schoolteacher.

> , "Village idiot" etc etc.
>

lol! noddy named his latest protege that, when he wasn't so. now it
seems jonz continually produces pearls of wisdom, lol

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 6:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 7:40 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 9:14 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla. There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response,
>>>>>>>>>>>> did you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself
>>>>>>>>>>>> and goes quiet once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>> context. it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>> you have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>> was too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>
>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>
>>>
>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments
>>> you made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way
>>> to go and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain
>>> what purpose?
>>
>> Hardly out of his way, and it would hardly be a private meeting as I
>> would expect him to immediately splash any information that he had
>> managed to glean all over this NG.
>
> That's exactly what the FLCJC does, has done and supports doing yet
> you take no issue with that despite the fact there is a long history
> of them doing exactly that. Like myself, I wouldn't expect Alvey to do
> that *at all*.
>
>

keith is proving he has the right credentials for FLCJC membership these
days..

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 10:47 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 8:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 7:39 am, Clocky wrote:
>
>>> Would you throw your whole life out into the open? You made comments
>>> recently about safeguarding what you put out into the public.
>>
>> Throw your whole life out there? We're talking about a couple of
>> qualifications. Xeno's name and address are common knowledge, what
>> else are they likely to reveal?
>>
>> Personally, I don't really care what qualifications he may or may not
>> have, but he is repetitiously demanding that noddy reveal his so it
>> would seem reasonable that he does what he demands of others.
>
> A more important, and often overlooked point, is why these cretins think
> they have a *right* to my personal information.

You *encouraged* someone to plaster my (and other peoples) personal and
never before posted information into this public group FFS.

At the end of the day you made the claims you get to prove them, that's
how it works - you said that yourself countless times but that is
especially true when you have denigrating and belittling others over
possessing real qualifications.

See, it was all out open slather you attacking others but as soon as
people asked you to prove your claims of qualifications it was killfail
time. Another question is why there is no record of your claimed long
term VACC membership?

On 20/01/2022 6:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
>>>>>>>>>> but he was
>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need
>>>>>>> to "tell
>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>
>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses
>>>> for
>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>
>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>
>> It would hardly be accidental
>>
>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>
>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>> beware of?
>>
>
> You implied Alvey would be "too scared".

didn't imply, stated/claimed

> "Too scared" of what keith?

Oh dear! you asked a direct question of Keith. that's akin to holding a
cross to a vampire!

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 6:14 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to
>>>> "tell
>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered
>>>> the
>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>
>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out
>>>> from keith.
>>>
>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop
>>> out from alvey aka the black knight.
>>
>> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You
>> didn't turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a face
>> to face?
>>
>>
>
> I doubt keith is interested in facts and evidence and is just here to
> troll.

surely not! he only wishes "good health and peace for all mankind"

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 1:47 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 8:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 7:39 am, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>> Would you throw your whole life out into the open? You made comments
>>>> recently about safeguarding what you put out into the public.
>>>
>>> Throw your whole life out there? We're talking about a couple of
>>> qualifications. Xeno's name and address are common knowledge, what
>>> else are they likely to reveal?
>>>
>>> Personally, I don't really care what qualifications he may or may not
>>> have, but he is repetitiously demanding that noddy reveal his so it
>>> would seem reasonable that he does what he demands of others.
>>
>> A more important, and often overlooked point, is why these cretins
>> think they have a *right* to my personal information. Clasener and
>> Jerkoff volunteered their information without anyone asking for it or
>> giving a fuck about it to be honest, and *now* they're of the
>> misguided belief that because they've laid themselves bare (to a
>> select few people) that I have some obligation to hand over anything
>> they want about myself.
>>
>> It's nonsensical, but then this is the level of mentality that you're
>> dealing with here, and it's been going on for years. These people are
>> fucking lunatics :)
>
>
> my god you're a moron. it is not 'your personal information' when you
> claim to a qualified automotive mechanic and ply for business with the
> public on that basis. anyone has a right to ask for your credentials.
>

Yep. But he can't show what he hasn't got and neither can public records ;-)

Nobody made a big deal about being qualified. He disputed other peoples
qualifications whilst providing no proof of his own *claimed*
qualifications.

Public records don't support his claims and that's why he tried so hard
to shut down the conversation but he *started* it by attacking qualified
people.

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:13:06 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to
>>>>>>> "tell
>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>
>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses for
>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>
>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>
>> It would hardly be accidental
>>
>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>
>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>> beware of?
>>
>
> You implied Alvey would be "too scared".

No he didn't. There was no implication, he *stated* that I was "too
scared". It was sensible to ask 'of what?'. While I was pretty confident
that he was going to try and bore me to death with endless tales of, "When
I was...", but for all I know he may have had dastardly plans involving his
rivet gun. Of course we'll never know as my sensible question was filed
into keiths' *enormous* Too Hard shredder. Meh.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/01/2022 6:32 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:41:55 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2022 11:37 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> Yeah interesting. His memory of issues seems to be quite self
>>> aggrandizing. His bullying and threats to me over the years have been
>>> quite well documented in the group.
>>>
>>> I didn't share the photo of him that I found on facebook which was done
>>> to me. I only ever shared information he himself had put on the
>>> newsgroup. Yes he had shared his name here before. He conveniently
>>> forgets that. He also constantly taunts me about having poor IT skills
>>> because he found xeno's photo, but then accuses me of being a stalker.
>>> Hmm HE found xeno's photo.... He states above I didn't share xeno's
>>> history.... I wonder who is the stalker. He accuses others of the very
>>> things he does himself.
>> He does, and seemingly has no problem with it whenever he *does* do it
>> himself. Like when he thought it was a great joke to help himself to my
>> profile pic and upload it to some pisstake site for his own amusement,
>> yet if you did the same thing to him you'd hear him crying about it for
>> fucking *ages*.
>>
>> He just loves being a victim....
> Ummmm Darren. You just pecked out a para of you playing the whining victim.
>
>
> alvey
> Wondering what %age of the Fraudsters posts this year have been about those
> whose opinions he "couldn't care less about"? Must be >90%.
>

yes

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 6:10 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:

>>
>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get some
>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or
>> attempt
>> to anyway.
>
> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only thing
> that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not even
> any pertinent questions.

That's the only thing he's ever done since he blew in here from aus.tv
or whatever other spastic group he came from, and I'll happily bet my
balls he's exactly the same in every other group he frequents and is
about as popular in those as he is here.

He's a juvenile attention whore. It's about quantity. Not quality.

> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
> "Grubby", "Village idiot" etc etc.

He has the mental ability of a 12 year old. It's the same childish
bullshit over over again day after day after day.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 20/01/2022 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:48:24 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 19/01/2022 6:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2022 1:46 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> The is a public forum, so answer them publicly. You expect answers to
>>>> your questions.
>>> In polite society, which you obviously aren't a member of, you ASK a
>>> question and an answer is requested not DEMANDED. You'd have made a good
>>> Gestapo interrogator "Answer ze question, ve haf ways to make you talk".
>> Not just that, but if you ask a question and it becomes clear even to a
>> concrete statue that you're not going to get an answer, then continuing
>> to stamp your feet and ask the same question over and over does nothing
>> other than make you look like a complete moron :)
> Ooooh no it doesn't. It makes the person who refuses all requests to
> substantiate their claim a complete liar and fraud.
>

that's what it does!

> alvey
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 7:27 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:10:35 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:14:44 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context.
>>>>>>>>>>>> it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>>
>>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments you
>>>> made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way to go
>>>> and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain what purpose?
>>>>
>>>> And this seems reasonable to you does it?
>>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get some
>>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or attempt
>>> to anyway.
>> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only thing
>> that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not even
>> any pertinent questions.
>>
>> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
>> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
>> "Grubby", "Village idiot" etc etc.
> Could be worse keith. I could have made some boring posts about geriatric
> and insignificant aircraft...
>

many of those 'geriatric and insignificant aircraft", and the brave men
who flew them, are the reason Japanese is not our first language.

>
> alvey
>
>
>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 20/01/2022 7:46 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 7:27 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:10:35 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:14:44 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> context.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public*
>>>>> comments you
>>>>> made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way
>>>>> to go
>>>>> and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain what
>>>>> purpose?
>>>>>
>>>>> And this seems reasonable to you does it?
>>>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to
>>>> get some
>>>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or
>>>> attempt
>>>> to anyway.
>>> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only
>>> thing
>>> that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not even
>>> any pertinent questions.
>>>
>>> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
>>> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
>>> "Grubby", "Village idiot" etc etc.
>> Could be worse keith. I could have made some boring posts about
>> geriatric
>> and insignificant aircraft...
>>
>
> many of those 'geriatric and insignificant aircraft", and the brave
> men who flew them, are the reason Japanese is not our first language.
>

'one of the reasons' I should have said..

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:05:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:02:46 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to "tell
>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>
>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from keith.
>>>
>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face, but the
>>> fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop out
>>> from alvey aka the black knight.
>>
>> keith, I appreciate the obvious fact that you're desperate to try and save
>> some long-gone cred, but this 'face to face' tactic is as poor a choice and
>> as big a Fail as your Black Knight analogy. If you want a better example of
>> a Python analogy then, "You're only making it worse for yourself!"
>>
>> Or, in closing, "Now go away. Or I shall taunt you a zecond time."
>
> Alv, you have the worst case of rectomyopia that I have ever seen (and
> I've seen quite a few), maybe some medical student could do a study as
> his PhD thesis.
>
> Anyway enjoy your weekend I'll be away for a few days...

That's fortunate. For you too! Then you may not hear the laughter at
"rectomyopia". This literally, and *only*, means 'being too short-sighted
to read the right hand page of a book'.

But wait! There's more!
It is very, very rare for an MD undergrad to do a PhD.

Coupla zingers there keith.

alvey
Realising why keith uses so many cliches and worn out phrases.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:14:19 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to "tell
>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>
>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>> keith.
>>>
>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop
>>> out from alvey aka the black knight.
>>
>> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You didn't
>> turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a face to face?
>>
>
> I doubt keith is interested in facts and evidence and is just here to troll.

Thanks for the warning. Do you know when he's going to start?

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/1/2022 7:39 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 6:10 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get
>>> some
>>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or
>>> attempt
>>> to anyway.
>>
>> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only
>> thing that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not
>> even any pertinent questions.
>
> That's the only thing he's ever done since he blew in here from aus.tv
> or whatever other spastic group he came from, and I'll happily bet my
> balls he's exactly the same in every other group he frequents and is
> about as popular in those as he is here.
>
> He's a juvenile attention whore. It's about quantity. Not quality.

The lies you've spouted in here year after year certainly came in
*quantity* but there wasn't a lot of *quality* in them.
>
>> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
>> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
>> "Grubby", "Village idiot" etc etc.
>
> He has the mental ability of a 12 year old. It's the same childish
> bullshit over over again day after day after day.

Trite sayings, grow a brain and think of some new ones.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)