On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 11:23:51 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 21/1/2022 8:30 am, Clocky wrote:
> > On 20/01/2022 4:39 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 20/01/2022 6:32 pm, alvey wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:41:55 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 20/01/2022 11:37 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> >>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >>>>> Yeah interesting. His memory of issues seems to be quite self
> >>>>> aggrandizing. His bullying and threats to me over the years have been
> >>>>> quite well documented in the group.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I didn't share the photo of him that I found on facebook which was
> >>>>> done
> >>>>> to me. I only ever shared information he himself had put on the
> >>>>> newsgroup. Yes he had shared his name here before. He conveniently
> >>>>> forgets that. He also constantly taunts me about having poor IT skills
> >>>>> because he found xeno's photo, but then accuses me of being a stalker.
> >>>>> Hmm HE found xeno's photo.... He states above I didn't share xeno's
> >>>>> history.... I wonder who is the stalker. He accuses others of the very
> >>>>> things he does himself.
> >>>> He does, and seemingly has no problem with it whenever he *does* do it
> >>>> himself. Like when he thought it was a great joke to help himself to my
> >>>> profile pic and upload it to some pisstake site for his own amusement,
> >>>> yet if you did the same thing to him you'd hear him crying about it for
> >>>> fucking *ages*.
> >>>>
> >>>> He just loves being a victim....
> >>> Ummmm Darren. You just pecked out a para of you playing the whining
> >>> victim.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> alvey
> >>> Wondering what %age of the Fraudsters posts this year have been about
> >>> those
> >>> whose opinions he "couldn't care less about"? Must be >90%.
> >>>
> >>
> >> yes
> >>
> >
> > ...and continues if not increases whether the person responds or is even
> > in the group.
~~~~~~~~~~~``
Really, a cite on that would nice.`

He loves nothing more than to tell grander lies about
> > people who are no longer (here) defending themselves.
> You've noticed that too, huh?
~~~~~~~~~~~`
*Defending themselves*, Who are they?? You`re a bunch of Fucking pussies crying boo hoo, I`se been bullied..If you can`t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 21/01/2022 5:37 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 11:23:51 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>>>
>>> ...and continues if not increases whether the person responds or is even
>>> in the group.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~``
> Really, a cite on that would nice.`
>
>
> He loves nothing more than to tell grander lies about
>>> people who are no longer (here) defending themselves.
>> You've noticed that too, huh?
> ~~~~~~~~~~~`
> *Defending themselves*, Who are they?? You`re a bunch of Fucking pussies crying boo hoo, I`se been bullied..If you can`t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen

Moreover they should probably stop making themselves look like
ridiculous hypocritical morons by just shutting the fuck up.

*Jesus* they're fucking *dumb* :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 13:12:30 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 21/1/2022 12:31 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 21/01/2022 10:44 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 20 January 2022 at 19:15:19 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> >
> >>>> Not just that, but if you ask a question and it becomes clear even to a
> >>>> concrete statue that you're not going to get an answer, then continuing
> >>>> to stamp your feet and ask the same question over and over does nothing
> >>>> other than make you look like a complete moron :)
> >>>
> >>> Ooooh no it doesn't. It makes the person who refuses all requests to
> >>> substantiate their claim a complete liar and fraud.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~```
> >> Nup ya weasel, Just proves yer a piss weak waste of space.
> >>> alvey
> >
> > I'm not quite sure how someone not answering a question makes them a
> > "complete liar and fraud", but then there's a lot that goes on in
> > Alvey's head that's a bit NQR.
> An example, when the questioner asks you to *substantiate your claims*,
> claims that are known and proven to be lies, then, yes, by not answering
> the question, you most certainly are *confirming* that you are a liar
> and fraud.
~~~~~~~~~~~~``~~~~~~~~~~~~
*FACTS* OK: You say the above..However, What about the walled up cars from the time of krypsis??.
All yer enablers *know* that krypsis is *YOU*.. But nothing from them either. (Gutless) Admit yer lies, Before you go accusing others.
I`ve called you on this *numerous*! times and you *RUN AWAY* Have Never said thats *not* me, and provided *PROOF* that it was *not*.... Nup, U simply *RUN AWAY*. Good role model for yer fellow circle jerkers. (NAH, forget that there`s not one of you that can lie straight in bed.)

You see, had you *real evidence* of your claims, it would be
> easy to prove their veracity.

*Veracity* eh? see above. ^^^^^^^.

That you have nothing to offer up in
> support of your claims, well, it says it all really.
~~~~
Regarding *you* certainly.
>
> You would dearly love to shoot me down in flames, wouldn't you Darren?
Flames???? Heh, soon enough kryppy..
> Such a pity that your claims would need, firstly, to be true and,
> secondly, there exist *tangible* evidence of said claims. Such a pity
> (for you) that *my claims* are true and I have such tangible evidence of
> my claims.
~~~~~~~~~~``
Present it then krypsis!.. (The reasons for denying that you are/were krypsis, and the bullshit that *you* carried on with)
>
> The ball is in your court Darren.
~~~~~~~`
So you say every other day Krypsis.. Sorry it aint so.

BTW This is *MY* take on the repetitive schoolboy shit you and the other kiddies come up with.
*OR* the *cowardly* group attack tactic.
> > He can be in denial as much as he likes, but repeatedly asking the same
> > question over and over is about as mental as eating your own shit and
> > complaining about the taste.
~~~~~~~`~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prolly likes it.
> >
> You have some weird shit running through your mind Darren, the above
> being the perfect example.
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 21/1/2022 6:06 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 21/01/2022 5:37 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 11:23:51 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> ...and continues if not increases whether the person responds or is
>>>> even
>>>> in the group.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> Really, a cite on that would nice.`
>>
>>
>>   He loves nothing more than to tell grander lies about
>>>> people who are no longer (here) defending themselves.
>>> You've noticed that too, huh?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~`
>>   *Defending themselves*,  Who are they?? You`re a bunch of  Fucking
>> pussies crying boo hoo, I`se been bullied..If you can`t stand the
>> heat, get out of the kitchen
>
> Moreover they should probably stop making themselves look like
> ridiculous hypocritical morons by just shutting the fuck up.
>
> *Jesus* they're fucking *dumb* :)
>
Hey Darren, you're the pussy here.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 18:06:24 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 21/01/2022 5:37 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 11:23:51 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> ...and continues if not increases whether the person responds or is even
>>>> in the group.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> Really, a cite on that would nice.`
>>
>> He loves nothing more than to tell grander lies about
>>>> people who are no longer (here) defending themselves.
>>> You've noticed that too, huh?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~`
>> *Defending themselves*, Who are they?? You`re a bunch of Fucking pussies crying boo hoo, I`se been bullied..If you can`t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen
>
> Moreover they should probably stop making themselves look like
> ridiculous hypocritical morons by just shutting the fuck up.

Just more opinions Fraudster.
>
> *Jesus* they're fucking *dumb* :)

Could be worse.
"They" could be dumb, dishonest, cowardly and abusive. You know. Like you
Fraudster.

alvey
“She's [Michalia Cash] a fucktard. If she came anywhere near me I
would punch her.” Fraudster, 09Apr19

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 21/01/2022 6:22 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 13:12:30 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>> You would dearly love to shoot me down in flames, wouldn't you Darren?
> Flames???? Heh, soon enough kryppy..

No need. He's already been over the train incident, where he was made to
look like *such* a clueless imbecile that he was burnt beyond
recognition. After all his ridiculous postulating and accusing he was
*decisively* defeated, and his utterly feeble attempts at face saving
after the fact were cringeworthy in the extreme.

Put very simply he had his arse handed to him better than anyone ever
has around here, and all he's ever done since is try to win back some
credibility with his pathetic constant attacks.

He's done, and he has been for a loooooong time :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 21/1/2022 8:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 21/01/2022 6:22 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 13:12:30 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> You would dearly love to shoot me down in flames, wouldn't you Darren?
>> Flames???? Heh, soon enough kryppy..
>
> No need. He's already been over the train incident, where he was made to
> look like *such* a clueless imbecile that he was burnt beyond
> recognition. After all his ridiculous postulating and accusing he was
> *decisively* defeated, and his utterly feeble attempts at face saving
> after the fact were cringeworthy in the extreme.
>
> Put very simply he had his arse handed to him better than anyone ever

What a laugh. You're a history revisionist. Get a job with the
propaganda department of the CCP. Yeah, they are crap at it too.

> has around here, and all he's ever done since is try to win back some
> credibility with his pathetic constant attacks.
>
> He's done, and he has been for a loooooong time :)

The only one done here is you Darren.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 20:42:37 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 21/01/2022 6:22 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 13:12:30 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> You would dearly love to shoot me down in flames, wouldn't you Darren?
>> Flames???? Heh, soon enough kryppy..
>
> No need. He's already been over the train incident, where he was made to
> look like *such* a clueless imbecile that he was burnt beyond
> recognition. After all his ridiculous postulating and accusing he was
> *decisively* defeated, and his utterly feeble attempts at face saving
> after the fact were cringeworthy in the extreme.
>
> Put very simply he had his arse handed to him better than anyone ever
> has around here, and all he's ever done since is try to win back some
> credibility with his pathetic constant attacks.
>
> He's done, and he has been for a loooooong time :)

You know, I think 'Service Manager' may actually have been an appropriate
job for the Fraudster. Being able to sprout convoluted bullshit would be a
real asset there.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 21/01/2022 8:23 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 21/1/2022 8:30 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 4:39 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 6:32 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:41:55 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 11:37 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>> Yeah interesting. His memory of issues seems to be quite self
>>>>>> aggrandizing. His bullying and threats to me over the years have been
>>>>>> quite well documented in the group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't share the photo of him that I found on facebook which was
>>>>>> done
>>>>>> to me. I only ever shared information he himself had put on the
>>>>>> newsgroup. Yes he had shared his name here before. He conveniently
>>>>>> forgets that. He also constantly taunts me about having poor IT
>>>>>> skills
>>>>>> because he found xeno's photo, but then accuses me of being a
>>>>>> stalker.
>>>>>> Hmm HE found xeno's photo.... He states above I didn't share xeno's
>>>>>> history.... I wonder who is the stalker. He accuses others of the
>>>>>> very
>>>>>> things he does himself.
>>>>> He does, and seemingly has no problem with it whenever he *does* do it
>>>>> himself. Like when he thought it was a great joke to help himself
>>>>> to my
>>>>> profile pic and upload it to some pisstake site for his own amusement,
>>>>> yet if you did the same thing to him you'd hear him crying about it
>>>>> for
>>>>> fucking *ages*.
>>>>>
>>>>> He just loves being a victim....
>>>> Ummmm Darren. You just pecked out a para of you playing the whining
>>>> victim.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> alvey
>>>> Wondering what %age of the Fraudsters posts this year have been
>>>> about those
>>>> whose opinions he "couldn't care less about"? Must be >90%.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yes
>>>
>>
>> ...and continues if not increases whether the person responds or is
>> even in the group. He loves nothing more than to tell grander lies
>> about people who are no longer (here) defending themselves.
>
> You've noticed that too, huh?
>

Yes I have.

On 22/01/2022 3:39 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 20:42:37 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 21/01/2022 6:22 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 13:12:30 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>> You would dearly love to shoot me down in flames, wouldn't you Darren?
>>> Flames???? Heh, soon enough kryppy..
>>
>> No need. He's already been over the train incident, where he was made to
>> look like *such* a clueless imbecile that he was burnt beyond
>> recognition. After all his ridiculous postulating and accusing he was
>> *decisively* defeated, and his utterly feeble attempts at face saving
>> after the fact were cringeworthy in the extreme.
>>
>> Put very simply he had his arse handed to him better than anyone ever
>> has around here, and all he's ever done since is try to win back some
>> credibility with his pathetic constant attacks.
>>
>> He's done, and he has been for a loooooong time :)
>
> You know, I think 'Service Manager' may actually have been an appropriate
> job for the Fraudster. Being able to sprout convoluted bullshit would be a
> real asset there.
>

He displays a lot of character traits that would be *perfect* in a role
as service manager. Pity they are also traits that make for a lousy
human being.

On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 20:42:42 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 21/01/2022 6:22 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 13:12:30 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
> >> You would dearly love to shoot me down in flames, wouldn't you Darren?
> > Flames???? Heh, soon enough kryppy..
> No need. He's already been over the train incident, where he was made to
> look like *such* a clueless imbecile that he was burnt beyond
> recognition.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Heh, i was thinking of a somewhat different burn. <G>

After all his ridiculous postulating and accusing he was
> *decisively* defeated, and his utterly feeble attempts at face saving
> after the fact were cringeworthy in the extreme.
>
> Put very simply he had his arse handed to him better than anyone ever
> has around here, and all he's ever done since is try to win back some
> credibility with h
~~~~~~
now won`t even try to refute what I said yesterday. I reminded him/them of all the crap thats been espoused. Go back and *look* girls:

https://groups.google.com/g/aus.cars/c/wYYUQOB7MjQ/m/yI0A78BeBAAJ
Read and reply. (Wishful thinking <G>) You ppl are the *Very definition* (With exceptions) of *keyboard warriors*
> He's done, and he has been for a loooooong time :)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A bunch of lying/ repetitive kiddies no less, hiding in the dark recesses of usenet. Until its time to spew lies and irrelevancy all over *everything.
> --
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On 20/01/2022 5:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need
>>>>>>> to "tell
>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>
>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses for
>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>
>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>
>> It would hardly be accidental
>>
>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>
>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>> beware of?
>>
>
> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?

Ask him, I have no idea.

On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
>>>>>>>>>>> but he was
>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need
>>>>>>>> to "tell
>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses
>>>>> for
>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>
>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>
>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>
>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>
>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>> beware of?
>>>
>>
>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>
> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of what
> keith?

See my previous reply - only one to a customer.

On 20/01/2022 6:54 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:05:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2022 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:02:46 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to "tell
>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>
>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from keith.
>>>>
>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face, but the
>>>> fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop out
>>>> from alvey aka the black knight.
>>>
>>> keith, I appreciate the obvious fact that you're desperate to try and save
>>> some long-gone cred, but this 'face to face' tactic is as poor a choice and
>>> as big a Fail as your Black Knight analogy. If you want a better example of
>>> a Python analogy then, "You're only making it worse for yourself!"
>>>
>>> Or, in closing, "Now go away. Or I shall taunt you a zecond time."
>>
>> Alv, you have the worst case of rectomyopia that I have ever seen (and
>> I've seen quite a few), maybe some medical student could do a study as
>> his PhD thesis.
>>
>> Anyway enjoy your weekend I'll be away for a few days...
>
> That's fortunate. For you too! Then you may not hear the laughter at
> "rectomyopia". This literally, and *only*, means 'being too short-sighted
> to read the right hand page of a book'.

It is actually disease suffered by smartarses that causes them to stick
their head up their arse - what's it like up there alv.

> It is very, very rare for an MD undergrad to do a PhD.

To get to a PhD you have to start as an undergraduate, didn't you know that?

> Coupla zingers there keith.

Poor work alv try harder next time.

On 20/01/2022 11:47 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>
>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to "tell
>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>
>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>> keith.
>>
>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>> but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop
>> out from alvey aka the black knight.
>
> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You didn't
> turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a face to face?

Firstly, I don't recall any such post, perhaps you'd care to find it.
Secondly, passing through Coffs doesn't imply that we stopped there.

On 20/01/2022 5:14 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to
>>>> "tell
>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>
>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>> keith.
>>>
>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop
>>> out from alvey aka the black knight.
>>
>> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You
>> didn't turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a face
>> to face?
>>
>>
>
> I doubt keith is interested in facts and evidence and is just here to
> troll.

You're confusing me with alvey.

On 20/01/2022 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:22:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 19/01/2022 5:28 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:13:35 +1000, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context. it
>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>
>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>
>>> Thought that might prove a bit too tricky.
>>> So here's a question more suited to your abilities keith.
>>>
>>> What is your favourite colour?
>>> (You have 15 minutes)
>>
>> Pantone 368.
>>
>> I have worked out why you are reluctant to show your face - you're in a
>> witless protection scheme.
>
> Entering (in quotes) the phrase "witless protection scheme" into Goog only
> gives 550 hits. Thought it would have been *much* higher than that.

You obviously get around a lot.

On 20/01/2022 11:54 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 4:15 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:48:24 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2022 6:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/01/2022 1:46 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The is a public forum, so answer them publicly. You expect answers to
>>>>> your questions.
>>>>
>>>> In polite society, which you obviously aren't a member of, you ASK a
>>>> question and an answer is requested not DEMANDED. You'd have made a
>>>> good
>>>> Gestapo interrogator "Answer ze question, ve haf ways to make you
>>>> talk".
>>>
>>> Not just that, but if you ask a question and it becomes clear even to a
>>> concrete statue that you're not going to get an answer, then continuing
>>> to stamp your feet and ask the same question over and over does nothing
>>> other than make you look like a complete moron :)
>>
>> Ooooh no it doesn't. It makes the person who refuses all requests to
>> substantiate their claim a complete liar and fraud.
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>
>
> Indeed it does.
>
>

Little clocky peeked from under the curtain and in chorus with felix
squeaked :Me too"

On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>
>>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know you're
>>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>>
>>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero differentiates
>>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>>
>>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>>> "Yosemite sam"
>>
>> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
>> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
>
> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?

Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
tedious and irritating.

Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
remember one.

On 20/01/2022 6:27 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:10:35 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:14:44 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context.
>>>>>>>>>>>> it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>>
>>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>>
>>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments you
>>>> made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way to go
>>>> and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain what purpose?
>>>>
>>>> And this seems reasonable to you does it?
>>>
>>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get some
>>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or attempt
>>> to anyway.
>>
>> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only thing
>> that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not even
>> any pertinent questions.
>>
>> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
>> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
>> "Grubby", "Village idiot" etc etc.
>
> Could be worse keith. I could have made some boring posts about geriatric
> and insignificant aircraft...

<yawn> SSDD

On 21/01/2022 11:42 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 21/01/2022 7:14 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:28:27 +1100, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/01/2022 6:10 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:14:44 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public*
>>>>>> comments you
>>>>>> made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way
>>>>>> to go
>>>>>> and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain what
>>>>>> purpose?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this seems reasonable to you does it?
>>>>> Probably. Given that keith seems to believe that the best way to get
>>>>> some
>>>>> face time with someone is to indulge in a flamme war with them. Or
>>>>> attempt
>>>>> to anyway.
>>>> Flame war eh? Well you'd know something about that since it's only
>>>> thing that you've done here, You've provided no useful information not
>>>> even any pertinent questions.
>>>>
>>>> If it come to discussing flaming, you certainly can't take the moral
>>>> high ground with calling people things like "Fraudster", "Der Der",
>>>> "Grubby"
>>> hey, that was mine! I named him that after he stalked me trying to find
>>> my identity, and then cackled with glee when he found a video of some
>>> schoolteacher he thought was me, and posted it here. noddy jumped on the
>>> band wagon rubbishing me, and even told ppl on another ng I was an
>>> ex-schoolteacher.
>>>
>>>> , "Village idiot" etc etc.
>>>>
>>> lol! noddy named his latest protege that, when he wasn't so. now it
>>> seems jonz continually produces pearls of wisdom, lol
>> Accuracy isn't keith's forte. Like, "Fraudster" is fine because of the
>> Truth Defence.
>
>
> of course it is. it's appropriate, as is liar. and nothing wrong with
> "Der Der" either. it's just a play on the name. I call jonz jonzie,
> lindsay loonsey, etc.,

Well you wouldn't mind being called fuckwit then, after all it's just a
play name.

On 20/01/2022 5:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 7:40 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 9:14 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla. There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response,
>>>>>>>>>>>> did you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself
>>>>>>>>>>>> and goes quiet once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>> context. it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>> you have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>> was too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>
>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>
>>>
>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments
>>> you made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way
>>> to go and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain
>>> what purpose?
>>
>> Hardly out of his way, and it would hardly be a private meeting as I
>> would expect him to immediately splash any information that he had
>> managed to glean all over this NG.
>
> That's exactly what the FLCJC does, has done and supports doing yet you
> take no issue with that despite the fact there is a long history of them
> doing exactly that. Like myself,

Like what have I not had an issue with?

> I wouldn't expect Alvey to do that *at
> all*.

Why not, he seems to go to some trouble to find information about people
and then splash it here.

On 20/01/2022 6:30 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 6:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 7:40 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:14 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 19/01/2022 3:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 8:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla. There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and goes quiet once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>>> you have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>>> was too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how far would he have to travel?
>>>>>>
>>>>> 10 Km maybe. Hardly a reason not to show.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So because you won't answer questions relating to *public* comments
>>>> you made in a *public* newsgroup it's up to him to go out of his way
>>>> to go and see you for a private meeting for which you don't explain
>>>> what purpose?
>>>
>>> Hardly out of his way, and it would hardly be a private meeting as I
>>> would expect him to immediately splash any information that he had
>>> managed to glean all over this NG.
>>
>> That's exactly what the FLCJC does, has done and supports doing yet
>> you take no issue with that despite the fact there is a long history
>> of them doing exactly that. Like myself, I wouldn't expect Alvey to do
>> that *at all*.
>>
>>
>
> keith is proving he has the right credentials for FLCJC membership these
> days..

Toeing the party line eh?

On 24/1/2022 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 11:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you.
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to
>>>> "tell
>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>
>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>> keith.
>>>
>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop
>>> out from alvey aka the black knight.
>>
>> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You
>> didn't turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a face
>> to face?
>
> Firstly, I don't recall any such post, perhaps you'd care to find it.
> Secondly, passing through Coffs doesn't imply that we stopped there.
>
Not overly fussed about looking but you were on your way to Port
Macquarie or the like. I didn't imply that you stopped but, in passing,
you could have. The invite was there.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:55:26 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 5:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need
>>>>>>>> to "tell
>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses for
>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>
>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>
>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>
>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>
>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>> beware of?
>>>
>>
>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>
> Ask him, I have no idea.

I have *lots* of ideas keith. But while none of them are about being
"scared", a few of them are about you. Unsuprisingly, exactly none of them
are complimentary.

And please spare me any more childish and stupid comebacks. They've been as
flat and boring as the dirtscape of Tucker Cct and will be enthusiastically
ignored if you can't help yourself.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus