On 10/01/2022 6:46 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 7/01/2022 8:09 am, lindsay wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Morrison and his like have dared attack Novak to bring Serbia to its
>> knees," Mr Djokovic said.
>>
>> "To it's knees"? WTF? But the fruitcake didnt say *why*...
>>
>> and:
>>
>> "They're stomping all over Novak to stomp all over Serbia and Serbian
>> people."
>>
>> Huh? ramblings of a man with severe issues...
>>
>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-07/novak-djokovic-dad-says-deportation-is-politically-motivated/100743158
>
>
> So he's won his case, and free to play. His dad still needs help. Lots.

Shit-tonnes

> Be funny if he falls in the 1/4's. :-)

Be excellent :)

> Be interesting if we get to see who is made the scapegoat. Without
> knowing the whole drama, someone's gunna be butt-fucked for this. TA?

I'm tipping Craig Tilley, the head of TA.

For the life of me I have no idea why TA was handing out information
about Visas when that was way above their pay grade. Their authority
ends with competitors meeting the requirements to play in the
tournament, not what they need to do to get into the country. NoVax's
legal team apparently stated that his visa application was handled by
TA, and his medical review panel result was sufficient grounds for him
to be exempt from meeting the vaccination requirements needed to enter
the country, and if this is the case then I can't understand why the
judge has ruled in his favour as this would clearly be in breach of the
Border Security requirements.

There is clearly more to this, and it ain't over yet.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 6:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 5:09 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 3:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 2:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should
>>>> be commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other
>>>> people's photos for his own advantage.
>>>
>>>
>>> who's photos have I used for my own advantage? put up or shut up.
>>>
>>
>> I seem to recall having you issued with a takedown notice for a photo
>> you took of mine and posted on your own website. Remember that?
>
>
> oh yes. but what 'advantage' did I receive from that?

Making yourself look big around here with your mates

On 10/01/2022 7:54 pm, Daryl wrote:
> On 10/1/22 6:46 pm, lindsay wrote:

>> Be interesting if we get to see who is made the scapegoat. Without
>> knowing the whole drama, someone's gunna be butt-fucked for this. TA?
>>>
>>>
>
> Details are certainly thin on the ground but someones arse will be in
> the firing line, my guess is TA.

Yeah, me too.

Craig Tilley, the head of TA, has been keen to leak all kinds of emails
which to me smacks of getting in early to cover his arse in the shit
storm that is no doubt coming his way. Oddly enough the comments in
today's paper were allegedly from conversations he was having with Brett
Sutton, the Victorian Chief Health Officer, and he's not the guy he
needed to be talking to about Visa compliance :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/1/22 6:46 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 10:59 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 9/01/2022 3:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 9/01/2022 1:35 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/01/2022 7:57 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 11:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/01/2022 7:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fucking mental. The cunts were smacking each other with
>>>>>>>>>>> shovels when Wog A came home and saw what he did :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kind of like around here really.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep, the FLCJC in spades.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You need to look in the mirror, you and your mates are just as
>>>>>>>> bad these days quite possibly worse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Always worse Keith. But don't take my word for it. Have a look at
>>>>>>> the posts. It's all there for everyone to see. I may not be an
>>>>>>> angel, but I don't exist in this group for the express purpose of
>>>>>>> replying to *every* comment of a particular person to repeat the
>>>>>>> same "I hate you" bullshit over and over and over.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet all you have to do is post proof of your claimed
>>>>>> qualifications to make us all go away but you curiously you won't
>>>>>> so...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlike myself, Grumpy and you obviously have no moral objection to
>>>>>> snooping and posting information publicly because he posted mine
>>>>>> with your full support even encouragement, so Grumpy - post
>>>>>> verifiable proof of Darren's qualifications and we'll be off for
>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Help your mate out here.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
>>>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put
>>>>> them on the internet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must
>>>> be ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child
>>>> porno sites.
>>>>
>>> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen
>>> to share everything that they don't seem to care.
>>
>> Sometimes information is available that doesn't concern anyone here
>> and you haven't made public yourself. Decent people with morals and
>> integrity don't take it upon themselves to post such details into a
>> public space.
>>
>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>> available information here...
>
> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?

By accident? Pull the other one.

> What kind of IT person can't do simple shit like Facebook security? On
> his own Facebook account!
>>
>> In theory he shouldn't object but in reality you get libeled as a
>> "stalker" having never revealed anything about him here. He absurdly
>> and illogically perceives saying you would never do such a thing is a
>> veiled threat to do the opposite.
>>
>> To have integrity you have to keep your word and I'm quite comfortable
>> in stating that my integrity is well intact having kept mine. He knows
>> that and he already admitted he went too far yet he is intent on just
>> digging a bigger hole for himself.
>>
>> That's his problem, not mine.
>
> Careful, Grumpy is on the verge of crying. Queensland's got enough water
> already.
>

On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
>> been called, you've been found wanting.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Walled up car collections included.

Lol :)

Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
person here. Clasener, not so much :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 5:09 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 2:22 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should be
>>> commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other people's
>>> photos for his own advantage.
>>
>>
>> who's photos have I used for my own advantage? put up or shut up.

ROTFL :) This bloke *surely* can't be this stupid by accident :)

> I seem to recall having you issued with a takedown notice for a photo
> you took of mine and posted on your own website. Remember that?

Yep. That's what I was thinking of, and there were also the photos I put
up of the trailer I built (you know, the one Clasner claimed that
someone else built and just dragged over to my place for me to weld a
couple of brackets on so I could brag about it in here), that Felix
helped himself to by posting to some hosting site.

Remember how cunty he got when I told him to take it down? Got
incredibly pissy calling me an unappreciative arshole, despite me never
asking him to do anything with them in the first place.

Fucking idiot it is :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 3:47 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/1/22 6:42 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:19 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>    Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>>
>>> Clearly it wasn't about brake systems, carburetors or timing chains :)
>>>
>>> He was a teacher, huh? The useless cunt couldn't teach anyone how to
>>> catch a fucking cold..
>>
>> It looks like this pair are in competition to see who can come up with
>> the
>> pissiest insult.
>>
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
> But they give their own foibles away when they do that. For instance,
> they are currently banging on about relevance deprivation. Well, it's
> clear to see that the relevance deprived are they and they are just
> trying on a dose of projection. Sadly for them, it's not working.
>
>   ;-)
>

Neither of them are qualified. Both of them uneducable.
Pfffffft.

:-)

On 10/01/2022 1:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 10/1/22 1:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> All I ever objected to was his nonsensical claim that he taught "shop"
>>>> at Richmond tech, as I know for a *fact* that he never did and no
>>>> "piece
>>>> of paper" he has will ever prove that :)
>>> Ah Darren but I did teach *prac* (and theory) at Richmond and it wasn't
>>> proven with a *piece of paper*. That's a wrong guess by you right there.
>>> I taught at Richmond for 16 of my 20 years in education, the remainder
>>> at Sunshine Tech in the TAFE wing. You, on the other hand, have never
>>> seen the inside of an apprentice classroom, ever.
>>>
>>> So, how do you *know for a fact*???? Seems to me like your delusions are
>>> getting really bad of late. You should seek help. Start here;
>>>
>>> https://bacchusmarshpsychologyclinic.com.au/contact
>>>>
>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else
>>>> could
>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>   Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>
>>> Darren, you've *never* been relevant to the automotive trade
>>> and you proved it by inventing trade qualifications you have *never
>>> possessed*. That's your inferiority complex driving your actions there.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Turns that *FACT* into a *NO YOU*..... APU.
>>
>>>> It's delusional, and bordering on certifiably insane.
>> ~~~~~~~
>>   And again!.
>>> Your delusions certainly are.
>>> --
>>> Xeno
>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
>>> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
>
>
> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
>
>

Good question. Jonz knows for a fact that Xeno taught at Richmond TAFE
so why isn't he correcting him on this?

It must be a condition of FLCJC membership that you throw your integrity
and dignity out the window.

On 10/1/22 8:50 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
>>> been called, you've been found wanting.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Walled up car collections included.
>
> Lol :)
>
> Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
> person here. Clasener, not so much :)
>
Well, yes, you have proven beyond any shadow of doubt that you are a
lying delusional sociopath!

Yet the thing that you harped on so much about, your *claimed*
qualifications, you don't show them. It's Ok Darren, I know why that is.
You can't show what you don't have. I get that! That's why you only
waffle on about *experience* these days. It's all you have left but, it
has to be said, *experience as a TA* isn't going to cut it as a mechanic.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/1/22 8:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:47 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 10/1/22 6:42 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:19 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How
>>>>>>> else could
>>>>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>    Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>>>
>>>> Clearly it wasn't about brake systems, carburetors or timing chains :)
>>>>
>>>> He was a teacher, huh? The useless cunt couldn't teach anyone how to
>>>> catch a fucking cold..
>>>
>>> It looks like this pair are in competition to see who can come up
>>> with the
>>> pissiest insult.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>> But they give their own foibles away when they do that. For instance,
>> they are currently banging on about relevance deprivation. Well, it's
>> clear to see that the relevance deprived are they and they are just
>> trying on a dose of projection. Sadly for them, it's not working.
>>
>>    ;-)
>>
>
>
> Neither of them are qualified. Both of them uneducable.
> Pfffffft.
>
> :-)
>
Darren couldn't even get signed up to an apprenticeship. It really bit
into him though, and it shows. I mean, who in hell boasts about doing 3
apprenticeships FFS, when they didn't even qualify for *entry* into 1.
It takes a real inferiority complex to do that. Wasn't possible to do
more than one apprenticeship in Victoria during the era in question
anyway. 2 sets of laws, not repealed until 1992 saw to that. Of course
Darren, with *no experience* in the Victorian apprentice system couldn't
be expected to know that. That's why he tripped up on it. So funny.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/1/22 9:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 1:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 2:14 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 13:50:14 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 10/1/22 1:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All I ever objected to was his nonsensical claim that he taught "shop"
>>>>> at Richmond tech, as I know for a *fact* that he never did and no
>>>>> "piece
>>>>> of paper" he has will ever prove that :)
>>>> Ah Darren but I did teach *prac* (and theory) at Richmond and it wasn't
>>>> proven with a *piece of paper*. That's a wrong guess by you right
>>>> there.
>>>> I taught at Richmond for 16 of my 20 years in education, the remainder
>>>> at Sunshine Tech in the TAFE wing. You, on the other hand, have never
>>>> seen the inside of an apprentice classroom, ever.
>>>>
>>>> So, how do you *know for a fact*???? Seems to me like your delusions
>>>> are
>>>> getting really bad of late. You should seek help. Start here;
>>>>
>>>> https://bacchusmarshpsychologyclinic.com.au/contact
>>>>>
>>>>> Relevance deprivation eats at this fuckwit like a cancer. How else
>>>>> could
>>>>> you explain anyone claiming to be "extremely relevant" to a trade
>>>>> they've not had the slightest involvement with in close to 30 years?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>   Very true. (*BUT*, he`s *read a book* (sometime/somewhere))
>>>
>>>> Darren, you've *never* been relevant to the automotive trade
>>>> and you proved it by inventing trade qualifications you have *never
>>>> possessed*. That's your inferiority complex driving your actions there.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Turns that *FACT* into a *NO YOU*..... APU.
>>>
>>>>> It's delusional, and bordering on certifiably insane.
>>> ~~~~~~~
>>>   And again!.
>>>> Your delusions certainly are.
>>>> --
>>>> Xeno
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
>>>> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
>>
>>
>> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
>> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
>> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
>> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
>>
>>
>
>
> Good question. Jonz knows for a fact that Xeno taught at Richmond TAFE
> so why isn't he correcting him on this?
>
> It must be a condition of FLCJC membership that you throw your integrity
> and dignity out the window.

You have to have it before you can discard it.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 21:08:19 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/1/22 8:50 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 1:05 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 9 January 2022 at 17:37:03 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> >
> >>> People who make grandiose claims get called on to prove them. You've
> >>> been called, you've been found wanting.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> Walled up car collections included.
> >
> > Lol :)
> >
> > Truth be known I've proved more about myself and what I do than any
> > person here. Clasener, not so much :)
> >
> Well, yes, you have proven beyond any shadow of doubt that you are a
> lying delusional sociopath!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, you have kryppy. Where`s them cars?. Inquiring minds need to know.......

>
> Yet the thing that you harped on so much about, your *claimed*
> qualifications, you don't show them. It's Ok Darren, I know why that is.
> You can't show what you don't have. I get that! That's why you only
> waffle on about *experience* these days. It's all you have left but, it
> has to be said, *experience as a TA* isn't going to cut it as a mechanic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HMmmm, a backtracking krypsis...
Still got them cars kryppy??.

> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/01/2022 5:29 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 14:44:13 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>> 20 years of *training experience* Darren.

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All that means is, there are *many*
> undertrained/ticketed so called *mechanics* out there. (Prolly
> working as *anything* other than spanner twirling since they received
> their er, grounding from a nonce.)

Remember this post of some years ago?

> I have effectively been out of the trade now for
> a mere 14 years and my "current competencies" have suffered dramatically
> as a result. Not only are my skillsets getting rusty, the trade is
> moving on at a rapid pace and my knowledge of current systems is out of
> date. Since I am no longer working in the trade, maintenance of my
> competency to anything remotely current involves a lot of research and
> that brings with it exposure to terminology.

Yeah, no prizes for guessing which sorry arsed attention whore made that
pathetic post.

That comment was made 7 years ago and as the walking personality
disorder has *not* changed his position and ventured back into the trade
in that time the *only* reasonable conclusion anyone could reach is that
his "current competencies" have only continued on their dramatic decline
and he would find himself today being quite distant and removed from the
trade he continues to claim that he is "extremely relevant" to.

Bizarre, huh?

Yet despite that, he's here day after day, speaking with authority on
automotive subjects that by his *own* admission he has zero personal
experience with, and his *only* knowledge of comes from "research" that
I would happily bet the farm on being nothing more elaborate than
whatever he can find on Google.

Do you know what the *really* bizarre thing is?

He's bagged me plenty of times for claiming "trade relevance" and I've
never done that. Not once. In fact the opposite is true in that since I
retired I've become *irrelevant*, and I couldn't be happier about that.
I don't have to please anyone other than myself, and I couldn't give a
shit about what anyone else thinks. All I've ever said on the subject is
that as someone who owns a well equipped workshop, still runs a couple
of trade accounts, gets the odd trade journal or two and does the
(rarely) occasional paying job I would consider myself to be far more
"relevant" to the automotive trade than some posing used-to-be who last
worked on a car for a living in the 1970's and who's only existence
these days is to count the tupperware containers in his garage and try
to pass Google off as his personal knowledge.

And *that's* why the moron can't leave me alone :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 7:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
>> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
>> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you don't
>> care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
>
> ROTFL, from the guy spending his days sucking up to alvey, xeno, and
> clocky.

Felix is pretty stupid :)

It's pretty easy Fetid. I was there, and Clasener wasn't. It's that
simple :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 4:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 3:45 pm, Clocky wrote:

>> It seems to me the unwarranted name calling and making public stuff
>> that's none of your business and libeling of people is all coming from
>> one source... you.
>>
>> The evidence certainly supports it and there is no shortage of it.

What evidence? The crap you imagine to be true but never show?

> Allegations without evidence. You are not worth responding to as you
> have accused me of so much without evidence providing the opportunity
> for the rest of the idiots to pile on like rabid dogs.
>
> You are nothing but a schoolyard bully.

He's a fucking knob-end.

I wonder if he's enjoying his new old Commodore :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/1/22 9:38 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 7:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 3:14 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> hey jonzie instead of sucking up to your hero with the intensity of a
>>> thousand vacuum cleaners, I suggest you ask him how he knows 'for a
>>> fact' Xeno never taught at Richmond Tech? oh sorry, I forgot you
>>> don't care about lies anymore since you joined the dark side..
>>
>> ROTFL, from the guy spending his days sucking up to alvey, xeno, and
>> clocky.
>
> Felix is pretty stupid :)
>
> It's pretty easy Fetid. I was there, and Clasener wasn't. It's that
> simple :)
>
>
>
Hey Darren, you were there *faking it*, I was there *doing it*. That is
one hell of a huge difference!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/01/2022 5:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>
>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>
>
> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.

He's just a pathetic sook :)

You can just imagine it, can't you? He'd print out 76 pages of text
covering newsgroup exchanges over a period of years, and trot down to
the local Police station where he would confidently plonk it on the
counter claiming he wanted to press charges for "Libel".

The desk sergeant would read through the first couple of pages, grab the
circus freak by the neck and bitch slap the snowflake out of him before
throwing his pathetic arse out onto the street telling him to drink a
cup of concrete and harden the fuck up :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/1/22 9:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 5:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>>
>>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>>
>>
>> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.
>
> He's just a pathetic sook :)
>
> You can just imagine it, can't you? He'd print out 76 pages of text
> covering newsgroup exchanges over a period of years, and trot down to
> the local Police station where he would confidently plonk it on the
> counter claiming he wanted to press charges for "Libel".
>
> The desk sergeant would read through the first couple of pages, grab the
> circus freak by the neck and bitch slap the snowflake out of him before
> throwing his pathetic arse out onto the street telling him to drink a
> cup of concrete and harden the fuck up :)
>
Your experience shining through Darren. Is that *your experience*? It
must be since you are so good at projecting your own experiences onto
others.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/01/2022 2:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 2:58 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>> I'm an arsehole
>>
>>
>
> Ok
>
I see what you did there felix, very clever and witty too clap clap clap.

Alvey will have to watch out, if you keep this standard of work up, he
may become surplus to requirements.

On 10/01/2022 6:07 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 6:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 10/1/22 5:47 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2022 4:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Allegations without evidence.
>>>>
>>>> I have the all evidence, don't worry about that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Another pathetic attempt at schoolyard bullying.
>>
>> If you call a statement of fact like that bullying, you have a real
>> problem with the real world.
>>
>
> every time he fires a shot he misses  :)
>
>
little felix peeked from under the curtain and squeaked "Me too"

On 10/01/2022 8:47 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 6:03 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>>> who's photos have I used for my own advantage? put up or shut up.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I seem to recall having you issued with a takedown notice for a photo
>>> you took of mine and posted on your own website. Remember that?
>>
>>
>> oh yes. but what 'advantage' did I receive from that?
>
> Making yourself look big around here with your mates

You have to give Felix some time. He's not terribly bright, and he
usually only gets things about a fortnight later.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 8:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 5:51 pm, Xeno wrote:

>>> Ask Grumpy about how he'd feel if someone shared all his publicly
>>> available information here...
>>
>> That stupid clown couldn't secure his own Facebook page - and then
>> complained when people *found it* by accident. How pissy is that?
>
> By accident? Pull the other one.

Heh :)

There is nothing "accidental" about being a stalker. Ask Alvey all about
that. Hey Yelva? How big is my mortgage pal? :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 10:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 2:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/01/2022 2:58 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm an arsehole
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ok
>>
> I see what you did there felix, very clever and witty too clap clap clap.
>
> Alvey will have to watch out, if you keep this standard of work up, he
> may become surplus to requirements.

What, you mean he hasn't been since he first got here?

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/01/2022 11:22 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/01/2022 1:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 9/01/2022 3:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>>> Presumably Grumpy found your details on public forums, that isn't
>>>> snooping, if you don't want your details put out here don't put them
>>>> on the internet.
>>>
>>>
>>> yes but ppl want them where they put them, not for them to be posted
>>> elsewhere to identify someone. and if you think otherwise, you must
>>> be ok with parents kiddy snaps being copied and posted on child porno
>>> sites.
>>>
>> There are ways of ensuring privacy, but so many people are over keen
>> to share everything that they don't seem to care.
>
> Or have a clue either way, and Felix is the last person who should be
> commenting about this as he's guilty himself of using other people's
> photos for his own advantage.
>
> Jerky's details were made public *here* in this group by he himself.
> Repeating what he himself has already posted in this group is not in
> breach of any law.
>
>

There is a reason I don't consult you over legal matters.

On Monday, 10 January 2022 at 19:32:53 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:58:36 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> > On 10/01/2022 1:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 9/01/2022 9:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Keith's FLCJC membership must have been approved...
> >>
> >> ROTFL, if you're not with us you must be against us eh? That is a
> >> pathetic philosophy.
> >>
> > Watch out Keith they'll try to bully you into submission now. It's their
> > way or the highway.
> Umm Gumps. Which poster in this ng would have issued the most "fuck off"
> directives?
> >
> > I'm an arsehole because I pointed out what they or their friends had
> > already posted and it exposed their hypocrisy.
> You're not *just* an arsehole Gumps. You're a delusional arsehole.
> >
> > You could almost use this as a case study for gang bullying by the flc.
> lol. That's right! I recall the Gumpian Logic! 'If more than one person is
> attacking an individual then this is wrong and that individual must be
> supported'.
> > They don't mind dishing it out but if you give some back you get the
> > whole crew jumping in like a pack of rabid dogs.
> Hahaha. You're a hoot Gumps! The only thing you've *ever* given back is the
> recurring sight of your arse running back to your rats nest.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
An opportune time for moi to ask *you* if you have *ever* been other than a crap spewing, shit stirring, running away CUNT, in ANY group that you have infested.?...

>
>
>
> alvey
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus