On 24/01/2022 6:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:

>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>
> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
> tedious and irritating.
>
> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
> remember one.

I don't know if he'll mention it, but there was that one time where he
was keen to trade his little Audi in on some new softcock edition BMW,
but the only problem was that there was a 4 month wait on BMW's. He was
apparently concerned that the old Audi would become mechanically
problematic during that time, so he did the only thing that made any
sense to him:

Trade the potentially problematic Audi in on *another* fucking Audi :)

Smart :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 24/1/2022 8:29 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 6:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
>
>>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>>
>> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
>> tedious and irritating.
>>
>> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
>> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
>> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
>> remember one.
>
> I don't know if he'll mention it, but there was that one time where he
> was keen to trade his little Audi in on some new softcock edition BMW,
> but the only problem was that there was a 4 month wait on BMW's. He was
> apparently concerned that the old Audi would become mechanically
> problematic during that time, so he did the only thing that made any
> sense to him:
>
> Trade the potentially problematic Audi in on *another* fucking Audi :)
>
> Smart :)
>
Well, he could have traded it in on a problematic Navara and had
problems *from 40,000 kilometres*. I find it interesting that Alvey
bought *another* Audi but you didn't want to touch another Navara. Seems
to be the way of Navara owners, once bitten, twice shy, avoid buying
another!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 24/01/2022 5:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but he was
>>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't
>>>>>>>>> need to "tell
>>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop
>>>>>>>>> out from
>>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to
>>>>>>>> face,
>>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he
>>>>>> refuses for
>>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>>
>>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>>
>>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>>
>>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>>
>>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>>> beware of?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>>
>> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of what
>> keith?
>
> See my previous reply - only one to a customer.

is your mission at this time in your life to prove how stupid you really
are?

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 24/01/2022 6:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know
>>>>> you're
>>>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>>>
>>>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero
>>>> differentiates
>>>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>>>
>>>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>>>> "Yosemite sam"
>>>
>>> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
>>> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
>>
>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>
> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
> tedious and irritating.
>
> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
> remember one.
>

he has posted questions and links. my memory is obviously better than yours.

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 24/01/2022 3:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know you're
>>>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>>>
>>>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero differentiates
>>>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>>>
>>>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>>>> "Yosemite sam"
>>>
>>> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
>>> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
>>
>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>
> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
> tedious and irritating.
>
> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
> remember one.
>

You're asleep at the wheel mate.

On 24/01/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 5:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't
>>>>>>>>>> need to "tell
>>>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop
>>>>>>>>>> out from
>>>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to
>>>>>>>>> face,
>>>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he
>>>>>>> refuses for
>>>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>>>
>>>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>>>> beware of?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>>>
>>> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of what
>>> keith?
>>
>> See my previous reply - only one to a customer.
>
>
> is your mission at this time in your life to prove how stupid you really
> are?
>

Go easy. I think he's losing his marbles :-(

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:45:50 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 24/01/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 24/01/2022 5:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't
>>>>>>>>>>> need to "tell
>>>>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop
>>>>>>>>>>> out from
>>>>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to
>>>>>>>>>> face,
>>>>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he
>>>>>>>> refuses for
>>>>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>>>>> beware of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>>>>
>>>> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of what
>>>> keith?
>>>
>>> See my previous reply - only one to a customer.
>>
>> is your mission at this time in your life to prove how stupid you really
>> are?
>>
>
> Go easy. I think he's losing his marbles :-(

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:01:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 6:54 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:05:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/01/2022 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:02:46 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to "tell
>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face, but the
>>>>> fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop out
>>>>> from alvey aka the black knight.
>>>>
>>>> keith, I appreciate the obvious fact that you're desperate to try and save
>>>> some long-gone cred, but this 'face to face' tactic is as poor a choice and
>>>> as big a Fail as your Black Knight analogy. If you want a better example of
>>>> a Python analogy then, "You're only making it worse for yourself!"
>>>>
>>>> Or, in closing, "Now go away. Or I shall taunt you a zecond time."
>>>
>>> Alv, you have the worst case of rectomyopia that I have ever seen (and
>>> I've seen quite a few), maybe some medical student could do a study as
>>> his PhD thesis.
>>>
>>> Anyway enjoy your weekend I'll be away for a few days...
>>
>> That's fortunate. For you too! Then you may not hear the laughter at
>> "rectomyopia". This literally, and *only*, means 'being too short-sighted
>> to read the right hand page of a book'.
>
> It is actually disease suffered by smartarses that causes them to stick
> their head up their arse

What decade did you last admit that you stuffed up? It has happened, hasn't
it?

And incidentally, what you *should* be referring to is a 'recto-cranial
inversion'. "disease"? Pfft.

>> It is very, very rare for an MD undergrad to do a PhD.
>
> To get to a PhD you have to start as an undergraduate, didn't you know that?

Look keith, I don't know if you're deliberately misconstruing or, as opined
elsewhere, you're losing your marble(s), either way the result is tedious
and boring.
>> Coupla zingers there keith.
>
> Poor work alv try harder next time.

That's not necessary keith.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:14:46 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know you're
>>>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>>>
>>>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero differentiates
>>>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>>>
>>>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>>>> "Yosemite sam"
>>>
>>> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
>>> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
>>
>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>
> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
> tedious and irritating.
>
> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
> remember one.

lol!

It's occassions like this when a quote from the classics is positively
demanded. In this case it's, "You cannot be serious!"

keith, if you can't tell that this group hasn't been about cars for years
then there's no hope for you.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 20:29:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 24/01/2022 6:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
>
>>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>>
>> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
>> tedious and irritating.
>>
>> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
>> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
>> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
>> remember one.
>
> I don't know if he'll mention it, but there was that one time where he
> was keen to trade his little Audi in on some new softcock edition BMW,
> but the only problem was that there was a 4 month wait on BMW's. He was
> apparently concerned that the old Audi would become mechanically
> problematic during that time, so he did the only thing that made any
> sense to him:
>
> Trade the potentially problematic Audi in on *another* fucking Audi :)
>
> Smart :)

Judging "smart" is another task which you're unqualified for Fraudster.

Frinstance... Say that your errr 'creative re-imagining' above was correct,
all you'd achieve by posting it would be to make an enemy. Ok. You still
with me? I can go slower if you like. Ok, sooo, do you think that you,
being a monstrous liar, fraud and hypocrite, and having more badly hidden
skeletons in your 'house' than John Wayne Gacy, should be creating any more
enemies? That wouldn't be a very "smart" thing to do. Would it Fraudster?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Tuesday, 25 January 2022 at 00:55:55 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 5:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you. you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> but he was
> >>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't
> >>>>>>>>> need to "tell
> >>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
> >>>>>>>>> offered the
> >>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop
> >>>>>>>>> out from
> >>>>>>>>> keith.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to
> >>>>>>>> face,
> >>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he
> >>>>>> refuses for
> >>>>>> reasons unexplained.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
> >>>>
> >>>> It would hardly be accidental
> >>>>
> >>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
> >>>>
> >>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
> >>>> beware of?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
> >>
> >> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of what
> >> keith?
> >
> > See my previous reply - only one to a customer.
> is your mission at this time in your life to prove how stupid you really
> are?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~~
Nah, *You* have *that* area well and truly covered!.

On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 17:55:32 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 5:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
> > On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
> >>>>>>>>>> he was
> >>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
~~~~~~~~~
Thats yer parkinsons you silly old cunt.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need
> >>>>>>> to "tell
> >>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
> >>>>>>> offered the
> >>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
> >>>>>>> keith.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
> >>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses for
> >>>> reasons unexplained.
> >>>
> >>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
> >>
> >> It would hardly be accidental
> >>
> >> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
> >>
> >> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
> >> beware of?
> >>
> >
> > You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>
> Ask him, I have no idea.

On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 18:14:53 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >
> >> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know you're
> >>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
> >>>
> >>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero differentiates
> >>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
> >>>
> >>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
> >>> "Yosemite sam"
> >>
> >> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
> >> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
> >
> > Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
> > after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
> > him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~````
Wow! silence in the aviary....Nice thought.

>
> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
> tedious and irritating.
>
> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
> remember one.

On 25/01/2022 6:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 18:14:53 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:

>>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~````
> Wow! silence in the aviary....Nice thought.

Get your filter working. That's the only way you'll ever see these
fucktards disappear.

There's *already* been a shit-tonne of "put up", and it only ever leads
to ridiculous goalpost shift. "You don't have the tools" changes to "you
don't use the tools" once proof of having them is indeed offered, or "it
never happened and you were never there" morphs into "I never claimed it
never happened. My only concern was about the location".

It goes on and on, and the list is endless. I've offered up *mountains*
of proof for things when "bullshit" was called, and not on *one* single
occasion have these fucking cock tuggers done *anything* other than
change the argument. Not once have they ever accepted that their
bullshit call was wrong :)

So I don't bother anymore. They can toss off about whatever imaginary
rubbish they like and I couldn't care less. I don't need to make them go
away. My filter already has :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 20/01/2022 5:52 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 3:32 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:41:55 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/01/2022 11:37 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah interesting. His memory of issues seems to be quite self
>>>> aggrandizing. His bullying and threats to me over the years have been
>>>> quite well documented in the group.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't share the photo of him that I found on facebook which was done
>>>> to me. I only ever shared information he himself had put on the
>>>> newsgroup. Yes he had shared his name here before. He conveniently
>>>> forgets that. He also constantly taunts me about having poor IT skills
>>>> because he found xeno's photo, but then accuses me of being a stalker.
>>>> Hmm HE found xeno's photo.... He states above I didn't share xeno's
>>>> history.... I wonder who is the stalker. He accuses others of the very
>>>> things he does himself.
>>>
>>> He does, and seemingly has no problem with it whenever he *does* do it
>>> himself. Like when he thought it was a great joke to help himself to my
>>> profile pic and upload it to some pisstake site for his own amusement,
>>> yet if you did the same thing to him you'd hear him crying about it for
>>> fucking *ages*.
>>>
>>> He just loves being a victim....
>>
>> Ummmm Darren. You just pecked out a para of you playing the whining
>> victim.
>>
>
> Hasn't he just.
>
> Posting his facebook *public* profile pic that *he* posted online but
> was shared by someone else *here* is a whole different matter to
> stalking and snooping to find information not made public here and
> posting it here.

Like xeno snooping around the records offices in Victoria you mean?

> There is a *very* clear distinction.

true.

On 24/01/2022 11:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 5:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't
>>>>>>>>>> need to "tell
>>>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop
>>>>>>>>>> out from
>>>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to
>>>>>>>>> face,
>>>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he
>>>>>>> refuses for
>>>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>>>
>>>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>>>> beware of?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>>>
>>> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of what
>>> keith?
>>
>> See my previous reply - only one to a customer.
>
>
> is your mission at this time in your life to prove how stupid you really
> are?
>
That's a mission that I leave to you, you're really good at proving how
stupid you are.

On 24/01/2022 6:29 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:55:26 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2022 5:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need
>>>>>>>>> to "tell
>>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from
>>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he refuses for
>>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>>
>>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>>
>>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>>
>>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>>
>>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should I
>>>> beware of?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>>
>> Ask him, I have no idea.
>
> I have *lots* of ideas keith. But while none of them are about being
> "scared", a few of them are about you. Unsuprisingly, exactly none of them
> are complimentary.
>
> And please spare me any more childish and stupid comebacks. They've been as
> flat and boring as the dirtscape of Tucker Cct and will be enthusiastically
> ignored if you can't help yourself.

Cop-out.

On 25/01/2022 6:18 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:01:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2022 6:54 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:05:23 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:02:46 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but he was
>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to "tell
>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered the
>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out from keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face, but the
>>>>>> fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop out
>>>>>> from alvey aka the black knight.
>>>>>
>>>>> keith, I appreciate the obvious fact that you're desperate to try and save
>>>>> some long-gone cred, but this 'face to face' tactic is as poor a choice and
>>>>> as big a Fail as your Black Knight analogy. If you want a better example of
>>>>> a Python analogy then, "You're only making it worse for yourself!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, in closing, "Now go away. Or I shall taunt you a zecond time."
>>>>
>>>> Alv, you have the worst case of rectomyopia that I have ever seen (and
>>>> I've seen quite a few), maybe some medical student could do a study as
>>>> his PhD thesis.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway enjoy your weekend I'll be away for a few days...
>>>
>>> That's fortunate. For you too! Then you may not hear the laughter at
>>> "rectomyopia". This literally, and *only*, means 'being too short-sighted
>>> to read the right hand page of a book'.
>>
>> It is actually disease suffered by smartarses that causes them to stick
>> their head up their arse
>
> What decade did you last admit that you stuffed up? It has happened, hasn't
> it?

I was wrong once, I thought for a moment y=that I was wrong

> And incidentally, what you *should* be referring to is a 'recto-cranial
> inversion'. "disease"? Pfft.

Only by little smart-arses

>>> It is very, very rare for an MD undergrad to do a PhD.
>>
>> To get to a PhD you have to start as an undergraduate, didn't you know that?
>
> Look keith, I don't know if you're deliberately misconstruing or, as opined
> elsewhere, you're losing your marble(s), either way the result is tedious
> and boring.

Yet you keep comoing back for more.

>>> Coupla zingers there keith.
>>
>> Poor work alv try harder next time.
>
> That's not necessary keith.

Not possible more likely.
>

On 24/01/2022 5:38 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 24/1/2022 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 11:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine response,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to
>>>>> "tell
>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was offered
>>>>> the
>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>
>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out
>>>>> from keith.
>>>>
>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to face,
>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another dismal cop
>>>> out from alvey aka the black knight.
>>>
>>> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You
>>> didn't turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a face
>>> to face?
>>
>> Firstly, I don't recall any such post, perhaps you'd care to find it.
>> Secondly, passing through Coffs doesn't imply that we stopped there.
>>
> Not overly fussed about looking but you were on your way to Port
> Macquarie or the like. I didn't imply that you stopped but, in passing,
> you could have. The invite was there.
>
Last time I drove through Coffs, I was doing a direct drive from Shoal
Bay to home, that's a 9 hour drive (plus nearly an hour to get across
the border) so it would be unlikely that I'd stop for a chat in the middle.

On 25/01/2022 12:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 6:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/01/2022 6:20 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19/01/2022 6:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Look *keithr0*, which I'm guessing isn't your real name, I know
>>>>>> you're
>>>>>> desperate, but this is just plain silly.
>>>>>
>>>>> My name is Keith, my surname begins with R, and the zero
>>>>> differentiates
>>>>> me from all the other keithrs out there.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a bit different from calling yourself something stupid like
>>>>> "Yosemite sam"
>>>>
>>>> Or Felix_Unger, or whatever other ridiculous nyms that he probably
>>>> pissed himself at thinking they were hilarious.
>>>
>>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could explain to
>>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>>
>> Actually I find the petty snipes from yourself day after day after day
>> tedious and irritating.
>>
>> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
>> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
>> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
>> remember one.
>>
>
> he has posted questions and links. my memory is obviously better than
> yours.
>
Point them out then.

On 25/1/2022 8:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 25/01/2022 6:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 18:14:53 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes day
>>>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could
>>>> explain to
>>>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~````
>> Wow! silence in the aviary....Nice thought.
>
> Get your filter working. That's the only way you'll ever see these
> fucktards disappear.

And that's *only* because you have no trade papers to show. As you've
been told, you can *shame me* into leaving, just provide *verifiable*
proof of your manifold claims. After all, I'm the one saying you have no
papers because the Govt. has no records with your name on them. You can
verify this yourself at PROV. But you won't do any of this, will you?
>
> There's *already* been a shit-tonne of "put up", and it only ever leads
> to ridiculous goalpost shift. "You don't have the tools" changes to "you
> don't use the tools" once proof of having them is indeed offered, or "it
> never happened and you were never there" morphs into "I never claimed it
> never happened. My only concern was about the location".

I was right 100% on the location. I made an assumption based on your
refusal to accept evidence I proffered that *Malvern* was the location,
an assumption any logical thinker would make.
>
> It goes on and on, and the list is endless. I've offered up *mountains*
> of proof for things when "bullshit" was called, and not on *one* single
> occasion have these fucking cock tuggers done *anything* other than
> change the argument. Not once have they ever accepted that their
> bullshit call was wrong :)

You don't offer up the evidence that matters - papers with your unique
number on them - and that is because you don't have any.
>
> So I don't bother anymore. They can toss off about whatever imaginary
> rubbish they like and I couldn't care less. I don't need to make them go
> away. My filter already has :)

Yeah, right, that leaky filter. We know all about that.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 25/1/2022 8:32 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 5:38 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 24/1/2022 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 11:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 20/1/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a '67
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth do
>>>>>>>>>>>> you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to face, but
>>>>>>>>> he was
>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't need to
>>>>>> "tell
>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop out
>>>>>> from keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face to
>>>>> face, but the fact remains that you obviously are. It's another
>>>>> dismal cop out from alvey aka the black knight.
>>>>
>>>> I invited you to drop in on your way past here some time ago. You
>>>> didn't turn up at my door. Can I assume you too were scared of a
>>>> face to face?
>>>
>>> Firstly, I don't recall any such post, perhaps you'd care to find it.
>>> Secondly, passing through Coffs doesn't imply that we stopped there.
>>>
>> Not overly fussed about looking but you were on your way to Port
>> Macquarie or the like. I didn't imply that you stopped but, in
>> passing, you could have. The invite was there.
>>
> Last time I drove through Coffs, I was doing a direct drive from Shoal
> Bay to home, that's a 9 hour drive (plus nearly an hour to get across
> the border) so it would be unlikely that I'd stop for a chat in the middle.

This was pre-Covid. probably 3 or more years back.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 25/01/2022 8:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/01/2022 12:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>> Can you point to a post that you have made here that contained
>>> interesting and relevant information in regard to cars, or even a
>>> question relevant to the stated object of this NG? Buggered if I can
>>> remember one.
>>>
>>
>> he has posted questions and links. my memory is obviously better than
>> yours.
>>
> Point them out then.

You know you're asking an idiot who struggles to remember his *own*
comments, let alone those of anyone else, right?

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 25/01/2022 8:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 25/01/2022 6:39 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 24 January 2022 at 18:14:53 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>>> Gee keith. Don't you find Fraudster posting these same pissy snipes
>>>> day
>>>> after day after day tedious and irritating? Perhaps you could
>>>> explain to
>>>> him that if he Put Up we'd all Shut Up?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~````
>> Wow! silence in the aviary....Nice thought.
>
> Get your filter working. That's the only way you'll ever see these
> fucktards disappear.
>
> There's *already* been a shit-tonne of "put up", and it only ever
> leads to ridiculous goalpost shift. "You don't have the tools" changes
> to "you don't use the tools" once proof of having them is indeed
> offered, or "it never happened and you were never there" morphs into
> "I never claimed it never happened. My only concern was about the
> location".
>
> It goes on and on, and the list is endless. I've offered up
> *mountains* of proof for things

such as? and mountains?! if there was ever any more like mole hills

> when "bullshit" was called, and not on *one* single occasion have
> these fucking cock tuggers done *anything* other than change the
> argument. Not once have they ever accepted that their bullshit call
> was wrong :)
>
> So I don't bother anymore. They can toss off about whatever imaginary
> rubbish they like and I couldn't care less. I don't need to make them
> go away. My filter already has :)
>
>
>
>
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"my own words are irrelevant"
-noddy 5/08/2017 4:12 PM

On 25/01/2022 8:23 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 24/01/2022 11:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 24/01/2022 5:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/01/2022 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 20/01/2022 3:13 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 20/01/2022 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:47 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:36:55 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 9:18 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 6:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 20/01/2022 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:11:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/01/2022 8:13 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:25:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 6:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2022 4:45 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:45 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 4:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 11:26 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 10:24 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2022 9:36 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2022 9:43 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Come to that, is anything that you claim true, as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested, you could just as easily be an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly lesbian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> living on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disability pension in Redbank Plains driving a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '67 Corolla.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the possibility that you don't exist at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sock puppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a waste of time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Game Over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cop out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound surprised. You didn't expect a genuine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response, did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? This is Alvey you're talking to. The bloke who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant noise than anyone but pisses himself and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once you put him on the spot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no liar. you're up to your usual tricks of snipping the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context. it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was Keith who copped out. read the thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The alvey worshiper rides again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the juvenile nit-wit posts again. don't like the truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you. you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that in common with your new BFF the fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth hurts doesn't it felix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was you. you're the one who copped out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your little mate was offered the chance of a face to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> face, but he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too scared to take it up. That's a cop-out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Absolutely quaking in my thongs keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And pray tell, what exactly am I supposed to be scared of?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea alvey you tell me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can't imagine, that's why I was asking. Besides, I don't
>>>>>>>>>>> need to "tell
>>>>>>>>>>> you" keith. It was *you* who blurted, "Your little mate was
>>>>>>>>>>> offered the
>>>>>>>>>>> chance of a face to face, but he was too scared to take it up".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As the question remains unanswered, it's another dismal cop
>>>>>>>>>>> out from
>>>>>>>>>>> keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As I have said, I have no idea why you are scared of a face
>>>>>>>>>> to face,
>>>>>>>>>> but the fact remains that you obviously are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Illogical conclusion by any measure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is illogical about it? I made an offer to meet him, he
>>>>>>>> refuses for
>>>>>>>> reasons unexplained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deliberately "unexplained" keith.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would hardly be accidental
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In your clichespeak it'd be, "beware of what you wish for".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wish for good health and peace for all mankind. So what should
>>>>>> I beware of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You implied Alvey would be "too scared". "Too scared" of what keith?
>>>>
>>>> Correction... you *stated* Alvey was too scared. "Too scared" of
>>>> what keith?
>>>
>>> See my previous reply - only one to a customer.
>>
>>
>> is your mission at this time in your life to prove how stupid you
>> really are?
>>
> That's a mission that I leave to you, you're really good at proving
> how stupid you are.