On 20/02/2022 8:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 5:40 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 3:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 11:37 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and
>>>>>> it doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>>>
>>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Where does that condone lying?
>>
>>
>> you've said you don't care if noddy's claims are true, therefore you
>> condone lying by implication if they're not ie. you don't care if
>> he's lying.  (and all indications are that he is)
>>
>>
> No I said that I don't care whether he has any qualifications or not
> or whether he owned a business called "Noddys automotive".
>
> If you can't see the difference, ask somebody more intelligent.

well i certainly wouldn't be asking you because you're basically an
arrogant asshole with an over inflated ego.

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 20/2/2022 12:30 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 19/02/2022 11:12 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 19/2/2022 11:48 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2022 10:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 19/2/2022 9:17 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 19/02/2022 7:24 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 00:32:00 +1100, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 10:48 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/2/2022 10:16 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/2/22 4:01 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 2:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 11:54 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 8:24 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 8:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually programmers specialize in one or two languages only,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't they? so is this then a case of jack of all trades,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master of none?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have absolutely no concept about the software business.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I programmed my Mac in Basic does that count?  :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No on two counts. One, it's a fucking Mac and two it's BASIC
>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> well back in the 1980's it was the best home computer available.
>>>>>>>>>> It was the computer for people who knew nothing about computers
>>>>>>>>>> (still is too).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've got a new Mac mini which replaced the old Mac mini that I was
>>>>>>>>> given for free, by far the most reliable computer I've ever owned.
>>>>>>>>> I don't claim to know anything about computers and I don't need to
>>>>>>>>> because it just does what its supposed to and never gives me any
>>>>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>>>>> Funny thing is I hate iPhone's but I think the Mac Mini is
>>>>>>>>> brilliant.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Mac Mini is a brilliant piece of kit, it just does what it is
>>>>>>>> supposed to and doesn't give you grief. I will be sticking a 1TB
>>>>>>>> SSD
>>>>>>>> in it soon, get rid of the old 5400 rpm platter drive.
>>>>>>>> Generally, if I
>>>>>>>> want to tinker with computers, I drag out a Windows based one -
>>>>>>>> software and hardware tinkering galore, and they need it. Been
>>>>>>>> doing a
>>>>>>>> lot of that this past couple of weeks, going to give away a
>>>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>> my old Window (Win7) computers. I built them around 2007-2010 from
>>>>>>>> scratch but they have spent a lot of time in the bottom of the
>>>>>>>> wardrobe unused these past few years. Time they had some love -
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> someone else.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't like SSD's. you can lose all your data in an instant.
>>>>>> Ummm. You can on a platter too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> far less likely and recovery is possible.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>   Either one though, you *must* backup.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I do
>>>>>
>>>> Backup stuff with a Seagate 1TB drive and you may as well not have a
>>>> backup. Those useless POS turn themselves into a *32 Meg drive* at
>>>> the drop of a hat. Ask me how I know, I have 5 here that *used to
>>>> be* in my server. Was told by various people around the traps, and
>>>> the helpdesk in Canada, that it was a *firmware issue*. They had a
>>>> fix, so they said, but I had one drive that had been through the RMA
>>>> system and *fixed*. It proceeded to die again, that's how I found
>>>> out they were a POS. A set of 2 TB Western Digita ldrives solved the
>>>> problem and they still run perfectly nearly 10 years later.
>>>> . >
>>>
>>> Of course you do. Are they the 7200.11 series. If so they are fixable by
>>
>> I do indeed. Want the serial numbers? They are out on the table at the
>> moment. Seems like I am now down to 4 with one seemingly dead. Not the
>> 7200.11  See below.
>  Photos clearly showing the model numbers and serial numbers would be

You're a bit late and, I might add, asking a lot since you sanction the
fraud when he refuses to offer up *any proof at all* of his self
aggrandising claims. I gave the 4 working ones away to a chap this
morning when I gave him a computer I no longer needed. I told him they
might die so mirror one's data to another. He's happy enough with them.
As for the dead one still remaining here;

Barracuda 7200.12
S/N 9VP5BR14
ST31000528AS
P/N 9SL154-302
Firmware CC38
Date Code 10356

> perfect. Also a photo of a bios screen showing one of the unit serial
> numbers and the 32mb capacity.

No can do! It was working, then suddenly, on a reboot, the drive was no
longer seen. I'd not long before been updating the Linux OS on it after
it had mostly sat idle in the cupboard here for nigh on a decade here.
Speaking of decade, I'll have been up in this part of the country for a
decade in a couple of months time. How time flies. Anyway, the drive is
now FF&FFH. It has had bugger all use in that time too.
>>
>>> anyone with a modicum of ability to research and a small amount of
>>> electronics ability. Look it up on google. Funnily enough your arch
>>
>> When these die, the *only* option at the time was to send them back to
>> the manufacturer. One of mine went back whilst one I bought *new* had
>> supposedly been RMA'd and was sold to me by a local dealer and had all
>> the sealed Seagate wrapping on it. It wasn't a grey import either, as
>> verified by the Canadian helpdesk.
>
> Very interesting.. The 32mb problem only affected a series of 7200.11
> drives and was not reported as an issue on the 7200.12 drives.
>>
>>> enemy had exactly the same issue a number of years ago and you failed
>>> to mention a thing about yours. How bizarre.
>>>
>> Mine are 7200.12 Not bizarre in the slightest.
>>

>
> Extremely bizarre that you neither mentioned it when Noddy had the issue

Why should I care if Darren had the issue? Anyway, I don't recall even
seeing it mentioned. *I* had the issue and it cost me trust in my
server's reliability so I bought decent drives (WD) and have never had
an issue since.

> nor did the 7200.12 drive have a firmware issue that caused the 32mb
> bug. It was confined to the 7200.11 series.
>
Odd then how I had the issue with a few of them.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 20/2/2022 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter. you're
>>> an idiot.
>>
>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>
>
> ffs are you not following the thread?
>
> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or whether
> he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive, and neither
> do I care in the least one way or another."
>
>
Looks clear cut to me.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 20/2/2022 1:11 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 6:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>
>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>
>> It's rather bizarre that these fuckwits would make such a noise about
>> "truth" and how vitally important it is in an irrelevant newsgroup
>> like this, yet not one of them seems keen to say a *single* word about
>> Clasener and his horrendous history of bullshit that's been
>> perpetrated in this group.
>>
>
>
> Reckon your relentless bullying, lies and abuse might have something to
> do with that?

Darren is incapable of grasping such concepts, symptomatic of his
affliction - narcissism!
>
> Also, I know *he's* qualified.
>
> As keith said;
>
> "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he
>  is lying."
>
> So you're lying.
>
>
>
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 20/2/2022 3:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 11:37 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>
>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>
>>
>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>
>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive, and
>> neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>
>>
> Where does that condone lying?

By running away from *calling it out* for what it is - lying.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 20/02/2022 11:31 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 20/2/2022 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>
>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>
>>
>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>
>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>
>>
> Looks clear cut to me.
>
yep. he's saying he doesn't care if noddy is lying or not

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 20/02/2022 10:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 20/2/2022 12:30 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 19/02/2022 11:12 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 19/2/2022 11:48 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> Of course you do. Are they the 7200.11 series. If so they are
>>>> fixable by
>>>
>>> I do indeed. Want the serial numbers? They are out on the table at
>>> the moment. Seems like I am now down to 4 with one seemingly dead.
>>> Not the 7200.11  See below.
>>   Photos clearly showing the model numbers and serial numbers would be
>
> You're a bit late and, I might add, asking a lot since you sanction the
> fraud when he refuses to offer up *any proof at all* of his self
> aggrandising claims. I gave the 4 working ones away to a chap this
> morning when I gave him a computer I no longer needed. I told him they
> might die so mirror one's data to another. He's happy enough with them.
> As for the dead one still remaining here;
>
> Barracuda 7200.12
> S/N 9VP5BR14
> ST31000528AS
> P/N 9SL154-302
> Firmware CC38
> Date Code 10356

As expected when asked to stump up proof the excuses fly. You're full of
shot xeno as usual. You see you stated they had the 32mb issue now
you're stating you gave them away this morning. I call extreme bullshit.
I'd be certain that the one you have listed here did not have the 32mb
issue as they can be seen in bios.
>
>> perfect. Also a photo of a bios screen showing one of the unit serial
>> numbers and the 32mb capacity.
>
> No can do! It was working, then suddenly, on a reboot, the drive was no
> longer seen. I'd not long before been updating the Linux OS on it after
> it had mostly sat idle in the cupboard here for nigh on a decade here.
> Speaking of decade, I'll have been up in this part of the country for a
> decade in a couple of months time. How time flies. Anyway, the drive is
> now FF&FFH. It has had bugger all use in that time too.
>>>
Except the unseen part is bullshit if it had the 32mb issue.

>>>> anyone with a modicum of ability to research and a small amount of
>>>> electronics ability. Look it up on google. Funnily enough your arch
>>>
>>> When these die, the *only* option at the time was to send them back
>>> to the manufacturer. One of mine went back whilst one I bought *new*
>>> had supposedly been RMA'd and was sold to me by a local dealer and
>>> had all the sealed Seagate wrapping on it. It wasn't a grey import
>>> either, as verified by the Canadian helpdesk.
>>
>> Very interesting.. The 32mb problem only affected a series of 7200.11
>> drives and was not reported as an issue on the 7200.12 drives.
>>>
>>>> enemy had exactly the same issue a number of years ago and you
>>>> failed to mention a thing about yours. How bizarre.
>>>>
>>> Mine are 7200.12 Not bizarre in the slightest.
>>>
>
>>
>> Extremely bizarre that you neither mentioned it when Noddy had the issue
>
> Why should I care if Darren had the issue? Anyway, I don't recall even
> seeing it mentioned. *I* had the issue and it cost me trust in my
> server's reliability so I bought decent drives (WD) and have never had
> an issue since.
>
>> nor did the 7200.12 drive have a firmware issue that caused the 32mb
>> bug. It was confined to the 7200.11 series.
>>
> Odd then how I had the issue with a few of them.
>

Very odd. I'd say you were either mistaken about the drive model or
lying... I'd say lying considering you stated they were stuffed with the
32mb issue and now you just happened to give 4 of them away this morning
after I asked for proof last night. You're a liar xeno. A pathetic
excuse for a human being.

Your whole story is ludicrous. Absolute bullshit.

On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:13:24 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/02/2022 5:40 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 3:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 11:37 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>>>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>>>
>>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Where does that condone lying?
>>
>> you've said you don't care if noddy's claims are true, therefore you
>> condone lying by implication if they're not ie. you don't care if he's
>> lying.  (and all indications are that he is)
>>
> No I said that I don't care whether he has any qualifications or not or
> whether he owned a business called "Noddys automotive".
>
> If you can't see the difference, ask somebody more intelligent.

There's two more examples of the Fraudster/keith shared DNA.

1. They both commit GBH on English.
2. Fraudster usually concludes with a denigration of his targets' sanity or
intelligence, whereas keefy uses the twin of that by closing with a
proclamation on how smart he is.

Fascinating stuff!
Are they the same person? Have they ever been seen together? Is keef the
Fraudsters real father? And most importantly, which SBS newsreader is
hotter? Catalina Florez or Janice Petersen?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 21/02/2022 12:30 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 10:29 pm, Xeno wrote:

>>> nor did the 7200.12 drive have a firmware issue that caused the 32mb
>>> bug. It was confined to the 7200.11 series.
>>>
>> Odd then how I had the issue with a few of them.
>>
>
> Very odd. I'd say you were either mistaken about the drive model or
> lying... I'd say lying considering you stated they were stuffed with the
> 32mb issue and now you just happened to give 4 of them away this morning
> after I asked for proof last night. You're a liar xeno. A pathetic
> excuse for a human being.
>
> Your whole story is ludicrous. Absolute bullshit.

Of the highest order. His story is nothing other than absolute
nonsensical bullshit in the extreme, but then he has form. Like claiming
that he and Krypsis are different people, that I deleted posts, that he
worked with a guy who just happened to live where I do 20 years previous
to me, yada yada yada. The list is endless, and utterly ridiculous.

"Oh, I had them, but I can't show them to you as I gave them away this
morning". For fuck's sake if I'd said this you'd hear the FLC crying
"bullshit" from Mars, but I'll bet my left one that you won't hear any
of them say a single word about it as despite all their insane claims
about the importance of truth and how they attack bullshit whenever they
see it they are *clearly* all liars and are only ever interested in
playing the man rather than the ball.

Their ridiculous moral stance against bullshit is bullshit in itself,
and their support of this lying cunt of a thing speaks volumes about the
lot of them :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:15:14 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 20/02/2022 5:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>>> They are your own words and prove you dodge questions and lack
>>>> integrity. That's a problem for you, not me.
>>>>
>>> Whatever.
>>
>> 'whatever' doesn't cut it
>>
> It cuts it for me, if it doesn't for you then that's your problem.

A man who is into sadism, necrophilia and bestiality is flogging a dead
horse. And he's probably called keith.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 07:45:06 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 21/02/2022 12:30 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 10:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>>>> nor did the 7200.12 drive have a firmware issue that caused the 32mb
>>>> bug. It was confined to the 7200.11 series.
>>>>
>>> Odd then how I had the issue with a few of them.
>>>
>>
>> Very odd. I'd say you were either mistaken about the drive model or
>> lying... I'd say lying considering you stated they were stuffed with the
>> 32mb issue and now you just happened to give 4 of them away this morning
>> after I asked for proof last night. You're a liar xeno. A pathetic
>> excuse for a human being.
>>
>> Your whole story is ludicrous. Absolute bullshit.
>
> Of the highest order. His story is nothing other than absolute
> nonsensical bullshit in the extreme, but then he has form. Like claiming
> that he and Krypsis are different people, that I deleted posts, that he
> worked with a guy who just happened to live where I do 20 years previous
> to me, yada yada yada. The list is endless, and utterly ridiculous.

Gee Fraudster, don't you get tired of repeating the same claptrap every
day?

snip more repetitious whining from He Who Couldn't Care Less
What People Post of Castle Chickenshit (Vic).

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/02/2022 10:37 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 20/2/2022 3:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 11:37 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>>
>>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>>
>>>
>>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>>
>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>
>>>
>> Where does that condone lying?
>
> By running away from *calling it out* for what it is - lying.
>
ROTFL, so the only option is to agree with you, now that's real arrogance.

On 20/02/2022 11:09 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 11:31 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/2/2022 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and it
>>>>> doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>>
>>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>>
>>>
>>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>>
>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>
>>>
>> Looks clear cut to me.
>>
> yep. he's saying he doesn't care if noddy is lying or not
>
>
You have a great deal of trouble understanding plain english, it does
not mean that much as you want it to.

On 20/02/2022 8:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 5:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 3:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 12:22 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 20/02/2022 6:24 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/02/2022 1:32 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 19/02/2022 11:27 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 12:24 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 5:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 12:05 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't "expect answers to [keith blah blah]", but I *do*
>>>>>>>>>>>> expect answers to
>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate questions concerning claims which someone makes.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Whether you can
>>>>>>>>>>>> see it or not, there's a big difference there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter alvey, the bargain is you give answers, you
>>>>>>>>>>> get answers. like it or leave it the choice is yours.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You only answer questions that provide you with an opportunity
>>>>>>>>>> to boost your own ego. You don't answer questions that go to
>>>>>>>>>> the heart of your integrity however, you evade those wholesale.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Really? now you get to back up the accusation. Go ahead, make
>>>>>>>>> my day.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The usual smartarse nonsense from alvey and a fawning follow up
>>>>>>>> to that from xeno, but nothing from clocky? Odd that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh you want an example question that proves you lack integrity?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's one:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Oct 7 2021
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You assert to another poster:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proven liar.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the
>>>>>>> claim is
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is
>>>>>>> unproven, he
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Given your assertion above that "He asserts that the claim is
>>>>>>> true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I then asked:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> *no* evidence has been provided or found anywhere,
>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your response:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Whatever" isn't an answer. Given what you had just stated, "yes"
>>>>>>> was the only answer you could have given here if you had *any*
>>>>>>> integrity at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You then went on to evade answering the question as seen below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>> If there is only one course of action available then
>>>>>>> there are no
>>>>>>>  >>>>>> option - basic logic.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>>>  >>>>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fill your boots you can, and based on past performance will,
>>>>>> believe anything that you want.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are your own words and prove you dodge questions and lack
>>>>> integrity. That's a problem for you, not me.
>>>>>
>>>> Whatever.
>>>
>>>
>>> 'whatever' doesn't cut it
>>>
>> It cuts it for me, if it doesn't for you then that's your problem.
>
>
> no, it's your problem because you are being irrational and illogical and
> dishonest as clocky proved
>
Only in your tiny mind.

On 21/02/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 10:37 pm, Xeno wrote:

>>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Where does that condone lying?
>>
>> By running away from *calling it out* for what it is - lying.
>>
> ROTFL, so the only option is to agree with you, now that's real arrogance.

Inventive logic at the very least, but then you have how it is that the
FLC doing the *exact* same thing with Clasener and his claims is not
hypocrisy of the highest order :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 21/02/2022 9:04 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 11:09 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Looks clear cut to me.
>>>
>> yep. he's saying he doesn't care if noddy is lying or not
>>
>>
> You have a great deal of trouble understanding plain english, it does
> not mean that much as you want it to.

You should have worked out by now that Felix is an incredibly simple
minded person. This is a bloke who walked into an auto parts store to
buy coolant for his car and bought the wrong one despite the information
on the label *clearly* telling him it didn't suit his model.

The percentage of the population who would be stupid enough to actually
do that would be *very* small indeed I would expect.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 21/02/2022 9:04 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 8:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>>> 'whatever' doesn't cut it
>>>>
>>> It cuts it for me, if it doesn't for you then that's your problem.
>>
>>
>> no, it's your problem because you are being irrational and illogical
>> and dishonest as clocky proved
>>
> Only in your tiny mind.

Fantastic.

Felix: "Noddy's a liar".
Keithr0: "I don't care about Noddy's claims"
Felix: "Oooh Oooh Oooh. You don't care, therefore you're being
irrational and illogical and dishonest".

Someone please tell me that this *isn't* a pathetic attempt at a Monty
Python sketch.....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 21/02/2022 9:04 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 8:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 5:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 3:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 20/02/2022 12:22 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/02/2022 6:24 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/02/2022 1:32 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2022 11:27 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 12:24 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 5:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 12:05 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't "expect answers to [keith blah blah]", but I *do*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect answers to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate questions concerning claims which someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes. Whether you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see it or not, there's a big difference there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter alvey, the bargain is you give answers, you
>>>>>>>>>>>> get answers. like it or leave it the choice is yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You only answer questions that provide you with an
>>>>>>>>>>> opportunity to boost your own ego. You don't answer
>>>>>>>>>>> questions that go to the heart of your integrity however,
>>>>>>>>>>> you evade those wholesale.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Really? now you get to back up the accusation. Go ahead, make
>>>>>>>>>> my day.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The usual smartarse nonsense from alvey and a fawning follow
>>>>>>>>> up to that from xeno, but nothing from clocky? Odd that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh you want an example question that proves you lack integrity?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's one:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from the thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Oct 7 2021
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You assert to another poster:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proven liar.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the
>>>>>>>> claim is
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is
>>>>>>>> unproven, he
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Given your assertion above that "He asserts that the claim is
>>>>>>>> true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I then asked:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified
>>>>>>>> for which
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> *no* evidence has been provided or found anywhere,
>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your response:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Whatever" isn't an answer. Given what you had just stated,
>>>>>>>> "yes" was the only answer you could have given here if you had
>>>>>>>> *any* integrity at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You then went on to evade answering the question as seen below.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>> If there is only one course of action available then
>>>>>>>> there are no
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>> option - basic logic.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>>>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>>>>  >>>>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fill your boots you can, and based on past performance will,
>>>>>>> believe anything that you want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are your own words and prove you dodge questions and lack
>>>>>> integrity. That's a problem for you, not me.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 'whatever' doesn't cut it
>>>>
>>> It cuts it for me, if it doesn't for you then that's your problem.
>>
>>
>> no, it's your problem because you are being irrational and illogical
>> and dishonest as clocky proved
>>
> Only in your tiny mind.

nup according to logic and reason as clearly enunciated above by Clocky

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 21/02/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 10:37 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/2/2022 3:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 11:37 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and
>>>>>> it doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>>>
>>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Where does that condone lying?
>>
>> By running away from *calling it out* for what it is - lying.
>>
> ROTFL, so the only option is to agree with you, now that's real
> arrogance.

"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying"
- Keefy Oct 7, 2021

hoisted by your own petard

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:12:03 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 21/02/2022 9:04 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 8:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>>>> 'whatever' doesn't cut it
>>>>>
>>>> It cuts it for me, if it doesn't for you then that's your problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> no, it's your problem because you are being irrational and illogical
>>> and dishonest as clocky proved
>>>
>> Only in your tiny mind.
>
> Fantastic.
>
> Felix: "Noddy's a liar".
> Keithr0: "I don't care about Noddy's claims"
> Felix: "Oooh Oooh Oooh. You don't care, therefore you're being
> irrational and illogical and dishonest".
>
> Someone please tell me that this *isn't* a pathetic attempt at a Monty
> Python sketch.....

Few pointers for you Fraudster!

1. If you are presenting dialogue in script format then you don't need to
use quotes.
2. Using double quotes infers that what is between them was actually said.
Clearly this is untrue in your feeble post.
3. ***EVERYONE*** knows that accuracy isn't one of your strong suits, but
names can be important. Neither keith nor felix capitalise their nicks.
4. Your English is poor. "...you're being irrational and illogical and
dishonest" is a Fail in Year 9 English. Use a spelling and grammar checker.
5. Do *not*, under *any* circumstance, befoul Python by pretending that you
appreciate or understand it.
6. You are a liar, fraud, hypocrite, coward, misogynist and plagiarist.

HTH

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 20/02/2022 12:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 12:30 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 19/02/2022 11:12 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 19/2/2022 11:48 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Backup stuff with a Seagate 1TB drive and you may as well not have
>>>>> a backup. Those useless POS turn themselves into a *32 Meg drive*
>>>>> at the drop of a hat. Ask me how I know, I have 5 here that *used
>>>>> to be* in my server. Was told by various people around the traps,
>>>>> and the helpdesk in Canada, that it was a *firmware issue*. They
>>>>> had a fix, so they said, but I had one drive that had been through
>>>>> the RMA system and *fixed*. It proceeded to die again, that's how
>>>>> I found out they were a POS. A set of 2 TB Western Digita ldrives
>>>>> solved the problem and they still run perfectly nearly 10 years
>>>>> later.
>>>>> . >
>>>>
>>>> Of course you do. Are they the 7200.11 series. If so they are
>>>> fixable by
>>>
>>> I do indeed. Want the serial numbers? They are out on the table at
>>> the moment. Seems like I am now down to 4 with one seemingly dead.
>>> Not the 7200.11  See below.
>>  Photos clearly showing the model numbers and serial numbers would be
>> perfect. Also a photo of a bios screen showing one of the unit serial
>> numbers and the 32mb capacity.
>
>
> lol. how about you ask your mate for photos of his claimed
> qualifications instead?
>
>

it's a question grumps, it begs an answer

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 20/02/2022 9:30 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 20/02/2022 10:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/2/2022 12:30 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2022 11:12 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 19/2/2022 11:48 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>  >
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you do. Are they the 7200.11 series. If so they are
>>>>> fixable by
>>>>
>>>> I do indeed. Want the serial numbers? They are out on the table at
>>>> the moment. Seems like I am now down to 4 with one seemingly dead.
>>>> Not the 7200.11  See below.
>>>   Photos clearly showing the model numbers and serial numbers would be
>>
>> You're a bit late and, I might add, asking a lot since you sanction
>> the fraud when he refuses to offer up *any proof at all* of his self
>> aggrandising claims. I gave the 4 working ones away to a chap this
>> morning when I gave him a computer I no longer needed. I told him they
>> might die so mirror one's data to another. He's happy enough with
>> them. As for the dead one still remaining here;
>>
>> Barracuda 7200.12
>> S/N 9VP5BR14
>> ST31000528AS
>> P/N 9SL154-302
>> Firmware CC38
>> Date Code 10356
>
> As expected when asked to stump up proof the excuses fly. You're full of
> shot xeno as usual. You see you stated they had the 32mb issue now
> you're stating you gave them away this morning. I call extreme bullshit.
> I'd be certain that the one you have listed here did not have the 32mb
> issue as they can be seen in bios.
>>
>>> perfect. Also a photo of a bios screen showing one of the unit serial
>>> numbers and the 32mb capacity.
>>
>> No can do! It was working, then suddenly, on a reboot, the drive was
>> no longer seen. I'd not long before been updating the Linux OS on it
>> after it had mostly sat idle in the cupboard here for nigh on a decade
>> here. Speaking of decade, I'll have been up in this part of the
>> country for a decade in a couple of months time. How time flies.
>> Anyway, the drive is now FF&FFH. It has had bugger all use in that
>> time too.
>>>>
> Except the unseen part is bullshit if it had the 32mb issue.
>
>>>>> anyone with a modicum of ability to research and a small amount of
>>>>> electronics ability. Look it up on google. Funnily enough your arch
>>>>
>>>> When these die, the *only* option at the time was to send them back
>>>> to the manufacturer. One of mine went back whilst one I bought *new*
>>>> had supposedly been RMA'd and was sold to me by a local dealer and
>>>> had all the sealed Seagate wrapping on it. It wasn't a grey import
>>>> either, as verified by the Canadian helpdesk.
>>>
>>> Very interesting.. The 32mb problem only affected a series of 7200.11
>>> drives and was not reported as an issue on the 7200.12 drives.
>>>>
>>>>> enemy had exactly the same issue a number of years ago and you
>>>>> failed to mention a thing about yours. How bizarre.
>>>>>
>>>> Mine are 7200.12 Not bizarre in the slightest.
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>> Extremely bizarre that you neither mentioned it when Noddy had the issue
>>
>> Why should I care if Darren had the issue? Anyway, I don't recall even
>> seeing it mentioned. *I* had the issue and it cost me trust in my
>> server's reliability so I bought decent drives (WD) and have never had
>> an issue since.
>>
>>> nor did the 7200.12 drive have a firmware issue that caused the 32mb
>>> bug. It was confined to the 7200.11 series.
>>>
>> Odd then how I had the issue with a few of them.
>>
>
> Very odd. I'd say you were either mistaken about the drive model or
> lying... I'd say lying considering you stated they were stuffed with the
> 32mb issue and now you just happened to give 4 of them away this morning
> after I asked for proof last night. You're a liar xeno. A pathetic
> excuse for a human being.
>
> Your whole story is ludicrous. Absolute bullshit.
>
>

If you consider that "ludicrous" and "Absolute bullshit" I have a doozy
for you.

NoddyLiar, July 8 2013 - expanding on his PC/XT ownership delusion
stated clarifying that he meant 1981, not 1980:

Noddy "I said 1980, and that was clearly incorrect. The machine I bought
was an original XT that had twin 5.25" floppies and a mono screen and
was probably in late 1981."

For the sake of consistency and balance. When was the XT released?

How do you rate his chances of him receiving *any* IBM PC in late 1981
in Australia?

On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 23:30:29 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

Never mind all that...

Gumps, I've been buying Samsung SSDs for a while now, probably about 8, and
had two turn their toes up. You have any comments/experience with them?
They keep getting good reviews, but one should get better than a 25% fail
rate.

Note: Most are for storage/backup, only two get regular use.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 21/02/2022 9:53 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 21/02/2022 9:02 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 10:37 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 20/2/2022 3:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 11:37 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 20/02/2022 8:43 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 19/02/2022 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and you're on record saying you don't care if ppl lie or not and
>>>>>>> it doesn't matter if they do. i just told you why it does matter.
>>>>>>> you're an idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK show me where I said that I don't care if people lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ffs are you not following the thread?
>>>>>
>>>>> "For the record, I have no idea what qualifications noddy has or
>>>>> whether he did or did not run a business called noddys automotive,
>>>>> and neither do I care in the least one way or another."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Where does that condone lying?
>>>
>>> By running away from *calling it out* for what it is - lying.
>>>
>> ROTFL, so the only option is to agree with you, now that's real
>> arrogance.
>
>
> "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying"
> - Keefy Oct 7, 2021
>
> hoisted by your own petard
>
I'll have a check, but I don't think that I own a petard.

On 21/02/2022 9:50 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 21/02/2022 9:04 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 20/02/2022 8:19 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2022 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2022 5:34 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 20/02/2022 3:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/02/2022 12:22 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/02/2022 6:24 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2022 1:32 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2022 11:27 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2022 12:24 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 5:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/02/2022 12:05 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't "expect answers to [keith blah blah]", but I *do*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect answers to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate questions concerning claims which someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes. Whether you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see it or not, there's a big difference there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter alvey, the bargain is you give answers, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> get answers. like it or leave it the choice is yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You only answer questions that provide you with an
>>>>>>>>>>>> opportunity to boost your own ego. You don't answer
>>>>>>>>>>>> questions that go to the heart of your integrity however,
>>>>>>>>>>>> you evade those wholesale.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Really? now you get to back up the accusation. Go ahead, make
>>>>>>>>>>> my day.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The usual smartarse nonsense from alvey and a fawning follow
>>>>>>>>>> up to that from xeno, but nothing from clocky? Odd that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh you want an example question that proves you lack integrity?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's one:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> from the thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Oct 7 2021
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You assert to another poster:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he
>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proven liar.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the
>>>>>>>>> claim is
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> false, only that it's unproven
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is
>>>>>>>>> unproven, he
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Given your assertion above that "He asserts that the claim is
>>>>>>>>> true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I then asked:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified
>>>>>>>>> for which
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> *no* evidence has been provided or found anywhere,
>>>>>>>>> is lying.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your response:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Whatever" isn't an answer. Given what you had just stated,
>>>>>>>>> "yes" was the only answer you could have given here if you had
>>>>>>>>> *any* integrity at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You then went on to evade answering the question as seen below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>> I choose my own options, thank you.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>> You only had one option to choose.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>> If there is only one course of action available then
>>>>>>>>> there are no
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>> option - basic logic.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>> Basic logic says you're fucked.
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  >>>>> We will just call this Keef's paradox :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fill your boots you can, and based on past performance will,
>>>>>>>> believe anything that you want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are your own words and prove you dodge questions and lack
>>>>>>> integrity. That's a problem for you, not me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 'whatever' doesn't cut it
>>>>>
>>>> It cuts it for me, if it doesn't for you then that's your problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> no, it's your problem because you are being irrational and illogical
>>> and dishonest as clocky proved
>>>
>> Only in your tiny mind.
>
>
> nup according to logic and reason as clearly enunciated above by Clocky
>
>
If that is what you want to believe then go ahead.